-
Not Synced
Khuda se Mutaliq Sawalat aur Ilm
al Kalam ka Jawab - PART 2
-
Not Synced
by Jawed Ahmad Ghamidi
-
Not Synced
[Hassan Ilyas] Yesterday, I asked you a
question related to hypothetical statements
-
Not Synced
that we use in relation to Allah,
nauzubillah (I seek refuge with Allah)
-
Not Synced
That Allah can lie, or he can make a rock
which even he can lift.
-
Not Synced
You detailed out your views on these
kind of discussions.
-
Not Synced
There is a relative aspect and doubt, I
want you to explain us in detail.
-
Not Synced
When you are in a discussion related to
the existence of God,
-
Not Synced
the argument behind confirmation for
God's being,
-
Not Synced
or the various aspects of atheism or
agnosticism that are put forward.
-
Not Synced
It is said that you logically conclude
the arguments with intellectual evidence.
-
Not Synced
And the other party to the discussion is
puzzled with your style.
-
Not Synced
My question to you today is that,
Even you include these
-
Not Synced
intellectual evidences and arguments in
your discussions,
-
Not Synced
People often say that a conversation
with Ghamidi Sahib is very rational,
-
Not Synced
logical, enlightened and intellectual.
-
Not Synced
So, even your paradigm answers
these modern suspicion or doubt
-
Not Synced
by way of intellectual and logical
arguments.
-
Not Synced
Then what about simple and inherent
arguments given by the Quran
-
Not Synced
as you often say?
-
Not Synced
[Javed Ahmad Ghamidi] Don't you consider
the inherent arguments given
-
Not Synced
by the Quran as logical?
-
Not Synced
What I had earlier mentioned was that,
things that evolve from a specific
-
Not Synced
philosophical or logical background and
people present these questions just to
-
Not Synced
? of the religion.
