[Script Info] Title: [Events] Format: Layer, Start, End, Style, Name, MarginL, MarginR, MarginV, Effect, Text Dialogue: 0,0:00:01.45,0:00:07.08,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,The world is awash\Nwith divisive arguments, Dialogue: 0,0:00:07.08,0:00:10.82,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,conflict, fake news, Dialogue: 0,0:00:10.82,0:00:13.28,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,victimhood, Dialogue: 0,0:00:13.28,0:00:18.87,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,exploitation, prejudice,\Nbigotry, blame, shouting, Dialogue: 0,0:00:18.87,0:00:21.100,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and minuscule attention spans. Dialogue: 0,0:00:23.05,0:00:25.30,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It can sometimes seem Dialogue: 0,0:00:25.30,0:00:28.31,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,that we are doomed to take sides, Dialogue: 0,0:00:28.31,0:00:30.70,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,be stuck in echo chambers, Dialogue: 0,0:00:30.70,0:00:33.02,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and never agree again. Dialogue: 0,0:00:33.68,0:00:36.75,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It can sometimes seem\Nlike a race to the bottom, Dialogue: 0,0:00:36.75,0:00:40.58,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,where everyone is calling out\Nsomebody else's privilege Dialogue: 0,0:00:40.58,0:00:43.50,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and vying to show that they Dialogue: 0,0:00:43.50,0:00:48.50,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,are the most hard-done-by person\Nin the conversation. Dialogue: 0,0:00:49.52,0:00:51.55,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,How can we make sense Dialogue: 0,0:00:51.55,0:00:54.31,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,in a world that doesn't? Dialogue: 0,0:00:55.93,0:01:00.68,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I have a tool for understanding\Nthis confusing world of ours, Dialogue: 0,0:01:00.68,0:01:04.39,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,a tool that you might not expect: Dialogue: 0,0:01:04.62,0:01:06.48,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,abstract mathematics. Dialogue: 0,0:01:07.53,0:01:10.26,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I am a pure mathematician. Dialogue: 0,0:01:10.26,0:01:14.16,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Traditionally, pure maths\Nis like the theory of maths, Dialogue: 0,0:01:14.16,0:01:19.60,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,where applied maths is applied\Nto real problems like building bridges Dialogue: 0,0:01:19.60,0:01:21.06,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and flying planes Dialogue: 0,0:01:21.06,0:01:23.74,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and controlling traffic flow. Dialogue: 0,0:01:24.13,0:01:29.47,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,But I'm going to talk about a way\Nthat pure maths applies directly Dialogue: 0,0:01:29.47,0:01:32.82,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,to our a daily lives as a way of thinking. Dialogue: 0,0:01:33.18,0:01:37.23,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I don't solve quadratic equations\Nto help me with my daily life, Dialogue: 0,0:01:37.23,0:01:40.34,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,but I do use mathematical thinking\Nto help me understand arguments Dialogue: 0,0:01:40.34,0:01:44.95,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and to empathize with other people. Dialogue: 0,0:01:45.71,0:01:51.51,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And so pure maths helps me\Nwith the entire human world. Dialogue: 0,0:01:52.62,0:01:55.30,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,But before I talk about\Nthe entire human world, Dialogue: 0,0:01:55.30,0:01:58.88,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I need to talk about something\Nthat you might think of Dialogue: 0,0:01:58.88,0:02:02.17,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,as irrelevant schools maths: Dialogue: 0,0:02:02.40,0:02:04.27,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,factors of numbers. Dialogue: 0,0:02:04.27,0:02:08.10,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,We're going to start by thinking\Nabout the factors of 30. Dialogue: 0,0:02:08.10,0:02:12.89,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Now, if this makes you shudder\Nwith bad memories of school maths lessons, Dialogue: 0,0:02:12.89,0:02:13.91,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I sympathize, Dialogue: 0,0:02:13.91,0:02:17.38,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,because I found school\Nmaths lessons boring too. Dialogue: 0,0:02:17.64,0:02:21.67,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,But I'm pretty sure we are going\Nto take this in a direction Dialogue: 0,0:02:21.67,0:02:25.33,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,that is very different\Nfrom what happened at school. Dialogue: 0,0:02:25.94,0:02:28.12,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So what are the factors of 30?\NWell, they're the numbers that go into 30. Dialogue: 0,0:02:28.12,0:02:32.78,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Maybe you can remember them.\NWe'll work them out. Dialogue: 0,0:02:32.78,0:02:37.19,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It's one, two, three, Dialogue: 0,0:02:37.19,0:02:39.31,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,five, six, Dialogue: 0,0:02:39.31,0:02:42.23,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,10, 15, and 30. Dialogue: 0,0:02:42.23,0:02:44.20,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It's not very interesting. Dialogue: 0,0:02:44.20,0:02:46.73,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It's a bunch of numbers\Nin a straight line. Dialogue: 0,0:02:47.05,0:02:51.08,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,We can make it more interesting\Nby thinking about which of these numbers Dialogue: 0,0:02:51.08,0:02:53.36,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,are also factors of each other\Nand drawing a picture, Dialogue: 0,0:02:53.36,0:02:55.41,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,a bit like a family tree Dialogue: 0,0:02:55.41,0:02:56.59,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,to show those relationships. Dialogue: 0,0:02:56.59,0:03:00.65,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So 30 is going to be at the top\Nlike a kind of great-grandparent. Dialogue: 0,0:03:00.65,0:03:03.78,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Six, 10, and 15 go into 30. Dialogue: 0,0:03:03.78,0:03:07.01,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Five goes into 10 and 15. Dialogue: 0,0:03:07.19,0:03:09.66,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Two goes in six and 10. Dialogue: 0,0:03:09.66,0:03:13.19,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Three goes into six and 15. Dialogue: 0,0:03:13.19,0:03:17.27,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And one goes into two, three, and five. Dialogue: 0,0:03:17.27,0:03:20.98,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So now we see that 10\Nis not divisible by three, Dialogue: 0,0:03:20.98,0:03:24.23,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,but that is this the corners of a cube, Dialogue: 0,0:03:24.23,0:03:26.10,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,which is I think a bit more interesting Dialogue: 0,0:03:26.10,0:03:28.75,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,than a bunch of numbers\Nin a straight line. Dialogue: 0,0:03:29.52,0:03:32.69,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,We can see something more here.\NThere's a hierarchy going on. Dialogue: 0,0:03:32.69,0:03:34.89,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,At the bottom level is the number one, Dialogue: 0,0:03:34.89,0:03:36.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,then there's the numbers\Ntwo, three, and five, Dialogue: 0,0:03:36.99,0:03:39.87,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and nothing goes into those\Nexcept one and themselves. Dialogue: 0,0:03:39.87,0:03:42.35,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,You might remember\Nthis means they're prime. Dialogue: 0,0:03:42.35,0:03:45.39,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,At the next level up,\Nwe have six, 10, and 15, Dialogue: 0,0:03:45.39,0:03:48.90,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and each of those is a product\Nof two prime factors. Dialogue: 0,0:03:48.90,0:03:51.00,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So six is two times three, Dialogue: 0,0:03:51.00,0:03:52.62,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,10 is two times five, Dialogue: 0,0:03:52.62,0:03:54.59,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,15 is three times five, Dialogue: 0,0:03:54.59,0:03:56.50,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and then at the top, we have 30, Dialogue: 0,0:03:56.50,0:03:59.10,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,which is a product of three prime numbers, Dialogue: 0,0:03:59.36,0:04:01.17,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,two times three times five. Dialogue: 0,0:04:01.17,0:04:05.58,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So I could redraw this diagram\Nusing those numbers instead. Dialogue: 0,0:04:06.58,0:04:09.67,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So we see that we've got\Ntwo, three, and five at the top, Dialogue: 0,0:04:09.67,0:04:12.71,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,we have pairs of numbers\Nat the next level, Dialogue: 0,0:04:12.71,0:04:15.43,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and we have single elements\Nat the next level, Dialogue: 0,0:04:15.43,0:04:17.47,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and then the empty set at the bottom. Dialogue: 0,0:04:17.47,0:04:23.15,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And each of those arrows shows\Nlosing one of your numbers in the set. Dialogue: 0,0:04:23.15,0:04:25.44,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Now maybe it can be clear Dialogue: 0,0:04:25.44,0:04:28.77,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,that it doesn't really matter\Nwhat those numbers are. Dialogue: 0,0:04:28.77,0:04:30.38,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,In fact it doesn't matter what they are. Dialogue: 0,0:04:30.38,0:04:34.02,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So we could replace them with\Nsomething like A, B, and C instead Dialogue: 0,0:04:34.02,0:04:37.15,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and we get the same picture. Dialogue: 0,0:04:37.34,0:04:39.94,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So now this has become very abstract. Dialogue: 0,0:04:39.94,0:04:42.29,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,The numbers have turned into letters. Dialogue: 0,0:04:42.29,0:04:45.12,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,But there is a point to this abstraction, Dialogue: 0,0:04:45.12,0:04:50.34,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,which is that it now suddenly\Nbecomes very widely applicable, Dialogue: 0,0:04:50.34,0:04:54.51,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,because A, B, and C could be anything. Dialogue: 0,0:04:54.51,0:04:58.68,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,For example, they could be\Nthree types of privilege: Dialogue: 0,0:04:58.68,0:05:01.70,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,rich, white, and male. Dialogue: 0,0:05:02.57,0:05:06.61,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So then at the next level,\Nwe have rich white people. Dialogue: 0,0:05:06.61,0:05:09.15,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Here we have rich male people. Dialogue: 0,0:05:09.15,0:05:11.53,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Here we have white male people. Dialogue: 0,0:05:11.53,0:05:15.46,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Then we have rich, white, and male. Dialogue: 0,0:05:15.46,0:05:18.68,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And finally people with\Nnone of those types of privilege. Dialogue: 0,0:05:18.68,0:05:21.96,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And I'm going to put back in\Nthe rest of the adjectives for emphasis. Dialogue: 0,0:05:21.96,0:05:24.89,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So here we have rich white\Nnon-male people, Dialogue: 0,0:05:24.89,0:05:27.93,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,to remind us that there are\Nnon-binary people we need to include. Dialogue: 0,0:05:27.93,0:05:30.57,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Here we have rich non-white male people. Dialogue: 0,0:05:30.57,0:05:34.00,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Here we have non-rich white male people, Dialogue: 0,0:05:34.00,0:05:36.84,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,rich non-white non-male, Dialogue: 0,0:05:36.84,0:05:40.12,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,non-rich white non-male, Dialogue: 0,0:05:40.12,0:05:41.84,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and non-rich, non-white male, Dialogue: 0,0:05:41.84,0:05:43.82,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and, and at the bottom\Nwith the least privilege, Dialogue: 0,0:05:43.82,0:05:47.98,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,non-rich, not-white, non-male people. Dialogue: 0,0:05:47.98,0:05:51.82,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,We have gone from a diagram\Nof factors of 30 Dialogue: 0,0:05:51.82,0:05:56.32,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,to a diagram of interaction\Nof different types of privilege, Dialogue: 0,0:05:56.32,0:05:59.96,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and there are many things\Nwe can learn from this diagram, I think. Dialogue: 0,0:05:59.96,0:06:07.48,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,The first is that each arrow represents\Na direct loss of one type of privilege. Dialogue: 0,0:06:07.48,0:06:12.19,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Sometimes people mistakenly think\Nthat white privilege means Dialogue: 0,0:06:12.19,0:06:16.53,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,all white people are better off\Nthan all non-white people. Dialogue: 0,0:06:16.53,0:06:20.26,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Some people point at superrich\Nblack sports stars and say, Dialogue: 0,0:06:20.26,0:06:24.18,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,"See? They're really rich.\NWhite privilege doesn't exist." Dialogue: 0,0:06:24.18,0:06:27.29,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,But that's not what the theory\Nof white privilege says. Dialogue: 0,0:06:27.29,0:06:32.56,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It says that if that superrich sports star\Nhad all the same characteristics Dialogue: 0,0:06:32.56,0:06:34.29,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,but they were also white, Dialogue: 0,0:06:34.29,0:06:39.02,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,we would expect them\Nto be better off in society. Dialogue: 0,0:06:39.48,0:06:42.31,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,There is something else\Nwe can understand from this diagram Dialogue: 0,0:06:42.31,0:06:44.32,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,if we look along a row. Dialogue: 0,0:06:44.32,0:06:48.52,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,If we look along the second-to-top row,\Nwhere people have two types of privilege, Dialogue: 0,0:06:48.52,0:06:50.73,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,we might be able to see Dialogue: 0,0:06:50.73,0:06:52.58,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,that they're not all particularly equal. Dialogue: 0,0:06:52.58,0:06:54.55,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,For example, rich white women Dialogue: 0,0:06:54.55,0:06:58.84,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,are probably much better off in society Dialogue: 0,0:06:58.84,0:07:00.94,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,than poor white men, Dialogue: 0,0:07:00.94,0:07:04.03,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and rich black men are probably\Nsomewhere in between. Dialogue: 0,0:07:04.03,0:07:06.75,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So it's really more skewed like this, Dialogue: 0,0:07:06.75,0:07:09.24,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and the same on the bottom level. Dialogue: 0,0:07:09.24,0:07:11.71,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,But we can actually take it further Dialogue: 0,0:07:11.71,0:07:15.31,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and look at the interactions\Nbetween those two middle levels, Dialogue: 0,0:07:15.31,0:07:18.72,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,because rich non-white non-men\Nmight well be better off in society Dialogue: 0,0:07:18.72,0:07:23.31,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,than poor white men. Dialogue: 0,0:07:23.31,0:07:28.62,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Think about some extreme examples,\Nlike Michelle Obama, Oprah Winfrey. Dialogue: 0,0:07:28.62,0:07:33.98,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,They're definitely better off\Nthan poor white unemployed homeless men. Dialogue: 0,0:07:34.32,0:07:37.66,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So actually the diagram\Nis more skewed like this. Dialogue: 0,0:07:37.66,0:07:40.67,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And that tension exists Dialogue: 0,0:07:40.67,0:07:43.74,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,between the layers\Nof privilege in the diagram Dialogue: 0,0:07:43.74,0:07:47.41,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and the absolute privilege\Nthat people experience in society. Dialogue: 0,0:07:47.41,0:07:53.43,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And this has helped me to understand\Nwhy some poor white men Dialogue: 0,0:07:53.43,0:07:54.86,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,are so angry in society at the moment, Dialogue: 0,0:07:54.86,0:07:58.87,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,because they are considered to be high up\Nin this cuboid of privilege, Dialogue: 0,0:07:58.87,0:08:03.80,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,but in terms of absolute privilege,\Nthey don't actually feel the effect of it. Dialogue: 0,0:08:04.02,0:08:07.29,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And I believe that understanding\Nthe root of that anger Dialogue: 0,0:08:07.29,0:08:11.95,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,is much more productive\Nthan just being angry at them in return. Dialogue: 0,0:08:13.50,0:08:15.55,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Seeing these abstract structures Dialogue: 0,0:08:15.55,0:08:18.18,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,can also help us switch contexts Dialogue: 0,0:08:18.18,0:08:21.76,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and see that different people\Nare at the top in different contexts. Dialogue: 0,0:08:21.76,0:08:23.57,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,In our original diagram, Dialogue: 0,0:08:23.57,0:08:25.55,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,rich white men were at the top, Dialogue: 0,0:08:25.55,0:08:28.95,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,but if we restricted\Nour attention to non-men, Dialogue: 0,0:08:28.95,0:08:31.31,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,we would see that they are here, Dialogue: 0,0:08:31.31,0:08:33.81,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and now the rich white\Nnon-men are at the top. Dialogue: 0,0:08:33.81,0:08:36.68,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So we could move to\Na whole context of women, Dialogue: 0,0:08:36.68,0:08:41.74,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and our three types of privilege\Ncould now be rich, white, and cisgendered. Dialogue: 0,0:08:41.74,0:08:46.00,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Remember that cisgendered means\Nthat your gender identity does match Dialogue: 0,0:08:46.00,0:08:48.21,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,the gender you were assigned at birth. Dialogue: 0,0:08:48.21,0:08:54.16,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So now we see that rich white cis women\Noccupy the analogous situation Dialogue: 0,0:08:54.16,0:08:57.35,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,that rich white men did\Nin broader society, Dialogue: 0,0:08:57.35,0:09:00.96,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and this has helped me understand\Nwhy there is so much anger Dialogue: 0,0:09:00.96,0:09:02.90,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,towards rich white women, Dialogue: 0,0:09:02.90,0:09:06.10,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,especially in some parts\Nof the feminist movement at the moment, Dialogue: 0,0:09:06.10,0:09:09.89,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,because perhaps they're prone\Nto seeing themselves as underprivileged Dialogue: 0,0:09:09.89,0:09:11.67,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,relative to white men, Dialogue: 0,0:09:11.67,0:09:16.50,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and they forget how overprivileged\Nthey are relative to non-white women. Dialogue: 0,0:09:17.63,0:09:23.18,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,We can all use these abstract structures\Nto help us pivot between situations Dialogue: 0,0:09:23.18,0:09:26.93,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,in which we are more privileged\Nand less privileged. Dialogue: 0,0:09:26.93,0:09:29.67,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,We are all more privileged than somebody Dialogue: 0,0:09:29.67,0:09:32.51,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and less privileged than somebody else. Dialogue: 0,0:09:32.51,0:09:35.30,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,For example, I know and I feel Dialogue: 0,0:09:35.30,0:09:37.84,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,that as an Asian person, Dialogue: 0,0:09:37.84,0:09:42.05,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I am less privileged than white people\Nbecause of white privilege, Dialogue: 0,0:09:42.05,0:09:44.100,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,but I also understand that I am probably Dialogue: 0,0:09:44.100,0:09:47.79,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,among the most privileged\Nof non-white people, Dialogue: 0,0:09:47.79,0:09:51.82,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and this helps me pivot\Nbetween those two contexts. Dialogue: 0,0:09:51.82,0:09:53.49,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And in terms of wealth, Dialogue: 0,0:09:53.49,0:09:55.44,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I don't think I'm superrich. Dialogue: 0,0:09:55.44,0:09:58.42,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I'm not as rich as the kind of people\Nwho don't have to work, Dialogue: 0,0:09:58.42,0:10:00.08,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,but I am doing fine, Dialogue: 0,0:10:00.08,0:10:03.00,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and that's a much better\Nsituation to be in Dialogue: 0,0:10:03.00,0:10:04.54,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,than people who are really struggling, Dialogue: 0,0:10:04.54,0:10:07.90,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,maybe are unemployed\Nor working at minimum wage. Dialogue: 0,0:10:08.79,0:10:11.91,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I perform these pivots in my head Dialogue: 0,0:10:11.91,0:10:18.66,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,to help me understand experiences\Nfrom other people's points of view, Dialogue: 0,0:10:18.85,0:10:23.56,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,which brings me to this\Npossibly surprising conclusion: Dialogue: 0,0:10:23.56,0:10:26.13,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,that abstract mathematics Dialogue: 0,0:10:26.13,0:10:28.66,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,is highly relevant to our daily lives Dialogue: 0,0:10:28.66,0:10:37.22,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and can even help us to understand\Nand empathize with other people. Dialogue: 0,0:10:38.85,0:10:44.51,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,My wish is that everybody would try\Nto understand other people more Dialogue: 0,0:10:44.51,0:10:46.68,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and work with them together, Dialogue: 0,0:10:46.68,0:10:48.79,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,rather than competing with them Dialogue: 0,0:10:48.79,0:10:52.26,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and trying to show that they're wrong. Dialogue: 0,0:10:52.26,0:10:56.85,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And I believe that abstract\Nmathematical thinking Dialogue: 0,0:10:56.85,0:10:59.97,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,can help us achieve that. Dialogue: 0,0:10:59.97,0:11:02.12,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Thank you. Dialogue: 0,0:11:02.12,0:11:06.27,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,(Applause)