WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.699 Okay, I wanna give you a test of your visual acuity. 00:00:03.793 --> 00:00:06.824 Your sensitivity to differences in line lengths. 00:00:07.181 --> 00:00:09.277 So I'm gonna show you a standard 00:00:09.529 --> 00:00:12.084 and then I'm gonna show you three comparison lines. 00:00:12.599 --> 00:00:14.978 One is gonna be bigger, one is gonna be shorter, 00:00:14.978 --> 00:00:17.105 and one is gonna be the same size as the standard. 00:00:17.105 --> 00:00:18.050 Your job is... 00:00:18.295 --> 00:00:21.993 tell me which line, A, B, or C is the same as the standard. 00:00:24.529 --> 00:00:26.192 Seems like a simple judgement. 00:00:26.192 --> 00:00:27.674 You always get it right. 00:00:27.747 --> 00:00:30.437 But now, before you give your answer, 00:00:30.885 --> 00:00:32.103 there are gonna be 00:00:32.623 --> 00:00:36.588 half dozen to ten other people, like you, in the room 00:00:36.588 --> 00:00:38.121 and they're gonna give their answers first. 00:00:38.121 --> 00:00:39.736 An amazing thing happens. 00:00:39.736 --> 00:00:43.213 One after another, they say the line that you see as shorter 00:00:43.213 --> 00:00:44.913 is the same as the standard. 00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:46.673 Shorter, shorter, shorter, shorter, 00:00:46.673 --> 00:00:50.030 they don't say shorter, they just say B, B, B, B. and so forth. 00:00:50.195 --> 00:00:51.631 Now it's your turn. 00:00:52.163 --> 00:00:55.470 You know B is the wrong answer. 00:00:56.918 --> 00:00:58.108 But what do you say? 00:00:59.010 --> 00:01:01.116 In this study done by Solomon Asch, 00:01:01.116 --> 00:01:03.354 a classic study of group conformity, 00:01:04.413 --> 00:01:06.897 the majority of people gave in. 00:01:07.196 --> 00:01:10.043 Gave in on most of the critical trials 00:01:10.600 --> 00:01:13.432 to agree with, to say, publicly 00:01:13.612 --> 00:01:15.485 that they agreed with the majority. 00:01:15.690 --> 00:01:18.957 So this study is one of the first classic studies 00:01:18.957 --> 00:01:21.224 on the power of a group. 00:01:21.544 --> 00:01:23.475 As long as there's three or more people 00:01:23.866 --> 00:01:26.268 who agree among themselves 00:01:26.365 --> 00:01:29.243 that reality is not the way you see it, 00:01:29.662 --> 00:01:31.862 in many cases, you give in 00:01:32.175 --> 00:01:34.153 to see the world in their way. 00:01:34.422 --> 00:01:36.013 Let's look at that study. 00:01:36.526 --> 00:01:39.119 (male speaker) The experiment you'll be taking part in 00:01:39.119 --> 00:01:42.266 today involves the perception of lengths of lines 00:01:42.665 --> 00:01:45.047 as you can see here, I have a number of cards 00:01:45.047 --> 00:01:47.514 and on each card there are several lines. 00:01:47.954 --> 00:01:49.665 Your task is a very simple one. 00:01:49.665 --> 00:01:51.645 You're to look at the line on the left 00:01:51.645 --> 00:01:53.460 and determine which of the three lines 00:01:53.460 --> 00:01:55.276 on the right is equal to it in length. 00:01:55.276 --> 00:01:57.166 Alright we'll procede in this order: 00:01:57.166 --> 00:01:57.869 you'll give your answer... 00:01:57.869 --> 00:01:59.181 (male narrator) Only one of the peope in the group 00:01:59.181 --> 00:02:00.378 is a real subject. 00:02:00.471 --> 00:02:02.501 The fifth person with the white t-shirt. 00:02:02.786 --> 00:02:05.040 The others are confederates of the experimenter 00:02:05.040 --> 00:02:08.333 and have been told to give wrong answers on some of the trials. 00:02:09.101 --> 00:02:12.653 The experiment begins uneventfully, as subjects give their judgements. 00:02:12.740 --> 00:02:13.470 Two. 00:02:13.815 --> 00:02:14.545 Two. 00:02:14.750 --> 00:02:15.480 Two. 00:02:15.693 --> 00:02:16.484 Two. 00:02:16.694 --> 00:02:17.454 Two. 00:02:18.841 --> 00:02:19.795 (Subject 1) Three. 00:02:20.748 --> 00:02:21.678 (Subject 2) Three. 00:02:21.992 --> 00:02:22.878 (Subject 3) Three. 00:02:23.150 --> 00:02:23.950 Three. 00:02:23.950 --> 00:02:24.458 Three. 00:02:24.458 --> 00:02:26.948 (Narrator) But on the third trial, something happens. 00:02:26.948 --> 00:02:27.761 (Subject 1) Two. 00:02:29.147 --> 00:02:29.963 (Subject 2) Two. 00:02:30.694 --> 00:02:31.576 (Subject 3) Two. 00:02:33.436 --> 00:02:34.233 Two. 00:02:36.667 --> 00:02:37.524 Uh, two. 00:02:37.524 --> 00:02:39.538 (Narrator) The subject denies the evidence 00:02:39.538 --> 00:02:42.318 of his own eyes and yields to group influence. 00:02:43.976 --> 00:02:46.214 Asch found subjects went along with the group 00:02:46.214 --> 00:02:48.955 on 37% of the critical trials. 00:02:49.445 --> 00:02:51.172 But he found, through interviews, 00:02:51.172 --> 00:02:54.115 that they went along with the group for different reasons. 00:02:54.752 --> 00:02:55.512 One. 00:02:56.301 --> 00:02:57.064 One. 00:02:57.110 --> 00:02:58.528 (thinking) They must be right. 00:02:58.545 --> 00:03:00.221 There are four of them and one of me. 00:03:00.231 --> 00:03:01.026 One. 00:03:01.155 --> 00:03:02.864 (Narrator) This subject's yeilding 00:03:02.864 --> 00:03:05.047 is based on a distortion of his judgement. 00:03:05.130 --> 00:03:07.731 He genuinely believes that the group is correct. 00:03:09.412 --> 00:03:10.231 One. 00:03:11.136 --> 00:03:11.959 One. 00:03:13.295 --> 00:03:14.094 One. 00:03:14.452 --> 00:03:15.237 Two. 00:03:17.167 --> 00:03:18.025 One. 00:03:19.669 --> 00:03:20.695 (Subject 1) Two. 00:03:22.371 --> 00:03:23.288 Two. 00:03:24.418 --> 00:03:25.278 Two. 00:03:25.278 --> 00:03:26.606 (thinking) I know they're wrong, 00:03:26.606 --> 00:03:28.155 but why should I make waves? 00:03:28.155 --> 00:03:28.905 Two. 00:03:28.905 --> 00:03:30.078 (Narrator) In this case, 00:03:30.078 --> 00:03:31.537 the subject knows he is right, 00:03:31.551 --> 00:03:35.004 but goes along to avoid the discomfort of disagreeing with the group. 00:03:35.004 --> 00:03:38.180 Here the distortion is at the level of his response. 00:03:38.292 --> 00:03:39.084 Two. 00:03:40.317 --> 00:03:41.034 Two. 00:03:41.753 --> 00:03:42.554 Two. 00:03:43.250 --> 00:03:44.117 Two. 00:03:44.369 --> 00:03:46.261 (Narrator) In the previous experiment, 00:03:46.261 --> 00:03:48.745 the naive subject stood alone against the group. 00:03:49.391 --> 00:03:51.815 In this variation, Asch gave the naive subject 00:03:51.815 --> 00:03:54.364 a partner, here seated in the third position, 00:03:54.641 --> 00:03:56.890 who also gives the correct response. 00:03:57.951 --> 00:03:58.800 (Subject 1 One. 00:04:00.378 --> 00:04:01.228 One. 00:04:01.925 --> 00:04:02.878 Two. 00:04:04.671 --> 00:04:05.494 One. 00:04:06.404 --> 00:04:08.138 Um, two. 00:04:08.138 --> 00:04:09.379 (Narrator) With a partner, 00:04:09.379 --> 00:04:12.294 yielding drops to only 5% of the critical trials, 00:04:12.294 --> 00:04:14.861 compared to 37% without a partner. 00:04:15.428 --> 00:04:17.888 Although subjects report warmth and good feeling 00:04:17.888 --> 00:04:19.890 toward the partner, they typically deny 00:04:19.890 --> 00:04:22.303 that he played a role in their own independence. 00:04:23.866 --> 00:04:27.569 The partnership variation shows that much of the power of the group came, 00:04:27.569 --> 00:04:31.593 not nearly from it's numbers, but from the uninimity of its opposition. 00:04:31.723 --> 00:04:33.435 When that uninimity is punctured, 00:04:33.435 --> 00:04:35.575 the group's power is greatly reduced. 00:04:37.199 --> 00:04:38.982 Sometimes we go along with a group 00:04:38.982 --> 00:04:41.640 because what they say convinces us they are right. 00:04:41.991 --> 00:04:44.287 This is called informational conformity. 00:04:44.744 --> 00:04:47.325 And sometimes, we conform because we are apprehensive 00:04:47.325 --> 00:04:49.929 that the group will disapprove if we are deviant. 00:04:50.200 --> 00:04:52.315 This is called normative conformity. 00:04:52.940 --> 00:04:54.669 The strength of the normative factor 00:04:54.669 --> 00:04:57.385 is shown in another variation carried out by Asch. 00:04:58.625 --> 00:05:02.138 In this variation, the subject is told that, because he had arrived late, 00:05:02.138 --> 00:05:04.399 he would have to write his answers. 00:05:04.872 --> 00:05:07.073 Subjects in this private response experiment 00:05:07.073 --> 00:05:08.679 are exposed to the same amount of 00:05:08.679 --> 00:05:10.632 misleading information as other subjects, 00:05:10.632 --> 00:05:13.587 but they are immune from any possible criticism by the group. 00:05:13.964 --> 00:05:14.810 One. 00:05:15.046 --> 00:05:15.905 One. 00:05:16.600 --> 00:05:17.310 One. 00:05:17.310 --> 00:05:19.118 (Narrator) And this enormously reduces 00:05:19.118 --> 00:05:20.298 the pressure to conform. 00:05:20.701 --> 00:05:22.633 Conformity drops by two thirds. 00:05:24.320 --> 00:05:26.514 Asch's experiment is a classic. 00:05:26.567 --> 00:05:29.338 It reveals how people will deny what they see 00:05:29.353 --> 00:05:30.852 and submit to group pressure. 00:05:31.035 --> 00:05:33.760 It allows us not only to observe conformity, 00:05:33.875 --> 00:05:37.766 but to study the conditions that increase or reduce it's occurrence. 00:05:37.796 --> 00:05:46.236 [no audio]