Khuda se Mutaliq Sawalat aur Ilm 
al Kalam ka Jawab - PART 2

by Jawed Ahmad Ghamidi

[Hassan Ilyas] Yesterday, I asked you a 
question related to hypothetical statements

that we use in relation to Allah, 
nauzubillah (I seek refuge with Allah)

That Allah can lie, or he can make a rock
which even he can lift.

You detailed out your views on these 
kind of discussions.

There is a relative aspect and doubt, I 
want you to explain us in detail.

When you are in a discussion related to
the existence of God,

the argument behind confirmation for 
God's being,

or the various aspects of atheism or 
agnosticism that are put forward.

It is said that you logically conclude 
the arguments with intellectual evidence.

And the other party to the discussion is
puzzled with your style.

My question to you today is that,
Even you include these

intellectual evidences and arguments in 
your discussions,

People often say that a conversation 
with Ghamidi Sahib is very rational,

logical, enlightened and intellectual.

So, even your paradigm answers 
these modern suspicion or doubt

by way of intellectual and logical 
arguments.

Then what about simple and inherent 
arguments given by the Quran

as you often say?

[Javed Ahmad Ghamidi] Don't you consider 
the inherent arguments given

by the Quran as logical?

What I had earlier mentioned was that,
things that evolve from a specific

philosophical or logical background and 
people present these questions just to

?? of the religion.

These are the things that clearly convey 
that your addressee does not have that

perceptive attitude to understand or dive
into something of this imperative nature.

In that case you should follow ??