WEBVTT

00:00:00.130 --> 00:00:02.200


00:00:03.645 --> 00:00:05.600
欢迎观看诺贝尔对谈

00:00:07.250 --> 00:00:10.240
在本集中，Josh Angrist 和 Guido Imbens

00:00:10.240 --> 00:00:11.920
与 Isaiah Andrews 坐下来

00:00:11.920 --> 00:00:14.303
讨论他们的研究最初是如何被接受的

00:00:14.999 --> 00:00:17.090
以及他们如何回应批评

00:00:18.700 --> 00:00:20.380
当时，你有没有觉得

00:00:20.380 --> 00:00:21.627
自己在做一件大事

00:00:21.627 --> 00:00:25.152
认为这会是一整套工程的开端

00:00:25.152 --> 00:00:27.202
而这个工程将会非常重要，还是...？

00:00:27.600 --> 00:00:30.000
说这是一套大工程

00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:31.894
确实，我觉得，“哇，这--”

00:00:32.277 --> 00:00:35.045
我们已经证明了一些
我们从前所不知道的事

00:00:35.045 --> 00:00:36.114
而这是值得知道的

00:00:36.114 --> 00:00:38.033
是，回到...

00:00:38.741 --> 00:00:41.080
与我的就业市场报告或其他东西相比--

00:00:41.080 --> 00:00:45.560
不，我觉得这实际上
是一个非常清晰的结果

00:00:46.400 --> 00:00:49.657
但肯定会有不同的解释

00:00:49.657 --> 00:00:52.420
我想没有人会说

00:00:52.420 --> 00:00:55.487
“好吧，这是研究人员的噩梦

00:00:56.043 --> 00:00:59.386


00:01:00.230 --> 00:01:02.003
你认为你发现了一些东西，

00:01:02.003 --> 00:01:04.461
然后其他人说，‘哦，我知道。’”

00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:07.220
但绝对有必要让大家相信

00:01:07.220 --> 00:01:10.370
这是值得了解的，工具变量

00:01:10.370 --> 00:01:12.687
估计了依从者的因果效应

00:01:13.200 --> 00:01:16.178
是，即使需要很长时间

00:01:16.178 --> 00:01:19.348
才能说服更多观众

00:01:19.820 --> 00:01:24.346
有时也很快，但在一小群人中的

00:01:24.800 --> 00:01:26.645
接受度还是不错的

00:01:27.200 --> 00:01:31.297
Gary 显然从一开始就非常喜欢这个想法

00:01:31.800 --> 00:01:33.289
我记得…

00:01:33.289 --> 00:01:35.645
因为那时 Josh 已经去了以色列

00:01:35.645 --> 00:01:38.886
但我记得向 Don Rubin 解释过

00:01:39.696 --> 00:01:43.700
他说，“你可知，这不得了啊。"

00:01:43.700 --> 00:01:45.197
虽然不是马上

00:01:45.932 --> 00:01:47.173
Don 经过深思熟虑

00:01:47.500 --> 00:01:49.150
当你和 Don 联系上的时候

00:01:49.150 --> 00:01:51.226
我实际上已经和他

00:01:51.226 --> 00:01:53.304
来回通信过几次

00:01:53.700 --> 00:01:57.103
我记得某天我接到他的电话或电邮

00:01:57.103 --> 00:02:00.020
他说他坐在罗马机场

00:02:00.020 --> 00:02:03.700
看着报纸心想

00:02:03.700 --> 00:02:07.000
“喔，不，你们实际上有了重大的发现。”

00:02:07.490 --> 00:02:08.594
我们对此感到高兴

00:02:08.594 --> 00:02:10.550
但这比我想的还要久才发生

00:02:11.030 --> 00:02:12.500
那不是马上发生的

00:02:12.500 --> 00:02:13.700


00:02:13.700 --> 00:02:15.325
因为我知道那件事发生时

00:02:15.325 --> 00:02:16.627
我已经回到了以色列

00:02:16.627 --> 00:02:18.750
我在那个夏天去了以色列--

00:02:19.390 --> 00:02:21.190
我在哈佛只呆了两年

00:02:21.190 --> 00:02:22.540
我们一起度过了一年

00:02:22.540 --> 00:02:25.700
不简单啊，我的意思是
这一年对我们来说非常重要

00:02:25.900 --> 00:02:27.200
是的

00:02:27.690 --> 00:02:30.200
我们知道有好事发生了

00:02:30.200 --> 00:02:33.700
但我们不认为那足以改变生活
回想起来才发现

00:02:33.700 --> 00:02:35.620


00:02:35.620 --> 00:02:37.495
如您所说的听起来，最初一小群人

00:02:37.495 --> 00:02:39.190
是很容易接受的

00:02:39.190 --> 00:02:43.090
而对更广大的人群而言
他们可能需要一些时间

00:02:43.090 --> 00:02:45.912
才能将 LATE 框架视为看待世界的

00:02:45.912 --> 00:02:47.620
一种有价值的方式

00:02:47.620 --> 00:02:50.100
在那段时间里

00:02:50.100 --> 00:02:52.128
人们说这不是看待世界的

00:02:52.128 --> 00:02:54.450
有用方式，你是否认为

00:02:54.450 --> 00:02:55.751
他们可能是对的？

00:02:55.751 --> 00:02:58.360
你有没有感到气馁？
你是怎么想的呢？

00:02:58.360 --> 00:02:59.721
我沒有感到气馁

00:02:59.721 --> 00:03:01.119
说这些都是聪明人

00:03:01.119 --> 00:03:06.117
见多识广的计量经济学家、

00:03:06.117 --> 00:03:07.800
老练的读者

00:03:08.900 --> 00:03:11.324
我认为评论的实质是

00:03:11.324 --> 00:03:14.297
这不是计量经济学的内容

00:03:14.297 --> 00:03:20.572
当时传播的计量经济学是关于结构的

00:03:21.300 --> 00:03:24.490
有一种观点认为经济中存在结构

00:03:25.100 --> 00:03:27.200
我们的工作是发现它

00:03:27.200 --> 00:03:30.952
它的结构之所以如此
是因为它本质上是不变的

00:03:32.570 --> 00:03:34.900
所以我们说，在 LATE 定理中

00:03:34.900 --> 00:03:37.699
每个工具都会产生自己的因果效应

00:03:37.699 --> 00:03:41.386
这在某种程度上与此相矛盾

00:03:41.386 --> 00:03:43.640
这就是紧张的所在

00:03:43.640 --> 00:03:45.551
人们不想放弃这个想法

00:03:46.300 --> 00:03:50.369
是的，我记得有一次人们开始

00:03:51.200 --> 00:03:55.664
大声反对这一点--

00:03:56.900 --> 00:03:59.483
那从没有让我如此困扰

00:03:59.483 --> 00:04:03.051
明显地，我们在那里取得了结果

00:04:03.051 --> 00:04:05.878
它变得有些争议

00:04:05.878 --> 00:04:08.395
但是以一种好的方式引起争议

00:04:08.620 --> 00:04:10.190
人们很明显地觉得

00:04:10.820 --> 00:04:13.835
他们必须站出来以示反对，因为--

00:04:13.970 --> 00:04:15.649
嗯，我们现在认为那很好

00:04:17.426 --> 00:04:19.238
我们当时可能并不喜欢

00:04:20.168 --> 00:04:23.080
我记得我有点不高兴

00:04:23.080 --> 00:04:24.780
有一次晚餐有人说

00:04:24.780 --> 00:04:27.455
“不，不，不，Josh 的那篇论文--

00:04:28.855 --> 00:04:30.749
对这个专业造成了伤害。”

00:04:32.050 --> 00:04:33.850
我们确实得到了这样的反应

00:04:35.410 --> 00:04:38.200
在某种程度上
这可能是当时在经济学中

00:04:38.400 --> 00:04:40.000
普遍存在的文化

00:04:41.400 --> 00:04:44.097
我后来想了想
万一发生在现在呢？

00:04:44.600 --> 00:04:47.682
如果我是坐在那次谈话中的资深人士

00:04:48.200 --> 00:04:51.952
我会站出来，因为那确实不对

00:04:53.000 --> 00:04:54.200
没那么糟吧

00:04:54.600 --> 00:04:56.262
我认为那批评...

00:04:57.700 --> 00:04:59.298
它并没有完全被误导

00:05:00.070 --> 00:05:01.351
也许是错的

00:05:01.800 --> 00:05:04.485
不，不，你可以说那篇论文是错误的

00:05:05.280 --> 00:05:06.440
但它指的是

00:05:06.440 --> 00:05:08.128
这对专业造成了伤害--

00:05:08.128 --> 00:05:10.300
- 那不是真的...
- 这有点牵扯到个人名声

00:05:10.300 --> 00:05:12.646
- 是的，不是对我

00:05:12.646 --> 00:05:14.442
而是在我的高级同事面前这样做

00:05:15.191 --> 00:05:17.369
但没有人说结果是错误的

00:05:17.369 --> 00:05:18.700
我也记得

00:05:18.700 --> 00:05:21.579
有些评论发人深省

00:05:21.579 --> 00:05:23.059


00:05:23.059 --> 00:05:25.861


00:05:26.500 --> 00:05:30.361


00:05:31.967 --> 00:05:33.891


00:05:33.891 --> 00:05:35.678


00:05:35.678 --> 00:05:36.840


00:05:36.840 --> 00:05:38.400


00:05:38.837 --> 00:05:42.289


00:05:42.929 --> 00:05:44.679


00:05:44.679 --> 00:05:47.800


00:05:49.880 --> 00:05:53.502


00:05:54.300 --> 00:05:56.400


00:05:56.900 --> 00:06:00.244


00:06:00.800 --> 00:06:03.775


00:06:04.630 --> 00:06:08.831


00:06:09.238 --> 00:06:13.113


00:06:14.221 --> 00:06:16.978


00:06:17.500 --> 00:06:19.250


00:06:19.480 --> 00:06:21.261


00:06:23.480 --> 00:06:24.892


00:06:25.500 --> 00:06:28.761


00:06:28.761 --> 00:06:29.871


00:06:30.170 --> 00:06:34.600


00:06:34.600 --> 00:06:36.440


00:06:36.440 --> 00:06:40.041


00:06:40.700 --> 00:06:42.600


00:06:42.600 --> 00:06:43.730


00:06:43.730 --> 00:06:46.243


00:06:46.859 --> 00:06:48.829


00:06:49.770 --> 00:06:51.560


00:06:51.560 --> 00:06:54.186


00:06:54.186 --> 00:06:56.600


00:06:56.600 --> 00:06:57.830


00:06:57.830 --> 00:06:59.478


00:06:59.478 --> 00:07:01.247


00:07:01.900 --> 00:07:04.176


00:07:04.894 --> 00:07:06.761


00:07:06.761 --> 00:07:07.910


00:07:07.910 --> 00:07:11.736


00:07:11.736 --> 00:07:14.052


00:07:14.052 --> 00:07:16.058


00:07:17.430 --> 00:07:18.993


00:07:19.804 --> 00:07:21.948


00:07:21.948 --> 00:07:24.420


00:07:25.400 --> 00:07:27.450


00:07:27.450 --> 00:07:29.316


00:07:29.316 --> 00:07:32.218


00:07:32.218 --> 00:07:33.419


00:07:33.419 --> 00:07:35.454


00:07:35.454 --> 00:07:37.639


00:07:37.639 --> 00:07:40.860


00:07:40.860 --> 00:07:43.894


00:07:43.894 --> 00:07:45.900


00:07:45.900 --> 00:07:48.188


00:07:48.680 --> 00:07:51.028


00:07:51.028 --> 00:07:53.140


00:07:53.140 --> 00:07:56.880


00:07:56.880 --> 00:07:59.098


00:07:59.098 --> 00:08:02.405


00:08:02.405 --> 00:08:04.366


00:08:04.596 --> 00:08:06.516


00:08:07.500 --> 00:08:09.782


00:08:10.420 --> 00:08:11.868


00:08:11.868 --> 00:08:13.805


00:08:14.600 --> 00:08:16.006


00:08:16.780 --> 00:08:19.444


00:08:20.300 --> 00:08:22.522


00:08:22.522 --> 00:08:25.000


00:08:25.000 --> 00:08:26.438


00:08:26.438 --> 00:08:28.320


00:08:28.320 --> 00:08:29.500


00:08:29.800 --> 00:08:30.800


00:08:32.760 --> 00:08:34.125


00:08:35.200 --> 00:08:37.492


00:08:37.935 --> 00:08:39.606


00:08:40.600 --> 00:08:44.077


00:08:44.930 --> 00:08:47.430


00:08:47.430 --> 00:08:49.761


00:08:49.761 --> 00:08:53.500


00:08:54.500 --> 00:08:56.936


00:08:56.936 --> 00:08:58.800


00:08:58.800 --> 00:08:59.800


00:08:59.800 --> 00:09:01.530


00:09:01.530 --> 00:09:03.230


00:09:03.230 --> 00:09:05.743


00:09:06.300 --> 00:09:08.520


00:09:08.520 --> 00:09:09.791


00:09:09.791 --> 00:09:12.008


00:09:12.008 --> 00:09:13.225


00:09:13.225 --> 00:09:15.400


00:09:15.400 --> 00:09:17.860


00:09:18.690 --> 00:09:20.096


00:09:20.096 --> 00:09:21.365


00:09:22.030 --> 00:09:23.375


00:09:24.860 --> 00:09:26.595


00:09:26.595 --> 00:09:29.943


00:09:30.190 --> 00:09:33.460


00:09:33.460 --> 00:09:35.230


00:09:35.230 --> 00:09:37.000


00:09:37.000 --> 00:09:38.310


00:09:38.310 --> 00:09:39.720


00:09:39.720 --> 00:09:41.958


00:09:42.630 --> 00:09:46.000


00:09:46.400 --> 00:09:47.500


00:09:48.671 --> 00:09:50.245


00:09:50.245 --> 00:09:53.348


00:09:53.348 --> 00:09:56.435


00:09:57.200 --> 00:09:59.736


00:10:00.196 --> 00:10:01.376


00:10:01.376 --> 00:10:03.410


00:10:03.410 --> 00:10:04.583


00:10:05.000 --> 00:10:07.000


00:10:07.000 --> 00:10:08.460


00:10:08.460 --> 00:10:09.560


00:10:09.560 --> 00:10:11.100


00:10:11.100 --> 00:10:12.498


00:10:12.498 --> 00:10:15.143
若您想观看其他的诺贝尔对谈视频

00:10:15.143 --> 00:10:16.207
请单击此处

00:10:16.207 --> 00:10:18.409
或者，如果您想了解
计量经济学的更多相关信息

00:10:18.640 --> 00:10:21.240
请查看 Josh 的 
Mastering Econometrics 系列视频

00:10:21.800 --> 00:10:24.540
如果您想了解更多关于 
Guido、Josh 和 Isaiah 的信息

00:10:24.860 --> 00:10:26.502
请查看说明中的链接