1 00:00:12,768 --> 00:00:15,400 Host: Please welcome to the TEDxSonomaCounty stage, 2 00:00:15,400 --> 00:00:16,760 Todd Rose. 3 00:00:16,760 --> 00:00:19,760 (Applause) 4 00:00:24,161 --> 00:00:27,948 Todd Rose: It's 1952, and the Air Force has a problem. 5 00:00:28,748 --> 00:00:32,533 They've got good pilots flying better planes, 6 00:00:33,063 --> 00:00:35,135 but they're getting worse results. 7 00:00:35,135 --> 00:00:37,058 And they don't know why. 8 00:00:37,468 --> 00:00:40,404 For a while, they blamed the pilots. 9 00:00:40,984 --> 00:00:43,140 They even blamed the technology. 10 00:00:43,500 --> 00:00:46,471 They eventually got around to blaming the flight instructors. 11 00:00:47,151 --> 00:00:50,528 But it turned out that the problem was actually with the cockpit. 12 00:00:51,161 --> 00:00:52,414 Let me explain. 13 00:00:53,644 --> 00:00:55,970 Imagine you're a fighter pilot. 14 00:00:56,970 --> 00:00:58,985 You're operating a machine 15 00:00:58,985 --> 00:01:02,656 that in some cases can travel faster than the speed of sound, 16 00:01:04,266 --> 00:01:08,208 and where issues between success and failure, 17 00:01:08,208 --> 00:01:10,072 sometimes life and death, 18 00:01:10,072 --> 00:01:12,408 can be measured in split seconds. 19 00:01:13,268 --> 00:01:15,099 If you're a fighter pilot, 20 00:01:15,689 --> 00:01:18,472 you know that your performance 21 00:01:18,472 --> 00:01:23,811 depends fundamentally on the fit between you and your cockpit. 22 00:01:24,632 --> 00:01:28,751 Because after all, what good is the best technology in the world, 23 00:01:28,751 --> 00:01:30,760 if you can't reach the critical instruments 24 00:01:30,760 --> 00:01:32,500 when you need them the most? 25 00:01:33,420 --> 00:01:36,360 But this presents a challenge for the Air Force. 26 00:01:36,980 --> 00:01:39,960 Because obviously, pilots are not the same size. 27 00:01:42,490 --> 00:01:43,961 So, the issue is: 28 00:01:43,961 --> 00:01:49,733 how do you design one cockpit that can fit the most individuals? 29 00:01:51,521 --> 00:01:52,953 For a long time, 30 00:01:52,953 --> 00:01:58,015 it was assumed that you could do this by designing for the average pilot. 31 00:01:59,642 --> 00:02:01,808 That almost seems intuitively right. 32 00:02:01,808 --> 00:02:06,271 If you design something that's fit for the average sized person, 33 00:02:07,071 --> 00:02:09,127 wouldn't it fit most people? 34 00:02:10,087 --> 00:02:13,048 It seems right but it's actually wrong. 35 00:02:13,512 --> 00:02:15,108 And 60 years ago, 36 00:02:15,108 --> 00:02:18,090 an Air Force researcher, Gilbert Daniels, 37 00:02:18,090 --> 00:02:21,080 proved to the world just how wrong this really is, 38 00:02:21,080 --> 00:02:22,995 and what it was costing us. 39 00:02:23,835 --> 00:02:25,500 Here's how he did it. 40 00:02:26,530 --> 00:02:30,360 He studied over 4,000 pilots 41 00:02:31,330 --> 00:02:34,744 and he measured them on ten dimensions of size, 42 00:02:35,334 --> 00:02:37,750 and he asked a very simple question: 43 00:02:38,750 --> 00:02:42,670 how many of these pilots are average on all ten dimensions? 44 00:02:43,540 --> 00:02:44,990 (Laughter) 45 00:02:44,990 --> 00:02:48,971 The assumption was that most of them would be. 46 00:02:49,761 --> 00:02:51,718 Do you know how many really were? 47 00:02:52,918 --> 00:02:54,096 Zero. 48 00:02:55,016 --> 00:02:56,431 Gilbert Daniels proved 49 00:02:56,431 --> 00:02:59,883 there was no such thing as an average pilot. 50 00:03:01,813 --> 00:03:04,050 Instead, what he found 51 00:03:04,900 --> 00:03:11,313 was that every single pilot had what we call a jagged size profile. 52 00:03:12,232 --> 00:03:13,290 Right? 53 00:03:13,970 --> 00:03:17,970 It means no one is the same on every dimension. 54 00:03:18,290 --> 00:03:19,521 And this makes sense. 55 00:03:19,521 --> 00:03:22,391 Just because you're the tallest person 56 00:03:22,391 --> 00:03:24,235 doesn't mean you're the heaviest, 57 00:03:24,235 --> 00:03:26,328 doesn't mean you have the broadest shoulders, 58 00:03:26,328 --> 00:03:27,920 or the longest torso. 59 00:03:28,650 --> 00:03:33,109 But this is tricky because if every pilot has a jagged size profile 60 00:03:33,737 --> 00:03:36,277 and you design a cockpit on average, 61 00:03:37,107 --> 00:03:39,726 you've literally designed it for nobody. 62 00:03:41,236 --> 00:03:44,273 So, the Air Force realized they had a problem. 63 00:03:45,563 --> 00:03:47,668 And their response was bold. 64 00:03:49,288 --> 00:03:51,140 They banned the average. 65 00:03:51,770 --> 00:03:53,250 (Laughter) 66 00:03:53,250 --> 00:03:54,879 Meaning that moving forward, 67 00:03:54,879 --> 00:03:57,298 they refused to buy fighter jets 68 00:03:57,968 --> 00:04:01,525 where the cockpit was designed for an average sized pilot. 69 00:04:02,921 --> 00:04:07,210 And instead, they demanded that the companies who built these planes 70 00:04:08,071 --> 00:04:11,602 designed them to the edges of dimensions of size. 71 00:04:12,092 --> 00:04:15,712 Meaning that rather than design for, say, the average height, 72 00:04:15,712 --> 00:04:17,950 they wanted a cockpit that could accommodate 73 00:04:17,950 --> 00:04:21,198 as close to the shortest pilot and the tallest pilot 74 00:04:21,198 --> 00:04:23,120 as the technology would allow. 75 00:04:23,880 --> 00:04:27,620 Now, the companies that made these planes, as you could imagine, 76 00:04:27,620 --> 00:04:29,770 weren't happy, right? 77 00:04:30,161 --> 00:04:32,885 They argued, and lobbied, and they said, 78 00:04:32,885 --> 00:04:37,044 it's going to be impossible or at least impossibly expensive 79 00:04:37,504 --> 00:04:39,298 to build a flexible cockpit. 80 00:04:40,236 --> 00:04:44,392 But once they realized that the Air Force wasn't going to budge, 81 00:04:44,830 --> 00:04:46,721 suddenly, it was possible. 82 00:04:47,191 --> 00:04:49,680 And it turned out it wasn't that expensive. 83 00:04:50,020 --> 00:04:52,751 And in fact, they made great strides 84 00:04:53,661 --> 00:04:55,709 leveraging simple solutions 85 00:04:55,709 --> 00:04:58,550 that we all take for granted in our everyday life, 86 00:04:58,550 --> 00:05:00,320 like adjustable seats. 87 00:05:01,510 --> 00:05:03,392 And as a result, 88 00:05:03,392 --> 00:05:05,070 the Air Force not only 89 00:05:05,070 --> 00:05:08,369 improved the performance of the pilots that they already had, 90 00:05:09,189 --> 00:05:12,060 but they dramatically expanded their talent pool. 91 00:05:13,020 --> 00:05:17,361 And today, we have the most diverse pool of fighter pilots ever. 92 00:05:17,841 --> 00:05:19,231 But here's the thing, 93 00:05:19,231 --> 00:05:24,494 many of our top pilots would have never fit in a cockpit designed on average. 94 00:05:26,211 --> 00:05:29,410 So, most of us have never sat 95 00:05:29,410 --> 00:05:33,486 in the cockpit of a $150 million fighter jet, right? 96 00:05:34,506 --> 00:05:36,949 But we've all sat in the classroom. 97 00:05:38,289 --> 00:05:40,010 And I would argue 98 00:05:40,010 --> 00:05:41,942 (Laghter) 99 00:05:41,942 --> 00:05:45,012 (Applause) 100 00:05:46,081 --> 00:05:50,656 I would argue that these are the cockpits of our economy, 101 00:05:51,386 --> 00:05:55,014 and I think we all know that we have some problems. 102 00:05:56,290 --> 00:05:58,817 We're spending more money than ever before, 103 00:06:00,127 --> 00:06:02,277 but we're getting worse results. 104 00:06:02,897 --> 00:06:06,317 Whether we're talking about declining test scores in math and science 105 00:06:07,510 --> 00:06:09,436 or our dropout crisis. 106 00:06:10,946 --> 00:06:12,195 You probably know, 107 00:06:12,735 --> 00:06:16,174 that we have over 1.2 million dropouts 108 00:06:16,174 --> 00:06:18,969 every single year in high school in this country. 109 00:06:20,489 --> 00:06:21,859 What you may not know 110 00:06:22,877 --> 00:06:27,798 is that at least 4% of those dropouts are known to be intellectually gifted. 111 00:06:29,239 --> 00:06:34,759 That means we're losing over 50,000 of our brightest minds every single year. 112 00:06:36,710 --> 00:06:38,550 So, we know we have a problem. 113 00:06:40,359 --> 00:06:41,920 But do we know why? 114 00:06:43,740 --> 00:06:46,261 So far, we've been content to blame the students. 115 00:06:47,810 --> 00:06:49,059 We blame the teachers. 116 00:06:50,060 --> 00:06:51,651 We even blame the parents. 117 00:06:53,092 --> 00:06:54,630 But here's the thing ... 118 00:06:54,630 --> 00:06:57,020 I think back to the Air Force example, 119 00:06:58,241 --> 00:07:00,011 and I can't help but wonder: 120 00:07:00,011 --> 00:07:03,451 how much of this problem is just bad design? 121 00:07:05,682 --> 00:07:06,802 Here's what I mean. 122 00:07:07,471 --> 00:07:11,788 Even though we have one of the most diverse countries 123 00:07:11,788 --> 00:07:13,195 in the history of the world, 124 00:07:13,766 --> 00:07:16,216 and even though it's the 21st century, 125 00:07:16,840 --> 00:07:18,990 we still design our learning environments, 126 00:07:18,990 --> 00:07:22,162 like textbooks, for the average student. 127 00:07:23,217 --> 00:07:24,192 No kidding. 128 00:07:24,591 --> 00:07:26,001 We call it age-appropriate. 129 00:07:26,461 --> 00:07:28,140 And we think it's good enough. 130 00:07:28,792 --> 00:07:30,272 But of course, it's not. 131 00:07:30,810 --> 00:07:32,342 I mean, think about it. 132 00:07:32,342 --> 00:07:35,488 What does it even mean to design for an average student? 133 00:07:36,579 --> 00:07:39,288 Because a student is not one-dimensional, 134 00:07:39,679 --> 00:07:41,350 like struggling to gifted. 135 00:07:41,739 --> 00:07:44,589 Students vary on many dimensions of learning, 136 00:07:45,380 --> 00:07:47,549 just like they vary on dimensions of size. 137 00:07:48,502 --> 00:07:50,219 Here are a few obvious ones. 138 00:07:51,630 --> 00:07:53,291 And just like size, 139 00:07:54,890 --> 00:07:57,141 each student, every single one of them, 140 00:07:57,900 --> 00:07:59,591 has a jagged learning profile. 141 00:08:01,452 --> 00:08:03,082 Meaning, they have strengths, 142 00:08:03,631 --> 00:08:05,721 they're average at some things, 143 00:08:05,721 --> 00:08:07,081 and they have weaknesses. 144 00:08:07,621 --> 00:08:08,698 We all do. 145 00:08:09,172 --> 00:08:11,282 Even geniuses have weaknesses. 146 00:08:12,491 --> 00:08:13,552 But ... 147 00:08:14,462 --> 00:08:17,222 if the fighter pilot example has taught us anything, 148 00:08:17,892 --> 00:08:18,992 it's this. 149 00:08:19,682 --> 00:08:22,442 If you design those learning environments on average, 150 00:08:23,354 --> 00:08:26,182 odds are you've designed them for nobody. 151 00:08:28,504 --> 00:08:30,933 So, no wonder we have a problem. 152 00:08:31,823 --> 00:08:36,025 We've created learning environments that because they are designed on average, 153 00:08:36,025 --> 00:08:39,496 cannot possibly do what we expected them to do, 154 00:08:39,884 --> 00:08:42,355 which is to nurture individual potential. 155 00:08:43,804 --> 00:08:46,335 But think about what that could really costs us. 156 00:08:47,584 --> 00:08:50,974 Because every single student has a jagged learning profile, 157 00:08:52,107 --> 00:08:55,026 it means that the average hurts everyone, 158 00:08:55,468 --> 00:08:57,252 even our best and brightest. 159 00:08:58,566 --> 00:08:59,926 Even for them, 160 00:09:00,895 --> 00:09:05,567 designing on average destroys talent in at least two ways. 161 00:09:06,907 --> 00:09:10,547 First, it makes your talent a liability. 162 00:09:11,256 --> 00:09:13,037 We all know kids like this. 163 00:09:13,647 --> 00:09:16,857 So unbelievably gifted in one area 164 00:09:18,604 --> 00:09:21,887 that their educational environment can't challenge them. 165 00:09:23,186 --> 00:09:24,989 We also know what happens. 166 00:09:25,559 --> 00:09:30,148 They get bored, and a shockingly high number of them drop out. 167 00:09:31,969 --> 00:09:33,198 The second way 168 00:09:33,538 --> 00:09:36,319 that designing on average destroys talent 169 00:09:37,188 --> 00:09:40,919 is that it means your weakness will make it hard for us to see, 170 00:09:41,579 --> 00:09:43,960 let alone nurture, your talent. 171 00:09:45,449 --> 00:09:47,350 We all know kids like this as well. 172 00:09:47,990 --> 00:09:52,570 Like the kid who's gifted in science but who is a below average reader. 173 00:09:53,960 --> 00:09:55,851 Because our science textbooks 174 00:09:56,461 --> 00:09:58,940 assume that every kid is reading at grade level, 175 00:09:59,761 --> 00:10:00,990 this kid's in trouble. 176 00:10:02,130 --> 00:10:03,691 Because for her, 177 00:10:03,691 --> 00:10:06,732 science class is first and foremost a reading test. 178 00:10:08,732 --> 00:10:13,103 And it's doubtful that we will ever see what she's truly capable of. 179 00:10:15,273 --> 00:10:19,350 Now, it's one thing when our technology 180 00:10:19,350 --> 00:10:22,673 does not allow us to do anything other than average. 181 00:10:23,624 --> 00:10:25,263 But it is a whole other thing 182 00:10:26,214 --> 00:10:29,650 when the technology changes and we can do more, 183 00:10:29,993 --> 00:10:31,503 but we don't realize it. 184 00:10:32,744 --> 00:10:34,046 That's where we are today. 185 00:10:35,685 --> 00:10:39,955 In the last few years, education, just like the rest of society, 186 00:10:39,955 --> 00:10:41,305 has gone digital. 187 00:10:42,345 --> 00:10:44,673 If you don't believe me, just consider this fact: 188 00:10:45,275 --> 00:10:49,616 U.S. public schools are one of the largest buyers of iPads in the world. 189 00:10:50,317 --> 00:10:54,277 Right? So, the question isn't do you want the technology? 190 00:10:54,865 --> 00:10:57,710 It's already here. You've already paid for it. 191 00:10:57,960 --> 00:11:00,757 The question is: what do you want it to be? 192 00:11:02,337 --> 00:11:04,706 And this is where it really gets exciting. 193 00:11:06,307 --> 00:11:07,985 We have a chance, right now, 194 00:11:09,617 --> 00:11:12,976 to use this technology to create learning environments 195 00:11:12,976 --> 00:11:14,418 that are so flexible 196 00:11:14,878 --> 00:11:19,387 that they truly can nurture the potential of every single individual. 197 00:11:20,507 --> 00:11:23,259 Now, you might think that sounds expensive, right? 198 00:11:23,670 --> 00:11:24,949 Doesn't have to be. 199 00:11:25,769 --> 00:11:27,479 In fact, we can get a long way, 200 00:11:28,358 --> 00:11:32,479 we can make great strides with simple solutions 201 00:11:33,355 --> 00:11:35,950 that we take for granted in our everyday digital lives. 202 00:11:36,240 --> 00:11:37,961 Here I am thinking about basic stuff 203 00:11:37,961 --> 00:11:41,720 like language translation, support for reading, vocabulary, 204 00:11:41,720 --> 00:11:45,840 you know, even the ability of a machine to pronounce a word for you, 205 00:11:45,840 --> 00:11:47,831 or read a passage if you want. 206 00:11:47,831 --> 00:11:49,071 Basic stuff. 207 00:11:50,201 --> 00:11:52,320 But while these are simple solutions, 208 00:11:52,751 --> 00:11:53,987 you'll be surprised 209 00:11:53,987 --> 00:11:58,401 at how big of an impact they actually have on the lives of individuals. 210 00:11:59,222 --> 00:12:02,260 I know I was, the first time that I saw it happen. 211 00:12:03,993 --> 00:12:06,873 I was observing a fourth-grade classroom 212 00:12:06,873 --> 00:12:08,103 a few years ago, 213 00:12:08,653 --> 00:12:10,793 and they were participating in a study 214 00:12:10,793 --> 00:12:14,553 where we were testing the effectiveness of a new digital science curriculum. 215 00:12:15,104 --> 00:12:16,893 Now, I'll be the first to say 216 00:12:17,324 --> 00:12:19,556 this new digital version wasn't fancy. 217 00:12:20,195 --> 00:12:21,795 In fact, it was pretty basic. 218 00:12:23,424 --> 00:12:25,551 The thing that it had going for it though, 219 00:12:26,074 --> 00:12:28,063 was that it did not assume 220 00:12:28,063 --> 00:12:31,794 that every student in that classroom was reading at grade level. 221 00:12:33,334 --> 00:12:36,595 Now, one of my favorite things about this particular classroom 222 00:12:36,595 --> 00:12:37,705 was the teacher. 223 00:12:38,334 --> 00:12:40,335 Because she hated technology. 224 00:12:40,335 --> 00:12:41,805 And I know this 225 00:12:41,805 --> 00:12:44,795 because it's the first thing that she told me when I met her. 226 00:12:45,333 --> 00:12:46,895 And my response was, 227 00:12:47,345 --> 00:12:51,526 "OK, why did you sign up for a study that's about technology?" 228 00:12:54,237 --> 00:12:55,276 She told me 229 00:12:55,875 --> 00:12:57,735 she was willing to go through this 230 00:12:58,086 --> 00:13:01,645 in the hopes that it might help one kid in her class. 231 00:13:02,906 --> 00:13:04,176 His name was Billy. 232 00:13:05,287 --> 00:13:09,347 And Billy, as she told me, had a mind for science. 233 00:13:10,376 --> 00:13:13,427 But he was one of those kids who was a below average reader. 234 00:13:15,478 --> 00:13:17,668 And she was hoping this might reach him now 235 00:13:17,668 --> 00:13:19,618 while he's still learning to read. 236 00:13:20,987 --> 00:13:23,317 Now, I have to say, that actually made me nervous. 237 00:13:23,758 --> 00:13:26,838 Because as I said, the technology was pretty basic. 238 00:13:27,929 --> 00:13:29,739 And I didn't want to disappoint her. 239 00:13:30,228 --> 00:13:31,589 So, you can imagine 240 00:13:32,489 --> 00:13:35,950 how pleasantly surprised I was about halfway through the study, 241 00:13:37,260 --> 00:13:39,990 the teacher reaches out to say, "Hey, guess what?" 242 00:13:39,990 --> 00:13:42,610 Not only has Billy taken to the technology 243 00:13:43,560 --> 00:13:46,700 but I'm starting to see improvement in his performance. 244 00:13:47,631 --> 00:13:48,750 So, that was nice. 245 00:13:50,110 --> 00:13:51,371 But nothing, 246 00:13:51,901 --> 00:13:54,372 nothing prepared me for what I saw 247 00:13:54,372 --> 00:13:57,731 when I went back to that classroom at the end of the study. 248 00:13:59,842 --> 00:14:02,921 Billy had become the de facto smartest kid in the class. 249 00:14:03,682 --> 00:14:04,991 No kidding. 250 00:14:04,991 --> 00:14:06,591 And everybody knew it. 251 00:14:06,981 --> 00:14:10,092 In fact, the first thing that I saw when I walked through the door 252 00:14:10,523 --> 00:14:14,547 was six or seven kids huddled around Billy's desk 253 00:14:15,203 --> 00:14:17,706 asking him questions about the assignment. 254 00:14:18,222 --> 00:14:19,781 And boy did he have answers, 255 00:14:19,781 --> 00:14:20,812 it turns out. 256 00:14:21,512 --> 00:14:26,426 The thing is, all we really gave Billy and his classmates 257 00:14:27,804 --> 00:14:30,463 was the learning equivalent of adjustable seats. 258 00:14:31,744 --> 00:14:32,784 And in return, 259 00:14:33,194 --> 00:14:35,155 we got a glimpse of Billy's talent. 260 00:14:36,315 --> 00:14:40,308 And sure, you might say, "Well, look, that's one kid in one classroom," 261 00:14:41,341 --> 00:14:42,336 but then again, 262 00:14:42,336 --> 00:14:44,074 that's one kid in one classroom. 263 00:14:44,806 --> 00:14:47,025 And isn't that what it's actually about? 264 00:14:47,606 --> 00:14:49,685 Nurturing individual potential. 265 00:14:51,996 --> 00:14:56,066 Jonas Salk was one individual and he cured polio. 266 00:14:58,226 --> 00:15:00,407 What if Billy is the next Jonas Salk? 267 00:15:02,077 --> 00:15:04,557 What if the cure for cancer is in his mind? 268 00:15:05,637 --> 00:15:06,626 Who knows? 269 00:15:07,587 --> 00:15:11,488 But I do know that we came dangerously close to losing his talent 270 00:15:11,488 --> 00:15:13,618 before he even left grade school. 271 00:15:14,047 --> 00:15:16,618 Not because he didn't understand science, 272 00:15:16,968 --> 00:15:19,079 but because he was still learning to read. 273 00:15:20,278 --> 00:15:21,349 And that's what I mean 274 00:15:21,349 --> 00:15:25,394 when I say that simple solutions can have a profound impact on individuals. 275 00:15:26,247 --> 00:15:28,117 So, the real question to me 276 00:15:28,117 --> 00:15:31,648 is how do we get these adjustable seats for learning 277 00:15:31,648 --> 00:15:35,058 in the hands of every student as fast as possible 278 00:15:35,687 --> 00:15:37,278 without spending more money? 279 00:15:38,578 --> 00:15:42,833 Here, I actually think the Air Force has given us the formula for success. 280 00:15:44,873 --> 00:15:47,269 What if we ban the average in education? 281 00:15:48,279 --> 00:15:50,099 We know it destroys talent. 282 00:15:51,669 --> 00:15:55,079 Instead, what if we demanded that the companies 283 00:15:55,079 --> 00:15:57,630 that sell these materials into our classrooms 284 00:15:58,704 --> 00:16:01,526 design them not to the average of dimensions of learning 285 00:16:01,891 --> 00:16:03,242 but to the edges? 286 00:16:04,270 --> 00:16:06,139 It would be a bold move. 287 00:16:06,139 --> 00:16:09,099 It would certainly send a strong signal to the market: 288 00:16:09,782 --> 00:16:11,071 the game's changed. 289 00:16:12,121 --> 00:16:13,162 But trust me, 290 00:16:13,632 --> 00:16:14,771 if we do this, 291 00:16:16,010 --> 00:16:19,961 not only will we increase the performance of the kids in our classrooms today, 292 00:16:20,468 --> 00:16:23,022 we will dramatically expand our talent pool. 293 00:16:23,610 --> 00:16:24,752 Because right now 294 00:16:24,752 --> 00:16:27,651 there are so many students we simply cannot reach 295 00:16:28,271 --> 00:16:30,370 because we design on average. 296 00:16:31,720 --> 00:16:33,794 Design to the edges and we will reach them, 297 00:16:34,504 --> 00:16:36,192 and we'll get their talent. 298 00:16:37,472 --> 00:16:38,781 And I have to say I know, 299 00:16:38,781 --> 00:16:40,713 because I was one of those students. 300 00:16:41,472 --> 00:16:44,993 So today, I'm a faculty member at Harvard. 301 00:16:46,393 --> 00:16:48,693 But I'm also a high school dropout. 302 00:16:49,534 --> 00:16:50,545 It gets better. 303 00:16:50,545 --> 00:16:54,118 I was a high school dropout with a 0.9 GPA. 304 00:16:54,118 --> 00:16:55,271 (Laughter) 305 00:16:55,271 --> 00:16:57,723 For those of you who don't know, that's pretty bad. 306 00:16:57,723 --> 00:16:59,922 (Laughter) 307 00:17:01,024 --> 00:17:02,442 But here's the thing. 308 00:17:03,393 --> 00:17:06,303 I've been to the very bottom of our educational system 309 00:17:08,173 --> 00:17:09,793 and I've been to the very top. 310 00:17:10,274 --> 00:17:11,240 I'm here to tell you 311 00:17:11,240 --> 00:17:15,064 we are wasting so much talent at every single level. 312 00:17:17,275 --> 00:17:18,340 And the thing is, 313 00:17:18,340 --> 00:17:20,355 because for every one person like me 314 00:17:21,235 --> 00:17:26,445 there are millions who worked as hard, who had the ability, 315 00:17:27,295 --> 00:17:28,986 but who were unable to overcome 316 00:17:28,986 --> 00:17:32,366 the drag of an educational environment designed on average. 317 00:17:33,186 --> 00:17:35,316 And their talent is forever lost to us. 318 00:17:36,896 --> 00:17:38,162 The thing is 319 00:17:38,162 --> 00:17:40,097 we can't really afford to lose them. 320 00:17:41,458 --> 00:17:42,514 The good news is 321 00:17:42,514 --> 00:17:44,237 we don't have to anymore. 322 00:17:45,848 --> 00:17:49,768 I'm telling you we have a once in a lifetime chance, right now, 323 00:17:50,858 --> 00:17:53,518 to fundamentally re-imagine the very foundation 324 00:17:54,218 --> 00:17:55,871 of our institutions of opportunity 325 00:17:55,871 --> 00:17:57,170 like education, 326 00:17:57,170 --> 00:18:00,535 in ways that nurture the potential of every single individual; 327 00:18:01,175 --> 00:18:03,012 therefore, expand our talent pool, 328 00:18:03,012 --> 00:18:05,257 make us far more competitive in the world. 329 00:18:06,697 --> 00:18:08,018 We can do this. 330 00:18:08,876 --> 00:18:10,468 We know the formula. 331 00:18:10,468 --> 00:18:12,055 And it's time we demand it. 332 00:18:12,055 --> 00:18:13,104 Thank you. 333 00:18:13,104 --> 00:18:16,139 (Applause)