-
(In Maori: My mountain is Taupiri.)
-
(Waikato is my river.)
-
(My name is Marilyn.)
-
(Hello.)
-
As you've heard, when I was very young,
-
I was elected to
the New Zealand Parliament.
-
And at that age, you learn mostly
by listening to others' stories.
-
I remember a woman
who'd been injured in a farm accident,
-
and it was coming up to shearing time
-
on the farm,
-
and she had to be replaced by a shepherd,
-
by a rousie in the woolshed,
-
and of course there was still someone
needed to manage the household
-
and to prepare the food
for the shearing gangs.
-
And her mother came to help with that.
-
But the family got
no compensation for the mother,
-
because that's what mothers
and family members are supposed to do.
-
One year, a company called
Gold Mines New Zealand
-
applied for a prospecting license
on our beautiful Mt. Pirongia.
-
It is a mountain
-
full of extraordinary ecosystems,
-
of verdant, virgin native forests.
-
It produced oxygen, it was a carbon sink,
-
it was a home for endangered species
and for pollinating species
-
in the farmland around.
-
And the mining company put up
this great economic prospectus
-
that was about how much
money could be made
-
from mining our mountain,
-
about all the growth and development
-
that would show in New Zealand's
budgetary forecasts,
-
and we were just left with the language
-
of all that we valued about our mountain.
-
Fortunately, we stopped.
-
And then I remembered
-
a woman who had three children under five
-
who was caring for her elderly parents,
-
and nobody seemed to think
that at some stage
-
she might actually need
some assistance with childcare,
-
because she wasn't in the paid workforce.
-
And there began to be a pattern
in all of these stories I was being told.
-
And I started to ask enough questions
-
to try and track to the core
of this pattern of values
-
that was part of all of these stories.
-
And I found it
-
in an economic formula
called the "gross domestic product,"
-
or the GDP.
-
Most of you will have heard of it.
-
Many of you won't have any idea
what it actually means.
-
The rules were drawn up
by Western-educated men in 1953.
-
They established a boundary of production
-
in drawing up these rules.
-
What they were keen to measure
-
was everything that involved
a market transaction.
-
So on one side of the boundary,
-
everything where there was
a market exchange was counted.
-
It doesn't matter whether
the exchange is legal or illegal.
-
Market exchange in the illegal trade
in armaments, [munitions],
-
drugs, endangered species,
-
trafficking of people --
-
all of this is great for growth
-
and it all counts.
-
On the other side
of the boundary of production,
-
there was this extraordinary
phrase in the rules
-
that the work done by the people
they called "nonprimary producers"
-
was "of little or no value."
-
So I thought, let's see how many
nonprimary producers we have here today.
-
So in the last week or so,
-
how many of you have transported
members of your household or their goods
-
without payment?
-
How many of you have done
a bit of cleaning, a bit of vacuuming,
-
a bit of sweeping,
a bit of tidying up the kitchen?
-
Yeah?
-
How about going shopping
for members of the household?
-
Preparing food? Cleaning up afterwards?
-
Laundry? Ironing?
-
(Laughter)
-
Well, as far as economics is concerned,
-
you were at leisure.
-
(Laughter)
-
(Applause and cheers)
-
Now, how about the women
-
who have been pregnant
and who have had children?
-
Yes.
-
Now, I really hate to tell you this,
-
because it might well
have been hard labor,
-
but at that moment, you were unproductive.
-
(Laughter)
-
And some of you may
have breastfed your infant.
-
Now, in the New Zealand
national accounts --
-
that's what the figures are called,
that's where we get the GDP --
-
in the New Zealand national accounts,
-
the milk of buffalo, goats, sheep and cows
-
is of value
-
but not human breast milk.
-
(Laughter)
-
It is the very best food on the planet.
-
It is the very best investment
that we can make in the future health
-
and education of that child.
-
It doesn't count at all.
-
All of those activities are on
the wrong side of the production boundary.
-
And something that's
very important to know
-
about this accounting framework:
-
they call it "accounts,"
-
but there's no debit side.
-
We just keep market exchanges going,
-
and it's all good for growth.
-
We're in Christchurch,
-
where people have lived through
a devastating natural disaster
-
and recovered.
-
And ever since that time,
-
New Zealand has been told
-
our growth figures are great,
because we're rebuilding Christchurch.
-
Nothing was ever lost
-
from the national accounting framework
-
because of the loss of lives,
-
the loss of land,
-
the loss of buildings,
-
the loss of special spaces.
-
Now, it might also
be becoming obvious to you
-
that this boundary of production works
in terms of our environment.
-
When we're mining it,
-
when we're deforesting,
-
when we're deleting our environment,
-
when we're fishing out
our marine resources,
-
legal or illegal,
-
as long as market is exchanged,
it's all good for growth.
-
To leave our natural environment alone,
-
to sustain it, to protect it,
-
is apparently worth nothing.
-
Now, how and what can we do about this?
-
Well, I wrote first about it 30 years ago.
-
Then in 2008, after
the global financial crisis,
-
President Sarkozy of France
-
asked three men who had all
won Nobel Prizes in Economics --
-
Sen, Fitoussi and Stiglitz --
-
to discover what I'd written about
-
30 years ago.
-
(Laughter)
-
(Applause)
-
"Relying on per capita GDP, relying
on these growth figures," they said,
-
"doesn't appear to be
the best way to proceed
-
to make public policy."
-
And I totally agree with them.
-
(Laughter)
-
One of the things that you notice
about these rules --
-
they are revised; 1968
they were revised, 1993, 2008 --
-
is that the revisions
are mostly done by statisticians,
-
and the statisticians do know
what is wrong with the data,
-
but hardly any of the economists
ever stop to ask that same question.
-
So, in 2019,
-
the GDP is in even worse shape.
-
You see, to measure GDP,
-
you have to assume
that some kind of production
-
or service delivery or consumption
-
occurs inside a nation-state,
-
and you know where that is.
-
But trillions of dollars
are circling the globe,
-
in many part from our Googles,
our Facebooks, our Twitters,
-
siphoned through a number of tax shelters,
-
so that when we click on our computer
-
and go to download some software,
-
we don't know where it was produced,
-
and frankly, no one knows where we are
as we're consuming it, either.
-
These tax-free havens
-
distort the GDP to such an extent
-
that about three years ago,
-
Europe looked askance at Ireland
-
and said, "We don't think
you're reporting correctly,"
-
and in the next year,
their GDP went up 35 percent.
-
Now, all that work that you're doing
-
when you were at leisure and unproductive,
-
we can measure this,
-
and we can measure this
in time use surveys.
-
When we look at the amount
of time that's taken
-
in the unpaid sector,
-
what we find is that in almost every
country where I've ever seen the data,
-
it is the single largest sector
of the nation's economy.
-
In the last three years, for example,
-
the UK statistician has declared
-
that all of that unpaid work
is the equivalent of all manufacturing
-
and all retailing in the UK.
-
In Australia,
-
the single largest sector of Australia's
economy is unpaid childcare,
-
and the second-largest sector
is all the rest of the unpaid work,
-
before banking and insurance
and financial intermediation services
-
clock in at the largest part
of the market sector.
-
Just last year, the Premier
of the Victoria state of Australia
-
declared that half of that state's GDP
-
was, in fact, the value
of all the unpaid work.
-
Now, as a policy maker,
-
you cannot make good policy
-
if the single largest sector
of your nation's economy
-
is not visible.
-
You can't presume to know
where the needs are.
-
You can't locate time poverty.
-
You can't address
the most critical issues of need.
-
So what can go in the place of GDP?
-
Well, GDP has got many other problems, OK?
-
We don't behave in a way that assists GDP.
-
Large numbers of people around the planet
-
are now using household assets --
their cars, their homes, themselves --
-
for Uber, for Airbnb.
-
And no, we're not supposed to use
assets from the unpaid sector
-
to make money in the market sector.
-
This is confusing!
-
(Laughter)
-
And very difficult to measure.
-
So economists don't want to know
-
what's wrong with their
most important GDP,
-
and I think they've got so many problems,
they can just move off to a quiet corner
-
and continue to publish that
-
and not come anywhere near the rest of us
-
with this talk of capitals
-
and natural assets
-
and other ways in which to colonize
the rest of our lives.
-
I think time use is the most important
indicator going forward.
-
Every one of us has exactly
the same amount of it.
-
If there are going to be critical issues
as we move forward,
-
we need a solid database,
-
because whatever we change
away from the GDP,
-
we're going to be stuck with it
for about 50 years,
-
and we need something
that's solid and immutable
-
and that everybody understands,
-
because if I put
time use data in front of you,
-
you'll immediately start nodding.
-
You'll immediately start
recognizing what it means.
-
And, honestly,
-
if I put the GDP data in front of you,
-
a lot of you would prefer
to leave for morning tea.
-
(Laughter)
-
We also need to be looking
at the quality of our environment.
-
As every year goes past,
we get much better
-
at measuring the devastation of it,
-
of measuring how little
we protect anymore.
-
And yet, with climate change,
-
we don't all have to be scientists
to see, to feel, to know
-
what is happening to our beautiful planet.
-
We need, in this country,
-
the paramountcy of what we can learn
from kaitiakitanga,
-
from whanaungatanaga,
-
from what Maori, who have been here
for centuries, can teach us.
-
When you're in parliament,
-
and you're not in
an economist's frame of mind,
-
you make decisions across a range of data.
-
You look at the trade-offs.
-
You think deeply about implications
-
way beyond whether or not
GDP is up or down.
-
Economists want to turn everything
into a monetary exchange,
-
even time use data,
-
so that they can carry on
trying to decide
-
whether GDP is up or down.
-
That's not a great way to go.
-
And others have said to me,
-
"Marilyn, why don't you
just work on a system
-
that includes all the unpaid work
-
and the pregnancy
and the birth and the lactation
-
in the GDP?"
-
There's a very important
moral and ethical answer to that,
-
and it is that I do not want
the most valuable things on earth,
-
the things I treasure,
-
sitting in an accounting framework
that thinks that war is great for growth.
-
(Applause and cheers)
-
So from now on,
-
whenever you listen to the news,
-
you're not going to go blank
when they say GDP.
-
You're going to think,
-
"I know what they're talking about,
and it's not good."
-
(Laughter)
-
I know that there are alternatives,
-
and I'm going to spend my time
correcting people,
-
talking to them about this value base
-
and talking to them about
what the alternatives can be,
-
because humankind
-
and our planet
-
need another way.
-
Thank you.
-
(Applause and cheers)