Ethical dilemma: The burger murders - George Siedel and Christine Ladwig
-
0:07 - 0:12A few years ago, you founded a company
that manufactures meatless burgers. -
0:12 - 0:16Your product is now sold
in stores worldwide. -
0:16 - 0:19But you’ve recently received awful news:
-
0:19 - 0:25three unrelated people in one city died
after eating your burgers. -
0:25 - 0:29The police concluded that a criminal
targeted your brand, -
0:29 - 0:34injecting poison into your product
in at least two grocery stores. -
0:34 - 0:40The culprit used an ultrafine instrument
that left no trace on the packaging, -
0:40 - 0:44making it impossible to determine
which products were compromised. -
0:44 - 0:47Your burgers were immediately
removed from the two stores -
0:47 - 0:48where the victims bought them.
-
0:48 - 0:51The deaths are headline news,
-
0:51 - 0:55the killer is still at large,
and sales have plummeted. -
0:55 - 0:59You must quickly develop a strategy
to deal with the crisis. -
0:59 - 1:02Your team comes up with three options:
-
1:02 - 1:041. Do nothing.
-
1:04 - 1:092. Pull the products from grocery stores
citywide and destroy them. -
1:09 - 1:14Or 3. Pull and destroy
the product worldwide. -
1:14 - 1:17Which do you choose?
-
1:17 - 1:21Your company lawyer explains
that a recall is not required by law -
1:21 - 1:24because the criminal is fully responsible.
-
1:24 - 1:27She recommends the first option—
doing nothing— -
1:27 - 1:32because recalling the product
could look like an admission of fault. -
1:32 - 1:35But is that the most ethical strategy?
-
1:35 - 1:38To gauge the ethicality of each choice,
-
1:38 - 1:42you could perform
a “stakeholder analysis.” -
1:42 - 1:46This would allow you to weigh
the interests of some key stakeholders— -
1:46 - 1:51investors, employees, and customers—
against one another. -
1:51 - 1:53With the first option
-
1:53 - 1:57your advisors project that the crisis
will eventually blow over. -
1:57 - 2:01Sales will then improve but probably
stay below prior levels -
2:01 - 2:03because of damage to the brand.
-
2:03 - 2:06As a result, you’ll have to lay off
some employees, -
2:06 - 2:09and investors will suffer minor losses.
-
2:09 - 2:15But more customers could die
if the killer poisoned packages elsewhere. -
2:15 - 2:18The second option is expensive
in the short-term -
2:18 - 2:21and will require greater employee layoffs
-
2:21 - 2:24and additional financial loss
to investors. -
2:24 - 2:28But this option is safer
for customers in the city -
2:28 - 2:33and could create enough trust
that sales will eventually rebound. -
2:33 - 2:37The third option is the most expensive
in the short-term -
2:37 - 2:42and will require significant
employee layoffs and investor losses. -
2:42 - 2:46Though you have no evidence that these
crimes are an international threat, -
2:46 - 2:50this option provides the greatest
customer protection. -
2:50 - 2:53Given the conflict between the interests
of your customers -
2:53 - 2:56versus those of your investors
and employees, -
2:56 - 2:59which strategy is the most ethical?
-
2:59 - 3:03To make this decision,
you could consider these tests: -
3:03 - 3:06First is the Utilitarian Test:
-
3:06 - 3:09Utilitarianism is a philosophy concerned
-
3:09 - 3:13with maximizing the greatest amount
of good for the greatest number of people. -
3:13 - 3:17What would be the impact of each
option on these terms? -
3:17 - 3:20Second is the Family Test:
-
3:20 - 3:24How would you feel
explaining your decision to your family? -
3:24 - 3:26Third is the Newspaper Test:
-
3:26 - 3:31how would you feel reading about it
on the front page of the local newspaper? -
3:31 - 3:34And finally, you could use
the Mentor Test: -
3:34 - 3:39If someone you admire were making
this decision, what would they do? -
3:39 - 3:45Johnson & Johnson CEO James Burke
faced a similar challenge in 1982 -
3:45 - 3:51after a criminal added the poison cyanide
to bottles of Tylenol in Chicago. -
3:51 - 3:54Seven people died and sales dropped.
-
3:54 - 3:57Industry analysts said
the company was done for. -
3:57 - 4:02In response, Burke decided to pull Tylenol
from all shelves worldwide, -
4:02 - 4:07citing customer safety
as the company’s highest priority. -
4:07 - 4:13Johnson & Johnson recalled and destroyed
an estimated 32 million bottles of Tylenol -
4:13 - 4:17valued at 250 million in today’s dollars.
-
4:17 - 4:221.5 million of the recalled bottles
were tested and 3 of them— -
4:22 - 4:25all from the Chicago area—
-
4:25 - 4:27were found to contain cyanide.
-
4:27 - 4:31Burke’s decision helped the company
regain the trust of its customers, -
4:31 - 4:35and product sales rebounded within a year.
-
4:35 - 4:39Prompted by the Tylenol murders,
Johnson & Johnson became a leader -
4:39 - 4:42in developing tamper-resistant packaging
-
4:42 - 4:45and the government instituted
stricter regulations. -
4:45 - 4:48The killer, meanwhile, was never caught.
-
4:48 - 4:52Burke’s decision prevented further deaths
from the initial poisoning, -
4:52 - 4:58but the federal government investigated
hundreds of copycat tampering incidents -
4:58 - 5:01involving other products
in the following weeks. -
5:01 - 5:05Could these have been prevented
with a different response? -
5:05 - 5:09Was Burke acting in the interest
of the public or of his company? -
5:09 - 5:12Was this good ethics or good marketing?
-
5:12 - 5:18As with all ethical dilemmas,
this has no clear right or wrong answer. -
5:18 - 5:22And for your meatless burger empire,
the choice remains yours.
- Title:
- Ethical dilemma: The burger murders - George Siedel and Christine Ladwig
- Speaker:
- George Siedel and Christine Ladwig
- Description:
-
View full lesson: https://ed.ted.com/lessons/ethical-dilemma-the-burger-murders-george-siedel-and-christine-ladwig
You founded a company that manufactures meatless burgers that are sold in stores worldwide. But you've recently received awful news: three people in one city died after eating your burgers. A criminal has injected poison into your product! The deaths are headline news and sales have plummeted. How do you deal with the crisis? George Siedel and Christine Ladwig explore the different strategies of this ethical dilemma.
Lesson by George Siedel and Christine Ladwig, directed by Patrick Smith.
- Video Language:
- English
- Team:
- closed TED
- Project:
- TED-Ed
- Duration:
- 05:25
lauren mcalpine approved English subtitles for Ethical dilemma: The burger murders | ||
lauren mcalpine accepted English subtitles for Ethical dilemma: The burger murders | ||
lauren mcalpine edited English subtitles for Ethical dilemma: The burger murders | ||
Tara Ahmadinejad edited English subtitles for Ethical dilemma: The burger murders | ||
Tara Ahmadinejad edited English subtitles for Ethical dilemma: The burger murders |