WEBVTT

00:00:00.296 --> 00:00:04.003
♪ [music] ♪

00:00:13.926 --> 00:00:17.060
[Alex] Today we're going to look
at cyclical unemployment --

00:00:17.060 --> 00:00:19.950
unemployment correlated
with the ups and downs

00:00:19.950 --> 00:00:21.710
of the business cycle.

00:00:21.710 --> 00:00:23.980
Using our friend,
the FRED database,

00:00:23.980 --> 00:00:26.920
it's easy to see that
unemployment increases

00:00:26.920 --> 00:00:29.570
during a recession
when the economy is shrinking

00:00:29.570 --> 00:00:32.190
or growing only very slowly.

00:00:32.190 --> 00:00:34.650
Indeed, low growth
and high unemployment --

00:00:34.650 --> 00:00:37.521
that's part of what defines
a recession.

00:00:38.170 --> 00:00:40.170
Lower growth is usually accompanied

00:00:40.170 --> 00:00:43.092
by high unemployment
for two reasons.

00:00:43.690 --> 00:00:46.550
First, and most obviously,
when GDP is falling

00:00:46.550 --> 00:00:49.390
or growing more slowly
than expected,

00:00:49.390 --> 00:00:53.430
firms often lay off workers,
which generates unemployment.

00:00:53.430 --> 00:00:55.870
The second reason
is slightly more subtle.

00:00:55.870 --> 00:00:58.240
Higher unemployment means

00:00:58.240 --> 00:01:02.370
that fewer workers are producing
goods and services,

00:01:02.370 --> 00:01:04.690
and when workers are sitting idle,

00:01:04.690 --> 00:01:08.433
it's likely that capital
is also sitting idle.

00:01:08.846 --> 00:01:11.296
And an economy
with idle labor and capital,

00:01:11.296 --> 00:01:14.440
well, it can't
be maximizing growth.

00:01:15.340 --> 00:01:17.910
Although unemployment
is clearly correlated

00:01:17.910 --> 00:01:19.750
with the business cycle,

00:01:19.750 --> 00:01:23.330
the exact reasons why
are debated by economists.

00:01:23.330 --> 00:01:26.020
To see some of the issues,
notice, for example,

00:01:26.020 --> 00:01:29.350
that unemployment
typically spikes quickly

00:01:29.350 --> 00:01:31.660
when growth declines.

00:01:31.660 --> 00:01:35.970
But then it returns to more
normal levels only slowly.

00:01:36.809 --> 00:01:39.250
The unemployment rate
spiked in 2008,

00:01:39.250 --> 00:01:42.539
for example,
as the economy declined.

00:01:43.049 --> 00:01:46.491
By 2010, the economy
was actually growing

00:01:46.491 --> 00:01:51.236
at a slow but steady rate
of around 2% per year.

00:01:51.236 --> 00:01:55.601
But unemployment didn't return
to pre-recession levels

00:01:55.601 --> 00:01:57.527
for another five years.

00:01:58.649 --> 00:02:02.340
Why did it take so long
for the unemployment rate

00:02:02.340 --> 00:02:04.380
to return to more normal levels?

00:02:05.621 --> 00:02:09.260
Think about a typical market,
say the market for apples.

00:02:09.260 --> 00:02:12.541
Unemployed apples
in this case would be apples

00:02:12.541 --> 00:02:14.662
that aren't being bought.

00:02:14.662 --> 00:02:18.290
Now in a situation
with high apple unemployment,

00:02:18.290 --> 00:02:20.110
you'd have
a higher quantity supplied

00:02:20.110 --> 00:02:23.110
than the quantity demanded
at the current price.

00:02:23.110 --> 00:02:25.930
So what would you expect
to happen in this situation?

00:02:25.930 --> 00:02:29.590
Well ordinarily, the price
of apples would drop

00:02:29.590 --> 00:02:31.440
until the quantity
supplied of apples

00:02:31.440 --> 00:02:35.270
equaled the quantity demanded
and the market cleared.

00:02:35.989 --> 00:02:39.577
However, people are
more complicated than apples.

00:02:39.577 --> 00:02:43.445
And labor markets -- they don't
seem to behave in quite this way.

00:02:43.445 --> 00:02:46.775
Even when there are lots
of unemployed workers,

00:02:46.775 --> 00:02:48.941
that is a higher quantity
supplied of workers

00:02:48.941 --> 00:02:50.675
than the quantity demanded,

00:02:50.675 --> 00:02:55.261
wages seem to fall more slowly
than you would expect.

00:02:55.830 --> 00:02:59.730
Economists say
that wages are “sticky.”

00:02:59.730 --> 00:03:04.680
Sticky wages reduce the incentives
to hire more workers

00:03:04.680 --> 00:03:08.103
and they slow
the adjustment process.

00:03:08.103 --> 00:03:10.010
Now sticky wages are puzzling

00:03:10.010 --> 00:03:12.207
and economists
have a number of theories

00:03:12.207 --> 00:03:15.181
for why wages might be sticky.

00:03:15.670 --> 00:03:20.384
Probably the most important reason
is that human beings get very upset

00:03:20.384 --> 00:03:25.251
when their wages fall, especially
if a fall in wages is obvious

00:03:26.019 --> 00:03:29.325
and appears to be caused
by a person,

00:03:29.325 --> 00:03:33.244
easily identifiable,
like an employer.

00:03:33.244 --> 00:03:35.890
Imagine that your employer
cut your wages.

00:03:35.890 --> 00:03:37.967
You’d probably be pretty upset.

00:03:37.967 --> 00:03:40.820
You might even retaliate
by working less hard

00:03:40.820 --> 00:03:43.630
or even by disrupting
your work place.

00:03:44.713 --> 00:03:47.710
Because of the fear
of reducing morale,

00:03:47.710 --> 00:03:51.520
employers are very reluctant
to reduce nominal wages.

00:03:51.850 --> 00:03:54.200
This graph, for example,
shows the distribution

00:03:54.200 --> 00:03:57.010
of non-zero wage changes.

00:03:57.010 --> 00:03:59.970
Small increases in wages
are common,

00:03:59.970 --> 00:04:03.790
but small decreases in wages
are very rare.

00:04:04.840 --> 00:04:06.740
Now even in a growing economy,

00:04:06.740 --> 00:04:10.988
we'd expect to see wages
to fluctuate, like other prices,

00:04:10.988 --> 00:04:15.420
with lots of small wage decreases
as well as wage increases.

00:04:15.420 --> 00:04:18.188
Supply and demand
are constantly changing.

00:04:18.740 --> 00:04:21.172
But that's not what we see.

00:04:21.172 --> 00:04:25.785
Wages go up much more often
than they go down.

00:04:27.136 --> 00:04:30.720
If nominal wages are sticky
in the downward direction,

00:04:30.720 --> 00:04:34.352
it's going to take a long time
to adjust to a shock

00:04:34.352 --> 00:04:37.350
that requires wages to fall,

00:04:37.350 --> 00:04:40.240
especially
if the inflation rate is low --

00:04:40.240 --> 00:04:43.484
a point which we will return to
in a later video.

00:04:44.240 --> 00:04:46.990
Unemployed workers
may also take time to learn

00:04:46.990 --> 00:04:50.870
or to accept
that their wages have fallen.

00:04:50.870 --> 00:04:55.110
And workers may also be afraid
to accept a low-quality job

00:04:55.110 --> 00:04:58.460
for fear of being branded
a low-quality worker.

00:04:58.460 --> 00:05:00.040
If you're a computer programmer,

00:05:00.040 --> 00:05:02.580
you might not want
to take a job at Starbucks,

00:05:02.580 --> 00:05:04.720
even if you could get one --
or at least you might not want

00:05:04.720 --> 00:05:06.700
to put it on your resume.

00:05:06.700 --> 00:05:09.920
So workers may want
to search for a long time

00:05:09.920 --> 00:05:12.110
before they take a new job.

00:05:13.039 --> 00:05:16.725
Minimum wages and union contracts
can also slow the adjustment

00:05:16.725 --> 00:05:20.620
of wages, as they put legal
or contractual limits

00:05:20.620 --> 00:05:23.001
on how low wages can go.

00:05:23.500 --> 00:05:27.130
All of these mechanisms
can lengthen the amount of time

00:05:27.130 --> 00:05:31.160
that it takes for unemployed
workers to be rehired.

00:05:32.766 --> 00:05:35.562
Okay -- one final concept --

00:05:35.562 --> 00:05:37.747
the natural rate of unemployment.

00:05:38.248 --> 00:05:41.655
The natural rate is defined as
the rate of unemployment

00:05:41.655 --> 00:05:45.655
that would occur if there were
no cyclical unemployment.

00:05:46.150 --> 00:05:47.443
In other words, it's the rate

00:05:47.443 --> 00:05:51.020
of frictional plus
structural unemployment.

00:05:51.020 --> 00:05:53.960
Now why do we care
about the natural rate?

00:05:53.960 --> 00:05:58.070
We care because economists think
that under some conditions

00:05:58.070 --> 00:06:01.710
the government can reduce
cyclical unemployment

00:06:01.710 --> 00:06:04.330
through fiscal
and monetary policies --

00:06:04.330 --> 00:06:06.730
things like spending more money,
cutting taxes,

00:06:06.730 --> 00:06:09.214
or increasing the money supply.

00:06:10.230 --> 00:06:13.880
These policies, however,
are unlikely to change

00:06:13.880 --> 00:06:17.140
frictional
or structural unemployment.

00:06:17.140 --> 00:06:21.420
So when the unemployment rate
is close to the natural rate,

00:06:21.420 --> 00:06:24.308
that suggests that
the scope for monetary

00:06:24.308 --> 00:06:27.705
and fiscal policy is diminished.

00:06:28.440 --> 00:06:30.420
Now unfortunately,
we can only estimate

00:06:30.420 --> 00:06:31.980
the natural rate of unemployment.

00:06:31.980 --> 00:06:34.172
It's not something that we observe.

00:06:34.899 --> 00:06:38.630
This figure shows one estimate
of the natural rate

00:06:38.630 --> 00:06:41.394
alongside the actual
unemployment rate.

00:06:41.955 --> 00:06:45.340
Notice that by 2015
the actual unemployment rate

00:06:45.340 --> 00:06:49.937
was close to the natural rate.
So by this estimate,

00:06:49.937 --> 00:06:54.116
the time for fiscal
and monetary policy had passed.

00:06:54.549 --> 00:06:59.520
Other estimates of the natural rate
might suggest more room for policy.

00:07:00.279 --> 00:07:03.110
Clearly, theories
of cyclical unemployment

00:07:03.110 --> 00:07:06.674
are closely tied to theories
of the business cycle.

00:07:06.674 --> 00:07:09.760
Why does an economy
have booms and busts?

00:07:09.760 --> 00:07:13.014
And to theories about
how the government might use

00:07:13.014 --> 00:07:16.940
fiscal and monetary policy
to smooth the business cycle.

00:07:17.830 --> 00:07:22.661
So we will be revisiting all
of these issues in future videos.

00:07:23.550 --> 00:07:25.120
[Narrator] If you want
to test yourself,

00:07:25.130 --> 00:07:27.119
click "Practice Questions."

00:07:27.119 --> 00:07:28.951
Or, if you're ready to move on,

00:07:28.951 --> 00:07:31.230
you can click
"Go to the Next Video."

00:07:34.200 --> 00:07:36.749
You can also visit MRUniversity.com

00:07:36.749 --> 00:07:39.369
to see our entire library
of videos and resources.

00:07:39.676 --> 00:07:42.981
♪ [music] ♪