WEBVTT

00:00:18.824 --> 00:00:23.854
People have been using media
to talk about sex for a long time.

00:00:23.854 --> 00:00:27.715
Love letters, phone sex, racy polaroids.

00:00:27.715 --> 00:00:31.335
There's even a story of a girl
who eloped with a man

00:00:31.335 --> 00:00:36.636
that she met over the telegraph in 1886.

00:00:36.636 --> 00:00:39.296
Today we have sexting

00:00:39.296 --> 00:00:41.937
and I am a sexting expert.

00:00:41.937 --> 00:00:43.837
Not an expert sexter--

00:00:43.837 --> 00:00:45.146
(Laughter)

00:00:45.146 --> 00:00:48.027
Though, I do know what this means

00:00:48.027 --> 00:00:50.137
and I think you do too!

00:00:50.137 --> 00:00:52.656
(Laughter)

00:00:52.656 --> 00:00:54.707
I have been studying sexting

00:00:54.707 --> 00:00:58.627
since the media attention to it 
began in 2008.

00:00:58.627 --> 00:01:01.790
I wrote a book
on the moral panic about sexting,

00:01:01.790 --> 00:01:03.439
and here's what I found:

00:01:03.439 --> 00:01:06.669
Most people are worrying
about the wrong thing.

00:01:06.669 --> 00:01:10.779
They're trying to just prevent sexting
from happening entirely,

00:01:10.779 --> 00:01:12.429
but let me ask you this:

00:01:12.429 --> 00:01:15.359
as long as it is completely consensual,
what's the problem with sexting?

00:01:15.359 --> 00:01:21.400
People are into all sorts of things
that you may not be into,

00:01:21.400 --> 00:01:23.756
like blue cheese or cilantro.

00:01:23.756 --> 00:01:26.831
(Laughter)

00:01:26.831 --> 00:01:30.962
Sexting is certainly risky,
like anything that's fun,

00:01:30.962 --> 00:01:35.271
but as long as you're not
sending any image

00:01:35.271 --> 00:01:37.522
to someone who doesn't
want to receive it,

00:01:37.522 --> 00:01:39.401
there's no harm.

00:01:39.401 --> 00:01:41.972
What I do think is a serious problem

00:01:41.972 --> 00:01:47.283
is when people share private images
of others without their permission,

00:01:47.283 --> 00:01:49.882
and instead of worrying about sexting,

00:01:49.882 --> 00:01:54.853
what I think we need to do
is think a lot more about digital privacy.

00:01:54.853 --> 00:01:57.754
The key is consent.

00:01:57.754 --> 00:02:01.134
Right now people
are thinking about sexting

00:02:01.134 --> 00:02:04.505
without really thinking
about consent at all.

00:02:04.505 --> 00:02:09.485
Did you know that we currently
criminalize teen sexting?

00:02:09.485 --> 00:02:13.075
It can be a crime
because it counts as child pornography

00:02:13.075 --> 00:02:15.716
if there's an image
of someone under eighteen,

00:02:15.716 --> 00:02:19.475
and it doesn't even matter
if they took that image of themselves

00:02:19.475 --> 00:02:21.836
and shared it willingly.

00:02:21.836 --> 00:02:24.716
So we end up
with this bizarre legal situation

00:02:24.716 --> 00:02:29.226
where two 17-year-olds
can have sex in most U.S. states,

00:02:29.226 --> 00:02:32.057
but they can't photograph it.

00:02:32.057 --> 00:02:36.978
Some states have also tried passing
sexting misdemeanor laws,

00:02:36.978 --> 00:02:40.008
but these laws repeat the same problem

00:02:40.008 --> 00:02:44.628
because they still make
consensual sexting illegal.

00:02:44.628 --> 00:02:47.998
It doesn't make sense
to try to ban all sexting

00:02:47.998 --> 00:02:50.539
to try to address privacy violations.

00:02:50.539 --> 00:02:52.099
This is kind of like saying,

00:02:52.099 --> 00:02:59.010
"Let's solve the problem of date rape
by just making dating completely illegal."

00:02:59.010 --> 00:03:04.720
Most teens don't get arrested for sexting,
but can you guess who does?

00:03:04.720 --> 00:03:09.362
It's often teens who are disliked
by their partners parents,

00:03:09.362 --> 00:03:15.101
and this can be because of class bias,
racism, or homophobia.

00:03:15.375 --> 00:03:17.776
Most prosecutors are,
of course, smart enough

00:03:17.776 --> 00:03:21.865
not to use child pornography
charges against teenagers,

00:03:21.865 --> 00:03:23.735
but some do.

00:03:23.735 --> 00:03:27.335
According to researchers
at the University of New Hampshire,

00:03:27.335 --> 00:03:32.007
seven percent of all child pornography
possession arrests

00:03:32.007 --> 00:03:37.587
are teen sexting consensually
with other teens.

00:03:37.587 --> 00:03:40.168
Child pornography is a serious crime

00:03:40.168 --> 00:03:44.808
but it's just not the same thing
as teen sexting.

00:03:44.808 --> 00:03:48.428
Parents and educators
are also responding to sexting

00:03:48.428 --> 00:03:51.739
without really thinking
too much about consent.

00:03:51.739 --> 00:03:56.259
Their message to teens
is often just don't do it,

00:03:56.259 --> 00:03:57.819
and I totally get it.

00:03:57.819 --> 00:03:59.869
There are serious legal risks

00:03:59.869 --> 00:04:03.300
and, of course,
that potential for privacy violations.

00:04:03.300 --> 00:04:09.466
And when you were a teen, I'm sure you did
exactly as you were told, right?

00:04:09.466 --> 00:04:12.931
You're probably thinking,
"My kid would never sext,"

00:04:12.931 --> 00:04:16.427
and that's true; your little angel
may not be sexting

00:04:16.427 --> 00:04:23.118
because only 33 percent
of 16 and 17-year-olds are sexting.

00:04:23.118 --> 00:04:25.648
But, sorry, by the time they're older

00:04:25.648 --> 00:04:27.981
the odds are that they will be sexting.

00:04:27.981 --> 00:04:34.873
Every study I've seen puts the rate
above 50 percent for 18 to 24-year-olds.

00:04:34.873 --> 00:04:38.483
And most of the time, nothing goes wrong.

00:04:38.483 --> 00:04:41.103
People asking me all the time things like,

00:04:41.103 --> 00:04:43.933
"isn't sexting just so dangerous, though?

00:04:43.933 --> 00:04:47.493
You wouldn't leave your wallet
on a park bench.

00:04:47.493 --> 00:04:51.394
You expect it's going to get stolen
if you do that, right?"

00:04:51.394 --> 00:04:52.925
Here's how I think about it:

00:04:52.925 --> 00:04:56.775
Sexting is like leaving your wallet
at your boyfriend's house.

00:04:56.775 --> 00:05:01.405
If you come back the next day
and all the money is just gone,

00:05:01.405 --> 00:05:04.276
you really need to dump that guy.

00:05:04.276 --> 00:05:08.015
(Laughter)

00:05:08.015 --> 00:05:13.036
So instead of criminalizing sexting to try
to prevent these privacy violations,

00:05:13.036 --> 00:05:16.347
instead we need to make consent central

00:05:16.347 --> 00:05:20.858
to how we think about the circulation
of our private information.

00:05:20.858 --> 00:05:25.488
Every new media technology
raises privacy concerns;

00:05:25.488 --> 00:05:29.748
in fact, in the U.S.,
the first major debates about privacy

00:05:29.748 --> 00:05:34.519
were in response to technologies
that were relatively new at the time.

00:05:34.519 --> 00:05:38.509
In the late 1800s,
people were worried about cameras,

00:05:38.509 --> 00:05:41.930
which were just suddenly
more portable than ever before,

00:05:41.930 --> 00:05:44.410
and newspaper gossip columns.

00:05:44.410 --> 00:05:48.310
They were worried that the camera
would capture information about them,

00:05:48.310 --> 00:05:51.869
take it out of context,
and widely disseminate it.

00:05:51.869 --> 00:05:53.591
Does that sound familiar?

00:05:53.591 --> 00:05:58.370
It's exactly what we're worrying about now
with social media, drone cameras,

00:05:58.370 --> 00:06:00.581
and of course, sexting.

00:06:00.581 --> 00:06:03.852
And these fears about technology,
they make sense

00:06:03.852 --> 00:06:06.452
because technologies can amplify

00:06:06.452 --> 00:06:10.563
and bring out our worst qualities
and behaviors.

00:06:10.563 --> 00:06:13.013
But there are solutions


00:06:13.013 --> 00:06:17.303
and we've been here before
with a dangerous new technology.

00:06:17.303 --> 00:06:21.193
In 1908, Ford introduced the Model T car.

00:06:21.193 --> 00:06:25.142
Traffic fatality rates were rising;
it was a serious problem.

00:06:25.142 --> 00:06:26.833
It looks so safe, right?

00:06:26.833 --> 00:06:29.654
(Laughter)

00:06:29.654 --> 00:06:33.485
Our first response
was to try to change drivers' behavior,

00:06:33.485 --> 00:06:37.665
so we developed speed limits
and enforced them through fines.

00:06:37.665 --> 00:06:40.765
But over the following decades
we started to realize

00:06:40.765 --> 00:06:44.876
that the technology of the car itself
is not just neutral.

00:06:44.876 --> 00:06:48.206
We could design the car to make it safer.

00:06:48.206 --> 00:06:51.706
So in the 1920s,
we got shatter-resistant windshields,

00:06:51.706 --> 00:06:58.256
in the 1950s, seat belts,
and in the 1990s, air bags.

00:06:58.256 --> 00:07:03.697
All three of these areas, laws,
individuals, and industry,

00:07:03.697 --> 00:07:09.488
came together over time to help solve
the problems that a new technology causes

00:07:09.488 --> 00:07:13.148
and we can do the same thing
with digital privacy.

00:07:13.148 --> 00:07:16.478
Of course, it comes back to consent.

00:07:16.478 --> 00:07:17.688
Here's the idea:

00:07:17.688 --> 00:07:21.379
before anyone can distribute
your private information,

00:07:21.379 --> 00:07:24.259
they should have to get your permission.

00:07:24.259 --> 00:07:29.020
This idea of affirmative consent
comes from anti-rape activists

00:07:29.020 --> 00:07:32.940
who tell us that we need consent
for every sexual act.

00:07:32.940 --> 00:07:37.000
And we have really high levels
of consent in other areas.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Think about having surgery.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Your doctor has to make sure
that you are meaningfully

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and knowingly consenting
to that medical procedure.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
This is not the type of consent
with like an iTunes terms of service

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
where you just scroll to the bottom
and you're like, "Agree, agree, whatever."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
(Laughter)

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
If we think more about consent,
we can have better privacy laws.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Right now we just don't have
that many protections.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
If your ex-husband
or your ex-wife is a terrible person,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
they can take your nude photos
and upload them to a porn site.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It can be really hard
to get those images taken down

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and in a lot of states,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you're actually better off
if you took the images of yourself

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because then you can file
a copyright claim.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
(Laughter)

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Right now
if someone violates your privacy,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
whether that's an individual
or a company or the NSA,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you can try filing a lawsuit,
but you may not be successful

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because many courts assume
that digital privacy is just impossible

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
so they're not willing to punish anyone
for violating it.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I still hear people
asking me all the time,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"isn't a digital image somehow blurring
the line between public and private

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because it's digital, right?"

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
No, no!

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Everything digital
is not just automatically public.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That doesn't make any sense.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
As NYU legal scholar,
Helen Nissenbaum, tells us,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we have laws and policies and norms

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that protect all kinds
of information that's private,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and it doesn't make a difference
if it's digital or not.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
All of your health records are digitized

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but your doctor can't just
share them with anyone.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
All of your financial information
is held in digital databases

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but your credit card company can't just
post your purchase history online.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Better laws could help address
privacy violations after they happen,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but one of the easiest things
we can all do

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
is make personal changes
to help protect each others' privacy.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
We're always told that privacy
is our sole individual responsibility.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
We're told, "Constantly monitor
and update your privacy settings."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
We're told, "Never share anything you
wouldn't want the entire world to see."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
This doesn't make sense.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Digital media are social environments

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and we share things with people
we trust all day, every day.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
As Princeton researcher,
Janet Vertesi, argues,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
our data and our privacy,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
they're not just personal,
they're interpersonal.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So one thing you can do that's really easy
is just start asking for permission

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
before you share
anyone else's information.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
If you want to post a photo
of someone online, ask for permission.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
If you want to forward an email thread,
ask for permission.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
If you want to share
someone's nude selfie,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
obviously, ask for permission!

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
These individual changes can help us
protect each others' privacy,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but we need technology companies
on board as well.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
These companies have very little incentive
to help our privacy

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because their business models depend on us

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
sharing everything
with as many people as possible.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Right now, if I send you an image,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you can forward that
to anyone that you want.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But what if I got to decide
if that image was forwardable or not?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
This would tell you, "You don't have
my permission to send this image out."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
We do this kind of thing all the time
to protect copyright.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
If you buy an ebook, you can't just
send it out to as many people as you want,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
so why not try this with mobile phones?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
What you can do is we can demand
that tech companies

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
add these protections to our devices
and our platforms as the default.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
After all, you can choose
the color of your car,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but the airbags are always standard.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
If we don't think more
about digital privacy and consent,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
there can be serious consequences.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
There was a teenager from Ohio.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Let's call her Jennifer
for the sake of her privacy.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
She shared nude photos of herself
with her high school boyfriend

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
thinking she could trust him.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Unfortunately, he betrayed her and sent
her photos around the entire school.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Jennifer was embarrassed and humiliated,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but instead of being compassionate,
her classmates harassed her.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
They called her a slut and a whore
and they made her life miserable.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Jennifer started missing school,
and her grades dropped.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Ultimately,
Jennifer decided to end her own life.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Jennifer did nothing wrong.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
All she did was share a nude photo

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
with someone that she thought
that she could trust.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And yet, our laws tell herv

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that she committed a horrible crime
equivalent to child pornography.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Our gender norms tell her that
by producing this nude image of herself,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
she somehow did
the most horrible, shameful thing.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And when we assume that privacy
is impossible in digital media,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we completely write off and excuse
her boyfriend's bad, bad behavior.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
People are still saying all the time
to victims of privacy violations,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"What were you thinking?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You should've never sent that image."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
If you're trying to figure out
what to say instead, try this:

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
imagine you've run into your friend
who broke their leg skiing.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
They took a risk to do something fun,
and it didn't end well.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But you're probably
not going to be the jerk who says,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Well, I guess you shouldn't
have gone skiing then!"

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
If we think more about consent,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we can see that victims of privacy
violations deserve our compassion,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
not criminalization, shaming,
harassment, or punishment.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
We can support victims,
and we can prevent some privacy violations

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
by making these legal, individual,
and technological changes.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Because the problem is not sexting,
the issue is digital privacy

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and one solution is consent.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So the next time a victim
of a privacy violation comes up to you,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
instead of blaming them,
let's do this instead:

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
let's shift our ideas
about digital privacy

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and let's respond with compassion.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Thank you.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
(Applause)