0:00:00.000,0:00:03.699 Okay, I wanna give you[br]a test of your visual acuity. 0:00:03.793,0:00:06.824 Your sensitivity to [br]differences in line lengths. 0:00:07.181,0:00:09.277 So I'm gonna show you a standard 0:00:09.529,0:00:12.084 and then I'm gonna show [br]you three comparison lines. 0:00:12.599,0:00:14.978 One is gonna be bigger,[br]one is gonna be shorter, 0:00:14.978,0:00:17.105 and one is gonna be the[br]same size as the standard. 0:00:17.105,0:00:18.050 Your job is... 0:00:18.295,0:00:21.993 tell me which line, A, B, or C[br]is the same as the standard. 0:00:24.529,0:00:26.192 Seems like a simple judgement. 0:00:26.192,0:00:27.674 You always get it right. 0:00:27.747,0:00:30.437 But now, before you give your answer, 0:00:30.885,0:00:32.103 there are gonna be 0:00:32.623,0:00:36.588 half dozen to ten other [br]people, like you, in the room 0:00:36.588,0:00:38.121 and they're gonna [br]give their answers first. 0:00:38.121,0:00:39.736 An amazing thing happens. 0:00:39.736,0:00:43.213 One after another, they say [br]the line that you see as shorter 0:00:43.213,0:00:44.913 is the same as the standard. 0:00:45.000,0:00:46.673 Shorter, shorter, shorter, shorter, 0:00:46.673,0:00:50.030 they don't say shorter, they [br]just say B, B, B, B. and so forth. 0:00:50.195,0:00:51.631 Now it's your turn. 0:00:52.163,0:00:55.470 You know B is the wrong answer. 0:00:56.918,0:00:58.108 But what do you say? 0:00:59.010,0:01:01.116 In this study done by Solomon Asch, 0:01:01.116,0:01:03.354 a classic study of group conformity, 0:01:04.413,0:01:06.897 the majority of people gave in. 0:01:07.196,0:01:10.043 Gave in on most of the critical trials 0:01:10.600,0:01:13.432 to agree with, to say, publicly 0:01:13.612,0:01:15.485 that they agreed with the majority. 0:01:15.690,0:01:18.957 So this study is one of[br]the first classic studies 0:01:18.957,0:01:21.224 on the power of a group. 0:01:21.544,0:01:23.475 As long as there's three or more people 0:01:23.866,0:01:26.268 who agree among themselves 0:01:26.365,0:01:29.243 that reality is not the way you see it, 0:01:29.662,0:01:31.862 in many cases, you give in 0:01:32.175,0:01:34.153 to see the world in their way. 0:01:34.422,0:01:36.013 Let's look at that study. 0:01:36.526,0:01:39.119 (male speaker)[br]The experiment you'll be taking part in 0:01:39.119,0:01:42.266 today involves the [br]perception of lengths of lines 0:01:42.665,0:01:45.047 as you can see here,[br]I have a number of cards 0:01:45.047,0:01:47.514 and on each card there are several lines. 0:01:47.954,0:01:49.665 Your task is a very simple one. 0:01:49.665,0:01:51.645 You're to look at the line on the left 0:01:51.645,0:01:53.460 and determine which of the three lines 0:01:53.460,0:01:55.276 on the right is equal to it in length. 0:01:55.276,0:01:57.166 Alright we'll procede in this order: 0:01:57.166,0:01:57.869 you'll give your answer... 0:01:57.869,0:01:59.181 (male narrator)[br]Only one of the peope in the group 0:01:59.181,0:02:00.378 is a real subject. 0:02:00.471,0:02:02.501 The fifth person with the white t-shirt. 0:02:02.786,0:02:05.040 The others are [br]confederates of the experimenter 0:02:05.040,0:02:08.333 and have been told to give [br]wrong answers on some of the trials. 0:02:09.101,0:02:12.653 The experiment begins uneventfully,[br]as subjects give their judgements. 0:02:12.740,0:02:13.470 Two. 0:02:13.815,0:02:14.545 Two. 0:02:14.750,0:02:15.480 Two. 0:02:15.693,0:02:16.484 Two. 0:02:16.694,0:02:17.454 Two. 0:02:18.841,0:02:19.795 (Subject 1)[br]Three. 0:02:20.748,0:02:21.678 (Subject 2) [br]Three. 0:02:21.992,0:02:22.878 (Subject 3)[br]Three. 0:02:23.150,0:02:23.950 Three. 0:02:23.950,0:02:24.458 Three. 0:02:24.458,0:02:26.948 (Narrator) [br]But on the third trial, something happens. 0:02:26.948,0:02:27.761 (Subject 1)[br]Two. 0:02:29.147,0:02:29.963 (Subject 2) [br]Two. 0:02:30.694,0:02:31.576 (Subject 3) [br]Two. 0:02:33.436,0:02:34.233 Two. 0:02:36.667,0:02:37.524 Uh, two. 0:02:37.524,0:02:39.538 (Narrator) [br]The subject denies the evidence 0:02:39.538,0:02:42.318 of his own eyes and [br]yields to group influence. 0:02:43.976,0:02:46.214 Asch found subjects [br]went along with the group 0:02:46.214,0:02:48.955 on 37% of the critical trials. 0:02:49.445,0:02:51.172 But he found, through interviews, 0:02:51.172,0:02:54.115 that they went along with[br]the group for different reasons. 0:02:54.752,0:02:55.512 One. 0:02:56.301,0:02:57.064 One. 0:02:57.110,0:02:58.528 (thinking)[br]They must be right. 0:02:58.545,0:03:00.221 There are four of them and one of me. 0:03:00.231,0:03:01.026 One. 0:03:01.155,0:03:02.864 (Narrator) [br]This subject's yeilding 0:03:02.864,0:03:05.047 is based on a distortion of his judgement. 0:03:05.130,0:03:07.731 He genuinely believes[br]that the group is correct. 0:03:09.412,0:03:10.231 One. 0:03:11.136,0:03:11.959 One. 0:03:13.295,0:03:14.094 One. 0:03:14.452,0:03:15.237 Two. 0:03:17.167,0:03:18.025 One. 0:03:19.669,0:03:20.695 (Subject 1) [br]Two. 0:03:22.371,0:03:23.288 Two. 0:03:24.418,0:03:25.278 Two. 0:03:25.278,0:03:26.606 (thinking)[br]I know they're wrong, 0:03:26.606,0:03:28.155 but why should I make waves? 0:03:28.155,0:03:28.905 Two. 0:03:28.905,0:03:30.078 (Narrator) In this case, 0:03:30.078,0:03:31.537 the subject knows he is right, 0:03:31.551,0:03:35.004 but goes along to avoid the [br]discomfort of disagreeing with the group. 0:03:35.004,0:03:38.180 Here the distortion is at[br]the level of his response. 0:03:38.292,0:03:39.084 Two. 0:03:40.317,0:03:41.034 Two. 0:03:41.753,0:03:42.554 Two. 0:03:43.250,0:03:44.117 Two. 0:03:44.369,0:03:46.261 (Narrator)[br]In the previous experiment, 0:03:46.261,0:03:48.745 the naive subject stood [br]alone against the group. 0:03:49.391,0:03:51.815 In this variation, Asch[br]gave the naive subject 0:03:51.815,0:03:54.364 a partner, here seated[br]in the third position, 0:03:54.641,0:03:56.890 who also gives the correct response. 0:03:57.951,0:03:58.800 (Subject 1[br]One. 0:04:00.378,0:04:01.228 One. 0:04:01.925,0:04:02.878 Two. 0:04:04.671,0:04:05.494 One. 0:04:06.404,0:04:08.138 Um, two. 0:04:08.138,0:04:09.379 (Narrator) [br]With a partner, 0:04:09.379,0:04:12.294 yielding drops to only [br]5% of the critical trials, 0:04:12.294,0:04:14.861 compared to 37% without a partner. 0:04:15.428,0:04:17.888 Although subjects report [br]warmth and good feeling 0:04:17.888,0:04:19.890 toward the partner, they typically deny 0:04:19.890,0:04:22.303 that he played a role in[br]their own independence. 0:04:23.866,0:04:27.569 The partnership variation shows that [br]much of the power of the group came, 0:04:27.569,0:04:31.593 not nearly from it's numbers, but[br]from the uninimity of its opposition. 0:04:31.723,0:04:33.435 When that uninimity is punctured, 0:04:33.435,0:04:35.575 the group's power is greatly reduced. 0:04:37.199,0:04:38.982 Sometimes we go along with a group 0:04:38.982,0:04:41.640 because what they say [br]convinces us they are right. 0:04:41.991,0:04:44.287 This is called informational conformity. 0:04:44.744,0:04:47.325 And sometimes, we conform[br]because we are apprehensive 0:04:47.325,0:04:49.929 that the group will [br]disapprove if we are deviant. 0:04:50.200,0:04:52.315 This is called normative conformity. 0:04:52.940,0:04:54.669 The strength of the normative factor 0:04:54.669,0:04:57.385 is shown in another [br]variation carried out by Asch. 0:04:58.625,0:05:02.138 In this variation, the subject is told [br]that, because he had arrived late, 0:05:02.138,0:05:04.399 he would have to write his answers. 0:05:04.872,0:05:07.073 Subjects in this private[br]response experiment 0:05:07.073,0:05:08.679 are exposed to the same amount of 0:05:08.679,0:05:10.632 misleading information [br]as other subjects, 0:05:10.632,0:05:13.587 but they are immune from any [br]possible criticism by the group. 0:05:13.964,0:05:14.810 One. 0:05:15.046,0:05:15.905 One. 0:05:16.600,0:05:17.310 One. 0:05:17.310,0:05:19.118 (Narrator) [br]And this enormously reduces 0:05:19.118,0:05:20.298 the pressure to conform. 0:05:20.701,0:05:22.633 Conformity drops by two thirds. 0:05:24.320,0:05:26.514 Asch's experiment is a classic. 0:05:26.567,0:05:29.338 It reveals how people [br]will deny what they see 0:05:29.353,0:05:30.852 and submit to group pressure. 0:05:31.035,0:05:33.760 It allows us not only [br]to observe conformity, 0:05:33.875,0:05:37.766 but to study the conditions that[br]increase or reduce it's occurrence. 0:05:37.796,0:05:46.236 [no audio]