0:00:07.684,0:00:12.451
[Bruce Nauman: "Poke in the Eye/Nose/Ear"]

0:00:14.961,0:00:16.582
What is it, "Poke in the Eye?"

0:00:17.845,0:00:18.541
"Ear?"

0:00:21.184,0:00:22.013
What is it?

0:00:22.716,0:00:24.990
"Poke in the Eye, Ear, and Nose?"

0:00:25.722,0:00:27.079
"Eye, Nose, and Ear?"

0:00:27.079,0:00:27.983
"Eye, Ear, and Nose?"

0:00:27.983,0:00:29.213
Whatever. [LAUGHS]

0:00:35.294,0:00:38.514
My videos always involve

0:00:38.514,0:00:43.345
some idea of a human being in a unusual situation--

0:00:43.840,0:00:44.883
and what happens.

0:01:16.297,0:01:18.036
It's shot in a very slow motion

0:01:18.036,0:01:19.776
with a high-speed camera.

0:01:20.081,0:01:22.770
In this case it was projected as a large image.

0:01:23.620,0:01:30.148
And so, you're watching this uncomfortable activity take place

0:01:30.148,0:01:32.483
at the same time as you're watching

0:01:32.743,0:01:34.603
the way the colors change;

0:01:34.843,0:01:36.683
the way the creases in the skin changes;

0:01:36.683,0:01:37.882
the way the shadows change

0:01:37.882,0:01:40.545
and move across the screen very slowly,

0:01:40.545,0:01:43.040
so that they do become very abstract.

0:01:46.652,0:01:48.851
As things go in and out of focus,

0:01:48.851,0:01:52.083
your attention moves around quite a bit.

0:01:54.345,0:01:55.449
It's slowed down enough--

0:01:55.449,0:01:56.547
things happen slowly enough--

0:01:56.547,0:01:58.881
that it becomes almost like a moon landscape,

0:01:58.881,0:02:03.214
and you start just watching the slow frame-by-frame changes.

0:02:06.930,0:02:08.280
That's what I liked about it.

0:02:08.280,0:02:11.620
Again, another way of taking an activity

0:02:11.620,0:02:15.682
and changing it's meaning--

0:02:17.251,0:02:19.988
abstracting it by stretching out the time,

0:02:22.780,0:02:24.190
and allowing you to see things

0:02:24.190,0:02:26.759
that you couldn't see otherwise,

0:02:27.715,0:02:30.222
making you watch the formal parts of it.

0:02:40.520,0:02:43.820
A lot of people were thinking about

0:02:43.820,0:02:45.913
how to structure time.

0:02:46.483,0:02:49.190
John Cage was making different kinds of ways of making music,

0:02:49.190,0:02:52.789
and Merce was structuring dance in different kinds of ways,

0:02:53.115,0:02:55.344
and then Warhol was making films that

0:02:55.344,0:02:57.651
went on for a long period of time.

0:02:57.882,0:02:59.715
One of the things I liked about some of those people

0:02:59.715,0:03:03.388
was that they thought of their works as just on-going,

0:03:03.388,0:03:05.314
and so you can come and go,

0:03:05.314,0:03:07.114
and the work was there.

0:03:07.347,0:03:09.620
And so there wasn't a specific duration.

0:03:10.115,0:03:12.220
So where this thing can just repeat and repeat and repeat,

0:03:12.220,0:03:14.052
and you don't have to sit and watch the whole thing.

0:03:14.052,0:03:15.946
You can watch for a while, leave, and go have lunch.

0:03:15.946,0:03:17.146
Or, come back in a week,

0:03:17.146,0:03:18.342
and it's just going on.

0:03:18.342,0:03:20.283
And I really like that idea of

0:03:20.283,0:03:22.115
the thing just being there.

0:03:22.314,0:03:24.590
It became almost like an object that was there,

0:03:24.851,0:03:27.589
that you can go back and visit whenever you wanted to.

0:03:30.590,0:03:33.051
It's probably more painful for the viewer than it was for me.

0:03:33.619,0:03:34.621
[LAUGHS]

0:03:35.051,0:03:36.483
I didn't hurt myself.

0:03:36.716,0:03:37.853
[LAUGHS]