- [Yan] It's good that we have
an army of enthusiasts
writing Wikipedia articles,
but sometimes when it concerns
a disease that I might have,
I really want the experts' input.
♪ [music] ♪
Wikipedia is one of the most important
references for the general public.
It's actually one of the most top five
most visited websites in the world.
Everyone reads Wikipedia articles,
but sometime you spot an error
or you say,
"Well, this is not really correct."
But you move on
and say, "Someone else might fix it."
That's called the "free rider problem."
The success of Wikipedia
has been really surprising
for economists because it relies
purely on volunteer labor.
The medical profession has found
that patients tend to bring printouts
of Wikipedia articles
to their doctor's office.
Some of these articles are low quality
because they were not written by experts.
We're trying to figure out
what are the some of the motivators
to get experts to contribute
to high quality content.
So we decided to do a field experiment
to tease out the causalities,
to figure out what motivates people
to contribute to Wikipedia,
whether it's social impact
or private benefit
or public acknowledgement
or a combination of these factors.
So in this study,
in this field experiment,
we contacted about 4,000
academic economists.
We have a generic message
that says Wikipedia
is a very valuable public good,
and yet lots of the articles
are inaccurate or not up to date.