WEBVTT

00:00:03.693 --> 00:00:06.373
I am going to speak about the act of writing,

00:00:06.502 --> 00:00:08.962
which is something every
researcher has to do a lot

00:00:09.621 --> 00:00:12.491
and the good news is
that some pretty simple things

00:00:12.579 --> 00:00:14.639
can make your
written output a lot better.

00:00:14.900 --> 00:00:16.930
So that's why I titled this:
Seven simple suggestions.

00:00:16.930 --> 00:00:19.380
So here we go.
Seven simple suggestions.

00:00:19.631 --> 00:00:22.271
Here's the first one:
Don't wait: WRITE.

NOTE Paragraph

00:00:22.271 --> 00:00:23.211
This is what mistake,

00:00:23.536 --> 00:00:24.606
what a lot of people make.

NOTE Paragraph

00:00:24.606 --> 00:00:26.756
Here is a typical plan for doing research

00:00:27.153 --> 00:00:27.783
Number one:

00:00:28.033 --> 00:00:29.083
Have a brilliant idea.

00:00:29.260 --> 00:00:29.860
Number two:

00:00:29.881 --> 00:00:32.571
Spend months doing good research to back it up

00:00:32.571 --> 00:00:33.121
Number three:

00:00:33.121 --> 00:00:33.851
Write the paper.

00:00:33.851 --> 00:00:36.361
In last two weeks before the deadline for the conference.

00:00:37.151 --> 00:00:38.401
This is a bad plan, right.

00:00:38.931 --> 00:00:41.021
Here is a good plan for doing research:

00:00:41.061 --> 00:00:42.281
First: have an idea.

00:00:42.592 --> 00:00:44.602
Second: start writing the paper.

00:00:44.882 --> 00:00:47.842
Third: use the paper as a forcing function

00:00:48.373 --> 00:00:51.493
to make you do the research that articulates the paper.

00:00:51.493 --> 00:00:51.893
Ok?

00:00:52.010 --> 00:00:53.370
See how diferent it is?

00:00:53.440 --> 00:00:53.940
Right?

00:00:53.973 --> 00:00:55.833
It means you start writing very early.

00:00:55.833 --> 00:00:57.163
Why is this good? Well.

00:01:00.471 --> 00:01:02.421
hacking around and writing a code and thinking

00:01:02.723 --> 00:01:04.223
and I start to write the paper,

00:01:04.223 --> 00:01:06.243
than I relise that some of my previous work

00:01:06.294 --> 00:01:07.724
was misdirected, right?

00:01:07.844 --> 00:01:09.644
It wasn't able to do useful goal,

00:01:09.655 --> 00:01:10.575
certainly not for this paper

00:01:10.595 --> 00:01:11.745
and I also discover

00:01:11.868 --> 00:01:14.698
some key parts of the paper that need more work,

00:01:14.698 --> 00:01:15.138
right.

00:01:15.138 --> 00:01:19.678
So you wanna use the paper as a forcing function to learn that early.

00:01:20.129 --> 00:01:23.639
It also gives you a good way to communicate with another people

00:01:23.639 --> 00:01:26.061
Research is all about communication. Right?

00:01:26.061 --> 00:01:29.621
If you...Maybe you are kind of person who likes work just on their own

00:01:29.640 --> 00:01:31.920
in a windowless room with no lights.

00:01:31.920 --> 00:01:33.770
But I like to work with other people

00:01:33.770 --> 00:01:35.700
I spent a lot of time at the white board

00:01:35.700 --> 00:01:39.700
If you have something written you have a new mechanism for communicating with them

00:01:40.428 --> 00:01:40.958
Right?

00:01:40.958 --> 00:01:43.978
Is very important is a mechanism for communicating

00:01:44.072 --> 00:01:45.572
That's all along way saying

00:01:45.782 --> 00:01:49.502
that really writing is not the way in which we just report research

00:01:50.467 --> 00:01:54.467
for me is a way which I do research

00:01:54.681 --> 00:01:57.141
and I think you should think about writing in that way.

00:01:57.331 --> 00:02:00.231
It's not just the output, it's a computation

00:02:00.321 --> 00:02:02.731
It's the stuff that makes research happen

00:02:02.789 --> 00:02:08.099
And it's because somehow we think more clearly when we write, than when we just think.

00:02:08.414 --> 00:02:10.134
At least I do.

00:02:10.270 --> 00:02:10.950
So.

00:02:10.950 --> 00:02:15.590
Ehm. One problem with this plan here is that it starts with this idea bit.

00:02:15.590 --> 00:02:16.000
Right?

00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:17.670
Where this idea come from?

00:02:17.740 --> 00:02:21.580
And so..ehm...it's tempting when you looking at another peoples' work

00:02:21.580 --> 00:02:27.790
to think "oh my" everybody else has very clever ideas and I am a mere worm

00:02:27.849 --> 00:02:31.849
and I have such a trivial boring ideas that nobody would be interested in them

00:02:31.901 --> 00:02:33.191
And do you know that feeling? Yeh?

00:02:33.191 --> 00:02:35.541
You sit there and you don't feel very creative

00:02:35.541 --> 00:02:39.541
Let me tell you that this is what every researcher feels most of the time

00:02:40.226 --> 00:02:42.726
There are days when you have miraculous breakthrough

00:02:42.726 --> 00:02:45.836
and you really know your God is in heaven and you know that all is right with the World.

00:02:45.836 --> 00:02:50.966
But most of days you thing I am worm this is the natural state of the researcher.

00:02:50.966 --> 00:02:51.466
Right?

00:02:51.466 --> 00:02:56.616
So what you have to release is that even you know [Tarjan], and so forth, thinks that he's a worm most of the time

00:02:56.616 --> 00:02:58.816
and what what the researcher do? Good researchers

00:02:58.816 --> 00:03:01.586
is they simply start writing anyway, right?

00:03:01.586 --> 00:03:07.056
They write a paper about any idea no matter how trivial or insignificant it may be.

00:03:08.036 --> 00:03:14.316
My experiences that the clever the research student then more they prone to this failure mode

00:03:14.316 --> 00:03:17.246
either they don't understand something which case they are depressed

00:03:17.246 --> 00:03:22.626
well stay do undestand something which they do believe, in which case they think it is trivial and nobody would want to know about it, all right?

00:03:22.882 --> 00:03:25.422
So in both cases depressed.

00:03:25.422 --> 00:03:27.592
This is not a good situation, right?

00:03:27.653 --> 00:03:30.793
So just write an idea no matter how insignificant it seems to be

00:03:30.793 --> 00:03:36.243
because my experience consistently is that when you write the paper

00:03:36.243 --> 00:03:42.013
your idea develops and ramifies computer science is like a snowflake or flower

00:03:42.100 --> 00:03:46.100
you start with a little seed and its ramifies ahead of you in an interesting things

00:03:46.507 --> 00:03:50.507
something looked boring turns out to be actually rather interesting

00:03:50.656 --> 00:03:55.956
not always sometimes you start writing the paper and it turns out indeed to be weedy and insignificant

00:03:55.956 --> 00:04:00.759
and maybe when you published it and it will be done quickly and you put it on your homepage, all right?

00:04:01.542 --> 00:04:05.422
So, write early!

00:04:05.422 --> 00:04:10.452
And, and and I really do believe that the second thing is much the most a common case.

00:04:10.472 --> 00:04:14.112
It almost invariably turns out to be more interesting than you thought.

00:04:14.112 --> 00:04:19.362
All right, number two if you gonna have this idea and wrote about it you need to be clear what it is.

00:04:19.362 --> 00:04:27.222
The business of writing a paper is to convey from your brain into the minds of your readers your idea.

00:04:27.222 --> 00:04:30.352
So think of your papers like, like a virus, right?

00:04:30.352 --> 00:04:34.352
You trying to, you try to infect your readers' minds with your idea.

00:04:34.982 --> 00:04:38.172
And then you will infect them and then they talk to another people and they will infect them

00:04:38.172 --> 00:04:42.642
So it's like a kind of contagious play which is going to sweep the world

00:04:42.642 --> 00:04:46.642
And everybody is been thinking about your idea because it is so well infectious.

00:04:47.327 --> 00:04:47.697
Right?

00:04:47.810 --> 00:04:52.880
So...ehhmm....my, my, my knowledge here with, with Mozart

00:04:52.880 --> 00:04:58.190
It's just houndred of years after the Mozart died we are listening the people read his papers.

00:04:58.297 --> 00:05:00.237
Or more precisely play his music.

00:05:00.237 --> 00:05:02.827
Where you go to concert hall to hear his papers because

00:05:02.827 --> 00:05:04.667
their ideas were so infectious

00:05:04.667 --> 00:05:06.337
Don't you think that's amazing?

NOTE Paragraph

00:05:06.337 --> 00:05:10.467
Won't it be remarkable that in four hundred years time people will still reading you papers.

00:05:10.889 --> 00:05:11.929
That's not all likely

00:05:11.929 --> 00:05:15.219
But I think that's the..,that's a kind of idea like to get

00:05:15.219 --> 00:05:18.429
your your..the papers is not mechanism for getting promotion

00:05:18.429 --> 00:05:22.429
It's mechanism for convey ideas from your head to somebody elses head

00:05:22.553 --> 00:05:26.553
If you don't convey them, right, if don't bother to tell anybody about your ideas,

00:05:26.553 --> 00:05:28.633
then your minds don't have them

00:05:29.311 --> 00:05:29.791
Right?

00:05:29.868 --> 00:05:33.868
Even if Einstein had sat in the window this box not tell anybody about relativity.

00:05:33.933 --> 00:05:36.009
Then we wouldn't know relativity, right?

00:05:36.009 --> 00:05:41.559
That means you need to know what your idea is. Right? So when you write a paper in the end at least by the time you finished.

00:05:41.559 --> 00:05:45.559
You must know what is the idea that your paper conveys.

00:05:45.690 --> 00:05:49.220
It's surprising how hard that could be to determine from people's papers

00:05:49.220 --> 00:05:52.680
As a viewer if you read somebody's paper when you finish you can say:

00:05:52.680 --> 00:05:54.510
"What idea did that paper convey?"

00:05:55.549 --> 00:06:03.763
If you find that hard to articulate as a reader, then you know, in your view, you can say I really couldn't figure out what this what the idea this paper was about.

00:06:03.763 --> 00:06:06.613
And so than you apply to your own papers, right?

00:06:06.613 --> 00:06:10.180
It's actually sometimes quite hard to know exactly what your idea is to begin with.

00:06:10.180 --> 00:06:12.110
But you must now by the time you finish.

00:06:12.110 --> 00:06:16.140
Eeehrrr...if you find that yourself thinking, ohh..I have actually three ideas in this paper.

00:06:16.140 --> 00:06:18.830
Than what you do? Just write three papers.

00:06:18.830 --> 00:06:19.350
Right?

00:06:19.350 --> 00:06:26.570
It's wrong to try to merge them all in. In which case each one becomes cryptic and incomprehensible. Which you try to squidge into ten pages.

00:06:27.088 --> 00:06:29.508
Just write three papers, that's cool, right?

00:06:29.661 --> 00:06:33.511
That's not salami slicing, that is taking ideas and expressing them.

00:06:33.511 --> 00:06:38.461
A good idea in your paper is to say explicitly when you get to main idea

00:06:38.461 --> 00:06:40.801
It's suprising how seldom is this happens.

00:06:40.801 --> 00:06:47.941
So I often try to write phrases in my paper that say the beginning of section three somewhere the main idea of this paper is this..

00:06:48.068 --> 00:06:51.559
Because I have to explain some context and set up and background.

00:06:51.559 --> 00:06:57.339
And I wanted to be absolutly clear when I move from describing the context saying: here is the payload.

00:06:57.904 --> 00:06:58.314
Right?

00:06:58.598 --> 00:07:02.598
The viruses is about to arriving in your brain. Prepare!

00:07:02.714 --> 00:07:04.304
Does it make sence? All right?

00:07:04.377 --> 00:07:08.377
If you don't say that, if you leave you reader to be a detective.

00:07:08.606 --> 00:07:13.996
So, subsequently they have to reverse engineer what they think you meant was the key idea. That's not good, right?

00:07:13.996 --> 00:07:17.996
Why not said it explicitly, be completely up front about this.


00:07:18.806 --> 00:07:20.326
Third thing: Tell a story!

00:07:20.326 --> 00:07:23.572
So if you know write a paper this applies I am focusing mainly on papers.

00:07:23.572 --> 00:07:27.512
But I do also mean dissertations and so forth. Everything applies everything you like really.

00:07:27.512 --> 00:07:29.282
Is tell some kind of a story

00:07:29.282 --> 00:07:34.692
I always try to imagine when I'm writing a paper, that I am standing a front of the white board and explain it to a colleague.

NOTE Paragraph

00:07:35.167 --> 00:07:40.257
It's amazing how differently people present things at a white board and they will in a paper.

00:07:40.257 --> 00:07:40.647
Right?

00:07:40.674 --> 00:07:47.464
Without white board they start away ..??..with examples and explaining quite diffrently than if they..if they will not be out there..you you you get the idea..

00:07:47.464 --> 00:07:52.524
They often explain in much more accessible and engaging way at the white board than in the paper.

00:07:52.524 --> 00:07:58.524
So if you want to by accessible and engaging ......... do the same in the papers you do at the white board. Nearly.

00:07:58.524 --> 00:08:00.094
You need a little have a bit more substance.

00:08:00.094 --> 00:08:03.591
So here is a narrative flow that I usually try to follow with my papres. Right?

00:08:03.591 --> 00:08:08.171
You want to say here what a problem is, you want to motive your readers to say way it is an interesting problem

00:08:08.171 --> 00:08:14.441
You want to say at least briefly why it is unsolved problem, so be aware of solving, it is unsolved.

00:08:14.454 --> 00:08:19.075
And then you want to present your idea, that's the payload, right now

00:08:19.075 --> 00:08:19.495
Right?

00:08:19.495 --> 00:08:21.345
And then you give quite a bit of detail

00:08:21.345 --> 00:08:24.455
about exactly how what your idea is and how it works

00:08:24.455 --> 00:08:26.877
Ehm... Then you want to say something about

00:08:26.877 --> 00:08:28.653
how your idea compares with other people.

00:08:28.653 --> 00:08:30.659
See, you are kind of trying to lead people in

00:08:30.659 --> 00:08:32.419
You know, no everybody will read

00:08:32.419 --> 00:08:34.258
right the way through your paper.

00:08:34.258 --> 00:08:35.278
Your ideal is

00:08:35.278 --> 00:08:37.625
That whereever anybody stops reading

00:08:37.625 --> 00:08:40.021
they take away something valuable with them.

00:08:40.421 --> 00:08:43.031
And moreover every bit they read

00:08:43.031 --> 00:08:44.971
makes them want to read more, right?

00:08:44.971 --> 00:08:47.341
This is back to make it accesible, right?

00:08:47.341 --> 00:08:48.612
So, you know they say:

00:08:48.612 --> 00:08:50.132
Ah, here is an interesting problem

00:08:50.132 --> 00:08:51.122
I wish I could solve that one!

00:08:51.122 --> 00:08:52.602
I wonder if he can solve it!

00:08:52.602 --> 00:08:54.012
So, you know - they got a hook!

00:08:54.012 --> 00:08:55.712
They incline to read some more.

00:08:55.712 --> 00:08:59.152
Ehm, here is my - so, the typical outline

00:08:59.152 --> 00:09:00.272
for most papers that I write

00:09:00.272 --> 00:09:02.392
and indeed it works for dissertations as well.

00:09:02.542 --> 00:09:03.543
A short abstract.

00:09:04.514 --> 00:09:05.492
An introduction.

00:09:05.492 --> 00:09:06.882
Then something about the...

00:09:06.882 --> 00:09:08.762
stating what the problem is.

00:09:08.762 --> 00:09:10.142
Then a quite a bit of

00:09:10.142 --> 00:09:12.402
a short piece explaining what the idea is

00:09:12.402 --> 00:09:13.372
kind of intuitively

00:09:13.372 --> 00:09:16.236
and then a longer piece explaining the details

00:09:16.236 --> 00:09:17.156
behind the idea

00:09:17.156 --> 00:09:18.746
that sort of fills out the evidence.

00:09:18.746 --> 00:09:20.056
Then something about relaive work.

00:09:20.056 --> 00:09:21.016
And I am going to say a bit more about

00:09:21.016 --> 00:09:22.485
each of these sections

00:09:22.485 --> 00:09:23.405
in the following piece

00:09:23.405 --> 00:09:24.725
but this is my picture of

00:09:24.725 --> 00:09:26.945
how the structure of a paper might go.

00:09:26.945 --> 00:09:28.385
And look at the numbers of readers, right?

00:09:28.385 --> 00:09:30.505
More people read your abstract and title

00:09:30.505 --> 00:09:31.795
that will read all the rest of the paper

00:09:31.795 --> 00:09:33.795
so each time you want to give them a hook

00:09:33.795 --> 00:09:34.369
to continue.

00:09:34.369 --> 00:09:34.939
Here is what I think

00:09:34.939 --> 00:09:35.949
your introduction should do.

00:09:35.949 --> 00:09:36.726
One page!

00:09:36.726 --> 00:09:38.656
Describe the problem briefly

00:09:38.656 --> 00:09:41.099
and articulate what your contributions are.

00:09:41.415 --> 00:09:43.255
So, here is some by way of example

00:09:43.255 --> 00:09:44.853
Ehm, describing the problem

00:09:44.853 --> 00:09:46.933
I would suggest you introduce your problem

00:09:46.933 --> 00:09:47.873
with an example.

00:09:48.183 --> 00:09:49.993
So, my good way of doing to say:

00:09:49.993 --> 00:09:52.593
is there any typewriter fonts on the first page?

00:09:52.593 --> 00:09:53.994
I am a programming languages guy

00:09:53.994 --> 00:09:55.894
and programming languages people tend to

00:09:55.894 --> 00:09:58.347
put example programs in a typewriter font.

00:09:58.347 --> 00:10:00.447
So, I know if there is a typewriter font on the paper

00:10:00.447 --> 00:10:01.279
it's probably an example.

00:10:01.279 --> 00:10:02.289
That's good, right?

00:10:02.289 --> 00:10:03.959
But in your fields it may differ

00:10:03.959 --> 00:10:05.687
but anyway, start with an example

00:10:05.687 --> 00:10:06.597
that'll ilustrate your problem.

00:10:06.597 --> 00:10:07.947
So, here is an example of

00:10:07.947 --> 00:10:09.347
a paper that I wrote some time ago

00:10:09.347 --> 00:10:11.247
and the very first thing I did was to give

00:10:11.247 --> 00:10:13.257
a little program and explain a problem with it

00:10:13.257 --> 00:10:14.797
and explain that somehow

00:10:14.797 --> 00:10:16.417
my paper is gonna fix this problem.

00:10:16.417 --> 00:10:17.321
OK?

00:10:17.321 --> 00:10:18.791
So, that's an initial hook.

00:10:18.791 --> 00:10:20.721
Not a general description of a problem

00:00:57.631 --> 00:01:00.351
I often find, if I spend invested months of effort