WEBVTT

00:00:01.446 --> 00:00:07.082
The world is awash
with divisive arguments,

00:00:07.082 --> 00:00:10.825
conflict, fake news,

00:00:10.825 --> 00:00:13.281
victimhood,

00:00:13.281 --> 00:00:18.871
exploitation, prejudice,
bigotry, blame, shouting,

00:00:18.871 --> 00:00:21.999
and minuscule attention spans.

00:00:23.050 --> 00:00:25.296
It can sometimes seem

00:00:25.296 --> 00:00:28.306
that we are doomed to take sides,

00:00:28.306 --> 00:00:30.700
be stuck in echo chambers,

00:00:30.700 --> 00:00:33.017
and never agree again.

00:00:33.684 --> 00:00:36.751
It can sometimes seem
like a race to the bottom,

00:00:36.751 --> 00:00:40.584
where everyone is calling out
somebody else's privilege

00:00:40.584 --> 00:00:43.501
and vying to show that they

00:00:43.501 --> 00:00:48.503
are the most hard-done-by person
in the conversation.

00:00:49.518 --> 00:00:51.546
How can we make sense

00:00:51.546 --> 00:00:54.306
in a world that doesn't?

NOTE Paragraph

00:00:55.930 --> 00:01:00.679
I have a tool for understanding
this confusing world of ours,

00:01:00.679 --> 00:01:04.394
a tool that you might not expect:

00:01:04.615 --> 00:01:06.477
abstract mathematics.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:07.530 --> 00:01:10.262
I am a pure mathematician.

00:01:10.262 --> 00:01:14.156
Traditionally, pure maths
is like the theory of maths,

00:01:14.156 --> 00:01:19.597
where applied maths is applied
to real problems like building bridges

00:01:19.597 --> 00:01:21.062
and flying planes

00:01:21.062 --> 00:01:23.740
and controlling traffic flow.

00:01:24.134 --> 00:01:29.468
But I'm going to talk about a way
that pure maths applies directly

00:01:29.468 --> 00:01:32.822
to our a daily lives as a way of thinking.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:33.177 --> 00:01:37.230
I don't solve quadratic equations
to help me with my daily life,

00:01:37.230 --> 00:01:40.343
but I do use mathematical thinking
to help me understand arguments

00:01:40.343 --> 00:01:44.946
and to empathize with other people.

00:01:45.708 --> 00:01:51.510
And so pure maths helps me
with the entire human world.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:52.625 --> 00:01:55.297
But before I talk about
the entire human world,

00:01:55.297 --> 00:01:58.881
I need to talk about something
that you might think of

00:01:58.881 --> 00:02:02.174
as irrelevant schools maths:

00:02:02.404 --> 00:02:04.271
factors of numbers.

00:02:04.271 --> 00:02:08.096
We're going to start by thinking
about the factors of 30.

00:02:08.096 --> 00:02:12.886
Now, if this makes you shudder
with bad memories of school maths lessons,

00:02:12.886 --> 00:02:13.914
I sympathize,

00:02:13.914 --> 00:02:17.384
because I found school
maths lessons boring too.

00:02:17.640 --> 00:02:21.673
But I'm pretty sure we are going
to take this in a direction

00:02:21.673 --> 00:02:25.332
that is very different
from what happened at school.

NOTE Paragraph

00:02:25.941 --> 00:02:28.122
So what are the factors of 30?
Well, they're the numbers that go into 30.

00:02:28.122 --> 00:02:32.782
Maybe you can remember them.
We'll work them out.

00:02:32.782 --> 00:02:37.190
It's one, two, three,

00:02:37.190 --> 00:02:39.306
five, six,

00:02:39.306 --> 00:02:42.227
10, 15, and 30.

00:02:42.227 --> 00:02:44.196
It's not very interesting.

00:02:44.196 --> 00:02:46.727
It's a bunch of numbers
in a straight line.

00:02:47.049 --> 00:02:51.077
We can make it more interesting
by thinking about which of these numbers

00:02:51.077 --> 00:02:53.358
are also factors of each other
and drawing a picture,

00:02:53.358 --> 00:02:55.411
a bit like a family tree

00:02:55.411 --> 00:02:56.587
to show those relationships.

00:02:56.587 --> 00:03:00.653
So 30 is going to be at the top
like a kind of great-grandparent.

00:03:00.653 --> 00:03:03.777
Six, 10, and 15 go into 30.

00:03:03.777 --> 00:03:07.006
Five goes into 10 and 15.

00:03:07.192 --> 00:03:09.656
Two goes in six and 10.

00:03:09.656 --> 00:03:13.190
Three goes into six and 15.

00:03:13.190 --> 00:03:17.266
And one goes into two, three, and five.

00:03:17.266 --> 00:03:20.983
So now we see that 10
is not divisible by three,

00:03:20.983 --> 00:03:24.231
but that is this the corners of a cube,

00:03:24.231 --> 00:03:26.103
which is I think a bit more interesting

00:03:26.103 --> 00:03:28.747
than a bunch of numbers
in a straight line.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:29.518 --> 00:03:32.690
We can see something more here.
There's a hierarchy going on.

00:03:32.690 --> 00:03:34.893
At the bottom level is the number one,

00:03:34.893 --> 00:03:36.987
then there's the numbers
two, three, and five,

00:03:36.987 --> 00:03:39.870
and nothing goes into those
except one and themselves.

00:03:39.870 --> 00:03:42.350
You might remember
this means they're prime.

00:03:42.350 --> 00:03:45.394
At the next level up,
we have six, 10, and 15,

00:03:45.394 --> 00:03:48.904
and each of those is a product
of two prime factors.

00:03:48.904 --> 00:03:51.002
So six is two times three,

00:03:51.002 --> 00:03:52.623
10 is two times five,

00:03:52.623 --> 00:03:54.593
15 is three times five,

00:03:54.593 --> 00:03:56.500
and then at the top, we have 30,

00:03:56.500 --> 00:03:59.103
which is a product of three prime numbers,

00:03:59.355 --> 00:04:01.168
two times three times five.

00:04:01.168 --> 00:04:05.583
So I could redraw this diagram
using those numbers instead.

00:04:06.581 --> 00:04:09.672
So we see that we've got
two, three, and five at the top,

00:04:09.672 --> 00:04:12.706
we have pairs of numbers
at the next level,

00:04:12.706 --> 00:04:15.431
and we have single elements
at the next level,

00:04:15.431 --> 00:04:17.470
and then the empty set at the bottom.

00:04:17.470 --> 00:04:23.148
And each of those arrows shows
losing one of your numbers in the set.

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:23.148 --> 00:04:25.435
Now maybe it can be clear

00:04:25.435 --> 00:04:28.767
that it doesn't really matter
what those numbers are.

00:04:28.767 --> 00:04:30.384
In fact it doesn't matter what they are.

00:04:30.384 --> 00:04:34.020
So we could replace them with
something like A, B, and C instead

00:04:34.020 --> 00:04:37.153
and we get the same picture.

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:37.343 --> 00:04:39.943
So now this has become very abstract.

00:04:39.943 --> 00:04:42.290
The numbers have turned into letters.

00:04:42.290 --> 00:04:45.115
But there is a point to this abstraction,

00:04:45.115 --> 00:04:50.335
which is that it now suddenly
becomes very widely applicable,

00:04:50.335 --> 00:04:54.514
because A, B, and C could be anything.

00:04:54.514 --> 00:04:58.681
For example, they could be
three types of privilege:

00:04:58.681 --> 00:05:01.705
rich, white, and male.

00:05:02.569 --> 00:05:06.606
So then at the next level,
we have rich white people.

00:05:06.606 --> 00:05:09.151
Here we have rich male people.

00:05:09.151 --> 00:05:11.533
Here we have white male people.

00:05:11.533 --> 00:05:15.463
Then we have rich, white, and male.

00:05:15.463 --> 00:05:18.675
And finally people with
none of those types of privilege.

00:05:18.675 --> 00:05:21.958
And I'm going to put back in
the rest of the adjectives for emphasis.

00:05:21.958 --> 00:05:24.887
So here we have rich white
non-male people,

00:05:24.887 --> 00:05:27.928
to remind us that there are
non-binary people we need to include.

00:05:27.928 --> 00:05:30.566
Here we have rich non-white male people.

00:05:30.566 --> 00:05:34.001
Here we have non-rich white male people,

00:05:34.001 --> 00:05:36.844
rich non-white non-male,

00:05:36.844 --> 00:05:40.118
non-rich white non-male,

00:05:40.118 --> 00:05:41.839
and non-rich, non-white male,

00:05:41.839 --> 00:05:43.815
and, and at the bottom
with the least privilege,

00:05:43.815 --> 00:05:47.984
non-rich, not-white, non-male people.

00:05:47.984 --> 00:05:51.819
We have gone from a diagram
of factors of 30

00:05:51.819 --> 00:05:56.320
to a diagram of interaction
of different types of privilege,

00:05:56.320 --> 00:05:59.965
and there are many things
we can learn from this diagram, I think.

00:05:59.965 --> 00:06:07.483
The first is that each arrow represents
a direct loss of one type of privilege.

00:06:07.483 --> 00:06:12.193
Sometimes people mistakenly think
that white privilege means

00:06:12.193 --> 00:06:16.526
all white people are better off
than all non-white people.

00:06:16.526 --> 00:06:20.261
Some people point at superrich
black sports stars and say,

00:06:20.261 --> 00:06:24.180
"See? They're really rich.
White privilege doesn't exist."

00:06:24.180 --> 00:06:27.287
But that's not what the theory
of white privilege says.

00:06:27.287 --> 00:06:32.561
It says that if that superrich sports star
had all the same characteristics

00:06:32.561 --> 00:06:34.294
but they were also white,

00:06:34.294 --> 00:06:39.025
we would expect them
to be better off in society.

NOTE Paragraph

00:06:39.485 --> 00:06:42.310
There is something else
we can understand from this diagram

00:06:42.310 --> 00:06:44.319
if we look along a row.

00:06:44.319 --> 00:06:48.517
If we look along the second-to-top row,
where people have two types of privilege,

00:06:48.517 --> 00:06:50.732
we might be able to see

00:06:50.732 --> 00:06:52.584
that they're not all particularly equal.

00:06:52.584 --> 00:06:54.553
For example, rich white women

00:06:54.553 --> 00:06:58.837
are probably much better off in society

00:06:58.837 --> 00:07:00.942
than poor white men,

00:07:00.942 --> 00:07:04.027
and rich black men are probably
somewhere in between.

00:07:04.027 --> 00:07:06.748
So it's really more skewed like this,

00:07:06.748 --> 00:07:09.244
and the same on the bottom level.

00:07:09.244 --> 00:07:11.712
But we can actually take it further

00:07:11.712 --> 00:07:15.307
and look at the interactions
between those two middle levels,

00:07:15.307 --> 00:07:18.721
because rich non-white non-men
might well be better off in society

00:07:18.721 --> 00:07:23.306
than poor white men.

00:07:23.306 --> 00:07:28.616
Think about some extreme examples,
like Michelle Obama, Oprah Winfrey.

00:07:28.616 --> 00:07:33.977
They're definitely better off
than poor white unemployed homeless men.

00:07:34.324 --> 00:07:37.655
So actually the diagram
is more skewed like this.

00:07:37.655 --> 00:07:40.667
And that tension exists

00:07:40.667 --> 00:07:43.740
between the layers
of privilege in the diagram

00:07:43.740 --> 00:07:47.413
and the absolute privilege
that people experience in society.

00:07:47.413 --> 00:07:53.429
And this has helped me to understand
why some poor white men

00:07:53.429 --> 00:07:54.857
are so angry in society at the moment,

00:07:54.857 --> 00:07:58.874
because they are considered to be high up
in this cuboid of privilege,

00:07:58.874 --> 00:08:03.803
but in terms of absolute privilege,
they don't actually feel the effect of it.

00:08:04.021 --> 00:08:07.287
And I believe that understanding
the root of that anger

00:08:07.287 --> 00:08:11.953
is much more productive
than just being angry at them in return.

NOTE Paragraph

00:08:13.503 --> 00:08:15.552
Seeing these abstract structures

00:08:15.552 --> 00:08:18.185
can also help us switch contexts

00:08:18.185 --> 00:08:21.764
and see that different people
are at the top in different contexts.

00:08:21.764 --> 00:08:23.567
In our original diagram,

00:08:23.567 --> 00:08:25.552
rich white men were at the top,

00:08:25.552 --> 00:08:28.951
but if we restricted
our attention to non-men,

00:08:28.951 --> 00:08:31.309
we would see that they are here,

00:08:31.309 --> 00:08:33.813
and now the rich white
non-men are at the top.

00:08:33.813 --> 00:08:36.681
So we could move to
a whole context of women,

00:08:36.681 --> 00:08:41.740
and our three types of privilege
could now be rich, white, and cisgendered.

00:08:41.740 --> 00:08:46.001
Remember that cisgendered means
that your gender identity does match

00:08:46.001 --> 00:08:48.212
the gender you were assigned at birth.

00:08:48.212 --> 00:08:54.155
So now we see that rich white cis women
occupy the analogous situation

00:08:54.155 --> 00:08:57.352
that rich white men did
in broader society,

00:08:57.352 --> 00:09:00.962
and this has helped me understand
why there is so much anger

00:09:00.962 --> 00:09:02.898
towards rich white women,

00:09:02.898 --> 00:09:06.105
especially in some parts
of the feminist movement at the moment,

00:09:06.105 --> 00:09:09.894
because perhaps they're prone
to seeing themselves as underprivileged

00:09:09.894 --> 00:09:11.666
relative to white men,

00:09:11.666 --> 00:09:16.496
and they forget how overprivileged
they are relative to non-white women.

00:09:17.627 --> 00:09:23.178
We can all use these abstract structures
to help us pivot between situations

00:09:23.178 --> 00:09:26.928
in which we are more privileged
and less privileged.

00:09:26.928 --> 00:09:29.668
We are all more privileged than somebody

00:09:29.668 --> 00:09:32.512
and less privileged than somebody else.

00:09:32.512 --> 00:09:35.298
For example, I know and I feel

00:09:35.298 --> 00:09:37.837
that as an Asian person,

00:09:37.837 --> 00:09:42.054
I am less privileged than white people
because of white privilege,

00:09:42.054 --> 00:09:44.995
but I also understand that I am probably

00:09:44.995 --> 00:09:47.793
among the most privileged
of non-white people,

00:09:47.793 --> 00:09:51.818
and this helps me pivot
between those two contexts.

00:09:51.818 --> 00:09:53.487
And in terms of wealth,

00:09:53.487 --> 00:09:55.436
I don't think I'm superrich.

00:09:55.436 --> 00:09:58.415
I'm not as rich as the kind of people
who don't have to work,

00:09:58.415 --> 00:10:00.085
but I am doing fine,

00:10:00.085 --> 00:10:03.000
and that's a much better
situation to be in

00:10:03.000 --> 00:10:04.541
than people who are really struggling,

00:10:04.541 --> 00:10:07.895
maybe are unemployed
or working at minimum wage.

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:08.788 --> 00:10:11.911
I perform these pivots in my head

00:10:11.911 --> 00:10:18.657
to help me understand experiences
from other people's points of view,

00:10:18.849 --> 00:10:23.560
which brings me to this
possibly surprising conclusion:

00:10:23.560 --> 00:10:26.133
that abstract mathematics

00:10:26.133 --> 00:10:28.662
is highly relevant to our daily lives

00:10:28.662 --> 00:10:37.223
and can even help us to understand
and empathize with other people.

00:10:38.846 --> 00:10:44.508
My wish is that everybody would try
to understand other people more

00:10:44.508 --> 00:10:46.679
and work with them together,

00:10:46.679 --> 00:10:48.786
rather than competing with them

00:10:48.786 --> 00:10:52.262
and trying to show that they're wrong.

00:10:52.262 --> 00:10:56.852
And I believe that abstract
mathematical thinking

00:10:56.852 --> 00:10:59.974
can help us achieve that.

00:10:59.974 --> 00:11:02.118
Thank you.

00:11:02.118 --> 00:11:06.273
(Applause)