WEBVTT

00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:02.200
All right, welcome back to the largest

00:00:02.200 --> 00:00:05.120
study on climbing falls. In the first

00:00:05.120 --> 00:00:08.360
episode we looked how does extra slack

00:00:08.360 --> 00:00:11.320
affect the fall, or more precisely does

00:00:11.320 --> 00:00:14.320
falling more reduce the pendulum into

00:00:14.320 --> 00:00:16.520
the wall and how hard the climber is

00:00:16.520 --> 00:00:18.840
going to hit the wall, and then I showed

00:00:18.840 --> 00:00:21.640
you the importance of soft catch and

00:00:21.640 --> 00:00:25.359
what a massive difference that makes and

00:00:25.359 --> 00:00:28.400
also that hard catches are not only the

00:00:28.400 --> 00:00:30.599
problem for heavier belayers

00:00:30.599 --> 00:00:33.320
lighter belayers often lack practice to

00:00:33.320 --> 00:00:35.760
give soft catches since most of the time

00:00:35.760 --> 00:00:38.920
they don't need they fly up anyway but

00:00:38.920 --> 00:00:41.120
in exceptional cases with enough

00:00:41.120 --> 00:00:44.039
friction... -My foot -What happened to your

00:00:44.039 --> 00:00:49.000
foot -Well it was a hard fall - Heavey belayer?

00:00:49.000 --> 00:00:52.840
-Llight belayer. Yeah yeah and I also

00:00:52.840 --> 00:00:55.320
asked you guys I'm curious did you ever

00:00:55.320 --> 00:00:58.600
got unexpectedly hard catch from a light

00:00:58.600 --> 00:01:01.879
belayer? And turns out this happens more

00:01:01.879 --> 00:01:03.400
often than I

00:01:03.400 --> 00:01:06.040
thought. so yeah light or heavy you're

00:01:06.040 --> 00:01:08.119
going to love this episode because we're

00:01:08.119 --> 00:01:10.320
going to investigate which method of

00:01:10.320 --> 00:01:12.920
giving soft catch is the best. We're

00:01:12.920 --> 00:01:16.000
going to compare stepping forward versus

00:01:16.000 --> 00:01:19.000
jumping up and as a bonus the tube slide

00:01:19.000 --> 00:01:21.119
method where the belayer lets the rope

00:01:21.119 --> 00:01:23.040
slide through the device which is more

00:01:23.040 --> 00:01:24.799
common in trad

00:01:24.799 --> 00:01:27.920
climbing so let's begin. Now in the

00:01:27.920 --> 00:01:30.000
previous episode I showed you this

00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:32.799
beautiful horizontal velocity graphs and

00:01:32.799 --> 00:01:35.720
I explained that the peak of horizontal

00:01:35.720 --> 00:01:38.240
velocity is at the bottom of the

00:01:38.240 --> 00:01:40.720
pendulum and that is a good indicator

00:01:40.720 --> 00:01:44.159
how hard the climber would meet the wall

00:01:44.159 --> 00:01:46.960
if the wall would not be overhanging and

00:01:46.960 --> 00:01:49.200
in this test I wanted to go a step

00:01:49.200 --> 00:01:51.600
further and see what happens when the

00:01:51.600 --> 00:01:56.759
climber meets the wall. - 1... 2... 3...

00:01:56.920 --> 00:01:59.840
and my idea this time was to

00:01:59.840 --> 00:02:03.600
measure deceleration during the impact

00:02:03.600 --> 00:02:06.840
and in many of our test cases

00:02:06.840 --> 00:02:09.840
this idea was working really well. If we

00:02:09.840 --> 00:02:13.000
compare the soft catches to the hard one

00:02:13.000 --> 00:02:16.000
you can see a huge spike in

00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:18.800
deceleration. However after doing lots

00:02:18.800 --> 00:02:21.440
and lots of more falls and analyzing the

00:02:21.440 --> 00:02:23.840
data I realized that the peak

00:02:23.840 --> 00:02:26.959
deceleration is not always a good metric

00:02:26.959 --> 00:02:29.480
to look. for example take a look at this

00:02:29.480 --> 00:02:32.080
hard catch you can visually see that it

00:02:32.080 --> 00:02:35.080
was much harder for the climber but the

00:02:35.080 --> 00:02:38.200
peak deceleration was nearly identical

00:02:38.200 --> 00:02:41.159
to the soft catches before, so it turns

00:02:41.159 --> 00:02:44.519
out our soft bodies are incredible at

00:02:44.519 --> 00:02:45.800
absorbing

00:02:45.800 --> 00:02:48.400
impacts but the problem is that it's

00:02:48.400 --> 00:02:50.080
very difficult to measure what's

00:02:50.080 --> 00:02:52.319
happening in our muscles during this

00:02:52.319 --> 00:02:54.959
impact. So while peak deceleration was

00:02:54.959 --> 00:02:57.040
interesting to look in some cases,

00:02:57.040 --> 00:02:59.840
horizontal velocity at the moment of

00:02:59.840 --> 00:03:03.280
impact was much better indicator. After

00:03:03.280 --> 00:03:05.560
all, all of this velocity that we are

00:03:05.560 --> 00:03:08.239
about to hit the wall will need to be

00:03:08.239 --> 00:03:12.200
absorbed by our soft bodies. Okay so

00:03:12.200 --> 00:03:14.400
let's see which method to give a soft

00:03:14.400 --> 00:03:17.599
catch is the best. To not kill me on the

00:03:17.599 --> 00:03:20.280
very first test we started with smaller

00:03:20.280 --> 00:03:24.200
falls and jumping up technique. And these

00:03:24.200 --> 00:03:28.319
falls were extremely nice and soft.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:30.360 --> 00:03:33.799
[Climber] - A soft ride! 
So let's see how stepping

00:03:33.799 --> 00:03:38.080
forward will compare. 
[Climber] - 1... 2... 3...

00:03:38.080 --> 00:03:41.680
- This is harder.
And the fall this time

00:03:41.680 --> 00:03:45.159
felt a little bit harder and we can also

00:03:45.159 --> 00:03:48.480
see that in the graphs. However overall

00:03:48.480 --> 00:03:50.920
it was still a very soft catch.

00:03:50.920 --> 00:03:54.840
And the second fall was very similar.

00:03:54.840 --> 00:03:58.040
Also a quick note: I was not sure

00:03:58.040 --> 00:04:01.040
how much stiffer the rope gets over

00:04:01.040 --> 00:04:03.640
multiple falls, and even though in this

00:04:03.640 --> 00:04:06.079
video I'm presenting you all the data

00:04:06.079 --> 00:04:08.879
grouped by method, meaning at first I

00:04:08.879 --> 00:04:10.879
show you all the soft catches with

00:04:10.879 --> 00:04:13.480
jumping up method, then I show you all

00:04:13.480 --> 00:04:15.760
the soft catches with stepping forward,

00:04:15.760 --> 00:04:18.519
in reality we did alternate between the

00:04:18.519 --> 00:04:21.320
methods between every fall. So we did a

00:04:21.320 --> 00:04:23.919
jumping up and then stepping forward, etc.

00:04:23.919 --> 00:04:26.280
Pointless information for most of

00:04:26.280 --> 00:04:28.720
you, but I know that a lot of geeks are

00:04:28.720 --> 00:04:30.919
watching my videos and we like to write

00:04:30.919 --> 00:04:34.240
nitpicky comments, so this is for you

00:04:34.240 --> 00:04:37.280
nitpicky geek. All right now let's see

00:04:37.280 --> 00:04:40.479
how the tube slide method compares and

00:04:40.479 --> 00:04:42.520
while I was expecting a lot from this

00:04:42.520 --> 00:04:47.240
method, the first fall wasn't any better.

00:04:47.240 --> 00:04:50.039
The second fall had a very low momentum

00:04:50.039 --> 00:04:53.600
into the wall but a lot of vertical

00:04:53.600 --> 00:04:56.800
momentum, which made me almost run across

00:04:56.800 --> 00:04:58.840
the wall, which was slightly

00:04:58.840 --> 00:05:02.080
uncomfortable. So we tried again and this

00:05:02.080 --> 00:05:06.000
time the fall was much nicer and I know

00:05:06.000 --> 00:05:08.160
that people like to try all the crazy

00:05:08.160 --> 00:05:10.479
things they see on the internet so

00:05:10.479 --> 00:05:12.160
that's why I have to stress that this

00:05:12.160 --> 00:05:14.960
tube slide method is really advanced, so

00:05:14.960 --> 00:05:17.360
if you don't know what you're doing, make

00:05:17.360 --> 00:05:20.400
sure that you have an expert guiding you.

00:05:20.400 --> 00:05:22.360
Now if we would compare all the best

00:05:22.360 --> 00:05:24.919
attempts of all the methods, we can see

00:05:24.919 --> 00:05:28.000
that the jumping up was slightly better

00:05:28.000 --> 00:05:30.919
but overall all the method were very

00:05:30.919 --> 00:05:34.280
similar. 
[Climber] - So all of these falls felt quite

00:05:34.280 --> 00:05:36.240
soft except the one where he does

00:05:36.240 --> 00:05:39.960
nothing, then I fell to the wall.

00:05:39.960 --> 00:05:42.199
Yeah we actually forgot to film hard catches

00:05:42.199 --> 00:05:44.080
where the belayer does nothing on this

00:05:44.080 --> 00:05:46.919
test, but no worries this was just a

00:05:46.919 --> 00:05:50.220
small warm-up.
And let's see some bigger falls.

00:05:50.220 --> 00:05:52.240
So this time we started with a

00:05:52.240 --> 00:05:53.880
tube slide method,

00:05:53.880 --> 00:05:56.790
which at least in theory, 
lets the belayer achieve

00:05:56.790 --> 00:05:58.700
any full arc.

00:05:58.700 --> 00:06:00.960
And here is one more attempt

00:06:00.960 --> 00:06:04.600
this time with even bigger arc or longer

00:06:04.600 --> 00:06:07.800
braking distance, and the fall was just

00:06:07.800 --> 00:06:10.880
tiny bit softer for the climber. For now

00:06:10.880 --> 00:06:12.639
I'm just going to keep the softest

00:06:12.639 --> 00:06:15.039
attempt in the charts and let's see how

00:06:15.039 --> 00:06:17.880
does that compare to the jumping up

00:06:17.880 --> 00:06:20.520
technique. And we can see that the first

00:06:20.520 --> 00:06:24.479
fall was slightly smaller, however it had

00:06:24.479 --> 00:06:27.520
nearly identical horizontal acceleration

00:06:27.520 --> 00:06:31.319
and velocity. However it also had lower

00:06:31.319 --> 00:06:33.960
absolute velocity, which is actually

00:06:33.960 --> 00:06:36.680
better for the climber. Now the second

00:06:36.680 --> 00:06:40.919
fall was slightly smaller
but had a tiny bit

00:06:40.919 --> 00:06:43.800
more horizontal velocity towards the wall

00:06:43.800 --> 00:06:46.240
and again let's keep the best

00:06:46.240 --> 00:06:49.039
attempts of each method and see how does

00:06:49.039 --> 00:06:53.160
that compare to the stepping forward technique.

00:06:53.160 --> 00:06:55.840
And we can see that the fall

00:06:55.840 --> 00:06:59.440
was smallest however it had the greatest

00:06:59.440 --> 00:07:02.599
impact to the wall. Now on the second

00:07:02.599 --> 00:07:05.919
attempt the belayer did a much better job

00:07:05.919 --> 00:07:09.560
and the fall was significantly softer.

00:07:09.560 --> 00:07:11.479
And if we compare all the best attempts

00:07:11.479 --> 00:07:13.680
of all the methods, we can see that the

00:07:13.680 --> 00:07:16.680
horizontal speed at the moment of impact

00:07:16.680 --> 00:07:19.879
was nearly identical. Which means that at

00:07:19.879 --> 00:07:21.759
least in this test case scenario,

00:07:21.759 --> 00:07:24.280
a skilled belayer can achieve almost the

00:07:24.280 --> 00:07:27.440
same results with any method. But since

00:07:27.440 --> 00:07:29.879
consistency in catches also matters,

00:07:29.879 --> 00:07:33.440
if we compare the worst attempts,
tube slide method

00:07:33.440 --> 00:07:35.800
was the best, followed by jumping up,

00:07:35.800 --> 00:07:39.000
and then the stepping forward was the worst.

00:07:39.000 --> 00:07:42.479
However even the worst cases of

00:07:42.479 --> 00:07:45.440
any of these methods were much much

00:07:45.440 --> 00:07:49.280
better compared to the passive belay.

00:07:49.280 --> 00:07:52.120
So the first arising takeaway was that no

00:07:52.120 --> 00:07:54.199
matter which method you choose to give a

00:07:54.199 --> 00:07:57.039
soft catch, it's going to be much better

00:07:57.039 --> 00:07:58.960
than passively standing and doing

00:07:58.960 --> 00:07:59.960
nothing.

00:07:59.960 --> 00:08:03.280
And as always one test is no test, so I

00:08:03.280 --> 00:08:05.400
wanted to repeat these tests in a

00:08:05.400 --> 00:08:08.159
different location with another belayer.

00:08:08.159 --> 00:08:11.599
Ricky who has also a lot of experience

00:08:11.599 --> 00:08:14.319
using this tube slide method, and he told

00:08:14.319 --> 00:08:16.940
me that it's actually 
his preferred method.

00:08:16.940 --> 00:08:19.599
So, high expectations.

00:08:19.839 --> 00:08:21.641
[Climber] - Two, three... 
- Okay

00:08:21.641 --> 00:08:23.400
- Falling!

00:08:24.130 --> 00:08:26.100
- Aw, that was super soft!

00:08:27.662 --> 00:08:31.950
So we did three attempts, and all
of them had very similar

00:08:31.950 --> 00:08:35.789
horizontal velocity. 
Nice, for consistency.

00:08:35.789 --> 00:08:38.240
Next we tested the stepping

00:08:38.240 --> 00:08:40.880
forward method and we can see that the

00:08:40.880 --> 00:08:43.839
fall was much shorter and had a much

00:08:43.839 --> 00:08:46.760
greater swing into the wall. It seemed

00:08:46.760 --> 00:08:48.680
that the belayer was pulled towards the

00:08:48.680 --> 00:08:51.720
wall way too much, and did not have enough

00:08:51.720 --> 00:08:55.379
control to make the fall smooth.

00:08:55.379 --> 00:08:58.200
[Music]

00:09:00.920 --> 00:09:04.079
All right next the jumping up method,

00:09:04.079 --> 00:09:07.200
where Ricky actually did a very bad job

00:09:07.200 --> 00:09:08.880
on the first attempt.

00:09:08.880 --> 00:09:11.279
And the same happened on the

00:09:11.279 --> 00:09:14.680
second attempt where his jump was very

00:09:14.680 --> 00:09:17.800
minimal only initiated a little bit from

00:09:17.800 --> 00:09:20.680
his right calf. So that's not how you

00:09:20.680 --> 00:09:23.480
jump and that's why I decided to ignore

00:09:23.480 --> 00:09:26.669
these two attempts for the poor technique,

00:09:26.669 --> 00:09:29.918
and after he adjusted his technique
on the third jump,

00:09:29.920 --> 00:09:33.280
he jumped with both legs
and it was much much better.

00:09:34.480 --> 00:09:37.519
And finally we did one passive

00:09:37.519 --> 00:09:40.000
catch where the belayer does nothing and

00:09:40.000 --> 00:09:42.560
same as before, it causes significantly

00:09:42.560 --> 00:09:45.399
higher swing into the wall. So at least

00:09:45.399 --> 00:09:48.200
in this test case scenario, tube slide

00:09:48.200 --> 00:09:51.399
was the best, followed by jumping up, and

00:09:51.399 --> 00:09:54.079
stepping forward was again the worst.

00:09:54.719 --> 00:09:57.000
[Belayer] - So stepping forward versus uh

00:09:57.000 --> 00:10:01.079
jumping up 
[Climber] - Yes stepping forward was not

00:10:01.079 --> 00:10:04.360
in a controlled way I was just pulled to

00:10:04.360 --> 00:10:07.120
the wall. I tried to lean

00:10:07.120 --> 00:10:11.200
backwards to break to catch the fall

00:10:11.200 --> 00:10:13.519
but it was not in a controlled way, and

00:10:13.519 --> 00:10:15.880
jumping up I can choose how much I want

00:10:15.880 --> 00:10:17.648
to jump and at what timing.

00:10:17.648 --> 00:10:20.800
So overall which method is the 
best will heavily

00:10:20.800 --> 00:10:22.800
depend on your experience using this

00:10:22.800 --> 00:10:26.000
methods, however stepping forward seemed

00:10:26.000 --> 00:10:29.360
to be the worst and gave the least

00:10:29.360 --> 00:10:32.160
control, and also worth mentioning is

00:10:32.160 --> 00:10:35.399
that standing too far in many situations

00:10:35.399 --> 00:10:37.839
can drag the belayer into the wall

00:10:37.839 --> 00:10:40.090
completely uncontrollably.

00:10:44.510 --> 00:10:48.449
And that would make the catch even harder.

00:10:50.490 --> 00:10:53.120
All right but what if the belayer

00:10:53.120 --> 00:10:56.160
is significantly heavier. In that case if

00:10:56.160 --> 00:10:58.560
you try the jumping method there is not

00:10:58.560 --> 00:11:01.959
much pull up by the rope and jumping is

00:11:01.959 --> 00:11:04.959
much more difficult. So maybe stepping

00:11:04.959 --> 00:11:07.920
forward is better in this case. To test

00:11:07.920 --> 00:11:10.720
that Kishu suggested to introduce extra

00:11:10.720 --> 00:11:12.880
friction which basically makes the

00:11:12.880 --> 00:11:14.500
belayer heavier.

00:11:15.080 --> 00:11:18.040
[Climber] - Can we try like this?
[Belayer] - He wants to kill me!

00:11:18.040 --> 00:11:23.040
So that's what we got: a little

00:11:23.040 --> 00:11:25.959
zigzag in the beginning and then a

00:11:25.959 --> 00:11:29.040
straight line all the way to the climber

00:11:29.040 --> 00:11:31.560
so the rope actually is not going over

00:11:31.560 --> 00:11:35.160
the edge it's just very sharp angled.

00:11:35.160 --> 00:11:38.949
- He says you have to fall!

00:11:39.228 --> 00:11:41.721
- One, two, three

00:11:44.365 --> 00:11:49.523
The swing into the wall is...
...okayish.

00:11:49.523 --> 00:11:51.399
So we started with jumping

00:11:51.399 --> 00:11:54.839
method which felt slightly harder with

00:11:54.839 --> 00:12:00.120
increased friction but still 
plenty soft enough.

00:12:00.120 --> 00:12:02.440
Just take a look at this belayer

00:12:02.440 --> 00:12:05.000
running up the wall and even avoiding

00:12:05.000 --> 00:12:07.399
his arm being squished into the first

00:12:07.399 --> 00:12:11.160
quick draw. So let's see if

00:12:11.160 --> 00:12:13.920
with increased friction stepping forward

00:12:13.920 --> 00:12:16.440
will be better. This time he was not

00:12:16.440 --> 00:12:18.560
pulled into the wall uncontrollably

00:12:18.560 --> 00:12:21.360
anymore. It also looks like he got the

00:12:21.360 --> 00:12:23.959
perfect timing and even started running

00:12:23.959 --> 00:12:27.680
forward just before the impact, however

00:12:27.680 --> 00:12:30.199
the swing into the wall for the climber

00:12:30.199 --> 00:12:33.880
was still harder compared to the jumping

00:12:33.880 --> 00:12:36.959
method. Okay next we did a series of tube

00:12:36.959 --> 00:12:40.240
slight catches the first felt very nice

00:12:40.240 --> 00:12:43.839
and soft now the second fall had even

00:12:43.839 --> 00:12:46.839
softer impact with the wall however I

00:12:46.839 --> 00:12:49.360
still had a lot of momentum downwards

00:12:49.360 --> 00:12:52.240
which forced me almost run down the wall

00:12:52.240 --> 00:12:53.680
which is a little bit

00:12:53.680 --> 00:12:56.720
awkward and the last fall had a very

00:12:56.720 --> 00:12:57.839
similar

00:12:57.839 --> 00:12:59.440
effect

00:12:59.440 --> 00:13:01.639
and if we look into the best cases for

00:13:01.639 --> 00:13:04.360
each method we can see that jumping up

00:13:04.360 --> 00:13:07.399
and Tube slide were very very similar

00:13:07.399 --> 00:13:10.240
and the stepping forward was slightly

00:13:10.240 --> 00:13:13.120
worse and this bar chart plots all the

00:13:13.120 --> 00:13:16.839
Falls so we can see that on average tube

00:13:16.839 --> 00:13:19.519
slide method performed the best followed

00:13:19.519 --> 00:13:22.120
by jumping up and then stepping forward

00:13:22.120 --> 00:13:25.279
was the worst now from Pure feeling

00:13:25.279 --> 00:13:27.920
standpoint for me as a climber both

00:13:27.920 --> 00:13:30.839
jumping up and Tube slide methods felt

00:13:30.839 --> 00:13:33.720
very nice and soft maybe if I would be

00:13:33.720 --> 00:13:37.120
nitpicking this extra momentum downwards

00:13:37.120 --> 00:13:39.120
sometimes on the tube slide method was

00:13:39.120 --> 00:13:41.279
slightly uncomfortable although in

00:13:41.279 --> 00:13:43.680
theory the blayer should be able to give

00:13:43.680 --> 00:13:45.839
almost any kind of catch with this

00:13:45.839 --> 00:13:49.040
method and the stepping forward method

00:13:49.040 --> 00:13:51.800
was maybe slightly harder had slightly

00:13:51.800 --> 00:13:54.600
bigger impact to the wall however it was

00:13:54.600 --> 00:13:57.800
still plenty soft enough and what is not

00:13:57.800 --> 00:14:01.759
soft enough is passive blay so once

00:14:01.759 --> 00:14:04.399
again no matter which soft catch method

00:14:04.399 --> 00:14:07.639
we tried it was significantly better

00:14:07.639 --> 00:14:10.959
than passive Bay and with added friction

00:14:10.959 --> 00:14:13.440
the Bayer wasn't even lifted off the

00:14:13.440 --> 00:14:16.120
ground this time previously when we had

00:14:16.120 --> 00:14:18.800
no friction passive blay looked like

00:14:18.800 --> 00:14:22.320
this the blayer was still pulled up but

00:14:22.320 --> 00:14:25.240
now with extra friction that is not the

00:14:25.240 --> 00:14:27.120
case anymore and you can see how the

00:14:27.120 --> 00:14:29.880
climber is being pulled up and into the

00:14:29.880 --> 00:14:32.880
wall even

00:14:33.160 --> 00:14:34.839
harder

00:14:34.839 --> 00:14:38.480
yeah okay that

00:14:38.480 --> 00:14:42.120
was that was the way it was so yeah

00:14:42.120 --> 00:14:44.839
don't forget to subscribe I might need

00:14:44.839 --> 00:14:47.399
advertisement money to fix my broken

00:14:47.399 --> 00:14:51.639
body at old age so what's your favorite

00:14:51.639 --> 00:14:54.759
method yeah jumping up jumping up yes

00:14:54.759 --> 00:14:56.959
mhm okay so we were leaning towards

00:14:56.959 --> 00:15:00.399
jumping as our favorite meth foot but

00:15:00.399 --> 00:15:03.160
what if the blayer is really really

00:15:03.160 --> 00:15:05.399
heavy or there is so much friction in

00:15:05.399 --> 00:15:08.120
the system that the Rope Almost Doesn't

00:15:08.120 --> 00:15:12.959
pull the Blair up in that case you can

00:15:12.959 --> 00:15:17.839
jump I don't know what 30 40 cm maybe 50

00:15:17.839 --> 00:15:21.079
if you're a crazy athlete but is that

00:15:21.079 --> 00:15:23.680
enough for the soft catch and this

00:15:23.680 --> 00:15:26.079
brings us to this experiment here we did

00:15:26.079 --> 00:15:28.680
a series of false alternating between

00:15:28.680 --> 00:15:31.399
stepping forward and jumping up and we

00:15:31.399 --> 00:15:34.120
measured the forces to the climber and

00:15:34.120 --> 00:15:36.399
same as before jumping up was

00:15:36.399 --> 00:15:38.480
consistently better than stepping

00:15:38.480 --> 00:15:40.880
forward and doing nothing was

00:15:40.880 --> 00:15:43.360
significantly worse and then we decided

00:15:43.360 --> 00:15:46.360
to introduce this zigzag in the rout and

00:15:46.360 --> 00:15:49.279
although it doesn't look like much it

00:15:49.279 --> 00:15:52.240
actually added a ton of friction

00:15:52.240 --> 00:15:56.319
basically imitating a very heavy blay

00:15:56.319 --> 00:16:01.319
what wa I couldn't jump at all and as I

00:16:01.319 --> 00:16:04.480
was expecting jumping up was not working

00:16:04.480 --> 00:16:07.279
at all in this case so let's see if

00:16:07.279 --> 00:16:11.519
stepping forward is going to be better 2

00:16:12.000 --> 00:16:14.279
1 wow that was

00:16:14.279 --> 00:16:16.399
solid

00:16:16.399 --> 00:16:22.680
2.5 oh [ __ ] Z and it actually was even

00:16:23.040 --> 00:16:25.839
worse man I cannot give you a soft catch

00:16:25.839 --> 00:16:28.560
this way so yeah no matter how much I

00:16:28.560 --> 00:16:31.560
Tri to jump I was not able to give a

00:16:31.560 --> 00:16:34.279
truly soft catch and stepping forward

00:16:34.279 --> 00:16:35.959
was even

00:16:35.959 --> 00:16:38.560
worse it's impossible to give a soft

00:16:38.560 --> 00:16:41.399
catch like this to time well the

00:16:41.399 --> 00:16:44.440
stepping forward and such a short fall

00:16:44.440 --> 00:16:48.560
is nearly impossible yeah now while it

00:16:48.560 --> 00:16:51.600
seemed that heavy blers are doomed on

00:16:51.600 --> 00:16:53.839
this next experiment I actually

00:16:53.839 --> 00:16:56.680
discovered something that helps this

00:16:56.680 --> 00:16:59.800
time I was belaying a light girl and as

00:16:59.800 --> 00:17:02.360
before I was also struggling to give a

00:17:02.360 --> 00:17:06.480
soft catch the jumping simply did not

00:17:06.480 --> 00:17:09.280
work and neither did the stepping

00:17:09.280 --> 00:17:14.919
forward method but then I discovered

00:17:15.160 --> 00:17:20.839
something better better this one was

00:17:21.079 --> 00:17:25.919
soft yes it's soft so yeah turns out

00:17:25.919 --> 00:17:28.039
that bending Den KN will give you more

00:17:28.039 --> 00:17:30.799
range of movement and in this test case

00:17:30.799 --> 00:17:34.039
scenario it made a huge difference it

00:17:34.039 --> 00:17:36.440
the fall

00:17:36.440 --> 00:17:39.919
was just super soft and the others was

00:17:39.919 --> 00:17:44.840
boom like boom yeah yeah yeah so it's Bo

00:17:44.840 --> 00:17:48.640
versus and we prefer wo you prefer woo

00:17:48.640 --> 00:17:51.440
yeah yeah and although I already

00:17:51.440 --> 00:17:53.320
mentioned this in the first episode but

00:17:53.320 --> 00:17:56.080
it's really important to stress that

00:17:56.080 --> 00:17:59.320
simply throwing a lot of Slack does not

00:17:59.320 --> 00:18:03.559
mean a soft catch

00:18:05.120 --> 00:18:09.320
okay this [ __ ] and in a case of a

00:18:09.320 --> 00:18:12.600
passive Bay can end up very badly and

00:18:12.600 --> 00:18:14.880
the only reason she was fine in this

00:18:14.880 --> 00:18:17.280
case was because she was falling

00:18:17.280 --> 00:18:20.039
straight down under the Quick Draw so

00:18:20.039 --> 00:18:22.520
all she felt was just a jerk to the

00:18:22.520 --> 00:18:25.360
harness in a different situation with a

00:18:25.360 --> 00:18:28.200
little bit of swing that kind of catch

00:18:28.200 --> 00:18:31.559
with would probably break her ankles so

00:18:31.559 --> 00:18:33.720
instead of feeding a ton of slack for

00:18:33.720 --> 00:18:36.960
your climber maybe you should feed your

00:18:36.960 --> 00:18:39.360
climber and as we saw If the fall is

00:18:39.360 --> 00:18:42.159
small bending the knees before the fall

00:18:42.159 --> 00:18:45.280
might help now in case of a big whipper

00:18:45.280 --> 00:18:48.080
the fall naturally is much bigger so you

00:18:48.080 --> 00:18:50.480
will have more time to go down and

00:18:50.480 --> 00:18:52.799
explode up and from B mechanical

00:18:52.799 --> 00:18:55.120
standpoint since our muscles act as

00:18:55.120 --> 00:18:58.440
Springs going down and jumping up should

00:18:58.440 --> 00:19:01.200
result into a higher jump now if that

00:19:01.200 --> 00:19:03.640
doesn't help I would suggest more food

00:19:03.640 --> 00:19:06.480
cycles and if that's not an option then

00:19:06.480 --> 00:19:08.960
I've seen a method used by a very heavy

00:19:08.960 --> 00:19:11.400
Blair which worked very well for him

00:19:11.400 --> 00:19:14.600
where he took a little bit of slack with

00:19:14.600 --> 00:19:18.039
his lead hand and during the impact he

00:19:18.039 --> 00:19:22.440
used his lead hand to soften the

00:19:22.520 --> 00:19:26.000
catch it is extremely important to not

00:19:26.000 --> 00:19:28.880
have too much slack here or you will

00:19:28.880 --> 00:19:31.600
burn your hand so be smart and use this

00:19:31.600 --> 00:19:34.559
at your own risk this is sketchy but

00:19:34.559 --> 00:19:36.679
I've seen it working really well or

00:19:36.679 --> 00:19:39.159
alternatively go old school and learn

00:19:39.159 --> 00:19:41.919
how to use tube style BL then it doesn't

00:19:41.919 --> 00:19:43.799
matter what's the weight of the climber

00:19:43.799 --> 00:19:46.400
you can always make a soft catch but of

00:19:46.400 --> 00:19:48.760
course that comes with its own risks of

00:19:48.760 --> 00:19:51.480
not having assisted blade device but for

00:19:51.480 --> 00:19:53.720
majority of you jumping up is going to

00:19:53.720 --> 00:19:56.520
be the best and if for whatever reason

00:19:56.520 --> 00:19:58.600
you find yourself away from the wall

00:19:58.600 --> 00:20:01.960
then just do stepping forward as we saw

00:20:01.960 --> 00:20:04.480
whatever soft catch method is much

00:20:04.480 --> 00:20:06.679
better than passive delay now I

00:20:06.679 --> 00:20:08.280
understand that this video was full of

00:20:08.280 --> 00:20:10.840
charts and graphs and chances are if

00:20:10.840 --> 00:20:12.280
you're still watching you're a little

00:20:12.280 --> 00:20:14.799
bit nerdy however I'm going to make a

00:20:14.799 --> 00:20:17.320
separate video for my blay Master Class

00:20:17.320 --> 00:20:19.360
where I will go more on practical

00:20:19.360 --> 00:20:22.320
details including those sketchy low to

00:20:22.320 --> 00:20:25.080
the ground situations and also during

00:20:25.080 --> 00:20:27.200
these two years we have measured forces

00:20:27.200 --> 00:20:30.159
on hundred of Falls so we have a lot of

00:20:30.159 --> 00:20:32.120
data but as I explained in previous

00:20:32.120 --> 00:20:34.840
episodes Peak Force to the climber might

00:20:34.840 --> 00:20:37.120
not be the most important factor for

00:20:37.120 --> 00:20:38.240
sport

00:20:38.240 --> 00:20:41.080
climbers however that might be much more

00:20:41.080 --> 00:20:45.840
important for TR climbers keep a good

00:20:47.200 --> 00:20:50.840
eye [ __ ] so I guess this deserves an

00:20:50.840 --> 00:20:53.480
episode for trout climbers as well and

00:20:53.480 --> 00:20:55.640
all of these people and supporters

00:20:55.640 --> 00:20:58.280
deserve a huge thank you none of this

00:20:58.280 --> 00:21:00.400
project would been possible without all

00:21:00.400 --> 00:21:03.559
of you and you deserve some

00:21:03.559 --> 00:21:06.200
knowledge for the last 6 months I was

00:21:06.200 --> 00:21:09.000
warming up my brain in the mornings with

00:21:09.000 --> 00:21:12.039
brilliant.org which is an awesome online

00:21:12.039 --> 00:21:14.880
platform for learning math data science

00:21:14.880 --> 00:21:17.559
and computer science

00:21:17.559 --> 00:21:19.600
interactively good morning Ben how are

00:21:19.600 --> 00:21:22.080
you ah feeling like Quan in for

00:21:22.080 --> 00:21:24.440
dimensional space with emotions twisting

00:21:24.440 --> 00:21:26.960
like meus transformation and my mood

00:21:26.960 --> 00:21:29.880
transforming like like ien vector so not

00:21:29.880 --> 00:21:31.919
only you get deeper connections with

00:21:31.919 --> 00:21:34.440
your smart friends you also deepen your

00:21:34.440 --> 00:21:36.640
scientific understanding of the world

00:21:36.640 --> 00:21:39.320
just imagine how your regular life

00:21:39.320 --> 00:21:41.440
problems will look when you will be

00:21:41.440 --> 00:21:44.080
contemplating that we are all just

00:21:44.080 --> 00:21:47.120
riding a giant rock through constantly

00:21:47.120 --> 00:21:50.320
expanding space with supernovas and

00:21:50.320 --> 00:21:53.360
solar winds or maybe before human

00:21:53.360 --> 00:21:57.000
thinking becomes obsolete write a short

00:21:57.000 --> 00:22:02.120
math point poem in a style of me you

00:22:02.120 --> 00:22:05.039
want to know how Chad GPT works so

00:22:05.039 --> 00:22:06.880
whenever you're are a complete beginner

00:22:06.880 --> 00:22:09.200
or ready to dive into machine learning

00:22:09.200 --> 00:22:11.880
and Beyond brilliant.org makes it easy

00:22:11.880 --> 00:22:14.960
to level up fast with fun bite-sized

00:22:14.960 --> 00:22:17.200
lessons and you can try all of this

00:22:17.200 --> 00:22:19.600
completely for free for 30 days by

00:22:19.600 --> 00:22:22.799
visiting brilliant.org heart disey and

00:22:22.799 --> 00:22:26.120
first 200 of you can also get 20% off

00:22:26.120 --> 00:22:28.520
their annual premium subscription

00:22:28.520 --> 00:22:31.720
so thank you brilliant for making sure

00:22:31.720 --> 00:22:34.279
that we still use our brain and thank

00:22:34.279 --> 00:22:37.080
you for watching enjoy your brain and

00:22:37.080 --> 00:22:40.120
climbing and see you in the next one now

00:22:40.120 --> 00:22:44.799
it's going to be fun feeling like

00:22:45.240 --> 00:22:49.240
qu that word