9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Imagine you're at a football game

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
when this obnoxious guy sits next to you.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
He's loud,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
he spills his drink on you,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
and he makes fun of your team.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Days later, you're walking in the park

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
when suddenly it starts to pour rain.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Who should show up at your side

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
to offer you an umbrella?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
The same guy from the football game.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Do you change your mind about him

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
based on his second encounter,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
or do you go with your first impression

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
and write him off?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Research in social psychology suggests

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
we're quick to form lasting impressions of others

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
based on their behaviors.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
We manage to do this with little effort,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
inferring stable character traits

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
from a single behavior,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
like a harsh word

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
or a clumsy step.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Using our impressions as guides,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
we can accurately predict

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
how people are going to behave in the future.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Armed with the knowledge

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
that the guy from the football game

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
was a jerk the first time you met him,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
you might expect more of the same down the road.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
If so, you might choose to avoid him

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
the next time you see him.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
That said, we can change our impressions

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
in light of new information.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Behavioral researchers have identified

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
consistent patterns that seem to guide

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
this process of impression updating.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
On one hand, learning very negative,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
highly immoral information about someone

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
typically has a stronger impact

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
than learning very positive, highly moral information.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
So, unfortunately for our new friend

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
from the football game,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
his bad behavior at the game might outweigh

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
his good behavior at the park.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Research suggests that this bias occurs

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
because immoral behaviors are more diagnostic,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
or revealing,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
of a person's true character.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Okay, so by this logic,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
bad is always stronger than good

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
when it comes to updating.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Well, not necessarily.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Certain types of learning don't seem to lead

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
toward sort of negativity bias.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
When learning about another person's abilities and competencies,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
for instance,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
this bias flips.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
It's actually the positive information

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
that get weighted more heavily.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Let's go back to that football game.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
If a player scores a goal,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
it ultimately has a stronger impact

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
on your impression of their skills

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
than if they miss the net.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
The two sides of the updating story

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
are ultimately quite consistent.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Overall, behaviors that are perceived

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
as being less frequent are also the ones

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
that people tend to weigh more heavily

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
when forming and updating impressions,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
highly immoral actions

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
and highly competent actions.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
So, what's happening at the level of the brain

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
when we're updating our impressions?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Using fMRI,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
or functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
researchers have identified

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
an extended network of brain regions

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
that respond to new information

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
that's inconsistent with initial impressions.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
These include areas typically associated

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
with social cognition,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
attention,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
and cognitive control.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Moreover, when updating impressions

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
based on people's behaviors,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
activity in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
and the superior temporal sulcus

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
correlates with perceptions

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
of how frequently those behaviors occur in daily life.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
In other words, the brain seems to be tracking

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
low-level, statistical properties of behavior

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
in order to make complex decisions

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
regarding other people's character.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
It needs to decide

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
is this person's behavior typical

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
or is it out of the ordinary.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
In the situation

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
with the obnoxious-football-fan-turned-good-samaritan,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
your brain says,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
"Well, in my experience,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
pretty much anyone would lend someone their umbrella,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
but the way this guy acted at the football game,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
that was unusual."

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
And so, you decide to go with your first impression.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
There's a good moral in this data:

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
your brain, and by extension you,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
might care more about

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
the very negative, immoral things

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
another person has done

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
compared to the very positive, moral things,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
but it's a direct result

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
of the comparative rarity of those bad behaviors.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
We're more used to people being basically good,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
like taking time to help a stranger in need.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
In this context, bad might be stronger than good,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
but only because good is more plentiful.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Think about the last time you judged someone

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
based on their behavior,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
especially a time when you really feel

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
like you changed your mind about someone.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Was the behavior that caused you

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
to update your impression

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
something you'd expect anyone to do,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
or was it something totally out of the ordinary?