< Return to Video

cdn.media.ccc.de/.../wikidatacon2019-1076-eng-HerNaturalHistory_hd.mp4

  • 0:06 - 0:08
    (speaking in Maori)
  • 0:09 - 0:11
    As has been explained,
    I'm Siobhan Leachman.
  • 0:11 - 0:13
    I'm a Wikimedian from New Zealand.
  • 0:13 - 0:14
    I contribute to Wikidata,
  • 0:14 - 0:18
    as well as English Wikipedia
    and the Wikimedia Commons.
  • 0:18 - 0:20
    I'd like to thank
    the Wikimedia Foundation,
  • 0:20 - 0:22
    Wikimedia Deutschland,
  • 0:22 - 0:23
    and, in particular,
  • 0:23 - 0:26
    the organizing committee
    of the WikidataCon
  • 0:26 - 0:29
    for enabling me to attend
    this conference and present today.
  • 0:31 - 0:32
    Now, in this presentation,
  • 0:32 - 0:34
    I want to tell you about the vital role
  • 0:34 - 0:40
    I think Wikidata and Wikidata editors
    can play in surfacing notable women.
  • 0:40 - 0:41
    I want to take you through my workflows,
  • 0:41 - 0:46
    ensuring that these underacknowledged
    women and their work
  • 0:46 - 0:48
    can be added to Wikidata.
  • 0:48 - 0:51
    I want to show how the curation
    of data on these women
  • 0:51 - 0:55
    can assist with the creation
    of citable secondary sources.
  • 0:56 - 0:58
    This, in turn, can encourage and enable
  • 0:58 - 1:00
    the creation of Wikipedia articles
    about these women
  • 1:00 - 1:02
    in a variety of languages.
  • 1:04 - 1:05
    Now, I'm sure you're aware
  • 1:05 - 1:09
    that Wikipedia editors are working hard
    to write more articles on women.
  • 1:10 - 1:13
    Examples of projects
    focusing on this type of work
  • 1:13 - 1:19
    are the Women in Red project
    or the WikiProject Women Scientists.
  • 1:21 - 1:23
    But one of the main hurdles
    I've experienced
  • 1:23 - 1:26
    when attempting to write
    about women in Wikipedia
  • 1:26 - 1:28
    is the notability criteria.
  • 1:28 - 1:29
    When writing articles on women,
  • 1:29 - 1:32
    I've found this criteria
    can be a challenge to achieve.
  • 1:32 - 1:35
    I've discovered women
    are less likely to be written about
  • 1:35 - 1:37
    in citable secondary sources,
  • 1:37 - 1:39
    and this has particularly
    been brought home to me
  • 1:39 - 1:45
    when I've attempted to write articles
    about women and the scientists pre-1950.
  • 1:45 - 1:47
    However, just like in our Wiki projects,
  • 1:47 - 1:51
    there are plenty of researchers
    and creators of secondary sources
  • 1:51 - 1:54
    out in the wider world
    attempting to change this.
  • 1:54 - 1:56
    They just need to be pointed
    in the direction of these women,
  • 1:56 - 1:59
    and I believe Wikidata can be their arrow.
  • 2:01 - 2:05
    Now, yes, like Wikipedia,
    Wikidata has a notability criteria
  • 2:05 - 2:07
    that must be met.
  • 2:07 - 2:09
    But this criteria is a much lower bar.
  • 2:09 - 2:13
    I'm advocating using Wikidata
    to get a foot in the Wiki door
  • 2:13 - 2:15
    for unrepresented groups.
  • 2:16 - 2:18
    By adding these women to Wikidata,
  • 2:18 - 2:19
    editors can then make it easier
  • 2:19 - 2:23
    for the data about them
    to be collated, curated, and linked.
  • 2:23 - 2:27
    In doing so, it would make it easier
    for researchers and writers,
  • 2:27 - 2:30
    the generators of these vital
    secondary sources,
  • 2:30 - 2:31
    to find these women
  • 2:31 - 2:34
    and then to use the data
    to guide their research.
  • 2:34 - 2:37
    Once coverage reaches
    the Wikipedia notability threshold,
  • 2:37 - 2:42
    Wikipedia editors can then create articles
    on these underrepresented people.
  • 2:42 - 2:44
    Now, I want to show you
    how I put this into practice,
  • 2:44 - 2:47
    to take you through how I started
    on this data journey,
  • 2:47 - 2:49
    and to give you examples
    of the collaborations
  • 2:49 - 2:52
    I and others like me
    have managed to forge,
  • 2:52 - 2:55
    enabling this type of work to be done.
  • 2:56 - 3:00
    Now, I tend to focus on data about women
    in the field of natural history--
  • 3:00 - 3:03
    these women scientific illustrators,
    collectors of specimens
  • 3:03 - 3:07
    as well as women scientists,
    such as botanists and zoologists.
  • 3:07 - 3:09
    I became interested in these women
  • 3:09 - 3:12
    when I started volunteering
    for the Smithsonian Transcription Center.
  • 3:12 - 3:15
    I helped transcribe
    natural history specimens
  • 3:15 - 3:19
    or scientific handwritten field notebooks,
  • 3:19 - 3:22
    and, in doing so, I frequently
    came across women,
  • 3:22 - 3:25
    many of whom had contributed
    specimens to the Smithsonian
  • 3:25 - 3:27
    or had undertaken scientific research.
  • 3:28 - 3:32
    At the same time, I was volunteering
    for the Biodiversity Heritage Library,
  • 3:32 - 3:33
    or BHL.
  • 3:33 - 3:38
    Now, BHL is the world's
    largest open-access digital library
  • 3:38 - 3:42
    of biodiversity literature and archives.
  • 3:42 - 3:45
    Much of the biodiversity literature
    they host is historic
  • 3:45 - 3:48
    and therefore in the public domain.
  • 3:48 - 3:52
    They've got an extensive collection
    of scientific illustrations in Flickr.
  • 3:52 - 3:56
    So I would tag those images
    with not just taxonomic names
  • 3:56 - 3:58
    but as well as illustrated tags.
  • 3:58 - 4:03
    That metadata is in turn ingested
    and stored into BHL.
  • 4:03 - 4:06
    The hope is to use those tags
    to become searchable
  • 4:06 - 4:09
    at some point in the future
    on BHL's website.
  • 4:09 - 4:15
    But as an added bonus, many of these tags
    have been incorporated into Wikicommons
  • 4:15 - 4:19
    as a result of those Flickr files
    being bulk uploaded
  • 4:19 - 4:21
    by other Wikicommons editors.
  • 4:21 - 4:24
    It was while transcribing
    with the Smithsonian
  • 4:24 - 4:27
    I met and started collaborating
    with another volunteer,
  • 4:27 - 4:29
    Michelle Marshall.
  • 4:29 - 4:30
    Both of us were avid taggers
  • 4:30 - 4:32
    of BHL images,
  • 4:32 - 4:33
    and while doing this work,
  • 4:33 - 4:37
    both Michelle and I
    were enthusiastically kept encouraged
  • 4:37 - 4:42
    by Grace Constantino, the BHL Outreach
    and Communications Manager.
  • 4:43 - 4:46
    And while tagging, we would again
    come across women,
  • 4:46 - 4:48
    so many women, amazing women,
  • 4:48 - 4:52
    about whom there appeared
    little known or written.
  • 4:52 - 4:55
    Some of these women
    would be illustrating multiple articles,
  • 4:55 - 4:57
    books, and scientific publications.
  • 4:57 - 5:00
    Others would be writing
    the books or articles,
  • 5:00 - 5:04
    amassing collections of specimens,
    or having species named after them.
  • 5:04 - 5:09
    Both Michelle and I were really keen
    on making known more about these women,
  • 5:09 - 5:12
    but there was very little
    about them on the internet.
  • 5:12 - 5:13
    Every once in a while,
  • 5:13 - 5:16
    there would be a women
    who had significant coverage,
  • 5:16 - 5:19
    enough so there was a Wikipedia article
    created about them,
  • 5:19 - 5:22
    but this was an exception
    rather than the rule.
  • 5:22 - 5:25
    This lack of coverage
    was frustrating to both of us,
  • 5:25 - 5:29
    and, as a result, I became keen
    on learning how to edit Wikipedia.
  • 5:30 - 5:35
    Both the folk in the Smithsonian
    and BHL were extremely encouraging.
  • 5:35 - 5:37
    They too were keen
    on addressing this issue
  • 5:37 - 5:38
    of underrepresented women
  • 5:38 - 5:41
    and wanted to highlight
    notable women in their collections
  • 5:41 - 5:44
    via various WikiProjects.
  • 5:44 - 5:46
    So both Michelle and I
    started researching,
  • 5:46 - 5:48
    me with the aim of writing
    Wikipedia articles,
  • 5:48 - 5:53
    her with the aim of writing blog posts
    and enriching the BHL Instagram account.
  • 5:54 - 5:58
    Now, on the rare occasion we managed
    to find enough sources and references
  • 5:58 - 6:03
    to get these women over
    the English Wikipedia notability criteria,
  • 6:03 - 6:05
    I'd actually write an article.
  • 6:05 - 6:08
    But as I've explained, this tended to be
    the exception rather than the rule.
  • 6:08 - 6:11
    Historically, much
    of these women's illustration work
  • 6:11 - 6:13
    was not regarded
    at the time of their creation
  • 6:13 - 6:15
    as being worthy of comment.
  • 6:15 - 6:19
    At most, they received a passing remark
    in the reviews of the publication
  • 6:19 - 6:23
    or perhaps an acknowledgment
    by the author of the work.
  • 6:23 - 6:27
    This lack results in them
    being overlooked by library catalogs,
  • 6:27 - 6:30
    and they and their contributions
    were simply not recorded.
  • 6:30 - 6:33
    They created scientific illustrations
  • 6:33 - 6:36
    so didn't tend
    to exhibit in art galleries.
  • 6:36 - 6:39
    The art was created to enhance
    the scientific publication
  • 6:39 - 6:41
    and wasn't treated as a stand-alone work,
  • 6:41 - 6:44
    worthy of critique and public display.
  • 6:44 - 6:47
    It was, therefore, very rare
    to find enough sources
  • 6:47 - 6:51
    to get these women artists
    over the notability hurdle.
  • 6:51 - 6:52
    But we tried.
  • 6:53 - 6:55
    Working together, Michelle and I
    began researching these women
  • 6:55 - 6:59
    and gathering our information
    into a Google spreadsheet,
  • 6:59 - 7:02
    Often, we'd track down enough data
    to work out who they were,
  • 7:02 - 7:05
    the works they contributed to,
    and who they worked for.
  • 7:05 - 7:08
    BHL recently enabled a full text search,
  • 7:08 - 7:12
    which has significantly improved
    our ability to find information on them.
  • 7:12 - 7:15
    We'd search for and, if we were lucky,
    find external identifiers,
  • 7:15 - 7:17
    such as the BHL creator ID
  • 7:17 - 7:20
    or the Stuttgart Scientific
    Illustrators Database ID,
  • 7:20 - 7:23
    or if we were really lucky, a VIAF ID.
  • 7:23 - 7:25
    However, there was no guarantee
  • 7:25 - 7:28
    an external database
    identifier would exist.
  • 7:29 - 7:30
    So we'd tag their plates in Flickr,
  • 7:30 - 7:33
    collate our research on these women
    in our spreadsheets,
  • 7:33 - 7:35
    and then wait for more books and articles
  • 7:35 - 7:38
    and institution blogs
    and research to be generated.
  • 7:38 - 7:41
    For me, getting them into Wikipedia
    was the gold standard,
  • 7:42 - 7:45
    but I could stretch
    the notability criteria only so far.
  • 7:45 - 7:47
    My first Wikipedia article
    on a woman botanist
  • 7:47 - 7:49
    was nominated for deletion,
  • 7:49 - 7:53
    and ever since that experience,
    I've been extremely careful
  • 7:53 - 7:57
    about ensuring I did everything possible
    to meet the notability criteria.
  • 7:57 - 7:59
    But I was actively looking for ways
  • 7:59 - 8:02
    to make our work
    more impactful and effective.
  • 8:02 - 8:05
    Now, at this point,
    I know what you're thinking,
  • 8:05 - 8:07
    what about Wikidata?
  • 8:07 - 8:09
    And I completely agree.
  • 8:09 - 8:13
    As soon as I discovered Wikidata,
    I took the leap and started editing.
  • 8:13 - 8:15
    But, again, unfortunately,
  • 8:15 - 8:18
    I came up against
    the Wikidata notability criteria.
  • 8:18 - 8:20
    Early on, I had an item deleted
  • 8:20 - 8:25
    due to my failure to meet
    even the Wikidata notability criteria.
  • 8:25 - 8:28
    I was having to meet even that low bar.
  • 8:29 - 8:31
    But this was all part
    of my learning by mistakes,
  • 8:31 - 8:34
    and I soon adapted
    my workflow to allow for this.
  • 8:36 - 8:40
    I realized I could ensure these women
    met the Wikidata notability criteria
  • 8:40 - 8:44
    by creating at least
    one valid WikiCite link.
  • 8:44 - 8:45
    So my workflow started
  • 8:45 - 8:49
    with me creating a Wikicommons
    category page for these women
  • 8:49 - 8:53
    and then manually adding
    this category to her illustrations,
  • 8:53 - 8:55
    the illustrations that had been
    previously uploaded
  • 8:55 - 8:57
    from the BHL Flickr feed
  • 8:57 - 9:00
    into Wikicommons by other editors.
  • 9:00 - 9:02
    Once the category page was created,
  • 9:02 - 9:05
    I would then create
    a Wikidata item for that woman,
  • 9:05 - 9:07
    including that category in the item.
  • 9:08 - 9:09
    I'd then begin to collate
  • 9:09 - 9:12
    all the information
    and research we'd found out
  • 9:12 - 9:13
    about that particular woman.
  • 9:14 - 9:18
    I would autogenerate
    a creator page in Wikicommons
  • 9:18 - 9:20
    via that Wikidata item.
  • 9:20 - 9:24
    I'd improve the structured data
    of the scientific art in Wikicommons
  • 9:24 - 9:28
    by adding the creator markup
    to each of her images.
  • 9:28 - 9:31
    And I believe this assists
    with the structured data on Commons
  • 9:31 - 9:34
    as it links the Wikidata item
    to the artist
  • 9:34 - 9:37
    and to the work in Commons.
  • 9:37 - 9:39
    I'd like to emphasize
    this was a manual process.
  • 9:39 - 9:42
    I wasn't working from established dataset.
  • 9:42 - 9:46
    There is no established dataset
    for these women that I can find.
  • 9:49 - 9:52
    I would also use the reference section
    of the Wikidata statements,
  • 9:52 - 9:54
    not just to reference
    the statements themselves,
  • 9:54 - 9:56
    but also with an eye to help collate
  • 9:56 - 9:59
    all the links we discovered
    during our research.
  • 9:59 - 10:01
    I wanted to leave a research trail,
  • 10:01 - 10:03
    making it easier for me and others like me
  • 10:03 - 10:05
    to find these links
  • 10:05 - 10:07
    and then write either secondary sources
  • 10:07 - 10:10
    or, if appropriate,
    a Wikipedia article on these women.
  • 10:11 - 10:13
    Obviously, if external
    identifiers existed,
  • 10:13 - 10:15
    I wanted to include them.
  • 10:15 - 10:16
    Again, to my disappointment,
  • 10:16 - 10:19
    despite the prestige
    of the works they were illustrating,
  • 10:19 - 10:24
    many of these women
    were not listed in external databases.
  • 10:24 - 10:25
    I would always check VIAF,
  • 10:25 - 10:28
    the Virtual International
    Authority File database.
  • 10:28 - 10:30
    But, from my personal experience,
  • 10:30 - 10:33
    there appears to be
    a bias against illustrators,
  • 10:33 - 10:34
    no matter what their gender.
  • 10:34 - 10:36
    I admit this is anecdotal
  • 10:36 - 10:40
    because I'm unable to find
    any research to support this.
  • 10:40 - 10:44
    But VIAF would often list
    the author of the [inaudible] publication,
  • 10:44 - 10:46
    but not the illustrator.
  • 10:46 - 10:48
    And this would even be the case
  • 10:48 - 10:51
    even if the illustrations made up
    a large proportion of the work,
  • 10:51 - 10:55
    or the woman was thanked profusely
    on the dedication page.
  • 10:58 - 11:01
    I would also check the Stuttgart
    Scientific Illustrators database.
  • 11:01 - 11:03
    This is one of the most
    comprehensive databases
  • 11:03 - 11:05
    for scientific artists.
  • 11:05 - 11:07
    Sometimes the woman would be in there,
  • 11:07 - 11:09
    but sometimes not.
  • 11:09 - 11:10
    Although a fabulous starting point,
  • 11:10 - 11:14
    this database wasn't
    as comprehensive as I needed.
  • 11:14 - 11:18
    But the wonderful thing about it
    was how responsive its creator,
  • 11:18 - 11:20
    the History Department
    of the University of Stuttgart,
  • 11:20 - 11:22
    was to emails.
  • 11:22 - 11:24
    Both Michelle and I would write to them,
  • 11:24 - 11:29
    including our research
    on particular women illustrators,
  • 11:29 - 11:31
    asking for these women to be included.
  • 11:31 - 11:34
    Again, there is a threshold to this.
  • 11:34 - 11:35
    I certainly wouldn't write to them
  • 11:35 - 11:37
    unless I had reasonable
    supporting evidence
  • 11:37 - 11:39
    to justify their inclusion.
  • 11:39 - 11:43
    But the information they needed
    to generate an external identifier
  • 11:43 - 11:48
    was definitely less than what was needed
    to do a Wikipedia article.
  • 11:48 - 11:51
    Folk in charge of this database
    were very grateful for our input,
  • 11:51 - 11:54
    and once our research
    was confirmed by them,
  • 11:54 - 11:56
    they would add these women
    to their database
  • 11:57 - 11:59
    and then would generate
    an external identifier.
  • 11:59 - 12:05
    They were also able to access resources
    that neither Michelle nor I had access to.
  • 12:05 - 12:09
    Often, more data was added
    on these women in the DSI database
  • 12:09 - 12:12
    as a result of their further research.
  • 12:12 - 12:15
    A Wikidata property had already
    been created for this database,
  • 12:15 - 12:16
    and so once awarded,
  • 12:16 - 12:21
    it was an identifier I could then add
    to the woman's Wikidata item.
  • 12:23 - 12:27
    Now, Michelle and I also contacted
    the BHL about these women.
  • 12:27 - 12:30
    This is where our collaborative
    relationship with Grace
  • 12:30 - 12:32
    came to the fore.
  • 12:32 - 12:35
    Grace would encourage us
    to submit a request
  • 12:35 - 12:38
    that the woman's name be added
    to the BHL catalog record.
  • 12:38 - 12:42
    This is a more convoluted process
    than it might appear.
  • 12:42 - 12:47
    BHL metadata is sourced
    from numerous contributing institutions.
  • 12:47 - 12:50
    Since it was a cataloging change,
  • 12:50 - 12:54
    the BHL protocol required that the change
    be submitted as a change request
  • 12:54 - 12:58
    to the BHL cataloging group
    for review and final approval.
  • 12:59 - 13:02
    So, again, to obtain
    the change to the catalog
  • 13:02 - 13:04
    and the subsequent external identifier,
  • 13:04 - 13:07
    it wasn't an easy rubber stamp process.
  • 13:07 - 13:10
    We had to back up our request
    with sources and proof
  • 13:10 - 13:13
    in order for the catalog to be changed.
  • 13:13 - 13:15
    However, because we were doing
    this relatively frequently,
  • 13:15 - 13:18
    the catalog group
    became used to our requests
  • 13:18 - 13:21
    and were very appreciative of our efforts.
  • 13:22 - 13:24
    If the necessary criteria was satisfied,
  • 13:24 - 13:27
    the institutions were prepared
    to edit their metadata,
  • 13:27 - 13:30
    and in doing so,
    create another external identifier,
  • 13:30 - 13:32
    the BHL creator ID.
  • 13:32 - 13:35
    At around the same time
    we were undertaking this work,
  • 13:35 - 13:38
    BHL, in its intern program,
  • 13:38 - 13:40
    was collaborating
    with other Wikidata editors.
  • 13:40 - 13:45
    The BHL resident [Katie Nika]
    was working with Andy [Mebert]
  • 13:45 - 13:48
    trialing adding
    BHL creator IDs to Wikidata.
  • 13:48 - 13:54
    The original test case was 1,000 names
    into the Mix-n-Match tool,
  • 13:54 - 13:55
    But, subsequently,
  • 13:55 - 13:59
    the whole created dataset
    was uploaded into Mix-n-Match,
  • 13:59 - 14:03
    allowing the matching
    of BHL dataset to Wikidata items.
  • 14:03 - 14:07
    This dataset is huge and continues
    to be worked on by editors today.
  • 14:08 - 14:09
    Due to the lack of resources,
  • 14:09 - 14:14
    unfortunately, BHL can't continue
    Katie's work in Wikidata,
  • 14:14 - 14:18
    but there are very encouraging
    of folk reusing their data
  • 14:18 - 14:20
    and their collections and WikiProjects.
  • 14:21 - 14:26
    Now, editors have also approved
    several BHL Wikidata properties,
  • 14:26 - 14:28
    not just for the creator ID,
  • 14:28 - 14:32
    but also the bibliographic ID,
    page ID, and item ID.
  • 14:32 - 14:36
    And, as a result, it's now possible
    to link these women illustrators
  • 14:36 - 14:38
    to their works via Wikidata.
  • 14:38 - 14:42
    Obtaining a creator ID
    and therefore a Wikidata item
  • 14:42 - 14:45
    can ensure a cascade
    of linked open data on them
  • 14:45 - 14:49
    that can raise the visibility
    of these women to researchers.
  • 14:49 - 14:51
    Slowly, I began to feel
    we were making real difference
  • 14:51 - 14:53
    in surfacing these women.
  • 14:53 - 14:55
    At least now when folk googled them
  • 14:55 - 14:57
    the Wikidata item would appear
  • 14:57 - 15:01
    and images they had created
    would show up in the image feed.
  • 15:01 - 15:05
    Our research, tags, blogs,
    Wikidata items, and external identifiers
  • 15:05 - 15:07
    brought about by our requests
  • 15:07 - 15:08
    were all coming together,
  • 15:08 - 15:11
    making these women
    much more easier to discover.
  • 15:12 - 15:14
    Grace had already been using
    our tagging work
  • 15:14 - 15:16
    in the BHL social media feeds
  • 15:16 - 15:20
    to highlight the illustrations
    in the collections.
  • 15:20 - 15:24
    Member institution librarians
    were writing blogs on these women
  • 15:24 - 15:27
    and raising their visibility
    to a variety of audiences.
  • 15:27 - 15:31
    These edited, well researched
    and referenced blogs
  • 15:31 - 15:33
    were a definite step in the ladder
  • 15:33 - 15:37
    towards obtaining citable sources
    for Wikipedia articles.
  • 15:38 - 15:39
    But our work really came to the fore
  • 15:39 - 15:42
    when BHL held their "Her Natural History:
  • 15:42 - 15:46
    A Celebration of Women
    in Natural History" campaign.
  • 15:46 - 15:49
    This was a multi-institutional,
    multi-platform campaign
  • 15:49 - 15:50
    to raise awareness
  • 15:50 - 15:54
    and to celebrate the contributions
    of women to natural history.
  • 15:54 - 15:56
    This campaign resulted
    in numerous outcomes,
  • 15:56 - 15:58
    many of which had a direct impact
  • 15:58 - 16:01
    on the richness of the metadata
    available on these women.
  • 16:02 - 16:04
    So the BHL cataloging group
  • 16:04 - 16:07
    added more female contributors
    to the BHL catalog,
  • 16:07 - 16:09
    generating more external identifiers.
  • 16:09 - 16:12
    More images by the women
    were added to the Flickr feed,
  • 16:12 - 16:15
    and these were either
    in the public domain or openly licensed
  • 16:15 - 16:18
    so were able to be uploaded
    into Wikicommons.
  • 16:18 - 16:19
    Numerous blog posts were written
  • 16:19 - 16:21
    by the employees
    of the member institutions.
  • 16:21 - 16:25
    Some of these blogs used the research
    Michelle and I had undertaken
  • 16:25 - 16:26
    as a starting point,
  • 16:26 - 16:28
    picking it up and running with it.
  • 16:28 - 16:29
    These blogs often resulted
  • 16:29 - 16:33
    in the discovery of new resources
    and sources of information
  • 16:33 - 16:34
    that assisted in pushing
    some of the women
  • 16:34 - 16:38
    over the notability threshold
    for a Wikipedia article.
  • 16:38 - 16:41
    During the campaign, there were also
    three Wikimedia workshops:
  • 16:41 - 16:43
    the Wikimedia District of Columbia
  • 16:43 - 16:45
    ran a workshop concentrating
    on generating and improving
  • 16:45 - 16:47
    Wikipedia articles on these women;
  • 16:47 - 16:51
    two additional workshops
    were organized by Esther Jackson
  • 16:51 - 16:53
    and jointly hosted
    by the New York Botanical Garden
  • 16:53 - 16:56
    and the Wikimedia New York City.
  • 16:56 - 17:00
    The first workshop focused
    on editing tags to the BHL Flickr feed
  • 17:00 - 17:04
    and the second workshop focused
    on editing Wikidata and Wikicommons.
  • 17:04 - 17:07
    These events made use
    of research [inaudible]
  • 17:07 - 17:10
    that Michelle and I had undertaken
    in the preceding years.
  • 17:10 - 17:11
    Worklists were generated
  • 17:11 - 17:13
    by both the spreadsheets
    Michelle and I had created,
  • 17:13 - 17:17
    as well as from Wikidata items
    that I, along with other editors,
  • 17:17 - 17:19
    had helped create.
  • 17:19 - 17:22
    And this campaign, I think,
    shows how effective Wikidata can be
  • 17:22 - 17:25
    in assisting with
    the interlinking of knowledge.
  • 17:25 - 17:28
    The Wikidata items became
    a leaping-off point,
  • 17:28 - 17:30
    providing a framework enabling research
  • 17:30 - 17:34
    to be collated and writing to commence.
  • 17:36 - 17:38
    Now, this is just one example
    of a collaboration
  • 17:38 - 17:41
    that can improve linked
    open data on these women.
  • 17:41 - 17:43
    Once these women
    have a presence on Wikidata,
  • 17:43 - 17:46
    the item itself can be put to use.
  • 17:46 - 17:47
    An example of this
  • 17:47 - 17:49
    is women natural history
    specimen collectors.
  • 17:49 - 17:52
    Many underacknowledged women
    contributed to scientific knowledge,
  • 17:52 - 17:54
    collecting specimens,
  • 17:54 - 17:57
    and these are held
    in museums and herbaria.
  • 17:57 - 18:00
    As more and more
    of these collections are digitized,
  • 18:00 - 18:02
    more of the collectors
    are coming out of the woodwork.
  • 18:02 - 18:04
    There are now sites being developed
  • 18:04 - 18:07
    to assist scientists in getting
    the recognition they deserve
  • 18:07 - 18:09
    from their fieldwork and collecting.
  • 18:09 - 18:13
    The site I've recently been utilizing
    is Bloodhound Tracker.
  • 18:13 - 18:16
    It uses the ORCID ID or the Wikidata item
  • 18:16 - 18:19
    to link the collector
    to their collected specimen
  • 18:19 - 18:24
    via the Global Biodiversity
    Information Facility, or GBIF.
  • 18:24 - 18:29
    Collection information is a rich vein
    of data on early woman scientists,
  • 18:29 - 18:33
    particularly as at that time,
    they'd been unable to publish works
  • 18:33 - 18:35
    or join scientific societies
  • 18:35 - 18:37
    due to the social norms of the day.
  • 18:37 - 18:40
    Wikidata can be used
    to collect information on these women,
  • 18:40 - 18:46
    linking the information held on them
    from archives, libraries, and museums,
  • 18:46 - 18:50
    or to the scientific literature,
    based on the specimens they've collected,
  • 18:50 - 18:52
    or the species
    that have been named after them.
  • 18:52 - 18:54
    Once a Wikidata item is created
  • 18:54 - 18:56
    and sufficient metadata
    has been added to it,
  • 18:56 - 18:58
    the Bloodhound Tracker site
  • 18:58 - 19:02
    will then automatically ingest details
    about those women into its site.
  • 19:02 - 19:05
    Contributors can help those women
    claim their collections,
  • 19:05 - 19:07
    enriching not just the linked open data,
  • 19:07 - 19:11
    but ensuring these women
    get the credit for their vital work.
  • 19:11 - 19:14
    But, again, Wikidata notability criteria
    can be a challenge.
  • 19:14 - 19:16
    If the women collected significantly
  • 19:16 - 19:17
    but didn't contribute
  • 19:17 - 19:20
    either to the published record
    or as an illustrator,
  • 19:20 - 19:24
    it can be difficult to hurdle
    the notability criteria for Wikidata.
  • 19:24 - 19:26
    However, as more and more libraries,
    archives, and museums,
  • 19:26 - 19:33
    and genealogical databases are gaining
    Wikidata external identifiers,
  • 19:33 - 19:35
    it's becoming easier for these women
  • 19:35 - 19:37
    to become notable
    for the purposes of Wikidata
  • 19:37 - 19:41
    and then use Wikidata
    to link them to their works.
  • 19:41 - 19:43
    I believe similar workflows
    to what I've outlined
  • 19:43 - 19:46
    can be used for other
    underrepresented groups.
  • 19:46 - 19:50
    By actively working to achieve
    the notability criteria for Wikidata,
  • 19:50 - 19:52
    and then expanding the Wikidata items
  • 19:52 - 19:55
    to highlight the contributions
    of underrepresented people,
  • 19:56 - 19:58
    it's possible to improve their visibility.
  • 19:58 - 20:01
    This, in turn, assists with the generation
    of secondary sources
  • 20:01 - 20:04
    and creates a virtual cycle
  • 20:04 - 20:07
    of information creation,
    sharing, and linking.
  • 20:07 - 20:09
    By being proactive and collaborative,
  • 20:09 - 20:12
    it's possible to work towards
    eliminating underrepresentation.
  • 20:13 - 20:14
    Thank you.
  • 20:14 - 20:16
    (applause)
  • 20:29 - 20:31
    (women) Have you found any publication
  • 20:31 - 20:38
    in which all of the illustrations
    actually need their own item?
  • 20:39 - 20:42
    I think there will be;
    there definitely is.
  • 20:42 - 20:45
    But if I went down that rabbit hole...
  • 20:47 - 20:48
    I've got to stop somewhere,
  • 20:48 - 20:50
    and I'm just trying
    to concentrate on the women.
  • 20:50 - 20:57
    But, yes, there are classics
    of biodiversity literature
  • 20:57 - 21:02
    that not only should have
    an item for the book itself
  • 21:02 - 21:04
    but also for each illustration.
  • 21:04 - 21:06
    I mean, Elizabeth Gould
    immediately springs to mind.
  • 21:06 - 21:08
    Every piece of art that she ever did--
  • 21:08 - 21:10
    (woman) I would just say Maria Sibylla...
  • 21:10 - 21:12
    Yep, she's a classic too.
  • 21:18 - 21:20
    (man) James [Heald].
    While you've been working on this,
  • 21:20 - 21:23
    do you think that the way
    the notability criteria
  • 21:23 - 21:25
    have been being applied has changed?
  • 21:25 - 21:28
    - Is there are drift in a good direction?
    - Yes, I do think it has.
  • 21:29 - 21:32
    Other than that first item being...
  • 21:33 - 21:35
    I admit it was partially my mistake.
  • 21:35 - 21:38
    I did the item, and I didn't have
    an external identifiers,
  • 21:38 - 21:43
    and it seemed, because of the lack
    of the information I provided,
  • 21:43 - 21:45
    I am not surprised it got deleted.
  • 21:45 - 21:47
    Now I'm more experienced.
  • 21:47 - 21:50
    But, saying that, I'm pretty sure
    I could put the same thing in nowadays
  • 21:50 - 21:52
    and it wouldn't get deleted.
  • 21:52 - 21:53
    I actually do think it has improved.
  • 22:02 - 22:03
    (James [Heald]) Different question.
  • 22:03 - 22:05
    I've seen on your Twitter sometimes,
  • 22:05 - 22:09
    you've found women's work
    credited to their husbands.
  • 22:09 - 22:11
    - Oh God, yes!
    - Would you say a bit more about that?
  • 22:12 - 22:14
    Okay, there's a whole problem...
  • 22:16 - 22:18
    Specifically, what gets me
  • 22:18 - 22:21
    having to be peeling myself
    off the ceiling with rage
  • 22:21 - 22:24
    is when the women botanists
    go out and collect
  • 22:24 - 22:28
    and they're known
    under their marriage name,
  • 22:28 - 22:33
    and then they put
    their specimens into the herbaria
  • 22:33 - 22:35
    and the herbaria have a database,
  • 22:35 - 22:36
    they transcribe the names,
  • 22:36 - 22:39
    but they don't have
    a space in their database
  • 22:39 - 22:42
    for the vital, important missus.
  • 22:42 - 22:46
    And so what happens is that always,
  • 22:46 - 22:47
    if it's pre-1950
  • 22:47 - 22:49
    and the guy's known for being prolific,
  • 22:49 - 22:50
    check his wife,
  • 22:50 - 22:54
    because most of the time
    either she's typing
  • 22:54 - 22:56
    and helping him produce
    the scientific papers
  • 22:56 - 22:59
    or she's out there collecting with him.
  • 22:59 - 23:02
    Yes, that's a definite problem
    that I have been raising
  • 23:02 - 23:03
    with a lot of the herbaria.
  • 23:03 - 23:04
    They just keep saying,
  • 23:04 - 23:07
    "Our database doesn't have
    a place for the missus,"
  • 23:07 - 23:10
    and I say, "Find a place
    because it's important."
  • 23:11 - 23:12
    Yeah.
  • 23:18 - 23:21
    (man 2) What other domains
    will you copy this to?
  • 23:21 - 23:24
    Because you're now doing it
    for a very specific subject.
  • 23:24 - 23:25
    What comes to mind?
  • 23:29 - 23:30
    It's a good question.
  • 23:34 - 23:37
    I think anything
    where people get disappeared,
  • 23:37 - 23:40
    where they're not credited for their work,
  • 23:41 - 23:43
    it tends to be where they get lost.
  • 23:43 - 23:47
    So something historic
    and the data just isn't linked.
  • 23:47 - 23:50
    For me, women are the classic example.
  • 23:50 - 23:53
    But I also think if there's, for example--
  • 23:55 - 24:00
    one that does spring to mind
    is artists in New Zealand,
  • 24:00 - 24:05
    Maori artists, for example,
    who get acknowledged to oral history,
  • 24:05 - 24:08
    but there are no written works,
  • 24:08 - 24:13
    and so the scholarship could possibly be
    a problem later on down the track.
  • 24:14 - 24:19
    I think that was a group that's ripe
    for using this type of work,
  • 24:19 - 24:20
    to try and get identifiers for them,
  • 24:20 - 24:23
    to make them more notable,
    to get them into Wikidata,
  • 24:23 - 24:26
    so that then researchers
    are pointed towards them
  • 24:26 - 24:30
    and can start doing the research
    needed to rediscover them.
  • 24:37 - 24:40
    (woman 2) Okay, so I do
    a lot with women artists,
  • 24:40 - 24:44
    and what I've found,
    apart from the married name thing,
  • 24:44 - 24:48
    is they also tend to stay local,
  • 24:48 - 24:51
    so they don't move and cross borders.
  • 24:51 - 24:54
    It turns out notability
    is very highly correlated
  • 24:54 - 24:57
    with the number of borders
    you cross in your lifetime.
  • 24:57 - 24:58
    Right, yeah.
  • 25:00 - 25:02
    To tell you the truth,
    I actually find that a benefit.
  • 25:02 - 25:06
    It's much easier to disambiguate
    someone if they don't shift.
  • 25:06 - 25:08
    If they've been in one place,
  • 25:08 - 25:10
    you can then find the database,
  • 25:10 - 25:13
    like the births or deaths
    or marriages database,
  • 25:13 - 25:18
    and you can work out
    on the basis of their address
  • 25:18 - 25:22
    or you can find them
    a lot easier if they don't shift.
  • 25:22 - 25:27
    It's when they shift, and they change
    from maiden name to married name
  • 25:27 - 25:29
    that it can get really difficult.
  • 25:29 - 25:30
    (woman 2) Yeah.
  • 25:35 - 25:37
    (woman 3) Just adding to the question
  • 25:37 - 25:40
    that was asked earlier
    in what field you could use this.
  • 25:41 - 25:47
    If it's a case where people
    are disappearing or are not visible,
  • 25:47 - 25:49
    meaning that for women, in my opinion,
  • 25:49 - 25:51
    that would mean like everywhere.
  • 25:51 - 25:52
    Yeah.
  • 25:54 - 25:58
    (woman 3) One of the things I work on
    is Delftware pottery workshops,
  • 25:58 - 26:02
    and that was an official job
    in the 17th century.
  • 26:02 - 26:08
    And when the potter died,
    there needed to be a new potter
  • 26:08 - 26:15
    that was inscribed
    in the official guild book,
  • 26:15 - 26:17
    - unless his wife could take over.
    - Ah!
  • 26:17 - 26:20
    (woman 3) And then she could take over
    without that diploma,
  • 26:20 - 26:22
    or whatever you want to call it,
  • 26:22 - 26:23
    sometimes for years.
  • 26:24 - 26:27
    And it would be attributed to her husband?
  • 26:27 - 26:32
    (woman 3) Yes, because the pottery
    is always attributed to the owner.
  • 26:34 - 26:37
    And they're like one line
    in the official encyclopedias...
  • 26:37 - 26:38
    This doesn't surprise me.
  • 26:38 - 26:42
    ...where the women are like taking care
    of the business for 10 years
  • 26:42 - 26:44
    [and say for a job]
    of their husband for two years,
  • 26:44 - 26:47
    but all the pottery items
    would be marked--
  • 26:47 - 26:51
    I think this is a really good example
    of how Wikidata can actually be used
  • 26:51 - 26:53
    to surface these women
  • 26:53 - 26:56
    and have something
    to hang the scholarship off,
  • 26:56 - 26:58
    so that then, eventually,
  • 26:58 - 27:04
    the more people who don't struggle
    to try and find the base information
  • 27:04 - 27:07
    can then start the research,
    and the in-depth research
  • 27:07 - 27:09
    that's required to surface these women.
  • 27:09 - 27:12
    Wikidata, I think, is the easy way
    to have a framework,
  • 27:13 - 27:17
    a skeleton to hang the bare data
    that you've got on
  • 27:17 - 27:20
    to enable that research to happen.
  • 27:20 - 27:21
    Yeah.
  • 27:22 - 27:25
    (man 3) I'm sorry we are out of time.
  • 27:25 - 27:28
    We have the lunch break now, so thank you.
  • 27:28 - 27:30
    Well, come talk to me
    if anyone else has any questions.
  • 27:30 - 27:31
    (applause)
Title:
cdn.media.ccc.de/.../wikidatacon2019-1076-eng-HerNaturalHistory_hd.mp4
Video Language:
English
Duration:
27:39

English subtitles

Revisions