On the fourth of January, 1934, A young man delivered a report to the United States Congress that 80 years on, still shapes the lives of everyone in this room today. Still shapes the lives of everyone on this planet. That young man wasn't a politician, he wasn't a businessman, a civil rights activist, or a faith leader. He was the most unlikely of heroes, an economist. (Laughter) His name was Simon Kuznets and the report that he delivered was called, "National Income, 1929-32" Now, you might think that this is a rather dry and dull report, and you're absolutely right. It's dry as a bone. But this report is the foundation of how, today, we judge the success of countries. What we know best as Gross Domestic Product, or GDP. GDP has defined and shaped our lives for the last 80 years. And today I want to talk about a different way to measure the success of countries. A different way to define and shape our lives for the nest 80 years. But first, we need to understand how GDP came to dominate our lives. Kuznet's report was delivered at a moment of crisis. The U.S. economy was plumetting into the Great Depression. and policy makers were struggling to respond. Struggling because they didn't know what was going on. They didn't have data and statistics. So what Kuznet's report gave them was reliable data on what the U.S. economy was producing, updated year by year. And armed with this information, policy makers were, eventually, able to find a way out of the slump. And because Kuznet's invention was found to be so useful, it spread around the world. And now today, every country produces GDP statistics. But, in that first report, Kuznets himself delivered a warning. It's in the introductory chapter, page 7 he says, "The welfare of a nation can, therefore, scarcely be inferred from a measurement of national income as defined above." It's not the greatest soundbite in the world, And it's dressed up in the coursest language of the economist, but his message was clear, GDP is a tool to help us measure economic performance. It's not a measure of our wellbeing. And it shouldn't be a guide to all decision making. But we have ignored Kuznet's warning. We live in a world where GDP is the benchmark of sucess in a global economy. Our politicians boast when GDP goes up, Markets move and trillions of dollars in capital move around the world based on which countries are going up, and which countries are going down. All measured in GDP. Our societies have become engines to create more GDP. But we know that GDP is flawed. It ignores the environment. It counts bombs and prisons and progress. It can't count happiness or community. And it has nothing to say about fairness or justice. Is it any surprise, that our world, marching to the drumbeat of GDP, is teetering on the brink of environmental disaster and filled with anger and conflict? We need a better way to measure our societies. A measure based on the real things that matter to real people. Do I have enough to eat? Can I read and write? Am I safe? Do I have rights? Do I live in a society where I'm not discriminated against? Is my future and the future of my children prevented from environmental disaster? These are questions that GDP does not and cannot answer. There have, of course, been efforts in the past to move beyond GDP. But I believe that we're living in a moment when we are ready for a measurement revolution. We're ready because we've seen, in the financial crisis of 2008, how our fetish for economic growth led us so far astray. We've seen in the Arab Spring how countries like Tunisia were supposedly economic superstars but they were societies that were seething with discontentment. We're ready because today we have the technology to gather and analyze data in ways that would have been unimaginable to Kuznets. Today, I'd like to introduce you to the Social Progress Index. It's a measure of the wellbeing of society, completely separate from GDP. It's a whole new way [Social Progress Index] of looking at the world. The Social Progress Index begins by defining what it means to be a good society based around three dimensions: The first is, does everyone have the basic needs for survival? Food, water, shelter, safety. Secondly, does everyone have access to the building blocks to improve their lives? Education, information, health and sustainable environment. And then third, does every individual have access to the chance to pursue their goals and dreams and ambitions free from obstacles? Do they have rights? Freedom of choice? Freedom from discrimination and access to the the world's most advanced knowledge? Together, these 12 components form the Social Progress framework. And for each of these 12 components, we have indicators to measure how these countries are performing. Not indicators of effort or intention, but real achievement. We don't measure how much a country spends on healthcare, we measure the length and quality of people's lives. We don't measure whether governments pass laws against discrimination, we measure whether people experience discrimination. But, what you want to know is who's top, don't you? I knew that, I knew that, I knew that. Okay, I'm going to show you. I'm going to show you on this chart. So here we are, what I've done here is put on the vertical axis social progress. Higher is better. And then, just for comparison, just for fun, on the horizontal axis, is GDP per capita. Further to the right is more. Okay, the country in the world with the highest social progress, the number one country on social progress is New Zealand.