0:00:00.379,0:00:06.880
♪[Jazz music]♪

0:00:06.880,0:00:09.418
So yeah, being one of the first

0:00:09.418,0:00:14.398
net culture or computers in society writers

0:00:14.398,0:00:19.058
was, strategically, a poor move for me.

0:00:19.758,0:00:22.175
And I'm living proof, though, [br]you can still survive it,

0:00:22.175,0:00:26.975
if you can get through it somehow, [br]by answering e-mail more slowly

0:00:29.135,0:00:29.971
It's funny,

0:00:30.421,0:00:33.121
I wrote some notes because I thought [br]I should be responsible,

0:00:33.121,0:00:35.591
because you guys are real computer studies,

0:00:35.591,0:00:38.436
computer science people,[br]as opposed to just,

0:00:38.816,0:00:39.856
you know,

0:00:39.856,0:00:44.786
your average,[br]digitally illiterate audience.

0:00:45.736,0:00:50.060
So I don't really need to make the case[br]- I probably don't -

0:00:50.060,0:00:54.380
on why learning something about [br]digital technology is a smart thing,

0:00:54.380,0:00:57.331
because you guys have already[br]made that choice.

0:00:58.911,0:01:02.655
But something that occurred to me [br]on the way here, actually,

0:01:02.655,0:01:06.425
that you might not realize as young people

0:01:06.425,0:01:08.984
if you don't mind being called that

0:01:10.804,0:01:13.578
...is that it's very hard to get

0:01:13.578,0:01:19.458
an accurate sense of the biases [br]of the digital media environment...

0:01:19.458,0:01:23.096
...when you've been raised inside it.

0:01:23.096,0:01:28.693
In other words, what I want [br]to suggest to you is that

0:01:28.693,0:01:34.913
those of us who are old enough to have [br]experienced and consciously experienced

0:01:34.913,0:01:41.573
the shift from a pre-digital media [br]environment to a digital media environment

0:01:41.573,0:01:43.123
actually

0:01:43.663,0:01:47.463
understand something or sense something[br]or experience something

0:01:47.463,0:01:50.730
[br]about the biases of digital technology

0:01:50.730,0:01:55.610
that is relatively difficult for those [br]of you who have been raised

0:01:55.610,0:01:58.499
with digital technology to get.

0:01:58.499,0:02:02.188
Right now this is the opposite argument [br]I made through most of my career.

0:02:02.188,0:02:06.443
In 1995, I wrote a book called, [br]Playing the Future, where I argued that,

0:02:06.443,0:02:08.187
"Don't worry, you grown ups![br]

0:02:08.187,0:02:10.707
Digital technology is coming [br]and you feel overwhelmed.

0:02:10.707,0:02:15.054
But you guys are digital immigrants [br]whereas kids are digital natives.

0:02:15.054,0:02:18.564
So you'll speak the language like [br]an immigrant, they'll speak like a native.

0:02:18.564,0:02:21.490
You're always going to feel [br]slightly out of place and unsure,

0:02:21.490,0:02:24.190
and every time you have a hypertext link,

0:02:24.190,0:02:27.260
you're gonna be a disoriented [br]because we're not used to that,

0:02:27.260,0:02:29.512
whereas kids are going to experience [br]that very naturally.

0:02:29.512,0:02:33.156
That what looks disjointed to us, [br]will be a natural terrain for them.

0:02:33.156,0:02:37.056
And they will have command, [br]don't worry, the kids are alright."

0:02:37.056,0:02:42.422
But as I've grown older, and [br]as I've watched where cyberspace has gone,

0:02:42.422,0:02:45.492
and where our culture has gone, or hasn't,

0:02:46.162,0:02:51.728
I realize that some of my elders were [br]actually more right about this than I was.

0:02:51.728,0:02:53.240
And in reading all the

0:02:53.240,0:02:56.550
finally catching up [br]with who I was supposed to read,

0:02:56.550,0:03:01.021
when I was younger, McCluen and Ong, [br]and all the great media theorists.

0:03:01.021,0:03:05.069
I would read about the digital or[br]the media environments,

0:03:05.069,0:03:07.429
and this notion that McCluen had that,

0:03:07.429,0:03:12.386
if you ask a fish about water he wouldn't [br]be able to tell you what it is, right?

0:03:12.386,0:03:17.977
Because the fish is swimming in the water.[br]The fish not aware of the water.

0:03:17.977,0:03:20.629
If you ask someone who is raised [br]in a television environment,

0:03:20.629,0:03:22.659
"Oh, what about the impact of television [br]on you?"

0:03:22.659,0:03:24.878
You can't say it because you're living [br]in it.

0:03:24.878,0:03:27.568
You're living in that media environment.

0:03:28.638,0:03:31.716
Likewise, those of us who are living in [br]a digital media environment,

0:03:31.716,0:03:35.556
it's very difficult for us [br]to parse its effect,

0:03:35.556,0:03:38.675
for us to feel what it is

0:03:38.675,0:03:42.276
for us to understand the difference [br]between

0:03:43.406,0:03:45.276
what it is to be a human being

0:03:45.276,0:03:49.572
and what it is to be a digital being.

0:03:50.172,0:03:50.895
And

0:03:53.085,0:03:58.555
being able to parse it, though, [br]being able to begin to look at that

0:03:58.555,0:04:03.210
What Norbert Weinert used to call,

0:04:03.210,0:04:04.510
"the human use of human beings."

0:04:04.510,0:04:07.510
He was one of the first people to talk [br]about cybernetics

0:04:07.510,0:04:10.222
I think he invented the word, actually, [br]back when, cybernetics.

0:04:10.222,0:04:12.942
Even though it got stolen.

0:04:12.622,0:04:18.753
He was really looking at as we develop a computer environment, how will we recognize what is the difference between humans and the machines that we're in?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
How will we understand how to create a human, or a humanity-encouraging, digital media environment?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Now the reason why I think this is important is because most of my peers strongly disagree with this sentiment

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Most of my peers, and call them the sort of, the Negroponte, Kevin Kelley, Wired Magazine, Chris Anderson,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
all the way to Ray Kurzwhile on that spectrum, Clay Shirkey - there's this sense, this sort of letter ripped sense about technology

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
that's uncomfortably consonant with corporate capitalism, but that's another story

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
That human beings are merely one stage in information's inevitable evolution towards greater states of complexity, right?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
And they tell this very compelling story about the beginning of time all the way through now.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
That matter has been groping toward greater states of complexity, right?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
That we had atoms became molecules, and molecules became, you know, sort of these weird pre-proto-life things which became cells

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
And now we have this whole life thing that happened

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
And life got very complex through evolution

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
And we had people

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
And people built machines, and machines are just sort of in that big, blue, overtake humanity moment,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
and when they do, then machines, our computers, our networks will be the real host for the evolution of information

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
and we human beings can tend to those machines, or, at best, upload our consciousness

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
and then they will continue that journey for us

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
You know, and each one has a different metaphor for explaining it

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
You know, whether it's Kevin talking about what technology wants, right? What technology wants, like it really wants.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Not, it's not bias towards something, but it wants something, we've made this thing.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Just as God made people, people made technology, and this child will go on wanting something.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Or Ray Kurzwhile who will talk about the singularity, which I'm sure you've all read or heard about, even on, you know,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
you can find out about it in Vice Magazine or anything, at this point

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
You know, the idea that technology reaches this point of, not self-consciousness or self-awareness necessarily, but it just surpasses us

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
It becomes this thing and can keep going.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
It's a... I don't know... for me it's a discomforting view of humanity

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
but it's also, I would argue, an incorrect one, you know?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
It's one that is - it's one that is a result of living unconsciously in a digital media environment

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
It's one where you let the digital media environment dictate what you are and how you think about the world

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
rather than maintaining some sense of humanity in that.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Alright? So, what's interesting to me as I look at the history of computing, which now we have

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
and as we look at computers in society, which is a real thing.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
I mean, 20 years ago, 10 years ago, when we taught courses like this, it was futurism.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Computers in Society was a course was a course in, "What's it gonna be like someday when people have e-mail?"

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
I mean, there were times, and I'm sure you were in those conversations

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
when people like me used to go to a cocktail party or go to a publisher, or explain to a magazine editor.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Someday people are going to have their own computers

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
They are gonna send messages to eachother using little text editors

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
using, you know, word processors,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
and they would literally laugh us out of the room.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
They did not - they - it seemed so outrageous, that - Or they'd walk around

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
No, you're not gonna have to implant chips in people, they're gonna walk around with phones that are gonna track them everywhere they go

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
and they're gonna do this voluntarily

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
They're gonna give all their information - it's all just - and no one believed us. But, of course that happened.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
But, the thing that's interesting to me about computer history, if we're gonna follow it from the history of humanity

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
rather than the history of technology, right? Let's not worry about paper tape to punch cards to tape to discs to hard drives to RAM.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Let's not worry about machine evolution. But you look at the difference in people, right?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
If we look at history as the human story rather than the story of stuff

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
then the interesting thing becomes - the big switch, I think, is the shift from a pre-literate to a literate society, right?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
When we look at the impact of the printing press.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Do we talk about it in terms of, "Oh, look! These rooms filled up with books!"

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
No, that's not the part that's interesting.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
The part that is interesting is people learned to read

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
and then when they learned to read, they had personal interpretations of the Bible, right?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
So we had a Protestant Reformation, with people rebelling against the Church,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
So we had the idea of "one man, one vote," because everyone has their own perspective.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
It coincided with prospective painting.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
It coincided with central banking.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
And all of these other, very, analagous human inventions that were all about people having individual perspectives,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
"One man, one vote," it led to the Enlightenment, and all this other stuff.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Consumerism, Industrial Era and everything else.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
When we look at digital technology I think we have to look at it that way.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
In other words, what is the difference between a pre-literate digital society and a post-literate digital society?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
You know, I'm over arguing for digital literacy. I think digital literacy is inevitable, you know?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
I feel like I'm making that - when I, and I, it's my main talk that I do.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
It's like, you know, "Programmer be programmed!" And I wrote this book, Programmer Be Programmed.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
We have to learn to program. If you don't learn how to program, you're just swimming blindly in a sea of information.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Kids don't understand the biases of the technologies they use.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
You know, if you ask a kid what Facebook is for, he'll say Facebook is here to help him make friends.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
But we all know Facebook is really not here - it's really here to monetize the social graft and all that.