0:00:15.408,0:00:17.019 I have a confession to make. 0:00:17.019,0:00:18.429 I'm a business professor 0:00:18.429,0:00:20.959 whose ambition has been[br]to help people learn to lead. 0:00:20.959,0:00:22.570 But recently, I've discovered 0:00:22.570,0:00:25.239 that what many of us[br]think of as great leadership 0:00:25.239,0:00:28.519 does not work, when it comes[br]to leading innovation. 0:00:28.519,0:00:29.920 I'm an ethnographer. 0:00:29.920,0:00:31.640 I use the methods of anthropology 0:00:31.640,0:00:34.220 to understand the questions[br]which I'm interested. 0:00:34.220,0:00:36.380 So along with three co-conspirators, 0:00:36.380,0:00:40.200 I spent nearly a decade observing[br]up close and personal, 0:00:40.200,0:00:42.679 exceptional leaders of innovation. 0:00:42.679,0:00:44.880 We studied 16 men and women, 0:00:44.880,0:00:47.439 located in seven countries[br]across the globe 0:00:47.439,0:00:49.920 working in 12 different industries. 0:00:49.920,0:00:53.480 In total, we spent hundreds of hours[br]on the ground, on-site, 0:00:53.480,0:00:56.200 watching these leaders in action. 0:00:56.200,0:00:59.559 We ended up with pages[br]and pages of field notes 0:00:59.559,0:01:03.450 that we analyzed, and looked[br]for patterns in what our leaders did. 0:01:03.762,0:01:04.979 The bottom line? 0:01:04.979,0:01:08.140 If we want to build organizations[br]that can innovate time and again, 0:01:08.140,0:01:11.959 we must unlearn our conventional[br]notions of leadership. 0:01:11.959,0:01:14.560 Leading innovation is not[br]about creating a vision, 0:01:14.560,0:01:17.760 and inspiring others to execute it. 0:01:17.760,0:01:19.719 But what do we mean by innovation? 0:01:19.719,0:01:23.079 An innovation is anything[br]that is both new and useful. 0:01:23.079,0:01:24.840 It can be a product or service. 0:01:24.840,0:01:27.519 It can be a process[br]or a way of organizing. 0:01:27.519,0:01:30.359 It can be incremental,[br]or it can be breakthrough. 0:01:30.359,0:01:33.120 We have a pretty inclusive definition. 0:01:33.139,0:01:35.239 How many of you recognize this man? 0:01:35.239,0:01:37.560 Put your hands up. 0:01:38.416,0:01:41.205 Keep your hands up,[br]if you know who this is. 0:01:45.319,0:01:47.599 How about these familiar faces? 0:01:47.599,0:01:49.680 (Laughter) 0:01:49.680,0:01:51.220 From your show of hands, 0:01:51.220,0:01:53.770 it looks like many of you[br]have seen the Pixar movie. 0:01:53.770,0:01:56.239 But very few of you recognized Ed Catmull, 0:01:56.239,0:01:58.879 the founder and CEO of Pixar 0:01:58.879,0:02:01.799 - one of the companies[br]I had the privilege of studying. 0:02:01.799,0:02:04.479 My first visit to Pixar was in 2005, 0:02:04.479,0:02:06.400 when they were working on 'Ratatouille', 0:02:06.400,0:02:09.520 that provocative movie[br]about a rat becoming a master chef. 0:02:09.520,0:02:13.439 Computer generated movies[br]are really mainstream today, 0:02:13.439,0:02:16.120 but it took Ed and his colleagues[br]nearly 20 years 0:02:16.120,0:02:19.687 to create the first full length CG movie. 0:02:19.960,0:02:23.240 In the 20 years hence,[br]they've produced 14 movies. 0:02:23.240,0:02:26.000 I was recently at Pixar,[br]and I'm here to tell you 0:02:26.000,0:02:29.069 that number 15 is sure to be a winner. 0:02:29.069,0:02:31.280 When many of us think[br]about innovation though, 0:02:31.280,0:02:34.919 we think about an Einstein[br]having an 'Aha!' moment. 0:02:34.919,0:02:37.280 But we all know that's a myth. 0:02:37.280,0:02:40.240 Innovation is not about solo genius, 0:02:40.240,0:02:43.055 it's about collective genius. 0:02:43.479,0:02:47.159 Let's think for a minute about[br]what it takes to make a Pixar movie: 0:02:47.159,0:02:52.680 no solo genius, no flash of inspiration[br]produces one of those movies. 0:02:52.680,0:02:57.080 On the contrary, it takes about[br]250 people four to five years, 0:02:57.080,0:02:58.639 to make one of those movies. 0:02:59.232,0:03:01.319 To help us understand the process, 0:03:01.319,0:03:04.960 an individual in the studio[br]drew a version of this picture. 0:03:04.960,0:03:07.879 He did so reluctantly,[br]because it suggested 0:03:07.879,0:03:10.840 that their process[br]was a neat series of steps 0:03:10.840,0:03:13.360 done by discrete groups. 0:03:13.360,0:03:15.280 Even with all those arrows, 0:03:15.280,0:03:19.680 he thought it failed to tell you[br]just how iterative, interrelated 0:03:19.680,0:03:21.840 and, frankly, messy their process was. 0:03:22.892,0:03:26.730 Throughout the making of a movie[br]at Pixar, the story evolves. 0:03:28.280,0:03:29.520 So think about it. 0:03:29.520,0:03:32.280 Some shots go through quickly. 0:03:32.280,0:03:34.560 They don't all go through in order. 0:03:34.560,0:03:37.199 It depends on how vexing[br]the challenges are, 0:03:37.199,0:03:41.520 that they come up with, when[br]they're working on a particular scene. 0:03:41.520,0:03:43.919 So if you think about that scene in 'Up' 0:03:43.919,0:03:47.120 where the boy hands the piece[br]of chocolate to the bird, 0:03:47.120,0:03:52.265 that 10 seconds took one animator[br]almost six months to perfect. 0:03:53.259,0:03:55.000 The other thing about a Pixar movie 0:03:55.000,0:03:57.400 is that no part of the movie[br]is considered finished 0:03:57.400,0:03:59.319 until the entire movie wraps. 0:03:59.319,0:04:03.759 Partway through one production,[br]an animator drew a character 0:04:03.759,0:04:07.960 with an arched eyebrow[br]that suggested a mischievous side. 0:04:07.960,0:04:10.770 When the director saw that drawing,[br]he thought it was great. 0:04:10.770,0:04:12.449 It was beautiful, but he said, 0:04:12.449,0:04:15.020 "You've got to lose it,[br]it doesn't fit the character." 0:04:15.020,0:04:17.480 Two weeks later,[br]the director came back and said, 0:04:17.480,0:04:20.070 "Let's put in those few seconds of film." 0:04:20.370,0:04:23.050 Because that animator[br]was allowed to share 0:04:23.050,0:04:25.800 what we refer to as his slice of genius, 0:04:25.800,0:04:29.120 he was able to help that director[br]re-conceive the character 0:04:29.120,0:04:33.759 in a subtle but important way[br]that improved the story. 0:04:33.759,0:04:38.399 What we know is at the heart[br]of innovation is a paradox. 0:04:38.399,0:04:42.079 You have to unleash the talents[br]and passions of many people 0:04:42.079,0:04:46.738 and you have to harness them[br]into a work that is actually useful. 0:04:47.319,0:04:49.199 Innovation is a journey. 0:04:49.199,0:04:51.879 It's a type of collaborative[br]problem solving, 0:04:51.879,0:04:54.639 usually among people[br]who have different expertise 0:04:54.639,0:04:56.879 and different points of view. 0:04:56.879,0:05:00.360 Innovations rarely get created full blown. 0:05:00.360,0:05:04.199 As many of you know, they are usually[br]the result of trial and error. 0:05:04.199,0:05:08.399 Lots of false starts,[br]missteps, and mistakes. 0:05:08.399,0:05:11.199 Innovative work can be very exhilarating, 0:05:11.597,0:05:15.343 but it also can be really downright scary. 0:05:17.120,0:05:22.079 So when we look at why it is[br]that Pixar is able to do what it does, 0:05:22.079,0:05:26.304 we have to ask ourselves,[br]what's going on here? 0:05:26.839,0:05:29.800 For sure, history[br]and certainly Hollywood 0:05:29.800,0:05:33.240 is full of star-studded teams[br]that have failed. 0:05:33.240,0:05:35.560 Most of those failures are attributed 0:05:35.560,0:05:39.879 to too many stars or too many[br]cooks, if you will, in the kitchen. 0:05:39.879,0:05:43.215 Why is it that Pixar,[br]with all of its cooks, 0:05:43.519,0:05:47.023 is able to be so successful[br]time and time again? 0:05:48.360,0:05:51.439 When we studied[br]an Islamic Bank in Dubai, 0:05:51.439,0:05:55.590 or a luxury brand in Korea,[br]or a social enterprise in Africa, 0:05:56.000,0:05:58.079 we found that innovative organizations 0:05:58.079,0:06:00.879 are communities[br]that have three capabilities 0:06:01.265,0:06:05.959 - creative abrasion, creative agility,[br]and creative resolution. 0:06:07.098,0:06:09.720 Creative abrasion is about being able 0:06:09.720,0:06:13.160 to create a marketplace of ideas[br]through debate and discourse. 0:06:13.160,0:06:16.079 In innovative organizations,[br]they amplify differences, 0:06:16.079,0:06:17.689 they don't minimize them. 0:06:17.689,0:06:20.360 Creative abrasion[br]is not about brainstorming 0:06:20.360,0:06:22.480 where people suspend their judgment. 0:06:22.480,0:06:26.439 No, they know how to have very heated[br]but constructive arguments 0:06:26.439,0:06:29.443 to create a portfolio of alternatives. 0:06:29.600,0:06:31.879 Individuals in innovative organizations 0:06:31.879,0:06:35.329 learn how to inquire,[br]they learn how to actively listen 0:06:35.342,0:06:36.599 but - guess what? 0:06:36.599,0:06:39.249 They also learn how to advocate[br]for their point of view. 0:06:39.249,0:06:42.879 They understand[br]that innovation rarely happens 0:06:42.879,0:06:45.680 unless you have both[br]diversity and conflict. 0:06:46.960,0:06:49.160 Creative agility is about being able 0:06:49.160,0:06:51.759 to test and refine that portfolio of ideas 0:06:51.759,0:06:55.120 through quick pursuit,[br]reflection, and adjustment. 0:06:55.120,0:06:56.959 It's about discovery driven learning 0:06:56.959,0:07:00.199 where you act as opposed to plan[br]your way to the future. 0:07:00.199,0:07:02.034 It's about design thinking 0:07:02.034,0:07:04.123 where you have[br]that interesting combination 0:07:04.123,0:07:07.203 of the scientific method[br]and the artistic process. 0:07:07.399,0:07:09.536 It's about running[br]a series of experiments, 0:07:09.536,0:07:11.673 and not a series of pilots. 0:07:11.673,0:07:13.810 Experiments are usually about learning. 0:07:13.810,0:07:15.360 When you get a negative outcome, 0:07:15.360,0:07:18.399 you are still learning something[br]that you need to know. 0:07:18.399,0:07:20.959 Pilots are often about being right. 0:07:20.959,0:07:25.319 When they don't work,[br]someone or something is to blame. 0:07:25.319,0:07:28.279 The final capability[br]is creative resolution. 0:07:28.279,0:07:30.560 This is about doing[br]decision making in a way 0:07:30.560,0:07:33.519 that you can combine[br]even opposable ideas 0:07:33.519,0:07:36.040 to reconfigure them in new combinations 0:07:36.040,0:07:39.319 to produce a solution[br]that is new and useful. 0:07:39.319,0:07:43.520 When you look at innovative organizations,[br]they never go along to get along. 0:07:43.520,0:07:45.199 They don't compromise. 0:07:45.199,0:07:48.639 They don't let one group[br]or one individual dominate, 0:07:48.639,0:07:52.531 even if it's the boss,[br]even if it's the expert. 0:07:53.000,0:07:54.839 Instead, they have developed 0:07:54.839,0:07:58.399 a rather patient and more inclusive[br]decision-making process 0:07:58.399,0:08:02.079 that allows for both end solutions[br]to arise 0:08:02.079,0:08:04.199 and not simply either/or solutions. 0:08:05.873,0:08:08.879 These three capabilities are why we see 0:08:08.879,0:08:12.493 that Pixar is able to do what it does. 0:08:13.066,0:08:15.319 Let me give you another example. 0:08:15.319,0:08:18.099 And that example[br]is the infrastructure group of Google. 0:08:18.970,0:08:21.219 The infrastructure group[br]of Google is the group 0:08:21.219,0:08:25.199 that has to keep the website[br]up and running 24x7. 0:08:25.199,0:08:28.439 When Google was about to introduce[br]Gmail and YouTube, 0:08:28.439,0:08:31.759 they knew that their[br]data storage system wasn't adequate. 0:08:31.759,0:08:35.919 The head of the engineering group[br]and the infrastructure group at that time 0:08:35.919,0:08:38.480 was a man named Bill Coughran. 0:08:38.480,0:08:42.240 Bill and his leadership team,[br]who he referred to as his brain trust, 0:08:42.240,0:08:45.854 had to figure out what to do[br]about this situation. 0:08:46.120,0:08:47.960 They thought about it for a while. 0:08:47.960,0:08:51.234 Instead of creating a group[br]to tackle this task, 0:08:51.440,0:08:55.572 they decided to allow groups[br]to emerge spontaneously 0:08:55.720,0:08:57.659 around different alternatives. 0:08:57.757,0:09:00.000 Two groups coalesced. 0:09:00.000,0:09:03.159 One became known as Big Table, 0:09:03.159,0:09:06.679 the other became known[br]as Build it From Scratch. 0:09:06.679,0:09:09.600 Big Table proposed[br]that they build on the current system. 0:09:09.600,0:09:13.960 Build it From Scratch proposed[br]that it was time for a whole new system. 0:09:13.960,0:09:17.759 Separately, these two teams[br]were allowed to work full time 0:09:17.759,0:09:19.799 on their particular approach. 0:09:19.799,0:09:22.919 In Engineering Reviews,[br]Bill described his role 0:09:22.919,0:09:27.701 as injecting honesty into the process[br]by driving debate. 0:09:27.879,0:09:31.879 Early on, the teams were encouraged[br]to build prototypes so that they could 0:09:31.879,0:09:35.440 "Bump them up against reality[br]and discover for themselves 0:09:35.440,0:09:38.460 the strengths and weaknesses[br]of their particular approach." 0:09:38.460,0:09:41.600 When Build it From Scratch shared[br]their prototype with the group 0:09:41.600,0:09:44.490 whose beepers would have to go off[br]in the middle of the night 0:09:44.490,0:09:46.510 if something went wrong with the website, 0:09:46.510,0:09:51.120 they heard loud and clear about[br]the limits of their particular design. 0:09:51.120,0:09:54.039 As the need for a solution[br]became more urgent 0:09:54.039,0:09:57.320 and as the data[br]or the evidence began to come in, 0:09:57.320,0:10:00.600 it became pretty clear[br]that the Big Table solution 0:10:00.600,0:10:03.110 was the right one for the moment. 0:10:03.110,0:10:05.200 So they selected that one. 0:10:05.200,0:10:07.960 But to make sure[br]that they did not lose the learning 0:10:07.960,0:10:09.840 of the Build it From Scratch team, 0:10:09.840,0:10:11.530 Bill asked two members of that team 0:10:11.530,0:10:13.250 to join a new team that was emerging 0:10:13.250,0:10:16.240 to work on the next generation system. 0:10:16.240,0:10:19.828 This whole process took nearly two years, 0:10:20.000,0:10:24.199 but I was told that they were[br]all working at breakneck speed. 0:10:24.399,0:10:25.770 Early in that process, 0:10:25.770,0:10:28.038 one of the engineers[br]had gone to Bill and said, 0:10:28.038,0:10:30.759 "We're all too busy[br]for this inefficient system 0:10:30.759,0:10:33.240 of running parallel experiments." 0:10:33.240,0:10:36.320 But as the process unfolded,[br]he began to understand 0:10:36.320,0:10:40.240 the wisdom of allowing talented[br]people to play out their passions. 0:10:40.240,0:10:44.039 He admitted, "If you had forced us[br]to all be on one team, 0:10:44.039,0:10:47.480 we might have focused on proving[br]who was right, and winning, 0:10:47.480,0:10:49.720 and not on learning and discovering 0:10:49.720,0:10:53.000 what was the best answer for Google." 0:10:53.000,0:10:56.559 Why is it that Pixar and Google[br]are able to innovate time and again? 0:10:56.559,0:11:00.229 It's because they have mastered[br]the capabilities required for that. 0:11:00.229,0:11:02.619 They know how to do[br]collaborative problem solving, 0:11:02.619,0:11:04.759 they know how to do[br]discovery driven learning, 0:11:04.759,0:11:07.460 and they know how to do[br]integrated decision making. 0:11:07.460,0:11:10.679 Some of you may be sitting there[br]and saying to yourselves right now, 0:11:10.679,0:11:13.519 "We don't know how to do[br]those things in my organization." 0:11:13.519,0:11:16.120 So why do they know how to[br]do those things at Pixar, 0:11:16.120,0:11:19.559 and why do they know how to[br]do those things at Google? 0:11:19.559,0:11:22.080 When many of the people[br]that worked for Bill told us, 0:11:22.080,0:11:27.751 on their opinion, Bill was one[br]of the finest leaders in Silicon Valley. 0:11:28.480,0:11:31.792 We completely agreed,[br]the man is a genius. 0:11:32.649,0:11:35.559 Leadership is the secret sauce. 0:11:35.559,0:11:37.960 But it's a different kind of leadership, 0:11:37.960,0:11:39.960 not the kind many of us think about 0:11:39.960,0:11:43.054 when we think about great leadership. 0:11:43.279,0:11:45.960 One of the leaders I met with[br]early on, said to me, 0:11:45.960,0:11:49.120 "Linda, I don't read books on leadership. 0:11:49.120,0:11:51.766 All they do is make me feel bad. 0:11:52.039,0:11:55.000 In the first chapter they say[br]I'm supposed to create a vision. 0:11:55.000,0:11:59.240 But if I'm trying to do something[br]that's truly new, I have no answers. 0:11:59.240,0:12:01.240 I don't know what direction we're going in 0:12:01.240,0:12:05.039 and I'm not even sure I know[br]how to figure out how to get there." 0:12:05.039,0:12:07.440 For sure, there are times[br]when visionary leadership 0:12:07.440,0:12:09.480 is exactly what is needed. 0:12:09.480,0:12:12.879 But if we want to build organizations[br]that can innovate time and again, 0:12:12.879,0:12:17.000 we must recast our understanding[br]of what leadership is about. 0:12:17.000,0:12:20.720 Leading innovation[br]is about creating the space 0:12:20.720,0:12:23.919 where people are willing and able[br]to do the hard work 0:12:23.919,0:12:26.399 of innovative problem solving. 0:12:27.919,0:12:30.240 At this point, some of you[br]may be wondering, 0:12:30.240,0:12:32.559 what does that leadership[br]really look like? 0:12:32.559,0:12:37.024 At Pixar, they understand[br]that innovation takes a village. 0:12:37.480,0:12:40.919 The leaders focus on building[br]a sense of community 0:12:40.919,0:12:43.200 and building those three capabilities. 0:12:43.200,0:12:45.480 How do they define leadership? 0:12:45.480,0:12:47.759 They say leadership[br]is about creating a world 0:12:47.759,0:12:49.720 to which people want to belong. 0:12:49.720,0:12:52.360 What kind of world do people[br]want to belong in at Pixar? 0:12:52.360,0:12:54.440 A world where you're living[br]at the frontier. 0:12:54.440,0:12:56.759 What do they focus their time on? 0:12:56.759,0:12:58.230 Not on creating a vision. 0:12:58.230,0:13:00.360 Instead they spend[br]their time thinking about, 0:13:00.360,0:13:05.200 how do we design a studio that has[br]a sensibility of a public square 0:13:05.200,0:13:07.360 so that people will interact? 0:13:07.360,0:13:11.030 Let's put in a policy that anyone,[br]no matter what their level or role, 0:13:11.030,0:13:12.960 is allowed to give notes to the director 0:13:12.960,0:13:15.519 about how they feel[br]about a particular film. 0:13:15.519,0:13:17.519 You know what,[br]what can we do to make sure 0:13:17.519,0:13:18.956 that all the disruptors, 0:13:18.956,0:13:21.439 all the minority voices[br]in this organization 0:13:21.439,0:13:23.399 speak up and are heard? 0:13:23.399,0:13:27.210 And, finally, let's bestow credit[br]in a very generous way. 0:13:27.210,0:13:30.320 I don't know if you've ever looked[br]at the credits of a Pixar movie, 0:13:30.320,0:13:33.480 but the babies born during[br]a production are listed there. 0:13:33.480,0:13:34.879 (Laughter) 0:13:34.879,0:13:37.879 How did Bill think about[br]what his role was? 0:13:37.879,0:13:41.360 Bill said, "I lead[br]a volunteer organization. 0:13:41.360,0:13:45.120 Talented people[br]don't want to follow me anywhere. 0:13:45.120,0:13:48.679 They want to co-create[br]with me the future. 0:13:48.679,0:13:51.159 My job is to nurture the bottom up 0:13:51.159,0:13:54.519 and not let it degenerate into chaos." 0:13:54.519,0:13:55.840 How did he see his role? 0:13:55.840,0:13:58.639 I'm a role model,[br]I'm a human glue, 0:13:58.639,0:14:01.279 I'm a connector,[br]I'm an aggregator of viewpoints. 0:14:01.279,0:14:03.519 I'm never a dictator of viewpoints. 0:14:03.519,0:14:05.639 Advice about how you exercise the role, 0:14:05.639,0:14:08.600 hire people who argue with you. 0:14:08.600,0:14:12.592 Sometimes it's best to be[br]deliberately fuzzy and vague. 0:14:14.220,0:14:16.319 Some of you may be wondering now, 0:14:16.319,0:14:17.840 what are these people thinking? 0:14:17.840,0:14:19.300 They are thinking, 0:14:19.300,0:14:21.840 I'm not the visionary,[br]I'm the social architect. 0:14:21.840,0:14:25.440 I'm creating the space[br]where people are willing and able 0:14:25.440,0:14:28.789 to share and combine[br]their talents and passions. 0:14:28.789,0:14:31.919 If some of you are worrying now[br]that you don't work at a Pixar, 0:14:31.919,0:14:33.559 or you don't work at a Google, 0:14:33.559,0:14:36.000 I want to tell you there's still hope. 0:14:36.000,0:14:38.000 We've studied many organizations 0:14:38.000,0:14:40.960 that were not organization[br]you'd think of as ones 0:14:40.960,0:14:43.360 where a lot of innovation happens. 0:14:43.360,0:14:46.279 We studied a general counsel[br]in a pharmaceutical company 0:14:46.279,0:14:49.000 who had to figure out how[br]to get the outside lawyers, 0:14:49.000,0:14:51.759 19 competitors,[br]to collaborate and innovate. 0:14:51.759,0:14:55.609 We studied the head of marketing[br]at a German automaker 0:14:55.609,0:14:57.320 where, fundamentally, they believed 0:14:57.320,0:14:59.879 that it was the design[br]engineers, not the marketeers 0:14:59.879,0:15:02.159 who were allowed to be innovative. 0:15:02.159,0:15:06.120 We also studied Vineet Nayar[br]at HCL technologies, 0:15:06.120,0:15:08.180 an Indian outsourcing company. 0:15:08.180,0:15:09.729 When we met Vineet, 0:15:09.729,0:15:13.080 his company was about,[br]in his words, to become irrelevant. 0:15:13.080,0:15:15.399 We watched as he turned that company 0:15:15.399,0:15:19.154 into a global dynamo of IT innovation. 0:15:20.000,0:15:22.720 At HCL technologies,[br]like at many companies, 0:15:22.720,0:15:26.720 the leaders had learned to see[br]their role as setting direction 0:15:26.720,0:15:29.309 and making sure[br]that no one deviated from it. 0:15:30.399,0:15:34.320 What he did is tell them[br]it was time for them 0:15:34.320,0:15:37.740 to think about rethinking[br]what they were supposed to do. 0:15:37.740,0:15:40.600 Because what was happening[br]is that everybody was looking up 0:15:40.600,0:15:43.759 and you weren't seeing[br]the bottom-up innovation 0:15:43.759,0:15:46.119 we saw at Pixar or Google. 0:15:46.119,0:15:47.679 So they began to work on that. 0:15:47.679,0:15:51.840 They stopped giving answers,[br]they stopped trying to provide solutions. 0:15:51.840,0:15:54.679 Instead, what they did[br]is they began to see 0:15:54.679,0:15:58.556 the people at the bottom[br]of the pyramid, the young sparks, 0:15:58.556,0:16:01.030 the people who were closest[br]to the customers, 0:16:01.030,0:16:03.580 as the source of innovation. 0:16:03.580,0:16:06.713 They began to transfer[br]the organization's growth 0:16:06.713,0:16:08.236 to that level. 0:16:10.126,0:16:13.879 In Vineet's language,[br]this was about inverting the pyramid 0:16:13.879,0:16:16.919 so that you could unleash[br]the power of the many 0:16:16.919,0:16:19.840 by loosening the strength[br]hold of the few 0:16:19.840,0:16:22.960 and increase the quality[br]and the speed of innovation 0:16:22.960,0:16:25.530 that was happening every day. 0:16:26.600,0:16:30.559 For sure, Vineet[br]and all the other leaders that we studied 0:16:30.559,0:16:33.247 were in fact visionaries. 0:16:33.960,0:16:38.030 For sure, they understood[br]that that was not their role. 0:16:38.320,0:16:43.240 I don't think it is accidental[br]that many of you did not recognize Ed. 0:16:43.240,0:16:47.919 Because Ed, like Vineet,[br]understands that our role as leaders 0:16:47.919,0:16:51.554 is to set the stage, not perform on it. 0:16:52.080,0:16:54.960 If we want to invent a better future, 0:16:54.960,0:16:58.240 and I suspect that's why[br]many of us are here, 0:16:58.240,0:17:01.690 then we need to reimagine our task. 0:17:02.120,0:17:04.799 Our task is to create the space 0:17:04.799,0:17:07.440 where everybody's slices of genius 0:17:08.695,0:17:11.662 can be unleashed and harnessed, 0:17:11.960,0:17:14.720 and turned into works[br]of collective genius. 0:17:15.708,0:17:16.790 Thank you. 0:17:16.790,0:17:18.758 (Applause)