-
So I'd like you to imagine for a moment
-
that you're a soldier
in the heat of battle.
-
Maybe you're a Roman foot soldier
or a medieval archer
-
or maybe you're a Zulu warrior.
-
Regardless of your time and place,
there are some things that are constant.
-
Your adrenaline is elevated,
-
and your actions are stemming
from these deeply ingrained reflexes,
-
reflexes rooted in a need
to protect yourself and your side
-
and to defeat the enemy.
-
So now, I'd like you to imagine
playing a very different role,
-
that of the scout.
-
The scout's job is not
to attack or defend.
-
The scout's job is to understand.
-
The scout is the one going out,
-
mapping the terrain,
identifying potential obstacles.
-
And the scout may hope to learn
that, say, there's a bridge
-
in a convenient location across a river.
-
But above all, the scout
wants to know what's really there,
-
as accurately as possible.
-
And in a real, actual army, both
the soldier and the scout are essential.
-
But you can also think of each
of these roles as a mindset --
-
a metaphor for how all of us
process information and ideas
-
in our daily lives.
-
What I'm going to argue today
is that having good judgment,
-
making accurate predictions,
making good decisions,
-
is mostly about which mindset you're in.
-
To illustrate these mindsets in action,
-
I'm going to take you back
to 19th-century France,
-
where this innocuous-looking
piece of paper
-
launched one of the biggest
political scandals in history.
-
It was discovered in 1894
by officers in the French general staff.
-
It was torn up in a wastepaper basket,
-
but when they pieced it back together,
-
they discovered
that someone in their ranks
-
had been selling
military secrets to Germany.
-
So they launched a big investigation,
-
and their suspicions
quickly converged on this man,
-
Alfred Dreyfus.
-
He had a sterling record,
-
no past history of wrongdoing,
no motive as far as they could tell.
-
But Dreyfus was the only
Jewish officer at that rank in the army,
-
and unfortunately at this time,
the French Army was highly anti-Semitic.
-
They compared Dreyfus's handwriting
to that on the memo
-
and concluded that it was a match,
-
even though outside
professional handwriting experts
-
were much less confident
in the similarity,
-
but never mind that.
-
They went and searched
Dreyfus's apartment,
-
looking for any signs of espionage.
-
They went through his files,
and they didn't find anything.
-
This just convinced them more
that Dreyfus was not only guilty,
-
but sneaky as well, because clearly
he had hidden all of the evidence
-
before they had managed to get to it.
-
Next, they went and looked
through his personal history
-
for any incriminating details.
-
They talked to his teachers,
-
they found that he had studied
foreign languages in school,
-
which clearly showed a desire
to conspire with foreign governments
-
later in life.
-
His teachers also said that Dreyfus
was known for having a good memory,
-
which was highly suspicious, right?
-
You know, because a spy
has to remember a lot of things.
-
So the case went to trial,
and Dreyfus was found guilty.
-
Afterwards, they took him out
into this public square
-
and ritualistically tore
his insignia from his uniform
-
and broke his sword in two.
-
This was called
the Degradation of Dreyfus.
-
And they sentenced him
to life imprisonment
-
on the aptly named Devil's Island,
-
which is this barren rock
off the coast of South America.
-
So there he went,
and there he spent his days alone,
-
writing letters and letters
to the French government
-
begging them to reopen his case
so they could discover his innocence.
-
But for the most part,
France considered the matter closed.
-
One thing that's really interesting
to me about the Dreyfus Affair
-
is this question of why the officers
were so convinced
-
that Dreyfus was guilty.
-
I mean, you might even assume
that they were setting him up,
-
that they were intentionally framing him.
-
But historians don't think
that's what happened.
-
As far as we can tell,
-
the officers genuinely believed
that the case against Dreyfus was strong.
-
Which makes you wonder:
-
What does it say about the human mind
-
that we can find such paltry evidence
-
to be compelling enough to convict a man?
-
Well, this is a case of what scientists
call "motivated reasoning."
-
It's this phenomenon in which
our unconscious motivations,
-
our desires and fears,
-
shape the way we interpret information.
-
Some information, some ideas,
feel like our allies.
-
We want them to win.
We want to defend them.
-
And other information
or ideas are the enemy,
-
and we want to shoot them down.
-
So this is why I call
motivated reasoning, "soldier mindset."
-
Probably most of you have never persecuted
-
a French-Jewish officer for high treason,
-
I assume,
-
but maybe you've followed sports
or politics, so you might have noticed
-
that when the referee judges
that your team committed a foul,
-
for example,
-
you're highly motivated
to find reasons why he's wrong.
-
But if he judges that the other team
committed a foul -- awesome!
-
That's a good call,
let's not examine it too closely.
-
Or, maybe you've read
an article or a study
-
that examined some controversial policy,
-
like capital punishment.
-
And, as researchers have demonstrated,
-
if you support capital punishment
-
and the study shows
that it's not effective,
-
then you're highly motivated
to find all the reasons
-
why the study was poorly designed.
-
But if it shows
that capital punishment works,
-
it's a good study.
-
And vice versa: if you don't
support capital punishment, same thing.
-
Our judgment is strongly
influenced, unconsciously,
-
by which side we want to win.
-
And this is ubiquitous.
-
This shapes how we think
about our health, our relationships,
-
how we decide how to vote,
-
what we consider fair or ethical.
-
What's most scary to me
about motivated reasoning
-
or soldier mindset,
-
is how unconscious it is.
-
We can think we're being
objective and fair-minded
-
and still wind up ruining the life
of an innocent man.
-
However, fortunately for Dreyfus,
his story is not over.
-
This is Colonel Picquart.
-
He's another high-ranking officer
in the French Army,
-
and like most people,
he assumed Dreyfus was guilty.
-
Also like most people in the army,
he was at least casually anti-Semitic.
-
But at a certain point,
Picquart began to suspect:
-
"What if we're all wrong about Dreyfus?"
-
What happened was,
he had discovered evidence
-
that the spying for Germany had continued,
-
even after Dreyfus was in prison.
-
And he had also discovered
that another officer in the army
-
had handwriting that perfectly
matched the memo,
-
much closer than Dreyfus's handwriting.
-
So he brought these discoveries
to his superiors,
-
but to his dismay,
they either didn't care
-
or came up with elaborate rationalizations
to explain his findings,
-
like, "Well, all you've really shown,
Picquart, is that there's another spy
-
who learned how to mimic
Dreyfus's handwriting,
-
and he picked up the torch of spying
after Dreyfus left.
-
But Dreyfus is still guilty."
-
Eventually, Picquart managed
to get Dreyfus exonerated.
-
But it took him 10 years,
-
and for part of that time,
he himself was in prison
-
for the crime of disloyalty to the army.
-
A lot of people feel like Picquart
can't really be the hero of this story
-
because he was an anti-Semite
and that's bad, which I agree with.
-
But personally, for me,
the fact that Picquart was anti-Semitic
-
actually makes his actions more admirable,
-
because he had the same prejudices,
the same reasons to be biased
-
as his fellow officers,
-
but his motivation to find the truth
and uphold it trumped all of that.
-
So to me,
-
Picquart is a poster child
for what I call "scout mindset."
-
It's the drive not to make
one idea win or another lose,
-
but just to see what's really there
-
as honestly and accurately as you can,
-
even if it's not pretty
or convenient or pleasant.
-
This mindset is what
I'm personally passionate about.
-
And I've spent the last few years
examining and trying to figure out
-
what causes scout mindset.
-
Why are some people, sometimes at least,
-
able to cut through their own prejudices
and biases and motivations
-
and just try to see the facts
and the evidence
-
as objectively as they can?
-
And the answer is emotional.
-
So, just as soldier mindset
is rooted in emotions
-
like defensiveness or tribalism,
-
scout mindset is, too.
-
It's just rooted in different emotions.
-
For example, scouts are curious.
-
They're more likely to say
they feel pleasure
-
when they learn new information
-
or an itch to solve a puzzle.
-
They're more likely to feel intrigued
when they encounter something
-
that contradicts their expectations.
-
Scouts also have different values.
-
They're more likely to say
they think it's virtuous
-
to test your own beliefs,
-
and they're less likely to say
that someone who changes his mind
-
seems weak.
-
And above all, scouts are grounded,
-
which means their self-worth as a person
-
isn't tied to how right or wrong
they are about any particular topic.
-
So they can believe
that capital punishment works.
-
If studies come out showing
that it doesn't, they can say,
-
"Huh. Looks like I might be wrong.
Doesn't mean I'm bad or stupid."
-
This cluster of traits
is what researchers have found --
-
and I've also found anecdotally --
-
predicts good judgment.
-
And the key takeaway I want
to leave you with about those traits
-
is that they're primarily
not about how smart you are
-
or about how much you know.
-
In fact, they don't correlate
very much with IQ at all.
-
They're about how you feel.
-
There's a quote that I keep
coming back to, by Saint-Exupéry.
-
He's the author of The Little Prince.
-
He said, "If you want to build a ship,
-
don't drum up your men
to collect wood and give orders
-
and distribute the work.
-
Instead, teach them to yearn
for the vast and endless sea."
-
In other words, I claim,
-
if we really want to improve
our judgment as individuals
-
and as societies,
-
what we need most
is not more instruction in logic
-
or rhetoric or probability or economics,
-
even though those things
are quite valuable.
-
But what we most need
to use those principles well
-
is scout mindset.
-
We need to change the way we feel.
-
We need to learn how to feel proud
instead of ashamed
-
when we notice we might
have been wrong about something.
-
We need to learn how to feel intrigued
instead of defensive
-
when we encounter some information
that contradicts our beliefs.
-
So the question I want
to leave you with is:
-
What do you most yearn for?
-
Do you yearn to defend your own beliefs?
-
Or do you yearn to see the world
as clearly as you possibly can?
-
Thank you.
-
(Applause)