221 - A New World Order / Total Onslaught - Walter Veith

http://amazingdiscoveries.tv/media/134/221-a-new-world-order/
http://amazingdiscoveries.org/
In this DVD, the emergence of a new world order is discussed, with all its political and socio-economic ramifications. The intriques behind the setting up of a universal order dictating to the conscience of men are clearly exposed. The events leading up to this order, such as the great terrorist attacks of our time, and the battle against the so-called "axis of evil" are discussed, as well as how the new structure will personally impact on the lives of the citizens of the world.

We are now going to discuss
this issue of a New World Order.

As we saw in Revelation chapter 17,
the kings of the world give

their power unto the beast.
In “The Keys of this Blood”,

Malachi Martin tells us that the
greatest geo-political giant of our

age is the Pope. He says,
“On his trip to Poland..., barely eight

months after his election, he signalled
the opening of the millennium endgame.

He became the first of the
three players to enter the new

geopolitical arena.” He says that
“Pope John Paul would stride now in

the area of the millennium
endgame as something more

than a geopolitical giant of his age.
He was, and remains, the serene and

confident servant of the grand design.”
This is Masonic signal language.

Here is John Paul II with
the Trilateral Commission.

And here is John Paul II with
B’nai B’rith, Jewish Freemasonry.

This is a fascinating signal
picture with him in the center

controlling the most powerful
think tanks in the world, because

that’s what the signal tells us.
We saw in Revelation chapter 17

already some pictures of
the powers of the world giving

themselves over to the papacy.
Lech Walesa being honored for

his work with the host in public.

“The Bush-Gorbachev summit in Malta.
George Bush referred to it as:

‘A gateway to the new
Millennium of Freedom’”

And it was heralded as the
“Building of a New World”.

“It is a big idea: a new world
order, where diverse nations are

drawn together in common cause…
only the United States has both the

moral standing and the means to
back it up.” – President George Bush

So they want to create
this New World Order.

Revelation chapter 13 said that
the beast that comes up out of the

earth would be the power that did it.
Bush confirms that for us.

By 1990 a peace prize went to
Gorbachev for losing his country;

The Man of the Decade he became.
And the old symbols – which are

Masonic symbols, of the East German
empire, were removed. The Communist

emblem leaves. Pretoria News,
August 20, 1999 summit meeting in

63 countries about neoliberalism.
And Fidel Castro gives a Masonic signal.

Here he is with the papacy;
all these so called countries that

are against what the establishment
stands for are only against in the

sense that they are playing
the game of Hegelianism.

Thesis, antithesis, but behind the
scenes, they all belong to the same club.

Let’s just verify that.
“Fidel was significantly influenced

by [Jesuit] Father Armando Llorente
and Alberto DeCastro…

DeCastro admired Franco…
Fidel was very active in a Jesuit

organization similar to the Boy
Scouts, the ‘Explorers.’ …”

“[Wherever] a totalitarian movement
erupts, whether Communist or

Nazi [fascist], a Jesuit can be found
in the role of ‘advisor’ or leader;

in Cuba [it was] Castro’s Father
Armando Llorente…”

So forget about the idea that Cuba
was anti-Pope; a Jesuit was behind

the scenes, they were playing
the game of thesis-antithesis.

“When Tyrants Fall” in Romania,
and Panama, and all these countries;

these tyrants were put in place to
create a system of fear and chaos,

and then they are removed and the
people are happy to give up their

civil liberties. We’ve already seen
this video here of the Pope who

receives honor from Bill Clinton for
his role in ending the Communist empire.

Female Reporter: “2,400 of his faithful
here to welcome him.

He’s waving to the crowd.

Archbishop Regali is alongside the Pope
as he shakes hands with the first lady.”

Clinton: “We honor you for helping
to lead a revolution of values and

spirit in central Europe
and the former Soviet Union;

freeing millions to live by
conscious, not coercion, and

freeing all of us from the
constant fear of nuclear war.

Your Holiness, on behalf of all
of us gathered here today, indeed on

behalf of all the people
of our beloved nation,

we welcome you
back to America.”

Male reporter: “Ladies and gentlemen,
his holiness Pope John Paul II and

the vice president of the United
States and Archbishop -”

Veith: “Pope declares the European
Community heaven sent”

Very fascinating,
“Konrad Adenauer”

who was the German chancellor
at that particular time when this

was being devised, well he is to
be declared a saint,

can you believe that? He is to
be declared a saint for his work,

“Pope declares EC heaven sent…
Roman Catholic principles.”

They are to be declared saints.

Now to bring about the European
Union, they had Maastricht,

Maastricht is a Roman Catholic - a little town
in a Protestant country in the

Netherlands; and the symbolism there
was also interesting, the 12 stars;

they represent also the 12 stars
that you have in the book of

Revelation, which they apply to Mary
rather than to the woman in white.

It is also fascinating that the
European Union issued a poster

which was posted all over Europe,
where they had the tower of Babel

under construction, can you see that?
This was posted all over Europe,

and the stars were upside down,
representing the goat of Mendez.

This is Satanism.
This is the new tower of Babel;

and the high French politicians said
“we are building a new Babel,”

which they emphasized with this poster,
“and this time we will succeed.”

The new parliament of the
European Community is built like

the tower of Babel. In fact it
has a plaque on the inside –

or a poster – which says
precisely this. And it has these

scaffolding to give the appearance
that it is under construction.

This is rather arrogant. This is
the new European identity card,

and if you look at it at the back and you
turn it upside down, what do you see?

You see the goat of Mendez.
The horns are slightly modified

to give another symbolism
of the seat of the earth,

but the inner facial features of the
goat are very clearly discernable,

and what these mean over here
I would rather not say.

If we look at the high politicians
of Europe, those that played the

role in all of this, they are Masonic.
That is a Masonic handshake between

Schroeder and Kohl, signifying the
new Mason is taking over where

the old Mason is leaving.
So just as we saw that Kerry is

a Skull & Bones member in America
now, and the present President is

a Skull & Bones member, it doesn’t
matter which one is going to win,

so here too a Mason replaces a Mason.

Fingering, the system they’re all
showing that they’re all part of

the same system. When the Soviet
Union fell, the new emblem that it

adopted was this one, the double
headed eagle; could you guess why?

Well the double headed eagle is
the symbol of Freemasonry, and it

obviously shows who is in control.
The queens, the kings of the world,

as we have seen, all of them are
high masons and subject to the

Roman pontiff. And Islam, we did a
whole lecture to show the intrigue

of the Islamic religion and the
Catholic religion that behind the

scenes, controlled by the Secret
Societies, they have one aim and

one aim alone, subject to Rome.
So what is all this war about with Islam?

Who are these people who are
pulling the strings in the world,

and why are people being rubbed up
between them? From the rock stars

of the world, the Bonos of the
world, to the political leaders of the

world, everyone seems to be
bowing down to the papal Caesar.

From the East to the West, the
Islamic world is currently being

set up as the synthesis in the
religious world, pitted against

the Judeo-Christian culture as
the antithesis, and then out of

this must come a synthesis
where all of them will unite.

This is a website, there is the,
the actual website underneath,

and this one I believe fairly
accurately says who’s who in the zoo;

Adam Weishaupt, [John Jacob]
Astor, [Albert] Pike, [Andrew]

Carnegie, [Irenee] du Pont,
[W.Averell] Harriman, Bertrand

Russell, Ted Kennedy. These are the
Illuminatis of yesteryear and today.

George W. Bush of course, he’s
a Skull & Bones member, that’s

a sub-organization of chapter 322
of a German organization,

the Illuminati therefore.
[McGeorge] Bundy, [Otto of] Habsburg,

[Walter] Freeman, [Lee] Teng-hui,
Hillary Clinton, Allan Greenspan,

[David] Rockefeller, [Edmund de]
Rothschild, [Peter] Wallenberg,

these are the bankers in this system.
The negotiators, Lord [Peter] Carrington,

Jimmy Carter, Henry Kissinger,
Lord David Owen, Richard Holbrooke,

these are 33 degree Freemasons,
or Knights of Malta, or Bilderbergers,

or Committee of 300, they all
belong to the same club.

If we look at Franklin D. Roosevelt,
Cecil Rhodes, [Frederick] Engels,

all of these; [Leon] Trotsky,
[Joseph] Stalin, [Karl] Marx,

[J.Edgar] Hoover, all of their affiliations,
Grand Orient Lodge for example,

Grand Orient lodge.

Lenin was Grand Orient Lodge,
[Harry S.] Truman 33 degree,

Willy Brandt degree, Winston Churchill;
we’ve seen many of these before.

Helmut Kohl, Committee of 300;
Francois Mitterand, 33 degree

Freemason, he is not alive any more.
Yitzak Rabin, [Yasser] Arafat,

33 degree Freemason,
these are fascinating details.

Shimon Peres, Ronald Reagan,
George Bush, Gerald Ford,

I showed you Gerald Ford’s signature
where he signed for himself that he was

a 33 degree Freemason. There it is,
I photographed it in the lodge.

And the Carters and these great
political people in the world.

The Schroeder’s, the Netonyahu’s,
the Gorbachev’s, there is Saddam

Hussein listed as a 33 degree
Freemason.

Royalty: Prince Bernhard of the
Netherlands, Committee of 300;

and here, Princess [Rainha]
Beatriz, and Prince Bertil.

The queen of course, Prince Phillip,
all of them high Freemasons.

[Josef] Mengele, Walt Disney,
all of these individuals.

The world is really run by these
individuals. Here is the Duke of Kent

giving the Masonic handshake
under the Masonic shield.

He is the current Grand Master, so
he’s the highest Freemason at the

moment, if you like, because a King
may not be, or a Prince, may not be

the Grand Master. He is
currently the Grand Master.

So here is the highest Luciferian
in the country at the moment.

Political leaders, the Bill
Clintons, and all of these, we’ve

dealt with them. We don’t have
to go through all of them again;

the Jesse Helms, the Goldwaters,
the Al Gores, and all of these

individuals. And I’ve put the pages
up there, and there are many many

books that substantiate, all
of these names. So just about

everybody who is important in the
world, everybody who runs in the

political sphere is involved in
these clandestine operations.

We saw in the lecture on
Revelation chapter 17 and 13 how

there would be a holy alliance,
and how the United States would

eventually become the power house
for propagating a new world order.

Gorbachev summit in
Malta, referred to as

“A gateway to the Millenium of Freedom”,
as you will remember.

And the initiative came for this great
movement into a New World Order.

Now let us have a look at
this video where George Bush has

something to say on this issue.

Bush Senior:
“Our institutions of freedom have laid

dormant, the United Nations
can offer them new life. These

institutions play a crucial role in
our quest for a New World Order.

An order in which no nation must
surrender one iota of its own

sovereignty, an order characterized
by the rule of law rather

than the resort to force.”

Veith: So he says all the nations
don’t have to give up one iota of

their sovereignty, but we want them
all in a New World Order, basically

that is what he said. Out of the horse’s mouth.
And if you look at the high role

players in the United States,
whether it’s Madeline Albright, or

anyone of them, they use broaches
which depict Luciferian connections

like goats, and all of these.
President Clinton here is

receiving the host publicly, and he
claims not to be a Roman Catholic?

That is impossible. Hillary
Clinton is wearing the phoenix

rising which is a Masonic symbol.
Cherie Blair uses Masonic signals.

The presidents, the prime
ministers of the world, whether the

Thatchers or the Carters, or the
– whoever they are, all of them

seem to belong to insider
organizations. Whether they are

religious leaders or political
leaders or whether they are

Europeans or Americans or Eastern,
all of them seem to be involved.

If we look at Africa and Rome,
this will give us an idea of what

the New World Order is going to
be all about. Africa and what they

have done to Africa serves as a
model for what will happen in the

entire world. The great African
leaders and the tyrants of the past

like the Idi Amins,
these people have all received

exile and were probably high Masonics.
When we look at the Southern Africa,

South Africa, situation where
you had the black-white issue,

the apartheid issue, the role players
again were all Masons.

This is Foster, the president, and he
gives a Masonic signal, and he was a

Freemason. If we look at Nelson
Mandela, he is a Prince Hall Freemason,

so again both sides are on
the same side of a secret society.

If we look at DeKlerk and Nelson Mandela,
we have the same situation there.

Mandela is compared to Jesus
Christ. They lift him up. They have

a synthesis and an antithesis,
and he receives the

host publicly, although he declines
to say that he is Roman Catholic.

He says he’s not Roman Catholic.
Now Roman Catholic canon law

states that you cannot receive
the host if you are not a Roman

Catholic, so these people
are really something else.

Here he has a Hindu marriage with
the widow of Samora Machel.

Now Samora Machel is another
story and his anti-Christian

statements are historic.
He also had a Jewish wedding at

the same ceremony, and a Moslem,
showing that all religions are one

with him. The new political face
is totally Masonic, and in 1992

already it was known that Mugabe,
of Zimbabwe, was going to take the

farms away from the people that
lived there. This is before he

started doing this, they
had already said it.

“Mugabe is going to take white
farms very soon.” That was in 1992.

Today this is a fact, “Der Spiegel” published
“Die Deutschen müssen rause!”

The Germans must get out,
all whites must get out.

Here’s a cartoon of Kissinger
pointing to the fact that the

whites must get out of Africa.
Here is the current president of

South Africa, Mbeki, and Mugabe,
they are hand in hand on this issue.

He refuses to rebuke Mugabe
for taking the farms by force.

In South Africa itself 4000
farmers at least have died and have

been killed as they have
been driven off their land.

Nobody hears about these things in
the world. Zimbabwe lies in ruins,

but what do we find here?
A tremendous building going up,

and what is it called?
The Jesuit Province of Zimbabwe.

So the Jesuits are totally
in control in that country.

Jesuit school of Philosophy and Humanity.
Brand new buildings while

a country lies in ruins;
they’re preparing for a final order.

And all the black leaders are
in the same level as all the

European and America leaders,
they all belong to the same club.

Now what is this New World Order?
Here is the new South African coat

of arms where you can see the
phoenix rising out of the ashes,

the crown of Mithra with the seven
rays, all the symbolism points to

the same thing. I’m going to run
you through the new economic order

of the New World Order.
And these are now quotes from

Roman Catholic sources themselves.
And I would like to tell you that

you haven’t experienced anything
yet: waiting to come to you.

And I can tell you what it feels
like because I have experienced it.

If you’ve ever wanted to read
an interesting book, read

“Ecclesiastical Megalomania”, but
I’ll be quoting from encyclicals

and all these things.
“According to Canon Law, the

control of all property of the
Roman Church-State belongs to the

Pope, its supreme emperor”
Everything I say will have a quote now;

everything is substantiated by
either a papal encyclical or any

one of these. Now Communism took
all property away and made it the

state’s property. Capitalism says,
“The property belongs to the individual

and nobody has the right to take it away.
Now if that is thesis and antithesis,

then something in-between
is what we will want.

So the Pope condemned Communism
but he also condemns Capitalism.

The New World Order will be something
in between in the name of fairness.

So let us have a look at these issues.
The economic thought of the

Roman Catholic Church.
Private Property,

“…Thomas Aquinas, wrote no treatise
on economics, but his thinking,

based on that of Aristotle, is
foundational for understanding the

economic thought of the
Roman Catholic Church.”

Every time there is a quote.
Now what did Thomas Aquinas say?

“Roman Catholic economic thought,
as developed by the popes in their

encyclicals and by Roman
Church-State councils,

has been a contributor to…
feudalism and guild socialism

in Europe during the Middle Ages;
fascism in Italy, Spain, Portugal

Nazism in Germany in
the twentieth century;

interventionism and the
redistributive state in the West,

including the United States
in the twentieth century; and

liberation theology in Latin
America and Africa in the

twentieth century.” What does this mean?
Thomas Aquinas said,

“… the possession of all things
in common is natural law.

Thomas wrote: “…’the possession of
all things in common and universal

freedom’ are said to be of the
natural law because, to wit,

the distinction of possessions and
slavery were not brought in by nature,

but devised by human reason
for the benefit of human life”

Now what does all that mean?
It simply means, property is

for common good. You may own it,
but it is for common goods.

“The community of goods,” wrote Thomas,
“is ascribed to the natural law,

not that the natural law dictates
that all things should be possessed

in common and that nothing should
be possessed as one’s own.”

So you may possess things,
yes “but because the division

of possessions is not according
to the natural law, but rather arose

from human agreement, which
belongs to positive law…”

they talk such drivel, it’s
interesting, never mind,

“… Hence the ownership of
possessions is not contrary to

the natural law, but an addition
thereto devised by human reason”

Let’s continue, Thomas wrote:
“…Hence, whatever certain people

have in superabundance is due,
by natural law, to the purpose of

succouring the poor”
Ok, now we’re getting there, you

may possess things, whatever you
possess, but whatever you possess

more than you need is there for the
common good of those that don’t have.

Does that make sense?
Now what if you create two classes

of individuals, the rich and the poor;
or what if there is a

situation where you have two
classes, the rich and the poor.

You can go across the world and
you can look at the rich nations

and the poor nations, and you will
find that the rich nations are all

the Protestant nations, have you
noticed that? All the Protestant

nations are the rich. Now what if
you had it planned to disinherit them all,

so that you would again be ruler
and they would have to come

and beg at your feet for anything like that.
Now let’s have a look at how this unfolds,

for “… the purpose of
succouring the poor.”

“Because the goods of some are
due to others by natural

law, there is no sin if the poor
take the goods of their neighbours.

Thomas wrote: ‘In cases of need,
all things are common property, so

that there would seem to be no sin
in taking another’s property, for

the need has made it common.’”

Ok, now there’s the aspect of
sharing. If I see my neighbour in

trouble, as a good Christian
I will help him out, right?

Yes, but now we’re looking at law.
So if my neighbour has need, and who

determines the need?
He. He determines the need,

“I have need, I have need, I have
need of a television, and I don’t

have one and you have one;
and you have money and you can go

and buy yourself another one,
I have need of your television,”

can he then take it without
being a sinner, yes or no?

According to this yes. What if you
have a car and he doesn’t have one?

He can take it without sin
according to Thomas Aquinas.

Now this was a long time ago,
surely this doesn’t apply today.

Well we’ll see. “Not only is such
taking of another’s property not a

sin, it is not even a crime,
according to Thomas: ‘…it is lawful

for a man to succour his own need
by means of another’s property by

taking it either openly or secretly;
nor is this, properly speaking,

theft and robbery… It is not theft,
properly speaking, to take secretly

and use another’s property
in a case of extreme need;

because that which he takes for
the support of his life becomes his

own property by reason of that
need… In a case of a like need a

man may also take secretly
another’s property in order to

succour his neighbour in need.”

Oh, this gets very interesting.
Now did you know that if I leave

my property unattended in South
Africa, and somebody moves in,

I cannot throw him out; he’s in
because he has need. That’s the law.

And do you think that is a South
African law? No, that is British

law as well. That is a law
virtually all over the country now,

but it’s not being implemented
because the situation is not such

yet that it has to be implemented
everywhere. Once you start opening

the borders, and millions of poor
people start coming in, well then

there will be great need.
What did they do with need

overseas? So, in South Africa,
people go on holiday, they come

back, their house is occupied.
And they can’t throw the people

Out. Because their property is in
their name they have to pay the

bills, they have to pay the rents,
they have to pay all those things,

but need made it common
therefore that man can move in.

Is that the situation?
Yes it is. It gets worse.

“The Roman Catholic doctrine of
private property is echoed in the

nineteenth century Communist slogan,
‘From each according to his ability;

to each according to his need.’”
Can you see the Roman

Catholic doctrine there?
“‘Human rights are more important

than property rights.’ It was the
creed of Lyndon Johnson’s Great

Society: ‘We shall take from the
haves and give to the have-nots,

who need it so much.’”
Lyndon Johnson said that. What

continent is that? “It appears in
the literature of fascism, Nazism,

liberation theology,
interventionism, and socialism.’”

“The Universal Destination of Goods”:
this is John Paul II’s expression

of it in his 1987 encyclical
“On Social Concern”:

“It is necessary to state once more
the characteristic principle of

Christian social doctrine:
the goods of this world are originally

meant for all. The right of private
property is valid and necessary,

but it does not nullify
the value of this principle.

Private property, in fact,
is under a “social mortgage,”

which means that it has an
intrinsically social function,

based upon and justified precisely
by the principle of the universal

destination of goods.”
Oops, what did John Paul II just say?

He said that which Thomas said is
what I say. You may have private

property, the Roman Catholic
Church is for private property.

That sounds very nice, but it’s
never qualified that that property

is only yours for common good.
So one day you wake up and in your

garden you have squatters.
And you call the police and you say,

“hey” or you go out and say
“get off my property,”

and they say, “let me alone
or I’ll blow your head off.”

Hey, you go to the cops and you say,
“cops come help here, there

are people squatting on my land.”
“Sorry, they have need;

you have too much land anyway,
live with it.” OK. Pope Paul VI made

the point quite clear in his 1967
encyclical On the Progress of

Peoples: “‘…Each man has therefore
the right to find in the world what

is necessary for himself.”
This is interesting.

“The recent Council [Vatican
II] reminded us of this:

“God intended the earth and all
that it contains for the use of

every human being and people.
Thus, as all men follow justice

and unite in charity, created goods
– created goods - should abound for

them on a reasonable basis.
All other rights whatsoever,

including those of property
and of free commerce, are to be

subordinate to this principle”

That means if I have need of a

manufactured good, can I take it?
So now I’m driving my car – and we

have a hijacking just about every
twelve minutes – and a gun comes in

and says “get out of the car”
and I relinquish my car, and if I

don’t, what happens to me?
I get shot. The man has need of my

car, it’s gone; finished.
In my own church at home, we’ve

had hijackings after hijackings.
Even the pastor, they beat him up

and tried to put him into the trunk of
the car. They would have killed him.

He managed to fight himself free
and off he went without his car.

Do you think there’s any big
action to find these things?

No occasionally here and
occasionally there. Do you think

there’s any big action when the
farmers are killed and they move

onto the lands? No, a little bit
here and a little bit there just to

keep people happy, but
basically nothing is done.

And the police’s hands are cut
off, and the law says that, there’s

nothing you can do. The other day,
two cyclists were traveling along

when they were hijacked by five
gunmen demanding their bikes.

So they took out, they were armed
because they expect this – it’s

becoming like the wild west, and
they defended themselves, injured

one, and got away. And guess what?
The two cyclists are in jail, yes,

serving a sentence for
injuring someone without need.

They could have given them the bicycles,
that could have solved the problem.

You see how the law
has turned upside down?

Gandium et Spes, the Vatican II
Constitution that John Paul II

quoted, explained at greater length:
“… If one is in extreme

necessity he has the right to
procure for himself what he needs

out of the riches of others.”
Now who defines necessity?

“Since there are so many people
prostrate with hunger in the world,

this Sacred Council urges all,
both individual and governments, to

remember the aphorism of the Fathers,
“Feed the man dying of hunger,

because if you have not
fed him, you have killed him”

“Therefore, because private
property is immoral, all men –

individuals and governments
– have the moral obligation to

redistribute goods held
unjustly by property owners.”

Have you heard of
redistribution of goods lately?

Have you heard of it many times lately?
Yes, there is going to be a

redistribution. “… ‘all goods’
includes not just the goods found

in nature but manufactured goods as well.
John Paul II declared that

all men must have ‘…access to those
goods which are” quote “intended for common use:

both the goods of nature
and manufactured goods.’”

I own nothing, only on
paper do I own anything.

The state rules supreme,
my life soon could be a misery.

So if you are attached to your
homes here in Canada –

and this is the basis for
the New World Order –

if you are attached to your cars
and your televisions and all these

things, loosen yourself.
Because soon they will be

redistributed, and there will be
nothing that the white, or black,

or pink, Protestant can do about it.
And if some other suffers in the

way, that is fair enough,
the end justifies the means.

The redistribution will go as
it should be. “Rerum Novarum”

who’s heard of Rerum Novarum?
This is the papal encyclical that

was issued that is being quoted to
this day, Pope John’s, and to this

day all of them make reference to
this, including Pope John Paul II,

says this is the encyclical that
forms the basis of the New World

Order. Well I thought it’s
important to study it.

“One of the Roman church-State’s
most influential statements on

economic matters is the
encyclical Rerum Novarum, “On the

Condition of the Working Classes”.
“...the Roman

Church-State allied herself with
the proletariat, which in Marxism

is the great and final enemy
of the capitalist order”

“…Pius, writing,
declared that ‘Rerum Novarum,

however, stood out in this, that it
laid down for all mankind unerring

rules for the right solution of
the difficult problem of human

solidarity, called the Social Question…’”

Now let’s see. “By far the most notable
evidence of this social teaching and action,

which the Church has set forth through
the centuries, undoubtedly is the

Encyclical Rerum Novarum,
issued seventy years ago…

The norms and recommendations
contained therein were so momentous

that their memory will never
fall into oblivion”

John XXIII, Mater et Magistra
The papacy speaking.

“Pope Pius told us that the
encyclical Rerum Novarum was

instrumental in ending laissez-
faire capitalism in the twentieth

century by ushering in the era
of ‘effective interference by the

government’” Have you got this?
Let’s see how it ends up.

“Rerum Novarum…was the voice of
moral authority needed to ensure

the development of effective
interference by all governments in

the twentieth century.”
How many governments?

All. “Pius XI wrote: ‘It is not
surprising, therefore, that under

the teaching and guidance of the
Church, many learned priests and

laymen earnestly devoted themselves
to the problem of elaborating

social and economic science in
accordance with the conditions of

our age… …Under the guidance and
in light of Leo’s Encyclical [Rerum

Novarum] was thus evolved
a truly Christian social science,

which continues to be fostered and
enriched daily by the tireless labors”

all these peoples “labors”
now note carefully, of

“those picked men whom we have
named the auxiliaries of the Church…”

So everybody working in the
secret societies, the Opus Dei,

the this, the Knights of Malta, the
Knights of Columbus, all of these

people working “those picked
men to bring this about.”

“Nor were these the only blessings
which followed from the Encyclical.

The doctrine of Rerum Novarum
began little by little to penetrate

among those who, being outside
Catholic unity, do not recognize

the authority of the Church;
and these Catholic principles of

sociology gradually became part of
the intellectual heritage of the

whole human race…” Where are
we going? I’d like to know.

“… thus too, we rejoice that
the Catholic truths proclaimed so

vigorously by our illustrious
Predecessor [Leo XIII], are

advanced and advocated not merely
in non-Catholic books and journals,

but frequently also in legislative
assembles and in courts of justice”

“… ‘those picked men

whom we have named the auxiliaries
of the Church’ who have been

instrumental” this is John
Robbins writing, who are they?

“Under fascism, property owners
may keep their property titles and

deeds, but the use of their
property is, as Leo XIII wrote,

‘common’. Fascism is a form of
socialism that retains the forms

and trappings of capitalism,
but not its substance.”

This is basically what it boils down to.
“When we speak of the

reform of institutions, the State
comes chiefly to mind, not as if

universal well being were to
be expected from its activity.”

So now what is this state
going to do in all of this?

“The experiment with economic
freedom, Pius XI wrote, must end,

and economic life must again
be subjected to planning and

government.” Who wants to control
your economic life? Government.

John Paul II wrote in his
Sollicitudo Rei Socialis,

“On Social Concern” , “It is
necessary to state once more the

characteristic principle of
Christian social doctrine: the

goods of this world are meant for all.
Private property is under

‘social mortgage’.” These are the
things which will be controlled.

He wrote, “a faithful echo of
the centuries old tradition of the

Church regarding the
‘universal purpose of goods’…”

In today’s world, wrote the pope,
“We are… faced with a serious

problem of unequal distribution of
the means of subsistence originally

meant for everybody.’”
Then came liberation theology,

and Pius wrote an encyclical “On Atheistic Communism” and an age like ours,

when unusual misery has resulted.”
Who created the misery?

They created it so that they can
create the solution which they want.

So, in Africa they elevate a
few and suppress the masses.

Then they turn it round and they
create the situation that they want.

They create communism, they
create the chaos, out of the chaos

they create the social order which
they want. So the second reign of

terror was supported by the papacy.
“Father Camilo Tores, who was shot

in 1966, declared, ‘The Catholic
who is not a revolutionary is

living in Mortal sin’.”
Pope John Paul II wrote in 1968,

“The Church does not hesitate to
defend fearlessly the just and

noble cause of human rights and to
support courageous reforms, leading

to a better distribution of goods,
including earthly goods such as

education, health services,
housing, and so forth…”

Now we come to human rights, what
did we read about in the French

Revolution? What’s going to
be the standard of the world?

Human rights. You have a right
to property, you have a right to

anything that you have need of.
“… We are convinced that the

theology of liberation is not only
timely but useful and necessary.”

That’s what the Pope says, not
me, this is his words directly.

John Paul II, Letter to Brazilian
Bishops, “It should constitute a

new stage of the theological
reflection initiated with the

apostolic tradition” and then
he refers to “Rerum Novarum.”

Franklin Roosevelt, when he was
elected, he made Professor Ryan

part of his administration.
Now who was he?

Ryan wrote in 1931:
“The workers have a claim upon

industry for all the means of
living, from the time they begin to

work until they die. When industry
does not do it directly… then it is

the business of government
to enforce it upon industry”

O’Brien, Public Catholicism, 171.
See how it starts?

Right, now let’s look at
some of the human rights.

You have a right to freely founding
unions for working people.

You have a right to culture
A right to emigrate

A right to immigrate
A right to food

A right to clothing, a right to rest
A right to medical care

A right to a just wage
A right to life

A right to a safe environment
A right to personal

security of workers
A right to family life

A right to private property
(highly qualified of course)

A right to common use of all goods
(it’s just thereafter, so that means nothing)

A right to work
A right to a pension

A right to insurance for old age
A right of association

A right to security
A right to bodily integrity

A right to necessary social services
A right to strike

A right to choose a state of life freely
A right to found a family

A right to education
… employment

… good reputation
… respect

… appropriate information
A right for

the upright norm blah blah blah
… protection of privacy

Right to rightful freedom
… professional training

… quality education
Right to adequate health care.

Ah, it’s laborious. How do you control that?
How do you control it? If you are going to

control every aspect of that, then
you must control every aspect of a

person’s life, you will not be
able to go to the toilet in future

without making a triple
application to the Vatican.

They’re going to control every
single aspect of your lives, that’s

what they’re going to control.
And government is going to become

super huge. Now where’s the money
going to come from?

From you.

Now when the money comes from you,
what then happens to your wealth?

It gets less and less and less and
Less. That means the middle class

will disappear. How many classes
under Catholicism in the middle ages?

Two, there was a feudal class,
the goyem, and there was the upper

class who controlled everything.
Now, if we take employment--

in my country unemployment
was running at almost 50%,

in Germany it was running at
point something percent, and then

it went up to 2, 3, 5, 10, 20%;
now, unemployment is rife in

Europe, why? Because all the east
block countries are now being

incorporated into Europe and there
must be redistribution of wealth.

And so, it’s coming down
down, down, down, down.

The recent surveys don’t
ask where you live, they say

“how many rooms have you got, how
many people live there, how many

this, how many that?” When did
they do that and in what country?

In Communism, and what happened if
your house was bigger than your need?

The one who had the need got it,
but who has to pay for it?

You, because you own it.
It’s even worse now than in

Communism right? So they came
to our country, now you have to

register in each individual location.
And you may not vote

outside your location so that they have
your location attached to your name.

And then they came to my house
and they said they want to

know what is my religion. I said,
“I’m a Christian.” They said,

“which denomination are you?”
I said, “it’s none of your business.”

They said, “It is my business.
Which denomination are you?”

I said, “it’s none
of your business.”

“How many rooms have you got?”
I said “enough.”

“We want to know exactly how
many rooms you have.”

I said “I have enough.”
“Well we want to know exactly.”

“It’s got nothing to do with you,
why do you want to know exactly,

I could have another one next week,
or I could put a wall in,

I could have two right?
So it’s none of your business.”

You get into big trouble if
you answer questions like that.

You’re not supposed to do that.
“Therefore, there must be made

available to all men everything
necessary for leading a life truly human.”

Did you know that living life
truly human is the Catholic

acronym for salvation?
And I will prove this to you in a

future lecture where they say,
“to be saved means to live a life

truly human.” That means the
kingdom of God, for Catholicism, is

the kingdom of Catholicism ruling
the world on this earth and giving

everyone the capacity to
live a life truly human.

That means enough to take care of
your basic needs and nothing else.

Do you like the New World order?
Do you like it?

Do you know what? The Bible
calls him the man of sin.

Now there’s another word for the
redistribution of wealth and I’ve

given it to you already, what is it?
It’s called theft.

That’s right. The Bible says,
“thou shalt not steal.”

That means thou shalt not take
from one who has and give it to

someone else. That’s called theft,
that’s breaking the commandments of

God. Is that correct? Yes, we
will see that this system of Human

Rights breaks every single
commandment of God as we go along.

When God distributed land to
Israel, how was it distributed?

As an eternal inheritance, it was
your land. Ahab wanted Naboth’s

vineyard, and Naboth said to him,
“I will not sin against the Lord my

God because this land has
been given to me as an eternal

inheritance, and to my children.
God gives each one a piece that is his.

They take it and distribute it according
to need, but you pay the bill, fascinating.

“The complex circumstance
of our day make it

necessary for public authority to
intervene more often in social,

economic and cultural matters…”
The Second Vatican Council, that’s

what it said. So they’re going to
intervene at every level of your life.

“Lob von Gorbatschow fuer den Papst”
Gorbachev praises the Pope,

and he says, “the Pope is right in
his demand for a New World Order.”

In 1991 the San Francisco
Chronicle already said,

“Pope calls for a New World Order.
Albert Einstein says:

“Mankind’s desire for peace can be
realized only by the creation of a

world government…with all my heart
I believe that the world’s present

system of sovereign nations can
only lead to barbarism, war, and

inhumanity, and that only law can
assure progress toward a civilized

peaceful humanity”

Interesting statement Albert Einstein.
What did a – or he also

states – he says, “There is no
salvation for civilization, or even

the human race, other than the
creation of a world government.”

That was Albert Einstein.
What did U. Thant, Former Secretary

General of the United Nations say?
He said, “World federalists hold

before us the vision of a unified
mankind living peace under a just

world order… The heart of their
program – a world under law – is

realistic and attainable.”
What did Mortimer Adler say?

“World peace is impossible
without world government.”

Winston Churchill, these are big
names, I’m not talking about small fry.

“The creation of an
authoritative world order is the

ultimate aim toward which we
must strive.” Charles De Gaulle:

“Nations must unite in a
world government or perish.”

How do you do that? How about
creating so much conflict that

everybody will be willing to
give up their sovereignty.

Do you know what? In South Africa
I give these lectures to the public.

The people are in despair. They are
being robbed, driven off their land;

they are being murdered, our
houses look like prisons. We cannot

go to sleep without locking everything.
In my very own little

block, we’ve had murder after
murder after murder, and robberies,

aggravating robberies, and
nothing seems to happen.

Police don’t even care, they don’t
even come out, because there is so

much turmoil all over the place
that it cannot – they cannot even

cope with it. So who cares about
your little problem that you’ve

just lost everything. Take it to
the insurance and see if you can

get it back. Irrespective of the pain.
They come in, they move in,

they take all your private
papers, they burn them.

You have no record of your life,
everything’s gone, they sell the

furniture they don’t want and the
rest they keep for themselves and say

“get lost. It’s now
time for redistribution.

You had land before, now it’s
my land, that’s how it goes.”

This is the New World Order,
welcome to the New World Order.

Bertrand Russell: “… the only
possibilities are now world

government or death.”
The Humanist Manifesto II urges us

“to move toward the building
of a word community…”

Robert Muller, former Assistant
Secretary General of the United

Nations, said: “We must move as
quickly as possible to a one-world

government; a one-world religion;
under a one-world leader.”

I wonder who that is going to be.
These are big big names that I’m

putting on the screen, these
aren’t speculators here and there.

I’m often accused for speculating.
Well the biggest speculators are

these people themselves.
Now what about this man?

We saw how peace and unity
was to come about.

Man: “It was great, a great feeling,
it was a great feeling of excitement -”

“of peace, unity” “of love, peace
love and unity,” “unity, unity, yes.”

Choir leader: “All nations will come,
and worship before you oh Lord,

and worship before you oh Lord.
Music Playing: “Let thy kingdom come...”

Men’s choir: “and all the
world is gathering…”

Choir: "And all the
world in every corner..”

Veith: Pope calls for a New
World Order, CNN, Thursday,

January 1, 2004. He made his whole
New Year’s speech revolve around

the New World Order. I want to tell
you today that the New World Order

is intended not just to unite the
nations which God had separated,

that’s one aspect. But to eradicate
Protestantism off the face of the earth.

And particularly that form of
Protestantism which refuses to

bow to the Papal Caesar, that form
of Protestantism will have to go;

and we will see that under the
circumstances that will be created,

these conditions are all in place
right now. It is all there, and I

will put it on the screen for you,
so don’t miss the next lectures.

Now we’re getting into hot
Territory. I’ll put the quotes on

the screen where they will tell you who
the problem children are going to be.

And don’t think it’s Islam, it’s
someone else. Don’t miss the

next exciting episodes.
But before I go I would like to

remind you that Jesus said
that this was going to happen.

And if I know, and if I understand
with my whole mind and with my

whole heart, that Satan – because
the dragon gave him his power and

great authority – is setting up
his kingdom here upon this earth.

Then instead of becoming
disillusioned, frightened,

hysterical; I know that the time
must be very short, isn’t that right?

And I know that the Lord
must be coming very soon.

So as far as I’m concerned, I have
distanced myself from my property.

If I literally had to come home
next week and found my wife

somewhere in another little room,
and my house occupied by whomever,

then I will say, “tough cheese,
it’s going to blow up anyway, who

Cares. It’s going to be destroyed
when the Lord comes by the

brightness of his coming, why not
take it now, have fun while you

can, and I’ll move on somewhere
else. I don’t mind building a tree

house for a little while;
that should be ok.

If they take my cars, well that’s
ok too, we’ll get another one and

if we can’t afford another one
we’ll we’ll walk, who cares?

I really don’t care anymore.
But people who are losing things

become desperate, and what do they do?
They commit suicide. By the thousands,

people are committing suicide.
If they understand this

message, and they understand
where we are going, would they then

commit suicide?
No, they gather hope. They say,

“wow, so we’re part of
a big exciting end game,”

and this is exactly what is
happening, people are getting hope.

And they’re giving their lives to
the Lord Jesus Christ, and they are

saying, “Lord save me, not only
from my sin, but save me from this

World. I am longing for your kingdom.”
Do you know what the

government policy is in the kingdom
of God? I’ve already told you.

Everyone in the kingdom of God gets a
dwelling place in the city built by whom?

By God, and it has your name
on it, did you know that?

You have a city dwelling.
In the New World what happens?

God says, “No longer will they build
houses and others live in them.”

So what are you going to do?
“They will build houses,”

says the Bible, “and they
will plant vineyards.” And,

“no longer will you plant
vineyards and others eat of them,”

what does that mean? That means
you will have a country dwelling

where you will have a farm, which
God will bless, and who does it

belong to? To you, for how long?
For ever. For ever and ever and

ever and ever. That’s God’s policy.
So who cares about what they’re

going to do? Who cares?
And eye has not seen nor ear has

heard the wonders that God has
prepared for them that love Him.

That does not just include the
glory of seeing our King in heaven,

it includes everything that
goes into making life pleasant.

And the new kingdom is worthy of
waiting for, really, I look forward

to the new kingdom of God.
It’ll be a great place, and we

will unfortunately see this
world go from bad to worse.

And I don’t want to lie to you
and say it’s going to get better.

I’m going to tell you it’s going
to get worse, very much worse.

What happened in the French
Revolution is the forerunner of

what will happen in the entire world.
There will be anarchy like

you cannot believe, but if you are
under the protection of the Most

High, nothing will happen to you.
So why not accept Him, why not say

“Lord Jesus I want you to be my
personal Saviour.” Why not say

“Lord, clean up my life, let’s walk
together, because your government

is the only one worth having.”
And imagine looking in His face

and saying, “wow, this is my God,
I’ve waited for Him, He will save me.