The world is awash with divisive arguments, conflict, fake news, victimhood, exploitation, prejudice, bigotry, blame, shouting, and minuscule attention spans. It can sometimes seem that we are doomed to take sides, be stuck in echo chambers, and never agree again. It can sometimes seem like a race to the bottom, where everyone is calling out somebody else's privilege and vying to show that they are the most hard-done-by person in the conversation. How can we make sense in a world that doesn't? I have a tool for understanding this confusing world of ours, a tool that you might not expect: abstract mathematics. I am a pure mathematician. Traditionally, pure maths is like the theory of maths, where applied maths is applied to real problems like building bridges and flying planes and controlling traffic flow. But I'm going to talk about a way that pure maths applies directly to our a daily lives as a way of thinking. I don't solve quadratic equations to help me with my daily life, but I do use mathematical thinking to help me understand arguments and to empathize with other people. And so pure maths helps me with the entire human world. But before I talk about the entire human world, I need to talk about something that you might think of as irrelevant schools maths: factors of numbers. We're going to start by thinking about the factors of 30. Now, if this makes you shudder with bad memories of school maths lessons, I sympathize, because I found school maths lessons boring too. But I'm pretty sure we are going to take this in a direction that is very different from what happened at school. So what are the factors of 30? Maybe you can remember them. We'll work them out. It's one, two, three, five, six, 10, 15, and 30. It's not very interesting. It's a bunch of numbers in a straight line. We can make it more interesting by thinking about which of these numbers are also factors of each other and drawing a picture, a bit like a family tree to show those relationships. So 30 is going to be at the top like a kind of great grandparent. Six, 10, and 15 go into 30. Five goes into 10 and 15. Two goes in six and 10. Three goes into six and 15. And one goes into two, three, and five. So now we see that 10 is not divisible by three, but that is this the corners of a cube, which is I think a bit more interesting than a bunch of numbers in a straight line. We can see something more here. There's a hierarchy going on. At the bottom level is the number one, then there's the numbers two, three, and five, and nothing goes into those except one and themselves. You might remember this means they're prime. At the next level up, we have six, 10, and 15, and each of those is a product of two prime factors. So six is two times three, 10 is two times five, 15 is three times five, and then at the top, we have 30, which is a product of three prime numbers, two times three times five. So I could redraw this diagram using those numbers instead. So we see that we've got two, three, and five at the top, we have pairs of numbers at the next level, and we have single elements at the next level, and then the empty set at the bottom. And each of those arrows shows losing one of your numbers in the set. Now maybe it can be clear that it doesn't really matter what those numbers are. In fact it doesn't matter what they are. So we could replace them with something like A, B, and C instead and we get the same picture. So now this has become very abstract. The numbers have turned into letters. But there is a point to this abstraction, which is that it now suddenly becomes very widely applicable, because A, B, and C could be anything. For example, they could be three types of privilege: rich, white, and male. So then at the next level, we have rich white people. Here we have rich male people. Here we have white male people. Then we have rich, white, and male. And finally people with none of those types of privilege.