1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,166
>>Prof. Frank R. Baumgartner: Punctuated equilibrium theory comes out of the study of evolution and biology,

2
00:00:06,166 --> 00:00:08,159
and Brian Jones and I used it.

3
00:00:08,615 --> 00:00:13,078
Other people have used it, but we developed a book where we used it as the

4
00:00:13,078 --> 00:00:17,398
guiding framework or the guiding theory for our explanation of policy change,

5
00:00:17,398 --> 00:00:20,294
and that was a book that we published in 1993.

6
00:00:20,757 --> 00:00:25,715
And we were interested in analyzing over long periods of time,

7
00:00:25,715 --> 00:00:28,498
so for example maybe 40 or 50 years,

8
00:00:28,498 --> 00:00:35,839
of policy change why were certain policies for generations at a time stable,

9
00:00:36,399 --> 00:00:39,214
and people thought that maybe they were immovable;

10
00:00:39,214 --> 00:00:42,791
for example, smoking and tobacco policy in the United States.

11
00:00:43,512 --> 00:00:48,681
The tobacco industry was often seen as the single most influential lobby in America,

12
00:00:48,681 --> 00:00:50,682
that it would never be taken down because it

13
00:00:50,682 --> 00:00:55,981
had so many connections to farmers and tax receipts that the government got,

14
00:00:55,981 --> 00:00:58,992
and it was a huge export commodity for the US,

15
00:00:58,992 --> 00:01:01,149
and so people thought that that was an example

16
00:01:01,149 --> 00:01:04,270
like they think of the National Rifle Association

17
00:01:04,270 --> 00:01:07,132
now as the most influential interest group in American politics.

18
00:01:07,980 --> 00:01:12,191
But all of a sudden, finally things flipped on the tobacco industry,

19
00:01:12,191 --> 00:01:19,592
and the prevailing understanding of tobacco went from being glamourous to being catastrophic.

20
00:01:19,592 --> 00:01:21,433
And so today throughout the world,

21
00:01:21,433 --> 00:01:25,811
at least the Western world, we see policies that are much more anti-tobacco,

22
00:01:25,811 --> 00:01:28,680
and that was the once upon time that was unimaginable.

23
00:01:29,832 --> 00:01:32,032
So our book was published in ‘93,

24
00:01:32,542 --> 00:01:35,458
and that’s what it really focused on – how could

25
00:01:35,458 --> 00:01:41,271
we explain the unexpected shifts in the political fortunes of major American industries.

26
00:01:42,681 --> 00:01:46,591
Well, students should use many theories,

27
00:01:46,591 --> 00:01:49,630
but I think our theory is of interest because

28
00:01:52,580 --> 00:01:57,049
it poses as a question something that other people sometimes take for granted,

29
00:01:57,049 --> 00:01:59,163
which is why are certain industries powerful,

30
00:02:00,196 --> 00:02:02,156
and what is the basis of their power.

31
00:02:02,767 --> 00:02:05,828
And we propose that there’s really two bases of power,

32
00:02:05,828 --> 00:02:07,722
one is an institutional structure.

33
00:02:08,713 --> 00:02:16,763
So supporting government agencies that promote a certain industry and with smoking,

34
00:02:16,763 --> 00:02:20,383
you can think of that as once upon a time it

35
00:02:20,383 --> 00:02:23,522
was the Department of Agriculture in the United States;

36
00:02:23,522 --> 00:02:26,991
or with nuclear power in the 1950s and 1960s,

37
00:02:26,991 --> 00:02:30,923
it was very powerfully supported by its regulatory agency.

38
00:02:32,214 --> 00:02:34,642
There’s any number of these industries.

39
00:02:34,642 --> 00:02:38,424
But the other side of the equation and the other

40
00:02:38,424 --> 00:02:42,619
part of the supporting system is a very powerful supporting idea,

41
00:02:42,619 --> 00:02:45,634
what we called in our first book the policy image,

42
00:02:45,634 --> 00:02:51,053
but which people often refer to as the frame or the issue definition.

43
00:02:51,712 --> 00:02:56,923
And when that policy image is associated with things like patriotism,

44
00:02:57,663 --> 00:03:02,799
or economic growth, or entrepreneurialism,

45
00:03:05,349 --> 00:03:08,952
the American way of life, glamour,

46
00:03:09,655 --> 00:03:14,166
like cigarettes, then that combination of a very powerful supporting

47
00:03:14,166 --> 00:03:22,278
image and an institutional structure that prohibits or inhibits the participation of critics,

48
00:03:22,847 --> 00:03:24,542
then that can be a very powerful thing.

49
00:03:25,213 --> 00:03:30,522
On the other hand, those things can crumble almost as quickly as

50
00:03:30,522 --> 00:03:33,132
they were created because once the policy image

51
00:03:33,132 --> 00:03:36,582
begins to change and people start to take a critical

52
00:03:36,582 --> 00:03:39,434
view of something that they used to look at very favorably,

53
00:03:40,233 --> 00:03:42,732
then the political calculus changes,

54
00:03:42,732 --> 00:03:47,983
and people who were not previously involved in the issue demand a seat at the table,

55
00:03:47,983 --> 00:03:51,273
and that’s what we saw in the cases of – well,

56
00:03:51,273 --> 00:03:52,372
in the cases that we studied.

57
00:03:52,372 --> 00:03:55,429
We saw that they were able to be attacked successfully

58
00:03:56,353 --> 00:04:01,152

even though 10 years previously they were considered to be extremely powerful.