1 00:00:00,806 --> 00:00:02,881 Imagine that you invented a device 2 00:00:02,905 --> 00:00:04,577 that can record my memories, 3 00:00:04,601 --> 00:00:06,638 my dreams, my ideas, 4 00:00:06,662 --> 00:00:08,325 and transmit them to your brain. 5 00:00:08,755 --> 00:00:11,830 That would be a game-changing technology, right? 6 00:00:11,854 --> 00:00:14,892 But in fact, we already possess this device, 7 00:00:14,916 --> 00:00:17,560 and it's called human communication system 8 00:00:17,584 --> 00:00:19,432 and effective storytelling. 9 00:00:19,874 --> 00:00:22,334 To understand how this device works, 10 00:00:22,358 --> 00:00:24,773 we have to look into our brains. 11 00:00:24,797 --> 00:00:28,383 And we have to formulate the question in a slightly different manner. 12 00:00:28,407 --> 00:00:29,870 Now we have to ask 13 00:00:30,309 --> 00:00:32,925 how these neuron patterns in my brain 14 00:00:32,949 --> 00:00:36,151 that are associated with my memories and ideas 15 00:00:36,175 --> 00:00:38,694 are transmitted into your brains. 16 00:00:39,702 --> 00:00:43,070 And we think there are two factors that enable us to communicate. 17 00:00:43,094 --> 00:00:47,149 First, your brain is now physically coupled to the sound wave 18 00:00:47,173 --> 00:00:49,648 that I'm transmitting to your brain. 19 00:00:49,672 --> 00:00:53,050 And second, we developed a common neural protocol 20 00:00:53,074 --> 00:00:54,832 that enabled us to communicate. 21 00:00:55,459 --> 00:00:56,721 So how do we know that? 22 00:00:57,292 --> 00:00:59,185 In my lab in Princeton, 23 00:00:59,209 --> 00:01:02,714 we bring people to the fMRI scanner and we scan their brains 24 00:01:02,738 --> 00:01:06,638 while they are either telling or listening to real-life stories. 25 00:01:06,662 --> 00:01:09,286 And to give you a sense of the stimulus we are using, 26 00:01:09,310 --> 00:01:13,294 let me play 20 seconds from a story that we used, 27 00:01:13,318 --> 00:01:15,642 told by a very talented storyteller, 28 00:01:15,666 --> 00:01:16,817 Jim O'Grady. 29 00:01:18,244 --> 00:01:21,577 (Audio) Jim O'Grady: So I'm banging out my story and I know it's good, 30 00:01:21,601 --> 00:01:23,891 and then I start to make it better -- 31 00:01:23,915 --> 00:01:26,399 (Laughter) 32 00:01:26,423 --> 00:01:28,758 by adding an element of embellishment. 33 00:01:29,502 --> 00:01:32,810 Reporters call this "making shit up." 34 00:01:32,834 --> 00:01:35,105 (Laughter) 35 00:01:35,735 --> 00:01:38,851 And they recommend against crossing that line. 36 00:01:40,208 --> 00:01:44,812 But I had just seen the line crossed between a high-powered dean 37 00:01:44,836 --> 00:01:46,262 and assault with a pastry. 38 00:01:46,286 --> 00:01:47,778 And I kinda liked it." 39 00:01:47,802 --> 00:01:50,176 Uri Hasson: OK, so now let's look into your brain 40 00:01:50,200 --> 00:01:53,428 and see what's happening when you listen to these kinds of stories. 41 00:01:53,452 --> 00:01:57,496 And let's start simple -- let's start with one listener and one brain area: 42 00:01:57,520 --> 00:02:01,009 the auditory cortex that processes the sounds that come from the ear. 43 00:02:01,033 --> 00:02:03,477 And as you can see, in this particular brain area, 44 00:02:03,501 --> 00:02:06,993 the responses are going up and down as the story is unfolding. 45 00:02:07,017 --> 00:02:08,610 Now we can take these responses 46 00:02:08,634 --> 00:02:11,435 and compare them to the responses in other listeners 47 00:02:11,459 --> 00:02:12,934 in the same brain area. 48 00:02:12,958 --> 00:02:14,125 And we can ask: 49 00:02:14,149 --> 00:02:17,384 How similar are the responses across all listeners? 50 00:02:18,018 --> 00:02:20,380 So here you can see five listeners. 51 00:02:20,983 --> 00:02:24,436 And we start to scan their brains before the story starts, 52 00:02:24,460 --> 00:02:27,999 when they're simply lying in the dark and waiting for the story to begin. 53 00:02:28,023 --> 00:02:29,177 As you can see, 54 00:02:29,201 --> 00:02:31,959 the brain area is going up and down in each one of them, 55 00:02:31,983 --> 00:02:33,758 but the responses are very different, 56 00:02:33,782 --> 00:02:35,449 and not in sync. 57 00:02:35,473 --> 00:02:38,179 However, immediately as the story is starting, 58 00:02:38,203 --> 00:02:39,889 something amazing is happening. 59 00:02:40,857 --> 00:02:43,786 (Audio) JO: So I'm banging out my story and I know it's good, 60 00:02:43,810 --> 00:02:45,338 and then I start to make it -- 61 00:02:45,362 --> 00:02:48,659 UH: Suddenly, you can see that the responses in all of the subjects 62 00:02:48,683 --> 00:02:49,835 lock to the story, 63 00:02:49,859 --> 00:02:53,288 and now they are going up and down in a very similar way 64 00:02:53,312 --> 00:02:54,866 across all listeners. 65 00:02:54,890 --> 00:02:57,939 And in fact, this is exactly what is happening now in your brains 66 00:02:57,963 --> 00:03:00,836 when you listen to my sound speaking. 67 00:03:00,860 --> 00:03:03,868 We call this effect "neural entrainment." 68 00:03:04,374 --> 00:03:06,686 And to explain to you what is neural entrainment, 69 00:03:06,710 --> 00:03:09,320 let me first explain what is physical entrainment. 70 00:03:10,076 --> 00:03:12,826 So, we'll look and see five metronomes. 71 00:03:12,850 --> 00:03:15,846 Think of these five metronomes as five brains. 72 00:03:15,870 --> 00:03:18,620 And similar to the listeners before the story starts, 73 00:03:18,644 --> 00:03:20,457 these metronomes are going to click, 74 00:03:20,481 --> 00:03:22,640 but they're going to click out of phase. 75 00:03:23,059 --> 00:03:27,455 (Clicking) 76 00:03:27,479 --> 00:03:30,480 Now see what will happen when I connect them together 77 00:03:30,504 --> 00:03:32,645 by pressing them on these two cylinders. 78 00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:37,101 (Clicking) 79 00:03:37,125 --> 00:03:39,737 Now these two cylinders start to rotate. 80 00:03:39,761 --> 00:03:42,890 This rotation vibration is going through the wood 81 00:03:42,914 --> 00:03:45,919 and is going to couple all the metronomes together. 82 00:03:45,943 --> 00:03:47,555 And now listen to the click. 83 00:03:47,579 --> 00:03:52,246 (Synchronized clicking) 84 00:03:57,834 --> 00:04:00,458 This is what you call physical entrainment. 85 00:04:00,482 --> 00:04:02,725 Now let's go back to the brain and ask: 86 00:04:02,749 --> 00:04:04,893 What's driving this neural entrainment? 87 00:04:04,917 --> 00:04:07,702 Is it simply the sounds that the speaker is producing? 88 00:04:07,726 --> 00:04:09,049 Or maybe it's the words. 89 00:04:09,073 --> 00:04:12,719 Or maybe it's the meaning that the speaker is trying to convey. 90 00:04:12,743 --> 00:04:15,503 So to test it, we did the following experiment. 91 00:04:15,527 --> 00:04:18,728 First, we took the story and played it backwards. 92 00:04:18,752 --> 00:04:21,878 And that preserved many of the original auditory features, 93 00:04:21,902 --> 00:04:23,915 but removed the meaning. 94 00:04:23,939 --> 00:04:25,610 And it sounds something like that. 95 00:04:25,634 --> 00:04:30,772 (Audio) JO: (unintelligible) 96 00:04:31,296 --> 00:04:33,648 And we flashed colors in the two brains 97 00:04:33,672 --> 00:04:37,584 to indicate brain areas that respond very similarly across people. 98 00:04:37,608 --> 00:04:38,762 And as you can see, 99 00:04:38,786 --> 00:04:42,554 this incoming sound induced entrainment or alignment in all of the brains 100 00:04:42,578 --> 00:04:45,310 in auditory cortices that process the sounds, 101 00:04:45,334 --> 00:04:47,558 but it didn't spread deeper into the brain. 102 00:04:48,051 --> 00:04:51,455 Now we can take these sounds and build words out of it. 103 00:04:51,479 --> 00:04:54,135 So if we take Jim O'Grady and scramble the words, 104 00:04:54,159 --> 00:04:55,399 we'll get a list of words. 105 00:04:55,423 --> 00:04:57,685 (Audio) JO: ... an animal ... assorted facts ... 106 00:04:57,709 --> 00:05:00,601 and right on ... pie man ... potentially ... my stories 107 00:05:00,625 --> 00:05:03,567 UH: And you can see that these words start to induce alignment 108 00:05:03,591 --> 00:05:06,196 in early language areas, but not more than that. 109 00:05:06,220 --> 00:05:10,037 Now we can take the words and start to build sentences out of them. 110 00:05:11,561 --> 00:05:14,561 (Audio) JO: And they recommend against crossing that line. 111 00:05:16,021 --> 00:05:19,663 He says: "Dear Jim, Good story. Nice details. 112 00:05:20,369 --> 00:05:22,521 Didn't she only know about him through me?" 113 00:05:22,545 --> 00:05:25,680 UH: Now you can see that the responses in all the language areas 114 00:05:25,704 --> 00:05:27,395 that process the incoming language 115 00:05:27,419 --> 00:05:29,798 become aligned or similar across all listeners. 116 00:05:30,218 --> 00:05:34,895 However, only when we use the full, engaging, coherent story 117 00:05:34,919 --> 00:05:37,144 do the responses spread deeper into the brain 118 00:05:37,168 --> 00:05:38,699 into higher-order areas, 119 00:05:38,723 --> 00:05:41,824 which include the frontal cortex and the parietal cortex, 120 00:05:41,848 --> 00:05:44,436 and make all of them respond very similarly. 121 00:05:44,460 --> 00:05:47,729 And we believe that these responses in higher-order areas are induced 122 00:05:47,753 --> 00:05:49,879 or become similar across listeners 123 00:05:49,903 --> 00:05:52,643 because of the meaning conveyed by the speaker, 124 00:05:52,667 --> 00:05:54,268 and not by words or sound. 125 00:05:54,735 --> 00:05:57,350 And if we are right, there's a strong prediction of??? 126 00:05:57,374 --> 00:05:59,736 if I tell you the exact same ideas 127 00:05:59,760 --> 00:06:02,404 using two very different sets of words, 128 00:06:02,428 --> 00:06:04,979 your brain responses will still be similar. 129 00:06:05,499 --> 00:06:08,513 And to test it, we did the following experiment in my lab. 130 00:06:09,142 --> 00:06:10,950 We took the English story 131 00:06:10,974 --> 00:06:13,110 and translated it to Russian. 132 00:06:13,134 --> 00:06:17,358 Now you have two different sounds and linguistic systems 133 00:06:17,382 --> 00:06:19,676 that convey the exact same meaning. 134 00:06:19,700 --> 00:06:23,348 And you play the English story to the English listeners 135 00:06:23,372 --> 00:06:25,724 and the Russian story to the Russian listeners, 136 00:06:25,748 --> 00:06:28,793 and we can compare their responses across the groups. 137 00:06:28,817 --> 00:06:32,388 And when we did that, we didn't see responses that are similar 138 00:06:32,412 --> 00:06:34,693 in auditory cortices in language, 139 00:06:34,717 --> 00:06:37,095 because the language and sound are very different. 140 00:06:37,119 --> 00:06:39,677 However, you can see that the responses in other areas 141 00:06:39,701 --> 00:06:42,195 were still similar across these two groups. 142 00:06:43,068 --> 00:06:47,160 We believe this is because they understood the story in a very similar way, 143 00:06:47,184 --> 00:06:51,210 as we confirmed, using a test after the story ended. 144 00:06:52,321 --> 00:06:56,008 And we think that this alignment is necessary for communication. 145 00:06:56,032 --> 00:06:58,658 For example, as you can tell, 146 00:06:58,682 --> 00:07:00,709 I am not a native English speaker. 147 00:07:00,733 --> 00:07:02,614 I grew up with another language, 148 00:07:02,638 --> 00:07:05,292 and the same might be for many of you in the audience. 149 00:07:05,316 --> 00:07:07,315 And still, we can communicate. 150 00:07:07,339 --> 00:07:08,490 How come? 151 00:07:08,514 --> 00:07:11,593 We think we can communicate because we have this common code 152 00:07:11,617 --> 00:07:13,044 that presents meaning. 153 00:07:13,921 --> 00:07:17,367 So far, I've only talked about what's happening in the listener's brain, 154 00:07:17,391 --> 00:07:19,638 in your brain, when you're listening to talks. 155 00:07:19,662 --> 00:07:22,361 But what's happening in the speaker's brain, in my brain, 156 00:07:22,385 --> 00:07:24,192 when I'm speaking to you? 157 00:07:24,216 --> 00:07:26,073 To look in the speaker's brain, 158 00:07:26,097 --> 00:07:29,193 we asked the speaker to go into the scanner, 159 00:07:29,217 --> 00:07:30,819 we scan his brain, 160 00:07:30,843 --> 00:07:34,850 and then compare his brain responses to the brain responses of the listeners 161 00:07:34,874 --> 00:07:36,676 listening to the story. 162 00:07:36,700 --> 00:07:40,910 You have to remember that producing speech and comprehending speech 163 00:07:40,934 --> 00:07:42,657 are very different processes. 164 00:07:42,681 --> 00:07:44,925 Here we're asking: How similar are they? 165 00:07:46,164 --> 00:07:47,571 To our surprise, 166 00:07:47,595 --> 00:07:52,466 we saw that all these complex patterns within the listeners 167 00:07:52,490 --> 00:07:55,197 actually came from the speaker brain. 168 00:07:55,221 --> 00:07:58,906 So production and comprehension rely on very similar processes. 169 00:07:58,930 --> 00:08:00,502 And we also found 170 00:08:00,526 --> 00:08:04,232 the stronger the similarity between the listener's brain 171 00:08:04,256 --> 00:08:05,755 and the speaker's brain, 172 00:08:05,779 --> 00:08:07,684 the better the communication. 173 00:08:07,708 --> 00:08:11,673 So I know that if you are completely confused now, 174 00:08:11,697 --> 00:08:13,718 and I do hope that this is not the case, 175 00:08:13,742 --> 00:08:16,135 your brain responses are very different than mine. 176 00:08:16,159 --> 00:08:19,266 But I also know that if you really understand me now, 177 00:08:19,290 --> 00:08:22,181 then your brain ...and your brain ... and your brain 178 00:08:22,205 --> 00:08:23,933 are really similar to mine. 179 00:08:25,793 --> 00:08:28,888 Now, let's take all this information together and ask: 180 00:08:28,912 --> 00:08:32,249 How can we use it to transmit a memory that I have 181 00:08:32,273 --> 00:08:34,459 from my brain to your brains? 182 00:08:35,037 --> 00:08:37,155 So we did the following experiment. 183 00:08:37,648 --> 00:08:40,221 We let people watch, for the first time in their life, 184 00:08:40,245 --> 00:08:44,379 a TV episode from the BBC series "Sherlock," while we scanned their brains. 185 00:08:44,403 --> 00:08:47,204 And then we asked them to go back to the scanner 186 00:08:47,228 --> 00:08:51,127 and tell the story to another person that never watched the movie. 187 00:08:51,151 --> 00:08:52,811 So let's be specific. 188 00:08:52,835 --> 00:08:54,882 Think about this exact scene, 189 00:08:54,906 --> 00:08:57,490 when Sherlock is entering the cab in London 190 00:08:57,514 --> 00:08:59,810 driven by the murderer he is looking for. 191 00:09:00,398 --> 00:09:02,894 With me, as a viewer, 192 00:09:02,918 --> 00:09:06,418 there is a specific brain pattern in my brain when I watch it. 193 00:09:07,179 --> 00:09:10,951 Now, the exact same pattern, I can reactivate in my brain again 194 00:09:10,975 --> 00:09:14,631 by telling the world: Sherlock, London, murderer. 195 00:09:15,369 --> 00:09:18,479 And when I'm transmitting these words to your brains now, 196 00:09:18,503 --> 00:09:20,988 you have to reconstruct it in your mind. 197 00:09:21,012 --> 00:09:25,561 In fact, we see that pattern emerging now in your brains. 198 00:09:25,585 --> 00:09:28,100 And we were really surprised to see 199 00:09:28,124 --> 00:09:30,379 that the pattern you have now in your brains 200 00:09:30,403 --> 00:09:32,315 when I'm describing to you these scenes 201 00:09:32,339 --> 00:09:36,161 would be very similar to the pattern I had when I watched this movie 202 00:09:36,185 --> 00:09:38,323 a few months ago in the scanner. 203 00:09:38,347 --> 00:09:40,451 This starts to tell you about the mechanism 204 00:09:40,475 --> 00:09:43,217 by which we can tell stories and transmit information. 205 00:09:43,733 --> 00:09:45,609 Because, for example, 206 00:09:45,633 --> 00:09:49,145 now you're listening really hard and trying to understand what I'm saying. 207 00:09:49,169 --> 00:09:50,719 And I know that it's not easy. 208 00:09:50,743 --> 00:09:54,779 But I hope that at one point in the talk we clicked, and you got me. 209 00:09:54,803 --> 00:09:58,701 And I think that in a few hours, a few days, a few months, 210 00:09:58,725 --> 00:10:00,869 you're going to meet someone at a party, 211 00:10:00,893 --> 00:10:04,441 and you're going to tell him about this lecture, 212 00:10:04,465 --> 00:10:08,103 and suddenly it will be as if he is standing now here with us. 213 00:10:08,127 --> 00:10:10,977 Now you can see how we can take this mechanism 214 00:10:11,001 --> 00:10:14,932 and try to transmit memories and knowledge across people, 215 00:10:14,956 --> 00:10:17,003 which is wonderful, right? 216 00:10:17,027 --> 00:10:20,194 But our ability to communicate relies on our ability 217 00:10:20,218 --> 00:10:22,784 to have common ground. 218 00:10:22,808 --> 00:10:24,013 Because, for example, 219 00:10:24,037 --> 00:10:27,804 if I'm going to use the British synonym 220 00:10:27,828 --> 00:10:30,206 "hackney carriage" instead of "cab," 221 00:10:30,230 --> 00:10:34,269 I know that I'm going to be misaligned with most of you in the audience. 222 00:10:34,720 --> 00:10:36,911 This alignment depends not only on our ability 223 00:10:36,935 --> 00:10:38,969 to understand the basic concept; 224 00:10:38,993 --> 00:10:43,788 it also depends on our ability to develop common ground and understanding 225 00:10:43,812 --> 00:10:45,599 and shared belief systems. 226 00:10:45,623 --> 00:10:47,457 Because we know that in many cases, 227 00:10:47,481 --> 00:10:51,524 people understand the exact same story in very different ways. 228 00:10:52,460 --> 00:10:55,501 So to test it in the lab, we did the following experiment. 229 00:10:56,089 --> 00:10:59,020 We took a story by J.D. Salinger, 230 00:10:59,044 --> 00:11:03,379 in which a husband lost track of his wife in the middle of a party, 231 00:11:03,403 --> 00:11:07,090 and he's calling his best friend, asking, "Did you see my wife?" 232 00:11:07,836 --> 00:11:09,043 For half of the subjects, 233 00:11:09,067 --> 00:11:13,208 we said that the wife was having an affair with the best friend. 234 00:11:13,232 --> 00:11:14,383 For the other half, 235 00:11:14,407 --> 00:11:19,512 we said that the wife is loyal and the husband is very jealous. 236 00:11:20,127 --> 00:11:22,815 This one sentence before the story started 237 00:11:22,839 --> 00:11:25,140 was enough to make the brain responses 238 00:11:25,164 --> 00:11:28,208 of all the people that believed the wife was having an affair 239 00:11:28,232 --> 00:11:30,669 be very similar in these high-order areas, 240 00:11:30,693 --> 00:11:32,915 and different than the other group. 241 00:11:32,939 --> 00:11:36,612 And if one sentence is enough to make your brain similar 242 00:11:36,636 --> 00:11:38,239 to people that think like you 243 00:11:38,263 --> 00:11:41,216 and very different than people that think differently than you, 244 00:11:41,240 --> 00:11:44,717 think how this effect is going to be amplified in real life, 245 00:11:44,741 --> 00:11:47,633 when we are all listening to the exact same news item 246 00:11:47,657 --> 00:11:51,405 after being exposed days after day after day 247 00:11:51,429 --> 00:11:55,241 to different media channels, like Fox News or The New York Times, 248 00:11:55,265 --> 00:11:58,378 that give us very different perspectives on reality. 249 00:11:59,556 --> 00:12:00,909 So let me summarize. 250 00:12:01,529 --> 00:12:03,618 If everything worked as planned tonight, 251 00:12:03,642 --> 00:12:07,941 I used my ability to vocalize sound to be coupled to your brains. 252 00:12:07,965 --> 00:12:09,468 And I used this coupling 253 00:12:09,492 --> 00:12:13,333 to transmit my brain patterns associated with my memories and ideas 254 00:12:13,357 --> 00:12:14,673 into your brains. 255 00:12:15,201 --> 00:12:18,999 In this, I start to reveal the hidden neural mechanism 256 00:12:19,023 --> 00:12:20,658 by which we communicate. 257 00:12:20,682 --> 00:12:23,649 And we know that in the future it will enable us to improve 258 00:12:23,673 --> 00:12:25,663 and facilitate communication. 259 00:12:26,111 --> 00:12:27,805 But these studies also reveal 260 00:12:28,535 --> 00:12:31,821 that communication relies on a common ground. 261 00:12:31,845 --> 00:12:34,307 And we have to be really worried as a society 262 00:12:34,331 --> 00:12:38,367 if we lose this common ground and our ability to speak with people 263 00:12:38,391 --> 00:12:40,508 that are slightly different than us 264 00:12:40,532 --> 00:12:43,920 because we let a few very strong media channels 265 00:12:43,944 --> 00:12:45,485 take control of the mike, 266 00:12:45,509 --> 00:12:49,284 and manipulate and control the way we all think. 267 00:12:49,308 --> 00:12:52,209 And I'm not sure how to fix it, because I'm only a scientist. 268 00:12:52,233 --> 00:12:54,693 But maybe one way to do it 269 00:12:54,717 --> 00:12:57,364 is to go back to the more natural way of communication, 270 00:12:57,388 --> 00:12:58,990 which is a dialogue, 271 00:12:59,014 --> 00:13:01,521 in which it's not only me speaking to you now, 272 00:13:01,994 --> 00:13:04,210 but a more natural way of talking, 273 00:13:04,234 --> 00:13:07,511 in which I am speaking and I am listening, 274 00:13:07,535 --> 00:13:12,255 and together we are trying to come to a common ground and new ideas. 275 00:13:12,279 --> 00:13:13,437 Because after all, 276 00:13:13,461 --> 00:13:17,125 the people we are coupled to define who we are. 277 00:13:17,149 --> 00:13:19,538 And our desire to be coupled to another brain 278 00:13:19,562 --> 00:13:24,079 is something very basic that starts at a very early age. 279 00:13:24,103 --> 00:13:28,290 So let me finish with an example from my own private life 280 00:13:29,044 --> 00:13:33,355 that I think is a good example of how coupling to other people 281 00:13:33,379 --> 00:13:35,653 is really going to define who we are. 282 00:13:36,294 --> 00:13:39,368 This my son Jonathan at a very early age. 283 00:13:39,392 --> 00:13:43,542 See how he developed a vocal game together with my wife, 284 00:13:43,566 --> 00:13:48,797 only from the desire and pure joy of being coupled to another human being. 285 00:13:49,556 --> 00:13:54,473 (Both vocalizing) 286 00:14:02,915 --> 00:14:05,243 (Laughter) 287 00:14:05,267 --> 00:14:09,064 Now, think how the ability of my son 288 00:14:09,088 --> 00:14:11,850 to be coupled to us and other people in his life 289 00:14:11,874 --> 00:14:14,732 is going to shape the man he is going to become. 290 00:14:14,756 --> 00:14:17,171 And think how you change on a daily basis 291 00:14:17,195 --> 00:14:21,518 from the interaction and coupling to other people in your life. 292 00:14:22,562 --> 00:14:24,665 So keep being coupled to other people. 293 00:14:25,157 --> 00:14:26,706 Keep spreading your ideas, 294 00:14:26,730 --> 00:14:29,974 because the sum of all of us together, coupled, 295 00:14:29,998 --> 00:14:31,592 is greater than our parts. 296 00:14:31,616 --> 00:14:32,782 Thank you. 297 00:14:32,806 --> 00:14:38,468 (Applause)