1 00:00:08,194 --> 00:00:12,272 (Portuguese) I want to tell you 2 00:00:12,272 --> 00:00:16,352 why I'm interested in listening. 3 00:00:16,352 --> 00:00:18,514 When I was 17 years old, 4 00:00:18,514 --> 00:00:21,844 I started to suffer from a pain in my throat. 5 00:00:21,844 --> 00:00:25,768 Psychiatrists called it globus hystericus, 6 00:00:25,768 --> 00:00:27,828 completely psychosomatic. 7 00:00:27,828 --> 00:00:31,142 Eventually I developed depressions, 8 00:00:31,142 --> 00:00:34,992 and even considered suicide, and I could not relax. 9 00:00:34,992 --> 00:00:37,754 At the age of 25 when I tried yoga, 10 00:00:37,754 --> 00:00:41,542 I felt as if somebody was putting a nail into my throat here 11 00:00:41,542 --> 00:00:43,964 and it was coming out from the other side. 12 00:00:43,964 --> 00:00:46,349 So I learned to cope with the pain 13 00:00:46,349 --> 00:00:50,440 by working many hours and ignoring what was going on inside, 14 00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:53,081 so I couldn't feel anything from here down. 15 00:00:53,081 --> 00:00:56,132 And in this way, I was able to raise a family, 16 00:00:56,132 --> 00:00:58,221 succeed in my career, 17 00:00:58,221 --> 00:01:01,363 and things were as if they were OK, 18 00:01:01,363 --> 00:01:03,909 until by the age of 46. 19 00:01:03,909 --> 00:01:05,389 I was hit by a crisis 20 00:01:05,389 --> 00:01:07,765 that was sparked by a consultant 21 00:01:07,765 --> 00:01:10,765 using questions from an appreciative inquiry. 22 00:01:10,765 --> 00:01:11,956 She asked: 23 00:01:12,986 --> 00:01:18,626 "When were the relationships between men and women ideal? 24 00:01:18,626 --> 00:01:22,429 And could you please tell us a story 25 00:01:22,429 --> 00:01:26,979 about a moment at work in which you felt full of life?" 26 00:01:28,019 --> 00:01:29,775 I was stunned. 27 00:01:29,775 --> 00:01:34,124 First, I realized how much little joy I had in my life, 28 00:01:34,124 --> 00:01:39,565 and second, I realized that answering this question is changing me, 29 00:01:39,565 --> 00:01:42,721 thanks to somebody listening to me. 30 00:01:45,611 --> 00:01:49,120 Then I allowed myself to try a variety of things 31 00:01:49,120 --> 00:01:53,491 such as: massage therapy, psychodrama, 32 00:01:53,491 --> 00:01:57,036 storytelling classes, voice classes, 33 00:01:58,491 --> 00:02:00,542 Zen Buddhism workshops, 34 00:02:00,542 --> 00:02:03,491 and more recently dialectical behavior therapy 35 00:02:03,491 --> 00:02:06,371 and things started to change for me. 36 00:02:06,371 --> 00:02:11,247 First I could feel the pain again but I didn't run away from it. 37 00:02:11,247 --> 00:02:13,273 Eventually I even started to feel anxiety, 38 00:02:13,273 --> 00:02:16,892 which I didn't know what it was until that age. 39 00:02:16,892 --> 00:02:23,493 But later on, I won some moments of tranquility, quietness, 40 00:02:23,493 --> 00:02:25,053 and moments of joy. 41 00:02:25,053 --> 00:02:28,849 And I started to ask myself, "What made it possible?" 42 00:02:28,849 --> 00:02:32,044 And my answer was that I was so lucky 43 00:02:32,044 --> 00:02:36,699 as to raise myself a village of people who would listen to me. 44 00:02:37,772 --> 00:02:42,748 So, then I decided to research listening. 45 00:02:42,748 --> 00:02:48,580 And today I would like to share with you the results of this research. 46 00:02:49,600 --> 00:02:52,627 So, I first looked in the professional literature 47 00:02:52,627 --> 00:02:55,722 in my field of management and organizational behavior, 48 00:02:55,722 --> 00:02:59,644 and in one top journal, out of 3,000 papers, 49 00:02:59,644 --> 00:03:02,762 I found zero discussing listening. 50 00:03:02,762 --> 00:03:04,248 In other top journal, 51 00:03:04,248 --> 00:03:08,009 out of 4,000 papers, two discussed listening. 52 00:03:09,289 --> 00:03:11,482 And while it reflects something 53 00:03:11,482 --> 00:03:15,432 about the disinterest of researchers in listening, 54 00:03:15,432 --> 00:03:21,305 I think it reflects the disinterest of humans in listening. 55 00:03:21,305 --> 00:03:23,002 Watch with me this graph. 56 00:03:23,002 --> 00:03:27,388 This shows what people are searching in Google 57 00:03:27,388 --> 00:03:31,138 from 2004 until 2015. 58 00:03:31,138 --> 00:03:35,299 The red is the amount of searches for the word "talking", 59 00:03:35,299 --> 00:03:37,846 and the blue is for "listening". 60 00:03:37,846 --> 00:03:40,626 This is what people are interested in. 61 00:03:40,626 --> 00:03:44,828 And you speaking Portuguese do not have to worry about 62 00:03:44,828 --> 00:03:49,499 (Português) "talking" in red versus (Português) "listening" in blue. 63 00:03:51,119 --> 00:03:56,623 So I started to look at what theories exist out there about listening 64 00:03:56,623 --> 00:03:59,653 and I'll show you three, 65 00:03:59,653 --> 00:04:01,478 starting with the idea 66 00:04:01,478 --> 00:04:07,908 that, actually, the listener dictates the speaker's speech quality. 67 00:04:07,908 --> 00:04:12,445 If he's going to listen to you, naturally you'll talk more, 68 00:04:12,445 --> 00:04:17,675 but you'll talk more coherently and you'll tell more interesting stories. 69 00:04:18,845 --> 00:04:21,069 And if this is not enough, 70 00:04:21,069 --> 00:04:25,089 if you tell more and more interesting stories 71 00:04:25,089 --> 00:04:30,992 you commit whatever you have said to your memory, 72 00:04:30,992 --> 00:04:33,982 so you know more about yourself, 73 00:04:33,982 --> 00:04:38,827 such that if a child comes home and tells the parents, 74 00:04:38,827 --> 00:04:41,421 "Oh! We did this and that in school," 75 00:04:41,421 --> 00:04:45,845 and the parents say, "Not now. Have a shower and we'll have dinner," 76 00:04:45,845 --> 00:04:47,566 the child will remember 77 00:04:47,566 --> 00:04:50,876 that whatever he or she did in school was not that interesting. 78 00:04:50,876 --> 00:04:53,499 That will be commited to memories. 79 00:04:53,499 --> 00:04:59,722 Thus, the collection of our listeners slowly, imperceptibly, 80 00:04:59,722 --> 00:05:02,722 changes our self-knowledge. 81 00:05:02,722 --> 00:05:05,893 If this is not enough, 82 00:05:05,893 --> 00:05:10,877 listening in a special way could even change personality, 83 00:05:10,877 --> 00:05:15,483 a listening that is nonjudgmental and emphatic. 84 00:05:17,013 --> 00:05:21,669 Let me explain to you how could it be that listening would change personality. 85 00:05:21,669 --> 00:05:25,691 For that, I have to paraphrase Pirandello from his book: 86 00:05:25,691 --> 00:05:31,356 "Uno, nessuno e centomila" or "One, No One, and One Hundred Thousand". 87 00:05:31,356 --> 00:05:33,709 From now I'm going to act, so don't get scared. 88 00:05:33,709 --> 00:05:35,441 I see that you're laughing at me. 89 00:05:35,441 --> 00:05:37,981 That is fine, continue to laugh at me, 90 00:05:37,981 --> 00:05:39,517 but do me a favor. 91 00:05:39,517 --> 00:05:41,782 Do you remember the case that you had 92 00:05:41,782 --> 00:05:45,288 that in your home there was a good friend sitting with you 93 00:05:45,288 --> 00:05:48,995 and, suddenly, a new friend was knocking on the door, 94 00:05:48,995 --> 00:05:50,983 and you, what did you do? 95 00:05:50,983 --> 00:05:53,450 With an ugly excuse, 96 00:05:53,450 --> 00:05:57,800 you asked the old friend to go home, 97 00:05:57,800 --> 00:05:59,994 because you were afraid 98 00:05:59,994 --> 00:06:04,064 that the old and the new friend will not get along. 99 00:06:04,624 --> 00:06:08,442 I see that you remember this case, so do me one more little favor. 100 00:06:08,442 --> 00:06:12,474 What do you think would have happened if, instead of throwing out from your home 101 00:06:12,474 --> 00:06:16,343 the good old friend, and let me add, the stand good old friend, 102 00:06:16,343 --> 00:06:20,275 you had left home for half an hour 103 00:06:20,275 --> 00:06:26,668 and, within this half an hour, asked them to sit in your living room? 104 00:06:26,668 --> 00:06:30,146 Tell me what do you think would have happened 105 00:06:30,146 --> 00:06:31,356 when you came back home? 106 00:06:31,356 --> 00:06:33,036 Don't you think it's possible 107 00:06:33,036 --> 00:06:36,804 that one of them would say, "Wow, what an interesting person!", 108 00:06:36,804 --> 00:06:41,718 and the other one, "You don't believe it! Thank you for this introduction!" 109 00:06:41,718 --> 00:06:46,280 So, you see, that is exactly what would have happened. 110 00:06:46,280 --> 00:06:48,435 So, now, let me ask you one more question. 111 00:06:48,435 --> 00:06:53,472 Who the hell do you think you kicked out from your home? 112 00:06:53,472 --> 00:06:58,501 It is not the good old friend because he or she 113 00:06:58,501 --> 00:07:01,711 "will not get along with the new one." 114 00:07:01,711 --> 00:07:04,551 We've just established they'd have gotten along just fine. 115 00:07:04,551 --> 00:07:05,548 Let me tell you. 116 00:07:05,548 --> 00:07:10,672 You kicked out from home the character that you present to the old friend 117 00:07:10,672 --> 00:07:15,533 because this one has absolutely nothing to do with the character 118 00:07:15,533 --> 00:07:18,669 that you want now to present to your new friend. 119 00:07:18,669 --> 00:07:22,746 And now that we discovered that you have two creatures in your mind, 120 00:07:22,746 --> 00:07:24,897 who knows what is the truth? 121 00:07:24,897 --> 00:07:27,317 How many creatures do you have inside? 122 00:07:27,317 --> 00:07:33,368 Is it scores, hundreds or, perhaps more accurately, thousands? 123 00:07:34,698 --> 00:07:38,274 So, I thank to Pirandello two things. 124 00:07:38,274 --> 00:07:41,124 First: (French) Congratulations! 125 00:07:41,124 --> 00:07:43,538 Seventy years before the psychologists, 126 00:07:43,538 --> 00:07:48,488 you described the self as a multitude and not as a unity. 127 00:07:48,488 --> 00:07:53,958 We say "my self-esteem", as if there is one self there. 128 00:07:53,958 --> 00:07:56,619 But the second thing, Mr. Pirandello, 129 00:07:56,619 --> 00:08:01,625 what wrong did the people attending TEDx do to you? 130 00:08:01,625 --> 00:08:03,148 And now we'll go home and think, 131 00:08:03,148 --> 00:08:06,258 "I have this character and this character, and I'll get crazy, 132 00:08:06,258 --> 00:08:08,868 like your book's hero." 133 00:08:09,698 --> 00:08:12,305 And here comes listening. 134 00:08:12,305 --> 00:08:16,704 My understanding is that when you really listen, 135 00:08:16,704 --> 00:08:23,116 a person will start to hear hidden characters inside him or her. 136 00:08:23,116 --> 00:08:28,023 But not only recognize different parts of the self, 137 00:08:28,023 --> 00:08:31,277 but it allows to build bridges between them. 138 00:08:31,277 --> 00:08:34,302 So the elements of the self could live together. 139 00:08:34,302 --> 00:08:36,879 So let's see what is the evidence. 140 00:08:36,879 --> 00:08:41,952 Now to collect the evidence, you know, some people collect stamps. 141 00:08:41,952 --> 00:08:44,707 I collect scientific papers on listening. 142 00:08:44,707 --> 00:08:47,591 And every paper that has numerical data, 143 00:08:47,591 --> 00:08:52,844 I take it and put it on a pile to see the overall picture of what we know. 144 00:08:52,844 --> 00:08:55,265 And this process is called meta-analysis. 145 00:08:55,265 --> 00:08:57,625 I've done many of those on many topics, 146 00:08:57,625 --> 00:09:00,723 and let me first summarize to you the results. 147 00:09:02,213 --> 00:09:03,653 This is the result. 148 00:09:03,653 --> 00:09:09,448 One person listening creates two people with benefits: 149 00:09:09,448 --> 00:09:11,478 the listener and the speaker. 150 00:09:11,478 --> 00:09:13,390 Let's go into details. 151 00:09:13,390 --> 00:09:14,690 For example, 152 00:09:14,690 --> 00:09:20,552 experiments show that a poor listener indeed creates poor speakers. 153 00:09:20,552 --> 00:09:24,122 My own team shows that a good listener 154 00:09:24,122 --> 00:09:31,215 indeed makes speakers who have more complex attitudes and less extreme. 155 00:09:31,215 --> 00:09:37,741 And finally, research on training suggests that listening could be taught. 156 00:09:37,741 --> 00:09:39,881 Let's see more data. 157 00:09:39,881 --> 00:09:42,149 There is also evidence 158 00:09:42,149 --> 00:09:46,855 that good listeners are also good performers, for example: 159 00:09:46,855 --> 00:09:52,177 physicians who listen well tend to have less malpractice losses; 160 00:09:52,177 --> 00:09:57,891 detectives who listen well tend to listen to new information 161 00:09:57,891 --> 00:10:01,252 unknown to the police, from the suspect; 162 00:10:01,252 --> 00:10:05,747 salespeople who listen well sell more; 163 00:10:06,891 --> 00:10:10,511 principals who listen to their teachers, 164 00:10:10,511 --> 00:10:15,471 their students have better grades in school; 165 00:10:15,471 --> 00:10:20,932 and finally, supervisors who listen, their employees have less accidents. 166 00:10:20,932 --> 00:10:23,130 Let me show you even more. 167 00:10:23,130 --> 00:10:27,279 Let me explain this graph of meta-analysis. 168 00:10:27,279 --> 00:10:33,169 On the first line you see that I found in this collection 13 studies 169 00:10:33,169 --> 00:10:37,976 that are accumulating information of almost 8,000 people 170 00:10:37,976 --> 00:10:41,686 and it suggests that if you listen to other people, 171 00:10:41,686 --> 00:10:45,229 especially if you are the boss, they'll think you are a leader of people, 172 00:10:45,229 --> 00:10:49,876 that you know how to lead the people aspects in leadership. 173 00:10:49,876 --> 00:10:51,804 You will feel more psychological safety, 174 00:10:51,804 --> 00:10:54,486 you'll say what is in your mind, 175 00:10:54,486 --> 00:10:56,376 you will trust the listener. 176 00:10:56,376 --> 00:10:59,584 If it's your boss, you have higher job satisfaction; 177 00:10:59,584 --> 00:11:02,808 if you're a physician, your patient will be more satisfied; 178 00:11:02,808 --> 00:11:06,802 if you're a boss, your workers will have more commitment; 179 00:11:06,802 --> 00:11:10,353 if you work in a hospital and listen to your patient, 180 00:11:10,353 --> 00:11:13,092 there will be less violence against the staff; 181 00:11:13,092 --> 00:11:17,784 if your manager listens to you, you'll have less burn out, 182 00:11:17,784 --> 00:11:22,313 your performance is higher and maybe a little bit even less depression. 183 00:11:22,313 --> 00:11:23,698 And let me tell you 184 00:11:23,698 --> 00:11:26,708 that everything to the right of the line here 185 00:11:26,708 --> 00:11:30,632 is considered a strong association in my field. 186 00:11:30,632 --> 00:11:33,674 Let me explain what I mean by strong association. 187 00:11:33,674 --> 00:11:37,057 Let's take the case of job satisfaction as an example. 188 00:11:37,057 --> 00:11:41,188 If I want to predict, to focus on your job satisfaction 189 00:11:41,188 --> 00:11:44,460 and I know how much you're being paid relative to other people, 190 00:11:44,460 --> 00:11:47,850 I can slightly predict your job satisfaction. 191 00:11:47,850 --> 00:11:51,498 But if I know whether your boss listens to you or not, 192 00:11:51,498 --> 00:11:57,325 I have a predictor that's 13.5 [times] stronger and more accurate than your pay. 193 00:11:58,885 --> 00:12:01,724 Next, in my research, in past years, 194 00:12:01,724 --> 00:12:05,706 I was studying the destructive effect of feedback on performance. 195 00:12:05,706 --> 00:12:12,599 I found out that, out of 607 experiments, in close to 40% of them, 196 00:12:12,599 --> 00:12:17,667 after feedback, whether positive or negative, performance goes down. 197 00:12:18,437 --> 00:12:20,331 In 38% in listening, in contrast, 198 00:12:20,331 --> 00:12:24,511 I didn't find any evidence that listening can cause damage, 199 00:12:24,511 --> 00:12:28,620 perhaps 5% of them showed it doesn't produce anything effective. 200 00:12:28,620 --> 00:12:31,474 My most conservative estimate 201 00:12:31,474 --> 00:12:38,340 is that giving feedback is 7.5 times more dangerous than just listening. 202 00:12:39,241 --> 00:12:42,656 Talking could cause you trouble. 203 00:12:42,656 --> 00:12:47,839 So, if listening is so useful, 204 00:12:47,839 --> 00:12:52,429 why is it that most of us have difficulty in listening 205 00:12:52,429 --> 00:12:54,079 most of the time? 206 00:12:54,079 --> 00:12:58,463 I want to introduce to you the enemies of listening. 207 00:12:58,463 --> 00:13:05,111 These are boredom, dominance, fear of intimacy, trauma and cost. 208 00:13:05,111 --> 00:13:09,042 Let's talk about each of them, alone. 209 00:13:10,128 --> 00:13:14,237 My approach is: let's collaborate with the enemies of listening 210 00:13:14,237 --> 00:13:16,114 rather than fight them. 211 00:13:16,114 --> 00:13:17,703 The first enemy is boredom. 212 00:13:17,703 --> 00:13:20,057 Some people may talk your ear off, 213 00:13:20,057 --> 00:13:22,327 and you say, "I can't listen to this anymore." 214 00:13:22,327 --> 00:13:24,964 You want to leave the room or want them to leave. 215 00:13:24,964 --> 00:13:27,264 What can you do? 216 00:13:27,264 --> 00:13:30,631 You can ask them to tell stories. 217 00:13:30,631 --> 00:13:32,531 Instead of asking, "What's your name?", 218 00:13:32,531 --> 00:13:36,114 "Could you tell me something interesting about your name?" 219 00:13:36,114 --> 00:13:38,702 You can ask these people, and in general, 220 00:13:38,702 --> 00:13:41,285 after they say whatever they say, 221 00:13:41,285 --> 00:13:44,695 "and what else", and wait. 222 00:13:45,845 --> 00:13:49,151 Sometimes the boring person will start to tell you the truth 223 00:13:49,151 --> 00:13:50,798 or what's really important. 224 00:13:50,798 --> 00:13:53,278 And it's not going to be boring anymore. 225 00:13:53,278 --> 00:13:57,083 Next, all of us want to gain social status. 226 00:13:57,083 --> 00:14:00,555 It's perhaps an evolutionary force that we cannot fight. 227 00:14:00,555 --> 00:14:03,027 But we can do it in two different ways: 228 00:14:03,027 --> 00:14:04,619 we can dominate other people 229 00:14:04,619 --> 00:14:07,619 by intimidating them and instilling fear in them 230 00:14:07,619 --> 00:14:11,890 or we can have some skill that people want to imitate to get from us 231 00:14:11,890 --> 00:14:14,120 and we build prestige. 232 00:14:14,120 --> 00:14:16,511 And we found that if you listen, 233 00:14:16,511 --> 00:14:22,645 you’re going to lose social status based on dominance, 234 00:14:22,645 --> 00:14:26,676 but you will gain social status based on prestige. 235 00:14:26,676 --> 00:14:31,169 So it's up to you to choose how do you want to build your status. 236 00:14:31,169 --> 00:14:34,495 And then some people, when you try to listen to them, 237 00:14:34,495 --> 00:14:36,135 they get nervous. 238 00:14:36,135 --> 00:14:39,231 You ask them questions that are not comfortable. 239 00:14:39,231 --> 00:14:44,618 For those people, try to talk to them at first only about technical things. 240 00:14:45,444 --> 00:14:51,353 And then, when you listen to people, you may start to hear horrible stories, 241 00:14:51,353 --> 00:14:54,661 about the Holocaust, about rape, 242 00:14:54,661 --> 00:14:59,261 about cancer, death, premature death. 243 00:14:59,261 --> 00:15:04,864 You may feel burdened that now you need to help the person who shared the story, 244 00:15:04,864 --> 00:15:07,378 but you should know that often 245 00:15:07,378 --> 00:15:12,438 what the other person wants is nothing but your listening. 246 00:15:12,438 --> 00:15:17,635 If you listen and believe it is helpful, you will not have such burden. 247 00:15:17,635 --> 00:15:22,820 And last, listening is a cost, it's an effort. 248 00:15:22,820 --> 00:15:24,682 So that's what I suggest to you: 249 00:15:24,682 --> 00:15:27,582 spread your eggs, don't start right now to listen to everyone, 250 00:15:27,582 --> 00:15:28,989 it's impossible. 251 00:15:28,989 --> 00:15:33,476 Every day choose one, two people to listen to just a little bit more. 252 00:15:33,476 --> 00:15:39,046 Then, you should respect your limitation of how much you really can listen to. 253 00:15:39,046 --> 00:15:41,238 And to build your energy to do that, 254 00:15:41,238 --> 00:15:45,188 you will need somebody to listen to you as well. 255 00:15:49,628 --> 00:15:52,768 Actually, everything that I have said is not that new. 256 00:15:52,768 --> 00:15:56,757 Let me show you what is written in the Book of Proverbs in the Bible: 257 00:15:57,719 --> 00:16:03,105 "Counsel in the heart of man is like deep water, 258 00:16:03,105 --> 00:16:07,686 but a man of understanding will draw it out." 259 00:16:07,686 --> 00:16:12,593 That is, each of us have an advice, a counsel, 260 00:16:12,593 --> 00:16:14,843 to our own problems and challenges 261 00:16:14,843 --> 00:16:19,289 and the value of this advice 262 00:16:19,289 --> 00:16:22,729 is like water which is a source of life. 263 00:16:22,729 --> 00:16:26,362 That is, the advice that we have for ourselves is a source of life. 264 00:16:26,362 --> 00:16:32,405 But a man or a prisioner of understanding will throw it out. 265 00:16:32,405 --> 00:16:37,207 This is the other that will bring our own wisdom outside. 266 00:16:37,207 --> 00:16:41,520 So, I'd like to conclude with two dreams that I have. 267 00:16:41,520 --> 00:16:45,887 One, I wish that in 20 or 30 years from now 268 00:16:45,887 --> 00:16:51,834 every child in every school will learn reading, writing, 269 00:16:51,834 --> 00:16:54,624 and listening. 270 00:16:54,624 --> 00:16:56,473 And my other small wish 271 00:16:56,473 --> 00:17:01,182 is that, during the break, the breaks here today and tomorrow, 272 00:17:01,182 --> 00:17:03,846 you will go and ask somebody around you, 273 00:17:03,846 --> 00:17:07,306 "Could you tell me a story about good listening?" 274 00:17:07,306 --> 00:17:08,873 Enjoy it. 275 00:17:08,873 --> 00:17:11,865 (Applause)