WEBVTT

00:00:11.111 --> 00:00:13.363
Like most journalists, I'm an idealist.

00:00:13.363 --> 00:00:18.031
I love unearthing good stories,
especially untold stories.

00:00:18.611 --> 00:00:21.391
I just didn't think that in 2011,

00:00:21.391 --> 00:00:24.105
women would still be in that category.

00:00:24.693 --> 00:00:28.223
I'm the President of the Journalism
and Women Symposium - JAWS.

00:00:28.223 --> 00:00:29.453
That's Sharky.

00:00:29.453 --> 00:00:31.312
(Laughter)

00:00:31.312 --> 00:00:34.098
I joined 10 years ago
because I wanted female role models,

00:00:34.098 --> 00:00:37.859
and I was frustrated by the lagging status
of women in our profession

00:00:37.859 --> 00:00:41.133
and what that meant
for our image in the media.

00:00:42.178 --> 00:00:44.290
We make up half
the population of the world,

00:00:44.290 --> 00:00:46.537
but we're just 24 percent
of the news subjects

00:00:46.537 --> 00:00:48.494
quoted in news stories.

00:00:48.716 --> 00:00:52.378
And we're just 20 percent
of the experts quoted in stories.

00:00:52.610 --> 00:00:54.298
And now, with today's technology,

00:00:54.298 --> 00:00:58.082
it's possible to remove women
from the picture completely.

00:00:58.438 --> 00:01:02.331
This is a picture of President
Barack Obama and his advisors,

00:01:02.331 --> 00:01:04.646
tracking the killing of Osama bin Laden.

00:01:04.646 --> 00:01:06.853
You can see Hillary Clinton on the right.

00:01:07.297 --> 00:01:08.710
Let's see how the photo ran

00:01:08.710 --> 00:01:11.672
in an Orthodox Jewish
newspaper based in Brooklyn.

00:01:12.732 --> 00:01:14.424
Hillary's completely gone.

00:01:14.424 --> 00:01:16.733
(Laughter)

00:01:16.733 --> 00:01:20.027
The paper apologized,
but said it never runs photos of women;

00:01:20.027 --> 00:01:22.113
they might be sexually provocative.

00:01:22.113 --> 00:01:24.039
(Laughter)

00:01:24.039 --> 00:01:26.144
This is an extreme case, yes.

00:01:26.144 --> 00:01:27.437
But the fact is,

00:01:27.437 --> 00:01:30.967
women are only 19 percent
of the sources in stories on politics,

00:01:30.967 --> 00:01:34.912
and only 20 percent
in stories on the economy.

00:01:35.846 --> 00:01:37.924
The news continues to give us a picture

00:01:37.924 --> 00:01:39.628
where men outnumber women

00:01:39.628 --> 00:01:42.623
in nearly all occupational
categories, except two:

00:01:42.623 --> 00:01:44.875
students and homemakers.

00:01:44.875 --> 00:01:45.920
(Laughter)

00:01:45.920 --> 00:01:49.586
So we all get a very
distorted picture of reality.

00:01:50.199 --> 00:01:53.403
The problem is, of course,
there aren't enough women in newsrooms.

00:01:53.403 --> 00:01:57.366
They report at just 37 percent of stories
in print, TV and radio.

00:01:57.680 --> 00:02:00.462
Even in stories on gender-based violence,

00:02:00.462 --> 00:02:04.452
men get an overwhelming majority
of print space and airtime.

00:02:04.452 --> 00:02:05.957
Case in point:

00:02:07.012 --> 00:02:09.962
This March, the New York Times
ran a story by James McKinley

00:02:09.962 --> 00:02:11.634
about a gang rape of a young girl,

00:02:11.634 --> 00:02:14.456
11 years old, in a small Texas town.

00:02:14.617 --> 00:02:16.957
McKinley writes that
the community is wondering,

00:02:16.957 --> 00:02:21.024
"How could their boys
have been drawn into this?"

00:02:21.096 --> 00:02:22.451
"Drawn into this" -

00:02:22.451 --> 00:02:25.229
like they were seduced
into committing an act of violence.

00:02:25.229 --> 00:02:27.327
And the first person he quotes says,

00:02:27.327 --> 00:02:30.630
"These boys will have to live
with this the rest of their lives."

00:02:30.630 --> 00:02:32.783
(Groans, laughter)

00:02:34.166 --> 00:02:36.586
You don't hear much
about the 11-year-old victim,

00:02:36.586 --> 00:02:39.687
except that she wore clothes
that were a little old for her

00:02:39.687 --> 00:02:41.464
and she wore makeup.

00:02:42.285 --> 00:02:44.571
The Times was deluged with criticism.

00:02:44.571 --> 00:02:46.429
Initially, it defended itself,

00:02:46.429 --> 00:02:48.361
and said, "These aren't our views.

00:02:48.361 --> 00:02:50.506
This is what we found in our reporting."

00:02:50.506 --> 00:02:53.209
Now, here's a secret
you probably know already:

00:02:53.209 --> 00:02:54.787
Your stories are constructed.

00:02:54.787 --> 00:02:57.387
As reporters, we research, we interview.

00:02:57.387 --> 00:03:00.948
We try to give a good picture of reality.

00:03:00.948 --> 00:03:03.600
We also have our own unconscious biases.

00:03:03.600 --> 00:03:07.424
But The Times makes it sound like anyone
would have reported this story

00:03:07.424 --> 00:03:08.842
the same way.

00:03:09.322 --> 00:03:11.094
I disagree with that.

00:03:11.094 --> 00:03:12.620
So three weeks later,

00:03:12.620 --> 00:03:14.470
The Times revisits the story.

00:03:14.470 --> 00:03:17.519
This time, it adds another byline
to it with McKinley's:

00:03:17.519 --> 00:03:19.187
Erica Goode.

00:03:19.359 --> 00:03:22.448
What emerges is a truly sad, horrific tale

00:03:22.448 --> 00:03:25.483
of a young girl and her family
trapped in poverty.

00:03:25.483 --> 00:03:28.447
She was raped numerous times by many men.

00:03:28.447 --> 00:03:30.913
She had been a bright, easygoing girl.

00:03:30.913 --> 00:03:33.192
She was maturing quickly, physically,

00:03:33.192 --> 00:03:36.697
but her bed was still covered
with stuffed animals.

00:03:36.697 --> 00:03:38.694
It's a very different picture.

00:03:38.694 --> 00:03:42.532
Perhaps the addition of Ms. Goode
is what made this story more complete.

00:03:42.532 --> 00:03:46.975
The Global Media Monitoring Project
has found that stories by female reporters

00:03:46.975 --> 00:03:50.342
are more likely to challenge stereotypes
than those by male reporters.

00:03:50.590 --> 00:03:52.393
At KUNM here in Albuquerque,

00:03:52.393 --> 00:03:54.539
Elaine Baumgartel
did some graduate research

00:03:54.539 --> 00:03:56.673
on the coverage of violence against women.

00:03:56.673 --> 00:04:00.064
What she found was many of these
stories tend to blame victims

00:04:00.064 --> 00:04:01.690
and devalue their lives.

00:04:01.690 --> 00:04:05.235
They tend to sensationalize,
and they lack context.

00:04:05.490 --> 00:04:06.823
So for her graduate work,

00:04:06.823 --> 00:04:09.344
she did a three-part series
on the murder of 11 women,

00:04:09.344 --> 00:04:11.745
found buried on Albuquerque's West Mesa.

00:04:11.818 --> 00:04:15.398
She tried to challenge those patterns
and stereotypes in her work

00:04:15.398 --> 00:04:18.116
and she tried to show
the challenges that journalists face

00:04:18.116 --> 00:04:21.653
from external sources,
their own internal biases

00:04:21.653 --> 00:04:23.484
and cultural norms.

00:04:23.805 --> 00:04:26.561
And she worked with an editor
at National Public Radio

00:04:26.561 --> 00:04:28.550
to try to get a story aired nationally.

00:04:28.550 --> 00:04:33.147
She's not sure that would have happened
if the editor had not been a female.

00:04:33.257 --> 00:04:34.693
Stories in the news

00:04:34.693 --> 00:04:38.334
are more than twice as likely
to present women as victims than men,

00:04:38.334 --> 00:04:42.543
and women are more likely to be defined
by their body parts.

00:04:43.347 --> 00:04:45.763
Wired magazine, November 2010.

00:04:46.304 --> 00:04:49.808
Yes, the issue was about
breast-tissue engineering.

00:04:50.784 --> 00:04:53.499
Now I know you're all distracted,
so I'll take that off.

00:04:53.499 --> 00:04:54.548
(Laughter)

00:04:54.548 --> 00:04:55.787
Eyes up here.

00:04:55.787 --> 00:04:58.989
(Laughter)

00:04:58.989 --> 00:05:00.079
So -

00:05:00.079 --> 00:05:03.866
(Applause)

00:05:03.866 --> 00:05:05.438
Here's the thing:

00:05:05.438 --> 00:05:08.402
Wired almost never puts
women on its cover.

00:05:08.402 --> 00:05:10.398
Oh, there have been some gimmicky ones -

00:05:10.398 --> 00:05:11.990
Pam from "The Office,"

00:05:11.990 --> 00:05:13.576
manga girls,

00:05:13.576 --> 00:05:16.698
a voluptuous model
covered in synthetic diamonds.

00:05:17.634 --> 00:05:21.109
Texas State University professor
Cindy Royal wondered in her blog

00:05:21.109 --> 00:05:24.548
how are young women like her students
supposed to feel about their roles

00:05:24.548 --> 00:05:26.505
in technology, reading Wired.

00:05:26.704 --> 00:05:29.725
Chris Anderson, the editor of Wired,
defended his choice

00:05:29.725 --> 00:05:32.728
and said there aren't enough women,
prominent women

00:05:32.728 --> 00:05:36.224
in technology to sell a cover,
to sell an issue.

00:05:36.558 --> 00:05:37.827
Part of that is true,

00:05:37.827 --> 00:05:40.387
there aren't as many
prominent women in technology.

00:05:40.387 --> 00:05:42.620
Here's my problem with that argument:

00:05:42.890 --> 00:05:45.488
Media tells us every day what's important,

00:05:45.488 --> 00:05:48.024
by the stories they choose
and where they place them;

00:05:48.024 --> 00:05:50.195
it's called agenda setting.

00:05:50.195 --> 00:05:52.851
How many people knew
the founders of Facebook and Google

00:05:52.851 --> 00:05:55.034
before their faces
were on a magazine cover?

00:05:55.034 --> 00:05:58.168
Putting them there
made them more recognizable.

00:05:58.514 --> 00:06:00.784
Now, Fast Company magazine
embraces that idea.

00:06:00.784 --> 00:06:03.792
This is its cover from November 15, 2010.

00:06:04.422 --> 00:06:08.763
The issue is about the most prominent
and influential women in technology.

00:06:08.904 --> 00:06:11.227
Editor Robert Safian
told the Poynter Institute,

00:06:11.227 --> 00:06:13.678
"Silicon Valley is very white
and very male.

00:06:13.678 --> 00:06:16.556
But that's not what Fast Company thinks

00:06:16.556 --> 00:06:18.855
the business world
will look like in the future,

00:06:18.855 --> 00:06:22.938
so it tries to give a picture
of where the globalized world is moving."

00:06:23.235 --> 00:06:26.223
By the way, apparently,
Wired took all this to heart.

00:06:26.518 --> 00:06:27.995
This was its issue in April.

00:06:27.995 --> 00:06:30.061
(Laughter)

00:06:30.061 --> 00:06:32.785
That's Limor Fried, the founder
of Adafruit Industries,

00:06:32.785 --> 00:06:35.016
in the Rosie the Riveter pose.

00:06:35.470 --> 00:06:38.877
It would help to have more women
in positions of leadership in media.

00:06:38.877 --> 00:06:40.402
A recent global survey

00:06:40.402 --> 00:06:43.444
found that 73 percent
of the top media-management jobs

00:06:43.444 --> 00:06:45.168
are still held by men.

00:06:45.168 --> 00:06:47.924
But this is also about something
far more complex:

00:06:47.924 --> 00:06:51.037
our own unconscious
biases and blind spots.

00:06:51.199 --> 00:06:53.274
Shankar Vedantam is the author

00:06:53.274 --> 00:06:56.562
of "The Hidden Brain: How Our Unconscious
Minds Elect Presidents,

00:06:56.562 --> 00:06:59.472
Control Markets, Wage Wars,
and Save Our Lives."

00:06:59.472 --> 00:07:02.723
He told the former ombudsman
at National Public Radio,

00:07:02.723 --> 00:07:06.012
who was doing a report
on how women fare in NPR coverage,

00:07:06.012 --> 00:07:09.496
unconscious bias flows
throughout most of our lives.

00:07:09.496 --> 00:07:12.584
It's really difficult
to disentangle those strands.

00:07:12.584 --> 00:07:14.813
But he did have one suggestion.

00:07:15.214 --> 00:07:17.659
He used to work for two editors

00:07:17.659 --> 00:07:21.702
who said every story had to have
at least one female source.

00:07:21.702 --> 00:07:23.242
He balked at first,

00:07:23.242 --> 00:07:26.244
but said he eventually followed
the directive happily,

00:07:26.244 --> 00:07:27.757
because his stories got better

00:07:27.757 --> 00:07:29.704
and his job got easier.

00:07:29.936 --> 00:07:32.381
Now, I don't know if one
of the editors was a woman,

00:07:32.381 --> 00:07:34.497
but that can make the biggest difference.

00:07:34.497 --> 00:07:38.573
The Dallas Morning News
won a Pulitzer Prize in 1994

00:07:38.573 --> 00:07:40.865
for a series it did on women
around the world,

00:07:40.865 --> 00:07:43.070
but one of the reporters told me

00:07:43.070 --> 00:07:45.514
she's convinced
it never would have happened

00:07:45.514 --> 00:07:48.806
if they had not had
a female assistant foreign editor,

00:07:48.806 --> 00:07:51.348
and they would not have gotten
some of those stories

00:07:51.348 --> 00:07:53.914
without female reporters
and editors on the ground,

00:07:53.914 --> 00:07:56.908
particularly one
on female genital mutilation -

00:07:56.908 --> 00:08:00.074
men would just not be allowed
into those situations.

00:08:00.074 --> 00:08:02.297
This is an important point to consider,

00:08:02.297 --> 00:08:05.361
because much of our foreign policy
now revolves around countries

00:08:05.361 --> 00:08:07.861
where the treatment of women is an issue,

00:08:07.861 --> 00:08:09.865
such as Afghanistan.

00:08:11.141 --> 00:08:15.118
What we're told in terms of arguments
against leaving this country

00:08:15.118 --> 00:08:18.407
is that the fate of the women is primary.

00:08:19.385 --> 00:08:23.607
Now, I'm sure a male reporter in Kabul
can find women to interview.

00:08:23.607 --> 00:08:26.862
Not so sure about rural,
traditional areas,

00:08:26.862 --> 00:08:30.141
where I'm guessing
women can't talk to strange men.

00:08:30.396 --> 00:08:34.114
It's important to keep talking about this,
in light of Lara Logan.

00:08:34.757 --> 00:08:36.789
She was the CBS News correspondent

00:08:36.789 --> 00:08:39.739
who was brutally sexually assaulted
in Egypt's Tahrir Square,

00:08:39.739 --> 00:08:41.953
right after this photo was taken.

00:08:41.953 --> 00:08:44.380
Almost immediately, pundits weighed in,

00:08:44.380 --> 00:08:47.433
blaming her and saying things like,

00:08:47.433 --> 00:08:50.568
"You know, maybe women shouldn't
be sent to cover those stories."

00:08:50.568 --> 00:08:54.849
I never heard anyone say this
about Anderson Cooper and his crew,

00:08:54.849 --> 00:08:57.711
who were attacked covering the same story.

00:08:58.393 --> 00:09:00.372
One way to get more women into leadership

00:09:00.372 --> 00:09:02.463
is to have other women mentor them.

00:09:02.463 --> 00:09:05.753
One of my board members is an editor
at a major global media company,

00:09:05.753 --> 00:09:08.331
but she never thought
about this as a career path,

00:09:08.331 --> 00:09:11.634
until she met female role models at JAWS.

00:09:12.193 --> 00:09:14.484
But this is not just a job
for super-journalists

00:09:14.484 --> 00:09:16.067
or my organization.

00:09:16.067 --> 00:09:18.717
You all have a stake
in a strong, vibrant media.

00:09:19.647 --> 00:09:21.466
Analyze your news.

00:09:21.466 --> 00:09:24.044
And speak up when there are gaps
missing in coverage,

00:09:24.044 --> 00:09:26.119
like people at The New York Times did.

00:09:26.119 --> 00:09:29.329
Suggest female sources
to reporters and editors.

00:09:29.565 --> 00:09:33.341
Remember - a complete picture of reality
may depend upon it.

00:09:33.341 --> 00:09:35.105
And I'll leave you with a video clip

00:09:35.105 --> 00:09:39.174
that I first saw in [1987]
when I was a student in London.

00:09:39.174 --> 00:09:40.732
It's for The Guardian newspaper.

00:09:40.732 --> 00:09:44.078
It's actually long before I ever thought
about becoming a journalist,

00:09:44.078 --> 00:09:47.775
but I was very interested
in how we learn to perceive our world.

00:09:48.861 --> 00:09:53.582
Narrator: An event seen from one
point of view gives one impression.

00:09:58.697 --> 00:10:00.430
Seen from another point of view,

00:10:00.430 --> 00:10:03.252
it gives quite a different impression.

00:10:04.974 --> 00:10:07.277
But it's only when you get
the whole picture,

00:10:07.277 --> 00:10:10.275
you can fully understand what's going on.

00:10:13.459 --> 00:10:15.825
[The Guardian]

00:10:15.825 --> 00:10:17.838
Megan Kamerick: I think you'll all agree

00:10:17.838 --> 00:10:20.437
that we'd be better off
if we all had the whole picture.

00:10:20.437 --> 00:10:22.153
(Applause)