Problem connecting to Twitter. Please try again.
Problem connecting to Twitter. Please try again.
Problem connecting to Twitter. Please try again.
Problem connecting to Twitter. Please try again.
Problem connecting to Twitter. Please try again.
Capitalism will eat democracy -- unless we speak up
-
0:02 - 0:03Democracy.
-
0:03 - 0:05In the West,
-
0:05 - 0:08we make a colossal mistake
taking it for granted. -
0:08 - 0:10We see democracy
-
0:10 - 0:14not as the most fragile
of flowers that it really is, -
0:14 - 0:18but we see it as part
of our society's furniture. -
0:18 - 0:22We tend to think of it
as any transient given. -
0:23 - 0:28We mistakenly believe that capitalism
begets inevitably, democracy. -
0:28 - 0:30It doesn't.
-
0:30 - 0:34Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew
and his great imitators in Beijing -
0:34 - 0:37have demonstrated
beyond reasonable doubt -
0:37 - 0:41that it is perfectly possible
to have flourishing capitalism, -
0:41 - 0:43spectacular growth,
-
0:43 - 0:46while politics remain democracy free.
-
0:46 - 0:51Indeed, democracy is receding
in our neck of the woods. -
0:51 - 0:52Here in Europe.
-
0:52 - 0:56Earlier this year while I was
representing Greece -- -
0:56 - 0:58the newly elected Greek government --
-
0:58 - 1:01in the Eurogroup as its Finance Minister,
-
1:01 - 1:06I was told in certain terms
that our nation's democratic process -- -
1:06 - 1:08our elections --
-
1:08 - 1:10could not be allowed to interfere
-
1:10 - 1:13with economic policies that were being
implemented in Greece. -
1:13 - 1:14At that moment,
-
1:14 - 1:19I felt that there could be no greater
vindication of Lee Kuan Yew, -
1:19 - 1:21of the Chinese Communist Party,
-
1:21 - 1:24indeed of some recalcitrant
friends of mine who kept telling me -
1:24 - 1:29that democracy would be banned
if it ever threatened to change anything. -
1:30 - 1:33Tonight, here, I want to present to you
-
1:33 - 1:36an economic case
for an authentic democracy. -
1:37 - 1:42I want to ask you to join me
in believing again -
1:42 - 1:45that Lee Kuan Yew ...
-
1:45 - 1:46the Chinese Communist Party,
-
1:46 - 1:48and indeed the Eurogroup,
-
1:48 - 1:51are wrong in believing that we
can dispense with democracy. -
1:52 - 1:55That we need an authentic,
boisterous democracy, -
1:55 - 1:59and without democracy,
-
1:59 - 2:01our societies will be nastier,
-
2:01 - 2:04our future bleak,
-
2:04 - 2:06and our great, new technologies wasted.
-
2:06 - 2:08Speaking of waste,
-
2:08 - 2:10allow me to point out
an interesting paradox -
2:10 - 2:13that is threatening our
economies as we speak. -
2:13 - 2:16I call it the twin peaks paradox.
-
2:16 - 2:17One peak you understand --
-
2:17 - 2:19you know it, you recognize it --
-
2:19 - 2:20is the mountain of debts
-
2:20 - 2:25that has been casting a long shadow
over the United States, -
2:25 - 2:26Europe,
-
2:26 - 2:27the whole world.
-
2:27 - 2:29We all recognize the mountain of debts.
-
2:29 - 2:33But few people discern its twin.
-
2:34 - 2:37A mountain of idle cash
-
2:37 - 2:41belonging to rich savers
and to corporations, -
2:41 - 2:44too terrified to invest it
-
2:44 - 2:47into the productive activities
that can generate the incomes -
2:47 - 2:50from which you can extinguish
the mountain of debts -
2:50 - 2:54and which can produce all those things
that humanity desperately needs, -
2:54 - 2:56like green energy.
-
2:56 - 2:58Now let me give you two numbers.
-
2:58 - 3:00Over the last three months,
-
3:00 - 3:02in the United States, in Britain
and in the Eurozone, -
3:02 - 3:07we have invested, collectively
3.4 trillion dollars -
3:07 - 3:10on all the wealth-producing goods.
-
3:10 - 3:13Things like industrial plants, machinery,
-
3:13 - 3:15office blocks, schools,
-
3:15 - 3:18roads, railways, machinery,
and so on and so forth ... -
3:18 - 3:213.4 trillion sounds like a lot of money
-
3:21 - 3:25until you compare it to the 5.1 trillion
-
3:25 - 3:28that has been slushing around
in the same countries, -
3:28 - 3:29in our financial institutions,
-
3:29 - 3:34doing absolutely nothing
during the same period ... -
3:34 - 3:38except inflating stock exchanges
and driving up house prices. -
3:39 - 3:44So a mountain of debt
and a mountain of idle cash -
3:44 - 3:48form twin peaks failing
to cancel each other out -
3:48 - 3:50through the normal
operation of the markets. -
3:50 - 3:54The result is stagnant wages,
-
3:54 - 3:59more than a quarter of 25 to 54-year-olds
in America, in Japan and in Europe -
3:59 - 4:01out of work.
-
4:01 - 4:03And consequently, low aggregate demand,
-
4:03 - 4:05which in a never-ending cycle,
-
4:05 - 4:09reinforces the pessimism of the investors,
-
4:09 - 4:13who fearing low demand,
reproduce it by not investing. -
4:13 - 4:16Exactly like Oedipus' father,
-
4:16 - 4:18who terrified by
the prophecy of the oracle -
4:18 - 4:21that his son would grow up to kill him,
-
4:21 - 4:23unwittingly engineered the conditions
-
4:23 - 4:27that insured that Oedipus,
his son, would kill him. -
4:27 - 4:29This is my quarrel with capitalism.
-
4:29 - 4:32Its gross wastefulness,
-
4:32 - 4:33all this idle cash,
-
4:33 - 4:37should be energized to improve lives,
-
4:37 - 4:39to develop human talents,
-
4:39 - 4:42and indeed to finance
all these technologies -- -
4:42 - 4:43green technologies --
-
4:43 - 4:46which are absolutely essential
for saving planet Earth. -
4:47 - 4:50Am I right in believing
that democracy might be the answer? -
4:50 - 4:51I believe so,
-
4:51 - 4:53but before we move on,
-
4:53 - 4:55what do we mean by democracy?
-
4:55 - 4:57Aristotle defined democracy
-
4:57 - 5:02as the constitution in which
the free and the poor, -
5:02 - 5:04being in the majority,
-
5:04 - 5:05control government.
-
5:05 - 5:09Now of course Athenian democracy
excluded too many. -
5:09 - 5:12Women, migrants and of course, the slaves.
-
5:12 - 5:13But it would be a mistake
-
5:13 - 5:17to dismiss the significance
of ancient Athenian democracy -
5:17 - 5:19on the basis of whom it excluded.
-
5:20 - 5:21What was more pertinent,
-
5:21 - 5:25and continues to be so
about ancient Athenian democracy, -
5:25 - 5:29was the inclusion of the working poor,
-
5:29 - 5:33who not only acquired
the right to free speech, -
5:33 - 5:35but more importantly --
-
5:35 - 5:36crucially --
-
5:36 - 5:38they acquired the rights
to political judgements -
5:38 - 5:41that were afforded equal weight
-
5:41 - 5:44in the decision-making
concerning matters of state. -
5:44 - 5:47Now of course, Athenian
democracy didn't last long. -
5:47 - 5:52Like a candle that burns brightly,
it burned out quickly. -
5:52 - 5:53And indeed,
-
5:53 - 5:57our liberal democracies today
do not have their roots in ancient Athens. -
5:57 - 6:00They have their roots in the Magna Carta,
-
6:00 - 6:03in the 1688 Glorious Revolution,
-
6:03 - 6:05indeed in the American constitution.
-
6:05 - 6:10Whereas Athenian democracy
was focusing on the masterless citizen -
6:10 - 6:14and empowering the working poor,
-
6:14 - 6:18our liberal democracies are founded
on the Magna Carta tradition, -
6:18 - 6:21which was, after all
a charter for masters. -
6:21 - 6:25And indeed, liberal democracy
only surfaced when it was possible -
6:25 - 6:29to separate fully the political sphere
from the economic sphere, -
6:29 - 6:34so as to confine the democratic process
fully in the political sphere, -
6:34 - 6:36leaving the economic sphere --
-
6:36 - 6:38the corporate world, if you want --
-
6:38 - 6:41as a democracy-free zone.
-
6:42 - 6:45Now in our democracies today,
-
6:45 - 6:48this separation of the economic
from the political sphere, -
6:48 - 6:51the moment it started happening,
-
6:51 - 6:55it gave rise to an inexorable,
epic struggle between the two, -
6:55 - 6:58with the economic sphere
colonizing the political sphere, -
6:58 - 7:00eating into its power.
-
7:01 - 7:05Have you wondered why politicians
are not what they used to be? -
7:05 - 7:08It's not because their DNA
has degenerated -- -
7:08 - 7:09(Laughter)
-
7:09 - 7:13It is rather because one can be
in government today and not in power. -
7:13 - 7:17Because power has migrated
from the political to the economic sphere, -
7:17 - 7:19which is separate.
-
7:20 - 7:21Indeed --
-
7:21 - 7:23I spoke about my
quarrel with capitalism -- -
7:23 - 7:25If you think about it,
-
7:25 - 7:29it is a little bit like
a population of predators, -
7:29 - 7:35that are so successful in decimating
the prey that they must feed on, -
7:35 - 7:37that in the end they starve.
-
7:37 - 7:38Similarly,
-
7:38 - 7:42the economic sphere has been colonizing
and cannibalizing the political sphere -
7:42 - 7:45to such an extent that it is
undermining itself, -
7:45 - 7:47causing economic crisis.
-
7:47 - 7:49Corporate power is increasing,
-
7:49 - 7:51political goods are devaluing,
-
7:51 - 7:53inequality is rising,
-
7:53 - 7:55aggregate amount is falling,
-
7:55 - 8:01and CEO's of corporations are too scared
to invest the cash of their corporations. -
8:02 - 8:08So the more capitalism succeeds in taking
the demos out of democracy, -
8:08 - 8:10the taller the twin peaks
-
8:10 - 8:13and the greater the waste
of human resources, -
8:13 - 8:15and humanity's wealth.
-
8:16 - 8:19Clearly, if this is right,
-
8:19 - 8:22we must reunite the political
and economic spheres -
8:22 - 8:25and better do it with a demos
being in control, -
8:25 - 8:28like in ancient Athens
except without the slaves -
8:28 - 8:31or the exclusion
of women and migrants. -
8:32 - 8:34Now this is not an original idea.
-
8:34 - 8:37The Marxist left had
that idea 100 years ago -
8:37 - 8:39and it didn't go very well, did it?
-
8:39 - 8:43The lesson that we learned
from the Soviet debacle -
8:43 - 8:49is that only by a miracle
will the working poor be re-empowered, -
8:49 - 8:51as they were in ancient Athens,
-
8:51 - 8:55without creating new forms
of brutality and waste. -
8:55 - 8:57But there is a solution.
-
8:57 - 8:59Eliminate the working poor.
-
9:00 - 9:01Capitalism's doing it
-
9:01 - 9:06by replacing low-wage workers
with automata, androids, robots. -
9:07 - 9:08The problem is
-
9:08 - 9:12that as long as the economic and
the political spheres are separate, -
9:12 - 9:17automation makes the twin peaks taller,
-
9:17 - 9:19the waste loftier,
-
9:19 - 9:21and the social conflicts deeper,
-
9:21 - 9:23including --
-
9:23 - 9:24soon, I believe --
-
9:24 - 9:26in places like China.
-
9:27 - 9:29So we need to reconfigure,
-
9:29 - 9:33we need to reunite the economic
and the political spheres, -
9:33 - 9:38but we'd better do it
by democratizing the reunified sphere, -
9:38 - 9:44lest you end up with
a surveillance-mad, hyper-autocracy -
9:44 - 9:48that makes The Matrix, the movie,
look like a documentary. -
9:49 - 9:50(Laughter)
-
9:50 - 9:53So the question is not whether
capitalism will survive -
9:53 - 9:56the technological innovations
of this moment. -
9:56 - 9:58The more interesting question
-
9:58 - 10:04is whether capitalism will be succeeded
by something resembling a Matrix dystopia -
10:04 - 10:08or something much closer
to a Star Trek-like society, -
10:08 - 10:11where machines serve the humans
-
10:11 - 10:15and the humans expend their energies
exploring the universe -
10:15 - 10:19and indulging in long debates
about the meaning of life -
10:19 - 10:23in some ancient, Athenian-like,
high tech Agora. -
10:25 - 10:28I think we can afford to be optimistic.
-
10:30 - 10:31But what would it take --
-
10:31 - 10:33what would it look like --
-
10:33 - 10:38to have this Star Trek-like utopia,
instead of the Matrix-like dystopia? -
10:39 - 10:40In practical terms,
-
10:40 - 10:42allow me to share just briefly,
-
10:42 - 10:43a couple of examples.
-
10:43 - 10:45At the level of the enterprise,
-
10:45 - 10:47imagine a capital market,
-
10:47 - 10:51where you earn capital as you work,
-
10:51 - 10:56and where your capital follows you
from one job to another, -
10:56 - 10:58from one company to another,
-
10:58 - 10:59and the company --
-
10:59 - 11:03whichever one you happen
to work at at that time -- -
11:03 - 11:07is solely owned by those who happen
to work in it at that moment. -
11:08 - 11:12Then all income stems
from capital, from profits, -
11:12 - 11:16and the very concept
of wage labor becomes obsolete. -
11:17 - 11:23No more separation between those
who own but do not work in the company, -
11:23 - 11:27and those who work
but do not own the company. -
11:27 - 11:30No more tug-of-war
between capital and labor. -
11:31 - 11:35No great gap between
investment and saving. -
11:35 - 11:38Indeed, no towering twin peaks.
-
11:39 - 11:41At the level of a global
political economy, -
11:41 - 11:43imagine for a moment
-
11:43 - 11:48that our national currencies
have a free-floating exchange rate, -
11:48 - 11:52with a universal, global,
digital currency. -
11:52 - 11:56One that is issued by
the International Monetary Fund, -
11:56 - 11:57the G-20,
-
11:57 - 12:00on behalf of all humanity.
-
12:00 - 12:01And imagine further,
-
12:01 - 12:05that all international trade
is denominated in this currency -- -
12:05 - 12:07let's call it "the cosmos" --
-
12:07 - 12:09in units of cosmos,
-
12:10 - 12:14with every government agreeing
to be paying into a common fund -
12:14 - 12:20a sum of cosmos units proportional
to the country's trade deficit, -
12:20 - 12:24or indeed to a country's trade surplus.
-
12:24 - 12:29And imagine that that fund is utilized
to invest in green technologies, -
12:29 - 12:34especially in parts of the world
where investment funding is scarce. -
12:35 - 12:37This is not a new idea.
-
12:37 - 12:40It's what, effectively,
John Maynard Keyes proposed -
12:40 - 12:44in 1944 at the Bretton Woods Conference.
-
12:44 - 12:46The problem is
-
12:46 - 12:49that back then, they didn't have
the technology to implement it. -
12:49 - 12:50Now we do.
-
12:50 - 12:56Especially in the context of a reunified
political economic sphere. -
12:57 - 12:59The world that I am describing to you
-
12:59 - 13:02is simultaneously libertarian,
-
13:02 - 13:06in that it prioritizes
empowered individuals, -
13:06 - 13:07Marxist,
-
13:07 - 13:11since it will have [confined?]
through the [dusting?] of history -
13:11 - 13:14the division between capital and labor,
-
13:14 - 13:16and Keynesian ...
-
13:16 - 13:18global Keynesian.
-
13:19 - 13:20But above all else,
-
13:20 - 13:22it is a world in which
-
13:22 - 13:26we will be able to imagine
an authentic democracy. -
13:26 - 13:29Will such a world dawn?
-
13:29 - 13:33Or shall we descend
into a Matrix-like dystopia? -
13:33 - 13:37The answer lies in the political choice
that we shall be making collectively. -
13:38 - 13:40It is our choice,
-
13:40 - 13:42and we'd better make it democratically.
-
13:43 - 13:44Thank you.
-
13:44 - 13:45(Applause)
-
13:50 - 13:51Bruno Giussani: Yanis ...
-
13:52 - 13:56It was you who described yourself
in your bios as a libertarian Marxist ... -
13:59 - 14:02what is the relevance
of Marx's analysis today? -
14:02 - 14:06YV: Well if there was any relevance
in what I just said then Marx is relevant. -
14:06 - 14:10Because the whole point of reunifying
the political and economic is -- -
14:10 - 14:12if we don't do it,
-
14:12 - 14:14then technological innovation
is going to create -
14:14 - 14:16such a massive fall in aggregate.
-
14:16 - 14:20What Larry Summers
refers to as secular stagnation. -
14:21 - 14:24With this crisis migrating
from one part of the world, -
14:24 - 14:26as it is now,
-
14:26 - 14:28that it will destabilize
not only our democracies, -
14:28 - 14:32but even the [emerging?] world that is not
that keen on liberal democracy. -
14:32 - 14:36So if this analysis holds water,
then Marx is absolutely relevant. -
14:36 - 14:38But so is [Hagen?] --
-
14:38 - 14:40that's why I'm a libertarian Marxist,
-
14:40 - 14:41and so is Keynes,
-
14:41 - 14:43so that's why I'm totally confused.
-
14:43 - 14:44(Laughter)
-
14:44 - 14:47BG: Indeed, and possibly we are too, now.
-
14:47 - 14:48(Laughter)
-
14:48 - 14:49(Applause)
-
14:50 - 14:52YV: If you are not confused,
you are not thinking, okay? -
14:52 - 14:55BG: That's a very, very Greek
philosopher kind of thing to say -- -
14:55 - 14:57YV: That's more Einstein, actually --
-
14:57 - 15:00BG: During your talk you mentioned
Singapore and China, -
15:00 - 15:02and yesterday night at the speaker dinner,
-
15:02 - 15:06you expressed a pretty strong opinion
about how the West looks at China. -
15:07 - 15:09Would you like to share that?
-
15:09 - 15:11YV: Well there's a great
degree of hypocrisy. -
15:12 - 15:16In our liberal democracies we have
a semblance of democracy. -
15:16 - 15:17It's because we have confined,
-
15:17 - 15:19as I was saying in my talk,
-
15:19 - 15:20democracy to the political sphere,
-
15:20 - 15:24while leaving the one sphere
where all the action is -- -
15:24 - 15:25the economic sphere --
-
15:25 - 15:28a completely democracy-free zone.
-
15:28 - 15:29In a sense,
-
15:29 - 15:32if I am allowed to be provocative ...
-
15:32 - 15:36China today is closer to Britain
in the 19th century, -
15:36 - 15:38because remember,
-
15:38 - 15:40we tend to associate
liberalism with democracy -- -
15:40 - 15:42that's a mistake, historically.
-
15:42 - 15:43Liberalism -- liberal --
-
15:43 - 15:44it's like John Stuart Mill.
-
15:44 - 15:49John Stuart Mill was particularly
skeptical about the democratic process. -
15:49 - 15:55So what you are seeing now in China
is a very similar process -
15:55 - 15:58to the one that we had in Britain
during the Industrial Revolution, -
15:58 - 16:00especially the transition
from the first to the second. -
16:01 - 16:04And to be castigating China
-
16:04 - 16:07for doing that which the West did
in the 19th century, -
16:07 - 16:09smacks of hypocrisy.
-
16:10 - 16:11BG: I am sure that many people here
-
16:11 - 16:14are wondering about your experience
-
16:14 - 16:16as the Finance Minister of Greece
earlier this year -- -
16:16 - 16:18YV: I knew this was coming --
-
16:18 - 16:19BG: Yes --
-
16:19 - 16:20(Laughter)
-
16:20 - 16:21BG: Six months after,
-
16:21 - 16:23how do you look back
at the first half of the year? -
16:24 - 16:27YV: Extremely exciting
from a personal point of view -
16:27 - 16:28and very disappointing,
-
16:28 - 16:32because we had an opportunity
to reboot the Eurozone. -
16:32 - 16:34Not just Greece, the Eurozone.
-
16:34 - 16:37To move away from the complacency
-
16:37 - 16:39and the constant denial
that there was a massive -- -
16:39 - 16:41and there is a massive --
-
16:41 - 16:45architectural fault line
going through the Eurozone, -
16:45 - 16:47which is threatening, massively,
-
16:47 - 16:49the whole of the European Union process.
-
16:49 - 16:52We had the opportunity
on the basis of the Greek program -- -
16:52 - 16:54which by the way,
-
16:54 - 16:58was the first program
to manifest that denial -- -
16:58 - 16:59to put it right.
-
16:59 - 17:00And unfortunately,
-
17:00 - 17:02the powers that be in the Eurozone,
-
17:02 - 17:04in the Eurogroup,
-
17:04 - 17:06chose to maintain denial.
-
17:06 - 17:08But you know what happens.
-
17:08 - 17:10This is the experience
of the Soviet Union. -
17:10 - 17:12When you try to keep alive
-
17:12 - 17:17an economic system
that architecturally cannot survive, -
17:17 - 17:20through political will
and through authoritarianism, -
17:20 - 17:21you may succeed in prolonging it,
-
17:21 - 17:22but when change happens
-
17:22 - 17:25it happens very abruptly
and catastrophically. -
17:25 - 17:27BG: What kind of change
are you foreseeing? -
17:27 - 17:28YV: Well there's no doubt
-
17:28 - 17:31that if we don't change
the architecture of the Eurozone, -
17:31 - 17:33the Eurozone has no future.
-
17:33 - 17:36BG: Did you make any mistakes
when you were Finance Minister? -
17:36 - 17:37YV: Every day.
-
17:37 - 17:38(Laughter)
-
17:38 - 17:40Anybody who looks back --
-
17:40 - 17:41(Applause)
-
17:44 - 17:46No but seriously.
-
17:46 - 17:48If there's any Minister of Finance,
-
17:48 - 17:50or of anything else for that matter,
-
17:50 - 17:52who tells you after six months in a job,
-
17:52 - 17:55especially in such a stressful situation,
-
17:55 - 17:57that they made no mistake,
-
17:57 - 17:58[they're dangerous people],
-
17:58 - 17:59of course I made mistakes.
-
17:59 - 18:00The greatest mistake
-
18:00 - 18:04was to sign the application
for the extension of a loan agreement -
18:04 - 18:06in the end of February.
-
18:06 - 18:07I was imagining
-
18:07 - 18:10that there was a genuine interest
on the side of the creditors -
18:10 - 18:11to find common ground.
-
18:11 - 18:12And there wasn't.
-
18:12 - 18:15They were simply interested
in crushing our government, -
18:15 - 18:16just because they did not want
-
18:16 - 18:20to have to deal with
the architectural fault lines -
18:20 - 18:22that were running through the Eurozone.
-
18:22 - 18:24And because they didn't want to admit
-
18:24 - 18:27that for five years they were implementing
a catastrophic problem in Greece. -
18:27 - 18:30We lost one-third of our Nominal GDP.
-
18:30 - 18:32This is worse than the Great Depression.
-
18:32 - 18:34And no one has come clean
-
18:34 - 18:37from the tribe of lenders
that has been imposing this policy -
18:37 - 18:40to say, "this was a colossal mistake."
-
18:40 - 18:41BG: Despite all this,
-
18:41 - 18:43and despite the aggressiveness
of the discussion, -
18:43 - 18:45you seem to remaining
quite pro-European. -
18:45 - 18:47YV: Absolutely.
-
18:47 - 18:51Look, my criticism of the European
Union and the Eurozone -
18:51 - 18:55comes from a person
who lives and breathes Europe. -
18:56 - 19:00My greatest fear is that
the Eurozone will not survive. -
19:00 - 19:01Because if it doesn't,
-
19:01 - 19:04the centrifugal forces
that would be unleashed -
19:04 - 19:06would be [demonic],
-
19:06 - 19:08and they would destroy the European Union.
-
19:08 - 19:10And that would be catastrophic
not just for Europe -
19:10 - 19:12but for the whole global economy.
-
19:12 - 19:15We are probably the largest
economy in the world. -
19:16 - 19:18And if we allow ourselves
-
19:18 - 19:20to fall into a [route?]
of the post-modern 1930's, -
19:20 - 19:23which seems to me to be what we are doing,
-
19:23 - 19:25then that will be detrimental
-
19:25 - 19:28to the future of Europeans
and non-Europeans alike. -
19:28 - 19:31BG: We definitely hope
you are wrong on that point. -
19:31 - 19:32Yanis, thank you for coming to TED.
-
19:32 - 19:33YV: Thank you
-
19:33 - 19:36(Applause)
- Title:
- Capitalism will eat democracy -- unless we speak up
- Speaker:
- Yanis Varoufakis
- Description:
-
- Video Language:
- English
- Team:
- closed TED
- Project:
- TEDTalks
- Duration:
- 19:51
Brian Greene edited English subtitles for Capitalism will eat democracy -- unless we speak up | ||
Brian Greene edited English subtitles for Capitalism will eat democracy -- unless we speak up | ||
Brian Greene edited English subtitles for Capitalism will eat democracy -- unless we speak up | ||
Brian Greene edited English subtitles for Capitalism will eat democracy -- unless we speak up | ||
Brian Greene approved English subtitles for Capitalism will eat democracy -- unless we speak up | ||
Brian Greene edited English subtitles for Capitalism will eat democracy -- unless we speak up | ||
Brian Greene edited English subtitles for Capitalism will eat democracy -- unless we speak up | ||
Brian Greene edited English subtitles for Capitalism will eat democracy -- unless we speak up |
English subtitles
Revisions Compare revisions
-
Revision 14 EditedBrian Greene
-
Revision 13 EditedBrian Greene
-
Revision 12 EditedBrian Greene
-
Revision 11 EditedBrian Greene
-
Revision 10 EditedBrian Greene
-
Revision 9 EditedBrian Greene
-
Revision 8 EditedJoanna Pietrulewicz
-
Revision 7 UploadedJoanna Pietrulewicz
-
Revision 6 EditedLeslie Gauthier
-
Revision 5 EditedLeslie Gauthier
-
Revision 4 EditedLeslie Gauthier
-
Revision 3 EditedLeslie Gauthier
-
Revision 2 EditedLeslie Gauthier
-
Amara Bot