WEBVTT 00:00:05.755 --> 00:00:08.954 Good morning everyone! I'll speak about time measurement. 00:00:08.955 --> 00:00:14.508 To talk about measuring time, I will ask an obvious question, which is: 00:00:14.509 --> 00:00:16.059 what time is it? 00:00:16.059 --> 00:00:19.041 It may seem like a trivial question, 00:00:19.042 --> 00:00:23.262 but if we performed an experiment today, and had everyone looking at their watch, 00:00:23.263 --> 00:00:26.989 everyone would have a different time from his or her neighbor. 00:00:27.509 --> 00:00:30.962 Particularly, you would have a different time from the one 00:00:30.963 --> 00:00:33.970 on this rather strange clock. 00:00:33.971 --> 00:00:37.982 This is a clock that gives you the atomic time. 00:00:37.983 --> 00:00:40.912 I wasn't able to bring an atomic clock along with me today. 00:00:40.913 --> 00:00:43.639 The atomic time is built at the Paris Observatory. 00:00:43.640 --> 00:00:48.341 It is broadcast by radio waves, and here, we receive that information. 00:00:48.390 --> 00:00:52.897 If you compare the time - that's the date, November 27 - 00:00:52.956 --> 00:00:56.647 to the time here, you see there's a difference. 00:00:56.744 --> 00:01:01.527 My presentation is not only going to explain to you how to reset the clock. 00:01:02.490 --> 00:01:07.257 I am going to explain to you how to measure time with high precision. 00:01:07.258 --> 00:01:10.372 You will see that the magnitudes in the precision are astonishing. 00:01:10.960 --> 00:01:14.954 To provide you with some original and fascinating applications, 00:01:15.753 --> 00:01:21.134 I'll start with a very simple thing. To measure time, we use a ruler. 00:01:21.135 --> 00:01:24.632 I use the analogy between a time ruler and a spatial ruler. 00:01:24.633 --> 00:01:28.754 To measure a distance, you take a ruler that's been calibrated. 00:01:28.755 --> 00:01:32.692 You'll count the number of graduations, for example, in centimeters, 00:01:32.693 --> 00:01:34.387 so if you count five graduations, 00:01:34.817 --> 00:01:37.241 assuming that one graduation equals one centimeter, 00:01:37.242 --> 00:01:40.002 you will deduce a length of five centimeters. 00:01:40.003 --> 00:01:44.250 With time, it's going to be the same. We are going to use a temporal ruler. 00:01:44.501 --> 00:01:47.569 A temporal ruler can take the form of an oscillator. 00:01:47.781 --> 00:01:50.759 An oscillator is a physical device 00:01:50.760 --> 00:01:53.417 that gives you a periodic signal with timing 00:01:53.418 --> 00:01:56.507 - whose parameter is reproduced in a periodic way with time. 00:01:56.508 --> 00:02:00.503 I brought one with me, Professor Calculus's pendulum. 00:02:00.504 --> 00:02:01.897 This is an oscillator. 00:02:01.907 --> 00:02:05.857 As you see, we can count time by counting the number of round trips. 00:02:05.867 --> 00:02:12.848 If we say a round trip takes one second, we can count one, two, the time passing. 00:02:13.292 --> 00:02:15.027 Using this time ruler, 00:02:15.161 --> 00:02:17.766 which elementary calibration - called period - 00:02:17.800 --> 00:02:19.628 we are able to measure time. 00:02:19.678 --> 00:02:22.772 We can imagine that if we want a better precision, 00:02:22.972 --> 00:02:25.517 we will need more graduations. 00:02:25.577 --> 00:02:29.441 It is equivalent to what we have with a ruler. 00:02:29.491 --> 00:02:32.549 If your ruler, instead of being calibrated in centimetres, 00:02:32.592 --> 00:02:34.357 is calibrated in millimeters, 00:02:34.358 --> 00:02:37.268 and that you measure 51 - tiny millimeter calibrations - 00:02:37.418 --> 00:02:40.891 you can assume that your length is 5.1 centimeters. 00:02:41.111 --> 00:02:43.346 It is exactly the same for measuring time. 00:02:43.526 --> 00:02:47.540 If you take a faster oscillator than the one I showed you, 00:02:47.670 --> 00:02:50.897 therefore, having a shorter period, meaning a frequency, 00:02:50.898 --> 00:02:53.152 a greater number of pulses per second 00:02:53.442 --> 00:02:56.660 you will achieve a much better resolution in time measure. 00:02:56.900 --> 00:03:00.504 This is what has led research 00:03:00.514 --> 00:03:04.025 since the invention of time measure with oscillators. 00:03:04.045 --> 00:03:08.304 Typically, given the magnitudes, you take a mechanical clock, 00:03:08.314 --> 00:03:10.360 it doesn't need to be a Swiss clock, 00:03:10.361 --> 00:03:14.354 just a mechanical one, similar to my little oscillator pendulum, 00:03:14.364 --> 00:03:16.454 it beats at a pulse per second, 00:03:16.474 --> 00:03:20.199 so you don't have a huge precision, when you want to measure a second. 00:03:20.200 --> 00:03:23.670 If you take an oscillator that you carry with you, 00:03:23.690 --> 00:03:25.985 like your watch or your mobile phone. 00:03:25.986 --> 00:03:29.209 It has a quartz oscillator using piezoelectricity, 00:03:29.210 --> 00:03:33.730 it has the shape of a vibrating diapason at a millimeter scale. 00:03:33.731 --> 00:03:37.723 It is going to beat at 32,768 pulses per second. 00:03:37.733 --> 00:03:41.950 You are going to cut one second, into 32,768 small elementary periods. 00:03:42.130 --> 00:03:43.890 Why such a weird number? 00:03:43.980 --> 00:03:46.777 Because it is easy to divide by two, 15 times, 00:03:46.907 --> 00:03:51.899 to get to one pulse per second, and get the tick-tock of your watch. 00:03:52.059 --> 00:03:57.986 And if we go to the ultimate, to the fastest oscillators known today, 00:03:58.030 --> 00:04:02.064 called lasers - oscillators, in the optics field - 00:04:02.076 --> 00:04:06.189 you see that a laser is an oscillator that gives you an electromagnetic wave 00:04:06.359 --> 00:04:08.300 beating extremely fast until it cuts 00:04:08.513 --> 00:04:12.775 your second to 500,000 billions little pulses. 00:04:13.159 --> 00:04:16.555 You can see the elementary calibration is extremely small 00:04:16.815 --> 00:04:20.459 We will count 500,000 billion and say that one second has passed, 00:04:20.459 --> 00:04:22.882 we will count again 500,000 billion etc. 00:04:22.982 --> 00:04:24.892 You see, in measuring time, 00:04:24.933 --> 00:04:30.420 having a frequency as high as possible is what gives you greater precision. 00:04:30.421 --> 00:04:34.502 We can say we have almost solved the problem. 00:04:34.912 --> 00:04:39.582 Not at all! In fact, what confidence can we have in this measure? 00:04:39.842 --> 00:04:42.029 I go back to the example with two rulers. 00:04:42.219 --> 00:04:46.464 You buy two rulers, in two different places, different countries, and measure. 00:04:46.484 --> 00:04:48.333 Make the experiment and you will see. 00:04:48.334 --> 00:04:51.674 It might not be as blatant, but you will see it works very well. 00:04:52.304 --> 00:04:55.548 For the same length, you won't have the same calibrations. 00:04:55.608 --> 00:04:57.099 So which should we trust? 00:04:57.159 --> 00:05:00.398 Which rule should we trust, which one has the right measure? 00:05:00.758 --> 00:05:03.285 With the oscillators, whilst measuring time, 00:05:03.475 --> 00:05:04.927 we face the same problem. 00:05:05.377 --> 00:05:08.099 Your oscillator, two different oscillators, 00:05:08.279 --> 00:05:09.785 won't give you exactly 00:05:09.895 --> 00:05:12.576 the same number of period for measuring a given duration; 00:05:12.577 --> 00:05:14.669 each little calibration is different. 00:05:14.789 --> 00:05:16.890 Or, if you take an oscillator, 00:05:17.137 --> 00:05:19.923 according to the place, or the moment you use it, 00:05:20.053 --> 00:05:22.025 it won't give you the same measurement. 00:05:22.295 --> 00:05:24.272 For example, the pendulum I showed you, 00:05:24.612 --> 00:05:28.409 whether you use it at the equator or at the poles, 00:05:28.429 --> 00:05:32.991 because the oscillation's period depends on the gravitational force, 00:05:33.411 --> 00:05:36.515 after one year, you will have around two days' difference 00:05:36.705 --> 00:05:38.531 between the measures... that's huge. 00:05:38.581 --> 00:05:42.487 Maybe not in everyday life, though two days is significant. 00:05:42.537 --> 00:05:44.858 But for the applications I am going to show you, 00:05:45.038 --> 00:05:46.934 it is something very annoying. 00:05:47.034 --> 00:05:48.808 How do we solve this problem? 00:05:48.888 --> 00:05:50.993 This is where we build atomic clocks. 00:05:51.233 --> 00:05:53.795 The atom is the solution to this problem, 00:05:53.975 --> 00:05:56.334 since the atom is going to be our reference. 00:05:56.464 --> 00:06:00.032 What happens in an atomic clock? It is relatively simple. 00:06:00.112 --> 00:06:04.712 You still have an oscillator, but we will compare its frequency 00:06:04.852 --> 00:06:09.658 to one that is infinitely stable, universal, and extremely well-known. 00:06:09.678 --> 00:06:13.810 It is the frequency of resonance to hop from one atomic level to the next. 00:06:13.811 --> 00:06:16.431 Why is this atomic frequency very well known? 00:06:16.432 --> 00:06:21.260 Well, because quantum mechanics tells us that the states of energy 00:06:21.261 --> 00:06:26.037 that is, energy levels between which atoms transit, 00:06:26.038 --> 00:06:27.682 these states of energy have 00:06:27.683 --> 00:06:30.720 extremely stable and well determined values. 00:06:30.721 --> 00:06:34.082 Thus, the frequency of resonance to go from a level to another, 00:06:34.083 --> 00:06:37.123 will too be extremely well fixed. 00:06:37.336 --> 00:06:42.027 Here you have a photo of the atomic clock 00:06:42.397 --> 00:06:44.397 which is at the Paris Observatory. 00:06:44.912 --> 00:06:48.275 Today, using atoms which are a bit specific, 00:06:48.635 --> 00:06:50.578 since they are cold atoms. 00:06:50.579 --> 00:06:53.982 We cool them by laser, to extremely low temperatures, 00:06:53.983 --> 00:06:56.092 and we trap them with the laser light, 00:06:56.093 --> 00:06:59.510 using optical oscillators beating extremely fast. 00:06:59.512 --> 00:07:02.344 We manage to have a precision in measuring time 00:07:02.354 --> 00:07:04.499 which is very impressive, 00:07:04.500 --> 00:07:08.681 since a clock amongst the best in the world today, 00:07:09.031 --> 00:07:12.117 will only go off one second after 3 billion years. 00:07:12.297 --> 00:07:16.116 In other words, we are capable of giving 00:07:16.117 --> 00:07:19.770 the value of a small graduation, or of the frequency of the clock, 00:07:19.771 --> 00:07:21.836 with 17 digits after the decimal point. 00:07:21.837 --> 00:07:23.959 As you see, it is an application, 00:07:23.960 --> 00:07:28.821 that is very highly impressive, a very high level of stability 00:07:28.822 --> 00:07:31.212 and which further more has many many applications. 00:07:31.234 --> 00:07:33.839 The first application is the speaking clock. 00:07:33.840 --> 00:07:37.047 It is an application which generally speaks to the public. 00:07:37.048 --> 00:07:39.201 Where does the speaking clock come from? 00:07:39.202 --> 00:07:42.005 It was created at the Paris Observatory in 1933, 00:07:42.006 --> 00:07:45.329 At that time, it was the role of astronomers to give the time. 00:07:45.330 --> 00:07:46.978 It was not atomic physics yet. 00:07:46.979 --> 00:07:49.955 The line of the Paris Observatory always took care of it, 00:07:49.956 --> 00:07:52.320 Because everybody called Ernest Esclangon, 00:07:52.321 --> 00:07:55.632 who was the Director of the Observatory, to get the time. 00:07:55.633 --> 00:08:01.640 Ernest Esclangon had the idea of developing this speaking clock. 00:08:01.642 --> 00:08:04.177 There has been several generations of speaking clock. 00:08:04.178 --> 00:08:07.431 Today, the speaking clock presented here gives you the time 00:08:07.432 --> 00:08:10.615 with 50 milliseconds of uncertainty. 00:08:10.616 --> 00:08:14.769 As metrology is an experimental science, we will call the speaking clock. 00:08:14.770 --> 00:08:18.191 I have the authorization to keep it connected, it is my privilege! 00:08:18.192 --> 00:08:22.575 It is always a risk, in experiments: it might not work. 00:08:22.578 --> 00:08:26.512 Clock: It is 5 pm, 7 minutes 10 seconds. 00:08:27.642 --> 00:08:29.590 ND: We are going to wait just a little, 00:08:29.591 --> 00:08:32.669 But you can see the red lights there. 00:08:32.671 --> 00:08:37.258 Speaking clock: It is 17 hours, 7 minutes, and 20 seconds. 00:08:37.259 --> 00:08:39.453 ND: There, it works! Thank you! 00:08:40.904 --> 00:08:42.335 (Applause) 00:08:44.475 --> 00:08:48.340 This application might be harmless, but it is important especially 00:08:48.341 --> 00:08:51.309 at the time of changes between summer time and winter time. 00:08:51.310 --> 00:08:56.943 If we want to give the time in a more precise way, 00:08:56.944 --> 00:09:03.611 we can also use Internet, telecommunication satellites, or GPS, etc. 00:09:03.612 --> 00:09:05.479 This is the first application. 00:09:05.480 --> 00:09:08.267 The second application, which is very fashionable, 00:09:08.268 --> 00:09:09.834 and is also very important 00:09:09.835 --> 00:09:14.059 is the use the atomic clocks to test Einstein's law of relativity 00:09:14.060 --> 00:09:17.669 that tells you, for the last 100 years, that time is not absolute. 00:09:17.670 --> 00:09:20.313 That is, if you take identical clocks, 00:09:20.314 --> 00:09:22.927 and you put them in different frames of reference, 00:09:22.928 --> 00:09:25.577 which move relative to one another, 00:09:25.578 --> 00:09:28.130 or which have different environmental parameters, 00:09:28.131 --> 00:09:30.558 you will find and measure differences 00:09:30.559 --> 00:09:33.324 between the times and frequencies of the clocks. 00:09:33.325 --> 00:09:37.889 This non-absolute character of time is already tested on the ground. 00:09:37.890 --> 00:09:40.453 We are going to test it extremely precisely in space, 00:09:40.454 --> 00:09:44.797 by installing in a few years, an ultra-precise clock 00:09:44.798 --> 00:09:47.329 aboard the International Space Station. 00:09:47.330 --> 00:09:51.596 And by comparing the time and frequency of this clock in space 00:09:51.597 --> 00:09:55.184 with the time and frequency of clocks situated all around the Earth, 00:09:55.185 --> 00:09:57.922 it will become possible to validate Einstein's theory. 00:09:57.923 --> 00:09:59.851 Knowing that all modern theories 00:09:59.852 --> 00:10:02.471 predict a violation of Einstein's theory. 00:10:02.472 --> 00:10:04.930 So there is a real scientific benefit in doing that. 00:10:04.931 --> 00:10:09.668 We are going to test various aspects of general relativity. 00:10:09.669 --> 00:10:14.525 For instance, we will test a rather interesting property, which says: 00:10:14.526 --> 00:10:16.933 fundamental constants are constant. 00:10:16.934 --> 00:10:18.249 This is not trivial! 00:10:18.250 --> 00:10:21.839 In physics, a whole set of constants is supposed to be constant. 00:10:21.840 --> 00:10:26.996 In fact, all modern theories predict these constants vary in time and in space. 00:10:27.142 --> 00:10:29.355 We will be able to test this precisely. 00:10:29.356 --> 00:10:32.241 We will also test an original effect of general relativity, 00:10:32.242 --> 00:10:35.709 time passes at a different rhythm according to the altitude. 00:10:36.992 --> 00:10:39.713 For instance, you, who are sitting in the first row, 00:10:39.714 --> 00:10:43.770 you do not age at the same speed as those sitting in the last row, 00:10:43.771 --> 00:10:46.085 since you are sitting at different altitudes. 00:10:46.195 --> 00:10:49.679 But to reassure you, on the length of my presentation 00:10:49.689 --> 00:10:52.886 the difference of aging is around one picosecond. 00:10:52.887 --> 00:10:56.960 10 to the power of -12 seconds, a billionth of a billionth of a second. 00:10:56.961 --> 00:11:00.070 So, there is no need to run up and down, remain in your seats! 00:11:00.071 --> 00:11:03.874 We will also test the speed of light is constant. 00:11:03.875 --> 00:11:07.250 This is an extremely strong postulate of special relativity: 00:11:07.251 --> 00:11:10.513 the speed of light is independent from the frame of reference 00:11:10.514 --> 00:11:12.414 against which the measure is taken. 00:11:12.415 --> 00:11:15.400 This is an extremely important property, 00:11:15.401 --> 00:11:20.555 which is used to measure distances from time measurements. 00:11:20.556 --> 00:11:25.906 If you want to measure a distance you use a signal which will propagate, 00:11:25.913 --> 00:11:30.900 and by knowing the time of propagation, knowing the speed of propagation, 00:11:30.901 --> 00:11:35.230 which is the case with the speed of light, you can infer the distance. 00:11:35.231 --> 00:11:36.772 One could say there is no need 00:11:36.773 --> 00:11:40.298 for an ultra-stable clock to do that. But yes, there is a need for it. 00:11:40.299 --> 00:11:43.011 Light goes fast, at 300,000 km per second. 00:11:43.012 --> 00:11:46.983 If you make a nanosecond error, a billionth of a second, 00:11:46.984 --> 00:11:49.375 you are wrong by 30 centimeters. 00:11:49.376 --> 00:11:55.252 Typically, this kind of application, measuring distances from measures of time, 00:11:55.253 --> 00:11:57.752 is used to measure Earth-Moon distance. 00:11:57.753 --> 00:11:59.651 By sending impulses to the Moon, 00:11:59.652 --> 00:12:04.447 which are reflected by retro-reflectors installed by the Apollo missions 00:12:04.448 --> 00:12:07.553 to measure the Earth-Moon distance better than to the centimeter. 00:12:08.330 --> 00:12:11.914 When we have a distance to measure, we know where to position. 00:12:11.916 --> 00:12:13.238 How do we do this? 00:12:13.239 --> 00:12:14.958 With the GPS, for instance, 00:12:14.959 --> 00:12:19.560 if you have a cluster of satellites with synchronized atomic clocks, 00:12:19.561 --> 00:12:22.044 by measuring the travel time of each wave, 00:12:22.045 --> 00:12:25.471 from each satellite to your receptor, 00:12:25.472 --> 00:12:28.981 you measure your distance from each satellite, 00:12:28.982 --> 00:12:31.511 and by triangulation, you measure your position. 00:12:31.512 --> 00:12:34.385 You need four satellites, because in the time-space 00:12:34.386 --> 00:12:37.316 there are four coordinates: x, y, z and t, 00:12:37.317 --> 00:12:40.426 since time is also needed to position one self in time-space. 00:12:40.427 --> 00:12:42.663 You can see that the GPS's applications 00:12:42.664 --> 00:12:45.106 are not only to position oneself in one's car 00:12:45.107 --> 00:12:47.754 an area where we need a resolution of a few meters. 00:12:47.755 --> 00:12:50.265 There are also applications in geophysics. 00:12:50.266 --> 00:12:53.846 We will be able to analyze the movement of tectonic plates 00:12:53.847 --> 00:12:57.206 with resolutions down to a few centimeters per year, 00:12:57.207 --> 00:12:59.007 which is an excellent resolution. 00:12:59.008 --> 00:13:00.087 It is interesting, 00:13:00.088 --> 00:13:03.755 since from time measurements, we know the functioning of the Earth, 00:13:03.756 --> 00:13:06.490 we infer fluctuations of the rotation of the Earth. 00:13:06.491 --> 00:13:09.741 It is interesting because historically, it was the exact opposite. 00:13:09.747 --> 00:13:12.168 It was the Earth's rotation which gave the hour. 00:13:12.169 --> 00:13:14.182 At present it is the opposite. 00:13:14.183 --> 00:13:18.673 The measurement of time gives us the fluctuations of the Earth's rotation. 00:13:18.674 --> 00:13:24.018 Another thing you might have heard, on the radio or on television, 00:13:24.019 --> 00:13:26.057 are the famous intercalary seconds. 00:13:26.058 --> 00:13:29.170 As the Earth does not go perfectly round, as we all know, 00:13:29.171 --> 00:13:31.700 and the atomic time is infinitely stable, 00:13:31.701 --> 00:13:35.496 meaning that both time scales linked to Earth's rotation and to atomic clocks 00:13:35.497 --> 00:13:37.759 are going to diverge from one another. 00:13:37.760 --> 00:13:39.458 To prevent them diverging too much, 00:13:39.496 --> 00:13:41.724 we voluntarily add, at the international level, 00:13:41.725 --> 00:13:44.284 a extra second, called the intercalary second. 00:13:44.285 --> 00:13:47.743 This means that generally every two years, 00:13:47.744 --> 00:13:52.478 either on June 30, or December 31, - December 31 is less bothersome - 00:13:52.479 --> 00:13:55.189 one minute is actually made of 61 seconds. 00:13:55.198 --> 00:13:58.737 This leap must be made everywhere, all over the Earth. 00:13:58.738 --> 00:14:01.821 So as a conclusion, 00:14:01.846 --> 00:14:06.850 I would like to show you 00:14:06.874 --> 00:14:10.577 time measurement has left the field of astronomy 00:14:10.601 --> 00:14:14.879 to land in the domains of atomic physics, and of quantum mechanics. 00:14:14.880 --> 00:14:18.033 Since the invention of clocks, around the mid-20th century, 00:14:18.034 --> 00:14:20.493 we have gained a factor of 10 every 10 years. 00:14:20.494 --> 00:14:24.565 It is really impressive progress. 00:14:24.566 --> 00:14:29.544 Each time we improved the precision, we said to ourselves: 00:14:29.545 --> 00:14:32.634 there is no need for all these figures after the decimal point. 00:14:32.635 --> 00:14:33.663 It is not true. 00:14:33.664 --> 00:14:38.222 Each time, an application appeared, 10 years later, 20 years later, 00:14:38.223 --> 00:14:40.511 which used that precision. 00:14:40.512 --> 00:14:42.942 I think that I'll conclude and say 00:14:42.943 --> 00:14:45.650 that those who measure time are ahead of their time 00:14:45.650 --> 00:14:47.419 is totally appropriate in this case. 00:14:47.419 --> 00:14:48.759 Thank you very much. 00:14:48.759 --> 00:14:49.949 (Applause)