WEBVTT

00:00:01.247 --> 00:00:06.860
The world is awash
with divisive arguments,

00:00:06.884 --> 00:00:08.757
conflict,

00:00:08.781 --> 00:00:10.594
fake news,

00:00:10.618 --> 00:00:12.204
victimhood,

00:00:13.146 --> 00:00:18.847
exploitation, prejudice,
bigotry, blame, shouting

00:00:18.871 --> 00:00:21.794
and minuscule attention spans.

00:00:22.859 --> 00:00:28.048
It can sometimes seem
that we are doomed to take sides,

00:00:28.072 --> 00:00:30.334
be stuck in echo chambers

00:00:30.358 --> 00:00:32.675
and never agree again.

00:00:33.342 --> 00:00:36.343
It can sometimes seem
like a race to the bottom,

00:00:36.367 --> 00:00:40.385
where everyone is calling out
somebody else's privilege

00:00:40.409 --> 00:00:45.523
and vying to show that they
are the most hard-done-by person

00:00:45.547 --> 00:00:47.085
in the conversation.

00:00:49.033 --> 00:00:50.863
How can we make sense

00:00:50.887 --> 00:00:53.291
in a world that doesn't?

NOTE Paragraph

00:00:55.604 --> 00:01:00.361
I have a tool for understanding
this confusing world of ours,

00:01:00.385 --> 00:01:03.293
a tool that you might not expect:

00:01:04.194 --> 00:01:05.848
abstract mathematics.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:07.268 --> 00:01:09.651
I am a pure mathematician.

00:01:10.063 --> 00:01:14.076
Traditionally, pure maths
is like the theory of maths,

00:01:14.100 --> 00:01:19.269
where applied maths is applied
to real problems like building bridges

00:01:19.293 --> 00:01:20.808
and flying planes

00:01:20.832 --> 00:01:23.175
and controlling traffic flow.

00:01:23.894 --> 00:01:28.820
But I'm going to talk about a way
that pure maths applies directly

00:01:28.844 --> 00:01:30.353
to our daily lives

00:01:30.377 --> 00:01:32.222
as a way of thinking.

00:01:32.931 --> 00:01:37.119
I don't solve quadratic equations
to help me with my daily life,

00:01:37.143 --> 00:01:42.285
but I do use mathematical thinking
to help me understand arguments

00:01:42.309 --> 00:01:44.818
and to empathize with other people.

00:01:45.501 --> 00:01:51.109
And so pure maths helps me
with the entire human world.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:52.434 --> 00:01:55.545
But before I talk about
the entire human world,

00:01:55.569 --> 00:01:58.629
I need to talk about something
that you might think of

00:01:58.653 --> 00:02:01.339
as irrelevant schools maths:

00:02:01.974 --> 00:02:04.053
factors of numbers.

00:02:04.077 --> 00:02:07.633
We're going to start
by thinking about the factors of 30.

00:02:07.657 --> 00:02:12.373
Now, if this makes you shudder
with bad memories of school maths lessons,

00:02:12.397 --> 00:02:16.995
I sympathize, because I found
school maths lessons boring, too.

00:02:17.480 --> 00:02:21.363
But I'm pretty sure we are going
to take this in a direction

00:02:21.387 --> 00:02:24.828
that is very different
from what happened at school.

NOTE Paragraph

00:02:25.718 --> 00:02:27.444
So what are the factors of 30?

00:02:27.468 --> 00:02:30.693
Well, they're the numbers that go into 30.

00:02:30.717 --> 00:02:33.118
Maybe you can remember them.
We'll work them out.

00:02:33.142 --> 00:02:36.956
It's one, two, three,

00:02:36.980 --> 00:02:39.072
five, six,

00:02:39.096 --> 00:02:41.956
10, 15 and 30.

00:02:41.980 --> 00:02:43.457
It's not very interesting.

00:02:43.957 --> 00:02:46.356
It's a bunch of numbers
in a straight line.

00:02:46.826 --> 00:02:48.349
We can make it more interesting

00:02:48.373 --> 00:02:52.063
by thinking about which of these numbers
are also factors of each other

00:02:52.087 --> 00:02:54.615
and drawing a picture,
a bit like a family tree,

00:02:54.639 --> 00:02:56.345
to show those relationships.

00:02:56.369 --> 00:03:00.439
So 30 is going to be at the top
like a kind of great-grandparent.

00:03:00.463 --> 00:03:03.060
Six, 10 and 15 go into 30.

00:03:03.689 --> 00:03:06.489
Five goes into 10 and 15.

00:03:06.945 --> 00:03:09.632
Two goes into six and 10.

00:03:09.656 --> 00:03:12.943
Three goes into six and 15.

00:03:12.967 --> 00:03:17.151
And one goes into two, three and five.

00:03:17.175 --> 00:03:20.910
So now we see that 10
is not divisible by three,

00:03:20.934 --> 00:03:24.114
but that this is the corners of a cube,

00:03:24.138 --> 00:03:26.219
which is, I think, a bit more interesting

00:03:26.243 --> 00:03:28.367
than a bunch of numbers
in a straight line.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:29.756 --> 00:03:32.666
We can see something more here.
There's a hierarchy going on.

00:03:32.690 --> 00:03:34.561
At the bottom level is the number one,

00:03:34.585 --> 00:03:36.829
then there's the numbers
two, three and five,

00:03:36.853 --> 00:03:39.663
and nothing goes into those
except one and themselves.

00:03:39.687 --> 00:03:42.117
You might remember
this means they're prime.

00:03:42.141 --> 00:03:45.174
At the next level up,
we have six, 10 and 15,

00:03:45.198 --> 00:03:48.706
and each of those is a product
of two prime factors.

00:03:48.730 --> 00:03:50.672
So six is two times three,

00:03:50.696 --> 00:03:52.367
10 is two times five,

00:03:52.391 --> 00:03:54.352
15 is three times five.

00:03:54.376 --> 00:03:56.341
And then at the top, we have 30,

00:03:56.365 --> 00:03:58.860
which is a product
of three prime numbers --

00:03:58.884 --> 00:04:00.937
two times three times five.

00:04:00.961 --> 00:04:05.580
So I could redraw this diagram
using those numbers instead.

00:04:06.335 --> 00:04:09.403
We see that we've got
two, three and five at the top,

00:04:09.427 --> 00:04:12.499
we have pairs of numbers
at the next level,

00:04:12.523 --> 00:04:14.910
and we have single elements
at the next level

00:04:14.934 --> 00:04:16.852
and then the empty set at the bottom.

00:04:17.271 --> 00:04:22.650
And each of those arrows shows
losing one of your numbers in the set.

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:22.674 --> 00:04:25.291
Now maybe it can be clear

00:04:25.315 --> 00:04:28.173
that it doesn't really matter
what those numbers are.

00:04:28.197 --> 00:04:30.156
In fact, it doesn't matter what they are.

00:04:30.180 --> 00:04:34.576
So we could replace them with
something like A, B and C instead,

00:04:34.600 --> 00:04:36.335
and we get the same picture.

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:37.025 --> 00:04:39.142
So now this has become very abstract.

00:04:39.626 --> 00:04:41.610
The numbers have turned into letters.

00:04:42.091 --> 00:04:45.569
But there is a point to this abstraction,

00:04:45.593 --> 00:04:50.178
which is that it now suddenly
becomes very widely applicable,

00:04:50.202 --> 00:04:53.876
because A, B and C could be anything.

00:04:54.291 --> 00:04:58.609
For example, they could be
three types of privilege:

00:04:58.633 --> 00:05:01.326
rich, white and male.

00:05:02.386 --> 00:05:05.576
So then at the next level,
we have rich white people.

00:05:06.368 --> 00:05:08.849
Here we have rich male people.

00:05:08.873 --> 00:05:10.922
Here we have white male people.

00:05:10.946 --> 00:05:14.561
Then we have rich, white and male.

00:05:15.209 --> 00:05:18.341
And finally, people with none
of those types of privilege.

00:05:18.365 --> 00:05:21.634
And I'm going to put back in
the rest of the adjectives for emphasis.

00:05:21.658 --> 00:05:24.688
So here we have rich, white
non-male people,

00:05:24.712 --> 00:05:27.761
to remind us that there are
nonbinary people we need to include.

00:05:27.785 --> 00:05:30.438
Here we have rich, nonwhite male people.

00:05:30.462 --> 00:05:33.758
Here we have non-rich, white male people,

00:05:33.782 --> 00:05:36.484
rich, nonwhite, non-male,

00:05:36.508 --> 00:05:39.059
non-rich, white, non-male

00:05:39.083 --> 00:05:41.418
and non-rich, nonwhite, male.

00:05:41.442 --> 00:05:43.639
And at the bottom,
with the least privilege,

00:05:43.663 --> 00:05:47.706
non-rich, nonwhite, non-male people.

NOTE Paragraph

00:05:47.730 --> 00:05:51.542
We have gone from a diagram
of factors of 30

00:05:51.566 --> 00:05:55.496
to a diagram of interaction
of different types of privilege.

00:05:56.068 --> 00:05:59.690
And there are many things
we can learn from this diagram, I think.

00:05:59.714 --> 00:06:06.525
The first is that each arrow represents
a direct loss of one type of privilege.

00:06:07.331 --> 00:06:11.814
Sometimes people mistakenly think
that white privilege means

00:06:11.838 --> 00:06:16.386
all white people are better off
than all nonwhite people.

00:06:16.410 --> 00:06:20.122
Some people point at superrich
black sports stars and say,

00:06:20.146 --> 00:06:23.602
"See? They're really rich.
White privilege doesn't exist."

00:06:24.116 --> 00:06:27.145
But that's not what the theory
of white privilege says.

00:06:27.169 --> 00:06:32.407
It says that if that superrich sports star
had all the same characteristics

00:06:32.431 --> 00:06:33.907
but they were also white,

00:06:33.931 --> 00:06:37.363
we would expect them
to be better off in society.

NOTE Paragraph

00:06:39.302 --> 00:06:42.087
There is something else
we can understand from this diagram

00:06:42.111 --> 00:06:44.097
if we look along a row.

00:06:44.121 --> 00:06:48.402
If we look along the second-to-top row,
where people have two types of privilege,

00:06:48.426 --> 00:06:52.382
we might be able to see
that they're not all particularly equal.

00:06:52.406 --> 00:06:58.485
For example, rich white women
are probably much better off in society

00:06:58.509 --> 00:07:00.704
than poor white men,

00:07:00.728 --> 00:07:03.734
and rich black men are probably
somewhere in between.

00:07:03.758 --> 00:07:06.535
So it's really more skewed like this,

00:07:06.559 --> 00:07:08.492
and the same on the bottom level.

NOTE Paragraph

00:07:08.990 --> 00:07:11.081
But we can actually take it further

00:07:11.105 --> 00:07:14.676
and look at the interactions
between those two middle levels,

00:07:15.076 --> 00:07:21.012
because rich, nonwhite non-men
might well be better off in society

00:07:21.036 --> 00:07:23.129
than poor white men.

00:07:23.153 --> 00:07:27.061
Think about some extreme
examples, like Michelle Obama,

00:07:27.085 --> 00:07:28.503
Oprah Winfrey.

00:07:28.527 --> 00:07:33.540
They're definitely better off
than poor, white, unemployed homeless men.

00:07:34.164 --> 00:07:36.944
So actually, the diagram
is more skewed like this.

00:07:37.519 --> 00:07:40.222
And that tension exists

00:07:40.246 --> 00:07:43.485
between the layers
of privilege in the diagram

00:07:43.509 --> 00:07:47.174
and the absolute privilege
that people experience in society.

00:07:47.198 --> 00:07:50.872
And this has helped me to understand
why some poor white men

00:07:50.896 --> 00:07:54.305
are so angry in society at the moment,

00:07:54.329 --> 00:07:58.756
because they are considered to be high up
in this cuboid of privilege,

00:07:58.780 --> 00:08:03.563
but in terms of absolute privilege,
they don't actually feel the effect of it.

00:08:03.587 --> 00:08:07.033
And I believe that understanding
the root of that anger

00:08:07.057 --> 00:08:11.344
is much more productive
than just being angry at them in return.

NOTE Paragraph

00:08:13.289 --> 00:08:17.839
Seeing these abstract structures
can also help us switch contexts

00:08:17.863 --> 00:08:21.509
and see that different people
are at the top in different contexts.

00:08:21.533 --> 00:08:23.313
In our original diagram,

00:08:23.337 --> 00:08:25.340
rich white men were at the top,

00:08:25.364 --> 00:08:29.066
but if we restricted
our attention to non-men,

00:08:29.090 --> 00:08:30.780
we would see that they are here,

00:08:30.804 --> 00:08:33.535
and now the rich, white
non-men are at the top.

00:08:33.559 --> 00:08:36.404
So we could move to
a whole context of women,

00:08:36.428 --> 00:08:41.572
and our three types of privilege
could now be rich, white and cisgendered.

00:08:41.596 --> 00:08:45.301
Remember that "cisgendered" means
that your gender identity does match

00:08:45.325 --> 00:08:47.290
the gender you were assigned at birth.

00:08:48.021 --> 00:08:54.033
So now we see that rich, white cis women
occupy the analogous situation

00:08:54.057 --> 00:08:57.231
that rich white men did
in broader society,

00:08:57.255 --> 00:09:00.683
and this has helped me understand
why there is so much anger

00:09:00.707 --> 00:09:02.360
towards rich white women,

00:09:02.384 --> 00:09:05.906
especially in some parts
of the feminist movement at the moment,

00:09:05.930 --> 00:09:09.590
because perhaps they're prone
to seeing themselves as underprivileged

00:09:09.614 --> 00:09:11.427
relative to white men,

00:09:11.451 --> 00:09:16.562
and they forget how overprivileged
they are relative to nonwhite women.

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:18.554 --> 00:09:23.994
We can all use these abstract structures
to help us pivot between situations

00:09:24.018 --> 00:09:26.610
in which we are more privileged
and less privileged.

00:09:26.634 --> 00:09:29.157
We are all more privileged than somebody

00:09:29.181 --> 00:09:31.619
and less privileged than somebody else.

00:09:32.738 --> 00:09:37.522
For example, I know and I feel
that as an Asian person,

00:09:37.546 --> 00:09:40.276
I am less privileged than white people

00:09:40.300 --> 00:09:41.775
because of white privilege.

00:09:41.799 --> 00:09:43.447
But I also understand

00:09:43.471 --> 00:09:47.600
that I am probably among
the most privileged of nonwhite people,

00:09:47.624 --> 00:09:50.743
and this helps me pivot
between those two contexts.

00:09:51.595 --> 00:09:53.288
And in terms of wealth,

00:09:53.312 --> 00:09:55.155
I don't think I'm superrich.

00:09:55.179 --> 00:09:58.224
I'm not as rich as the kind of people
who don't have to work,

00:09:58.248 --> 00:09:59.796
but I am doing fine,

00:09:59.820 --> 00:10:01.975
and that's a much better
situation to be in

00:10:01.999 --> 00:10:03.810
than people who are really struggling,

00:10:03.834 --> 00:10:06.895
maybe are unemployed
or working at minimum wage.

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:08.566 --> 00:10:11.992
I perform these pivots in my head

00:10:12.016 --> 00:10:17.255
to help me understand experiences
from other people's points of view,

00:10:18.412 --> 00:10:22.401
which brings me to this
possibly surprising conclusion:

00:10:23.242 --> 00:10:30.076
that abstract mathematics
is highly relevant to our daily lives

00:10:30.100 --> 00:10:36.820
and can even help us to understand
and empathize with other people.

00:10:38.584 --> 00:10:44.223
My wish is that everybody would try
to understand other people more

00:10:44.247 --> 00:10:46.163
and work with them together,

00:10:46.187 --> 00:10:48.208
rather than competing with them

00:10:48.232 --> 00:10:50.843
and trying to show that they're wrong.

00:10:52.031 --> 00:10:56.598
And I believe that abstract
mathematical thinking

00:10:56.622 --> 00:10:58.702
can help us achieve that.

NOTE Paragraph

00:11:00.265 --> 00:11:01.470
Thank you.

NOTE Paragraph

00:11:01.494 --> 00:11:05.649
(Applause)