0:00:00.000,0:00:00.000 0:00:00.000,0:00:03.630 In the last video we were able[br]to show that any lambda that 0:00:03.630,0:00:09.910 satisfies this equation for some[br]non-zero vectors, V, then 0:00:09.910,0:00:13.510 the determinant of lambda times[br]the identity matrix 0:00:13.510,0:00:15.560 minus A, must be equal to 0. 0:00:15.560,0:00:24.620 Or if we could rewrite this as[br]saying lambda is an eigenvalue 0:00:24.620,0:00:31.780 of A if and only if-- I'll[br]write it as if-- the 0:00:31.780,0:00:37.250 determinant of lambda times the[br]identity matrix minus A is 0:00:37.250,0:00:39.860 equal to 0. 0:00:39.860,0:00:42.230 Now, let's see if we can[br]actually use this in any kind 0:00:42.230,0:00:45.690 of concrete way to figure[br]out eigenvalues. 0:00:45.690,0:00:48.880 So let's do a simple 2[br]by 2, let's do an R2. 0:00:48.880,0:00:58.000 Let's say that A is equal to[br]the matrix 1, 2, and 4, 3. 0:00:58.000,0:01:01.790 And I want to find the[br]eigenvalues of A. 0:01:01.790,0:01:11.610 So if lambda is an eigenvalue[br]of A, then this right here 0:01:11.610,0:01:16.330 tells us that the determinant[br]of lambda times the identity 0:01:16.330,0:01:20.140 matrix, so it's going to be[br]the identity matrix in R2. 0:01:20.140,0:01:29.230 So lambda times 1, 0, 0, 1,[br]minus A, 1, 2, 4, 3, is going 0:01:29.230,0:01:30.320 to be equal to 0. 0:01:30.320,0:01:32.510 Well what does this equal to? 0:01:32.510,0:01:36.170 This right here is[br]the determinant. 0:01:36.170,0:01:39.740 Lambda times this is just lambda[br]times all of these 0:01:39.740,0:01:42.790 terms. So it's lambda times 1[br]is lambda, lambda times 0 is 0:01:42.790,0:01:47.260 0, lambda times 0 is 0, lambda[br]times 1 is lambda. 0:01:47.260,0:01:49.910 And from that we'll[br]subtract A. 0:01:49.910,0:01:56.130 So you get 1, 2, 4, 3, and[br]this has got to equal 0. 0:01:56.130,0:01:58.820 And then this matrix, or this[br]difference of matrices, this 0:01:58.820,0:02:00.580 is just to keep the[br]determinant. 0:02:00.580,0:02:03.360 This is the determinant of. 0:02:03.360,0:02:06.670 This first term's going[br]to be lambda minus 1. 0:02:06.670,0:02:11.540 The second term is 0 minus[br]2, so it's just minus 2. 0:02:11.540,0:02:15.570 The third term is 0 minus[br]4, so it's just minus 4. 0:02:15.570,0:02:18.310 And then the fourth term[br]is lambda minus 0:02:18.310,0:02:23.310 3, just like that. 0:02:23.310,0:02:25.620 So kind of a shortcut to[br]see what happened. 0:02:25.620,0:02:29.560 The terms along the diagonal,[br]well everything became a 0:02:29.560,0:02:30.550 negative, right? 0:02:30.550,0:02:31.700 We negated everything. 0:02:31.700,0:02:33.350 And then the terms around[br]the diagonal, we've got 0:02:33.350,0:02:34.260 a lambda out front. 0:02:34.260,0:02:37.930 That was essentially the[br]byproduct of this expression 0:02:37.930,0:02:38.900 right there. 0:02:38.900,0:02:41.990 So what's the determinant[br]of this 2 by 2 matrix? 0:02:41.990,0:02:45.950 Well the determinant of this is[br]just this times that, minus 0:02:45.950,0:02:46.940 this times that. 0:02:46.940,0:02:58.260 So it's lambda minus 1, times[br]lambda minus 3, minus these 0:02:58.260,0:03:00.170 two guys multiplied[br]by each other. 0:03:00.170,0:03:04.480 So minus 2 times minus 4[br]is plus eight, minus 8. 0:03:04.480,0:03:09.470 This is the determinant of this[br]matrix right here or this 0:03:09.470,0:03:12.920 matrix right here, which[br]simplified to that matrix. 0:03:12.920,0:03:17.510 And this has got to[br]be equal to 0. 0:03:17.510,0:03:20.180 And the whole reason why that's[br]got to be equal to 0 is 0:03:20.180,0:03:22.810 because we saw earlier,[br]this matrix has a 0:03:22.810,0:03:24.615 non-trivial null space. 0:03:24.615,0:03:27.860 And because it has a non-trivial[br]null space, it 0:03:27.860,0:03:29.790 can't be invertible and[br]its determinant has 0:03:29.790,0:03:31.530 to be equal to 0. 0:03:31.530,0:03:33.160 So now we have an interesting[br]polynomial 0:03:33.160,0:03:33.880 equation right here. 0:03:33.880,0:03:36.030 We can multiply it out. 0:03:36.030,0:03:37.030 We get what? 0:03:37.030,0:03:37.960 Let's multiply it out. 0:03:37.960,0:03:46.280 We get lambda squared, right,[br]minus 3 lambda, minus lambda, 0:03:46.280,0:03:50.880 plus 3, minus 8,[br]is equal to 0. 0:03:50.880,0:04:00.330 Or lambda squared, minus[br]4 lambda, minus 0:04:00.330,0:04:04.710 5, is equal to 0. 0:04:04.710,0:04:09.600 And just in case you want to[br]know some terminology, this 0:04:09.600,0:04:12.520 expression right here is known[br]as the characteristic 0:04:12.520,0:04:13.770 polynomial. 0:04:13.770,0:04:19.100 0:04:19.100,0:04:21.860 Just a little terminology,[br]polynomial. 0:04:21.860,0:04:24.430 But if we want to find the[br]eigenvalues for A, we just 0:04:24.430,0:04:25.775 have to solve this right here. 0:04:25.775,0:04:28.310 This is just a basic[br]quadratic problem. 0:04:28.310,0:04:29.600 And this is actually[br]factorable. 0:04:29.600,0:04:32.180 Let's see, two numbers and you[br]take the product is minus 5, 0:04:32.180,0:04:34.250 when you add them[br]you get minus 4. 0:04:34.250,0:04:39.760 It's minus 5 and plus 1, so you[br]get lambda minus 5, times 0:04:39.760,0:04:42.580 lambda plus 1, is equal[br]to 0, right? 0:04:42.580,0:04:47.190 Minus 5 times 1 is minus 5, and[br]then minus 5 lambda plus 1 0:04:47.190,0:04:50.260 lambda is equal to[br]minus 4 lambda. 0:04:50.260,0:04:52.970 So the two solutions of our[br]characteristic equation being 0:04:52.970,0:04:56.740 set to 0, our characteristic[br]polynomial, are lambda is 0:04:56.740,0:05:02.090 equal to 5 or lambda is[br]equal to minus 1. 0:05:02.090,0:05:05.240 So just like that, using the[br]information that we proved to 0:05:05.240,0:05:07.970 ourselves in the last video,[br]we're able to figure out that 0:05:07.970,0:05:15.610 the two eigenvalues of A are[br]lambda equals 5 and lambda 0:05:15.610,0:05:17.320 equals negative 1. 0:05:17.320,0:05:19.500 Now that only just solves part[br]of the problem, right? 0:05:19.500,0:05:22.570 We know we're looking[br]for eigenvalues and 0:05:22.570,0:05:24.800 eigenvectors, right? 0:05:24.800,0:05:28.660 We know that this equation can[br]be satisfied with the lambdas 0:05:28.660,0:05:30.700 equaling 5 or minus 1. 0:05:30.700,0:05:33.630 So we know the eigenvalues, but[br]we've yet to determine the 0:05:33.630,0:05:35.610 actual eigenvectors. 0:05:35.610,0:05:37.660 So that's what we're going[br]to do in the next video. 0:05:37.660,0:05:38.910