Herald: So the first speaker for this conference is lizvlx. And she runs ubermorgen.com and she is really interested in software art, photography and net art. And if you heard about Vote- Auction that was her. This talk will be about anti terrorist laws implications on free thinking and art. Thank you very much liz. applause lizvlx: Well hello, sorry that took a little bit. I'm using the wrong software apparently, its not Microsoft so I'm really sorry. "Do you think that's funny" that's the title of this talk because this was a question we got asked quite a few years ago by a reporter wanting to discuss a project that we did and I thought it was the stupidest question I have ever been asked and I have loved it ever since because obviously this shit is not funny at all. So, yeah. Because it's about art- practice under anti-terror laws. I'm not going to give this theoretical talk now, so you're fine it's about practice. I'm gonna show you a set of projects and focus on kind of the implications of anti-terror laws on the project, on the production of the project most and foremost and also some other projects obviously have been produced before all these crazy ass laws have come into effect. So let's just get started. And of course in the end I'll be doing a Q&A. So a short introduction. So for us, I mean when I'm talking us means ubermorgen.com so that's me and my partner Hans. So we started in the 90s and in the 90s it was really great, I really loved it because there was nothing happening on the net really except for the crazy boring shit and we all thought it was so cool. It was just really nerdy but nothing else. Obviously I started working in net-art, in 1995 about. And that was a really great time because nobody cared what you did on the net, not because there was no audience there was a huge audience. But there was no question about, because you know the net was still not a dot com rearm so it was fine, you could just do whatever you wanted to... There's a little footnote there because we did get, you know, a few problems but it was nothing major. Also because there was no laws in place it really had an effect onto like European citizen being kinda hassled by the CIA, basically local police didn't really want to help out the CIA at the time, so we were fine at the time. So in the early 2000s dot com had totally run over the net which is fine obviously but not only and we had to really get used to lots of people bugging us for doing what we did. But it was just small stuff as you can see, and especially the lawyers letters. These were always very creative and always a good basis for a new project I think. But also at the time there were all these people coming at you for doing projects and its not necessary that you call them art projects it could be anything really, that is not commercial. Were you just go like why shouldn't I do it. But all these things that got thrown at you, were always really valuable pieces of information on how the system works. And you could work with that. And you could work your way around it, you sometimes may pay a small legal fine or whatever, but you would be fine. Obviously that was not true for our Vote-Auction project which cost us enormous amounts of money, but it was worth it. So in about 2006 to 2008 I kind of noticed, I started doing a project back then which was called super-enhanced and I very much noticed that I was paying more and more attention to laws that were in place, not that I was thinking that if I do this project now I would get into trouble a, b, c and d but it was in the back of my head. Which is not really helping when you're trying to freely create a new project or a thinking space, you know? As it is now I feel that all these anti-terror-laws totally make us come into this kind of cluster where we start self-censoring ourselves. Most of all, you see that when you're on Facebook. And don't tell me you're not on Facebook, obviously it's a bullshit platform but still its really interesting. The same is true for twitter. I mean how many times will you say fuck on either of them. You're not going to post that one picture of that naked butt or the bare-breasted lady or whatever, because you're like "ok I have been using this account for a really long time, I don't want to get turned off now, because I'm using imagery now that might be not legal in the Facebook kind of sense". But this self censorship is going on in your head. And it happens online. But as long as it happens online it would be kind of fine, you know it's just Facebook. But this creeps into offline life as well. I'm very sure and I have noticed that with lots of people that the conversations you will have in real life will mirror the ones you have online. Because you're getting used to this kind of speak, this Facebook speak or twitter speak. And it just censors out lots of stuff. Our strategies in working are mostly like affirmative. We're not the ones that use critical approaches, because most of the time that's very boring. But we rather use affirmative techniques and the other one, but then we figured we need to come up with a new strategy. And that's when we started to do secret projects, because I was just getting really sick of having this thought in my head all the time of self-censorship and whatever. So we just started developing projects anonymously. But we can't publish them under our own name which is kind of a bug but that's the way it is. That's enough for a little theory in the beginning and I want to show you a little video of a project that we did a few years ago and we did this project because this is like one more thing i think it is really important. This is new speak, we all hear it all the time. Like yesterday I read something on the news, it talked about a dark figure of badgers in the forest. I figured, how can there be a dark figure of badgers in the forest? Are these illegal badgers? Are these criminal badgers now? And what I heard also a few years ago, it was Russian... deep sea... spider crabs that were moving into Finnish you know sea space? And I figured you know, what they don't have any identity on them or what... what's the problem? you know this, but this new speak i mean obviously that's a lot true for you know all the enemy combatant bullshit and so on. But this newspeak, it's really interesting if you listen to it and it's a real problem if you just go along with it because it alters your speech it alters your mind. So we did this project on oil and it's all about this. I hope this is not too loud. music starts: Seven Nation Army by The White Stripesapplause Where's my presentation? This video was based on a marketing campaign by Diesel, it was called "Be Stupid". laughs I don't want to add to that, but I'm sure some of you people in here have bought a Diesel product. So be proud of yourself you are officially stupid. I was asked to also present you know some projects that some of you might like really know but some of them might not to give you more of a context of our work. So I'm going to present Vote Auction. Vote Auction was a project we did in 2000 and we usually produce seals for our projects, not logos because we're surely not dot com. If we're anything we're an authority, so we need a seal, right? That gives you authority. And, wait I need that. So it was in 2000, it was a platform for buying and selling you know votes for the presidential election in 2000. Gore, yeah Gore against Bush. You know the one that Bush didn't win but took home anyways. You're laughing it's sad isn't it, but then maybe I mean so much good came out of it, so we should be happy. It'd be a lot colder probably if Gore had one, right? He's all into the climate shit and so on. So that was the website, we originally got it from this American called James Baumgartner who was an art student in the states, and he started doing this as a thesis project. But he got you know contacted by the FBI and such pretty early on and he didn't want to pursue the idea any more. And Art Mark who is now Yesman by now and sucks real bad now but was really good then um brought him over to us and we took over and made it a bit bigger I guess. And yeah well basically you could just you know sign up as a voter and just put your vote on sale and as one would be interested in buying a vote you'd only be able to buy the votes from a you know from a whole state to make it more easy. And the prices of votes in different states varied a lot obviously, we had enormous amounts of subscribers. I don't know precisely because we had a randomizing engine in the back obviously. And um we got into serious trouble obviously with this project with any kind of governmental agency. Any OGA in the states. And always made special little websites for them with, you know just IP filtering and they get their own websites and laughter I remember also the Germans were in there as well, I remember Karlsruhe always contacted us on I mean the server on a Wednesday at about 11. And always searched through the same pages and it was really easy then I just, you could just give them something they really liked as a website and that's just some DOS software that would download in the background. And you know stuff like that that really worked fine. I'm gonna show you a little video again, because we got like this feature on CNN for the project, this is really bad quality because it's from TV. I'm so sorry. TV intro music TV presenter: In just two weeks the citizens of the United States will elect their next commander-in-chief. But could that decision be rerouted over the internet? A website engineered halfway around the world is offering to literally buy your vote! Today on Burden of Proof: Bidding for ballots. Democracy on the block. announcer: This is Burden of Proof. lizvlx: Just need to interrupt here a few times. So this was on prime time US CNN. This was right in the midst of the elections and we were really lucky that we got so much news coverage. This was not because we are so awesome and doing projects, this was because we just touched a topic that lots of journalists really wanted to talk about, but they didn't have a specific issue. But if you present them with a specific issue they have something to talk about. So they did. We got about like I don't know how many people we reached about like 200 to 400 million people. This was like really all over the place from, I don't know, you know, they even discussed it in Russia in their parliament and so on. And we got our you know service hacked, and yeah Chan and Reno who was then you know somebody was on our... And we got sued by so many people for either, you know, false promise, consumerism laws, or you know election fraud. I need to point out that obviously it's perfectly legal to sell American votes in Europe. laughter and applause But this is also why vote auction is a big case in the - for lawyers all over the place. This was one of the first cases where people really noticed: Oh internet and national law is just really bad together, just don't mix, you know. And you know, they served us court papers onto our Nokia communicators. Like faxes, like 30 pages, which obviously doesn't fit on a communicator. Or on the phone, you know. I need to serve this to you which is an- it was ridiculous. But still, I mean they couldn't shut us down because we just had, we obviously we were aware that if we kept on doing this project we would get you know, people and authority would be getting more and more interested in us. So we had just this you know- we bought new domains because it turned up the one domain, so we put in the new domain which gives you a new news story. So that was fine, in the end we were running on an IP address but it was all out there so it was fine because we had the CNN coverage so there was no problem. So we had no terror laws at the time so we were no terrorists, we're just doing voter fraud, right? So this is, I mean we're obviously not doing it because we're just providing a platform, I'm not responsible for any user. That's what dot coms is. You know and you got to bring democracy and capitalism closer together, that's what we were saying. Yeah wait, there I just see where is, where's where is he... he yeah that's him. That was one of our first providers. TV presenter: Which along with voteauction.com was named as a defendant in a lawsuit in Chicago. In Los Angeles we're joined by internet law professor Stuart Beagle TV presenter 2: And in Sacramento, California we're joined by... lizvlx: He is an asshole. TV presenter 2: William Woods, chief counsel to the California secretary of state, where I'm from. And here in Washington, Melissa Stratton, constitutional law expert. lizvlx: That's my favorite picture. I mean look at that, I mean for me that project is also a very complicated way to produce like a video art. You do this whole project and then it gets filmed by CNN, right? laughter and applause If you want to see more of the video, pretty much all the videos are available on vimeo. If you go, you know look for the ubermorgen channel. So because they'll go on for way too long because it's 45 minutes and we don't have that much time. Do dee do de doo, more screenshots of the guys. Yeah that's the lawsuits. laughter It's a paper- I started doing paper sculptures then at the time because what are you supposed to do with it, right? And um, it's very expensive you know. This is from a show we just did at carol fletcher gallery in you know London. You know, Oxford Circus, high scale, good shit. But obviously it's not so much fun at the time sometimes. But because I come from a lawyer's family I cannot be bothered really. laughter Now on to something completely different. This is EKMRZ trilogy, it obviously means e-commerce. I don't like vowels apparently. And these are three projects. It's called Google Will Eat Itself, Amazon Noir, and The Sound of Ebay. Google Will Eat Itself, maybe some of you know. That's the seal again. Google release itself is just a very easy scheme for, I don't know a problematic network maybe. It's just, it's all about, we just bought into we just participated in the google ads program and made money with that, and with the money we made we bought Google shares. Hence Google Will Eat Itself, right? And we didn't do it on a huge big scale, because we were not so interested in that any more after doing stuff like vote auction. So we just did this more as a conceptual piece. I think at the scale that we did it in uh it would have taken us like something like 300 million years to buy the whole of Google. But then it gets, maybe it'll get like real cheap in the meantime. So who knows, yeah? For this project also still no terror laws, then that it wouldn't really be covered by that anyways. But of course nasty letters from Google, and we got you know blocked on Google which is great, you know? I once got disqualified from a conference, that was awesome. And then you know that one I really like. But if you get a lawyer from Google, a lawyer's letter from Google that's fine because we all know you can't talk to google, right? There's no phone number, you know? You can have, you can know someone who works at google. But officially you can't talk to them. So there's nothing they can do to you really because they can only send letters, but not react again because they don't want to be bothered. So that's fine, so you can just make a new story out of it. But we closed the project. We made about I think like 400˙000€ and it's still sitting there. It's in a kind of a fun thing and it's Google to the people. But it's not doing anything, because money shouldn't be doing anything. The next one was Amazon Noir which was basically just using the look inside the book function of Amazon to download the whole books. Just search for lots of terms and then recombine the book. They look quite measly afterwards but it's all about the content, who cares? And that project got kind of interpreted as if we were focusing on free books and all that and information for all and we're not interested in, we're not activists. I'm maybe an actionist but I'm not an activist. So I don't have a political agenda. I don't say that this is good or this is bad. I just might find some things interesting. And so we sold the software to Amazon because they didn't like it obviously. So we sold this software to Amazon in the end and made some money with that. laughter and applause And last one of that trilogy is called The Sound of Ebay, and I just really wanted to do a project with teletext imagery because teletext is just so great. And my mom still uses it and. But then my mom used to be a programmer so that's, I guess that explains it. So basically it just, this is a lyrical project. It makes the music with your user data. And I'm not gonna play the music, but I'm gonna show the images because i love them so much. I mean it's just the best parts of teletext obviously, I got there's like this, there's one person who won't talk to me anymore after I've done that because she thinks it's porn. laughter It's really pixels I mean come on. If you see porn in this shit you're sick. I mean seriously. laughter and applause I'm gonna jump through that because there's not enough time I think. Oh maybe, no we got... There's another set of projects I... we did. This is actually the ones I like doing most because this is where I get to do some coding. I love doing coding in Perl and I will never code in anything else I think. And we don't need that ruby shit. And basically this is also yeah this is the... from IP-NIC. We learned, with vote auction we learned how important the seal is, right? Because we got all these legal letters with lots of seals right? Texas, Internet Attorney, and shit like that. And so we got our own seal with the Internet Partnership for No Internet Content. Also sometimes we will get asked by you know, different... entities, companies and whatever like you know you do fake banners and shit like that and I wanna. They want you to take it offline and usually when you talk to big companies and you want them to do something they tell you: Um I'm not sure, I'm not the right person to talk to. They just send you to someone else and never get solved. So we just mirrored that. And so whenever someone asks us to take some information off our servers, I say you know, you need to speak to a different department. And because that's real complicated I made this form. And it's the universal content and/or domain removal form. It's very complicated, this was not what it was in the beginning. And it was you know it's like when you transfer a domain. It's hard, right? You need to sign all that and fax it and not with all of them, but some of them. And you just need to put lots of bureaucratic barriers in there, right? You still got to think you really want to get the shit solved, right? You do. But there's just so much paperwork that you got to fill out. Not you but the other people who want to get the stuff offline. And all the departments... The shit never gets solved. And then I coded it and basically it just works like that you can just put in any domain and it just creates a legal document and that you it's fine you know we have so many the wording is just fine. And like a preliminary, you know injunction or whatever and then you just send it out. We didn't automize it, because we didn't want to be the ones to blame in the end again. We figured the user can send it out by themselves, you know? We're not going to be the clowns, yeah? And take on your own responsibility, right? And you just send it out, and if you have a legal document where it says you know this domain I don't know i'm so cool dot com is supposed to be taken offline, because they're engaging in child pornography. I guess lots of providers will take it offline, in the beginning not to do anything wrong. So this worked really well and it's... again I think it's important to use stuff that comes back to you. In form of legal papers in this context, to make something else out of it. And also it just cuts out the middleman again. You don't need a lawyer, you don't need a court, you just need your own court papers and that's fine. The next one I did was the Bank Statement Generator. It's a weird account statement, and it's a generator that works like that, you just enter a starting figure and you pretty much and you enter some other shit and your name and blah and so on. And then you enter how you want to feel when you get the statement. You know, pretty much everyone has the same deductions right? You go to H&M and you do some Amazon and so on. And yeah I don't think you can ever really get high numbers but you know you just from suicidal to total mania that's what you can kind of decide for yourself, how you want to feel. I got that because we were really broke at the time and I remember I was sitting at home I got open letters and one letter from the bank and it said like oh you're in debt. And I felt really bad. And then I figured why am I feeling bad because of ink on paper? This is really crazy, and it's um it's so this is always what I say: This is just pixels on screen and the other one's just ink on paper. Especially because we're not talking about personal letters, we're talking about letters, they get sent out by servers that are signed by people. You can't talk to a person about them. So they're not a letter, that's not what constitutes a letter. This is fucking newspeak. So if you react to anything that gets sent to you by a server with an emotional reaction, something's wrong with you, you know? applause So this is, I put this in here because my daughter really really loves it. It's Clickistan. Clickistan, I put it also, put it in there because we developed this project for the Whitney Museum of American Art. And it was a bit of a hassle, it's Clickistan so it's like a Javascript click game. And I just used lots of stuff that I already had and you know Javascripted it around, it's all weird and stuff. But we couldn't release it right away because they were concerned about the wording. And they were concerned about the words. I couldn't use the words muslim, fundamentalist, and terror. And I had not, I had not put them in any special you know context, these words. Like, there was this one screen where it said are you allergic vegan muslim or i don't know whatever. And you just, and it's clearly not a political project but there was no way they would release the project with these words in it. So I figured okay I don't... I'm really bad with getting censored, so that's not cool. So I proposed to them, if it were okay with them if we just took these words out and instead put in the word you know variations of the word censor. And they were like oh that's fine. laughter I thought "no not really, but I'll go ahead." So that's yeah it was fucking crazy. I'll show you the video, it's an online game but you're not gonna play it now. But you can watch the video. repeated mouse clicks chiptune music applause Okay. Well this is like a small project we did, I don't know it feels like at least 10 years ago. And this is what we call a web painting. Basically, I mean you can read a bit for yourself. laughter and applause We just took the text and pretty much everything else from a website called Iris scan obviously. And just, just exchanged the words, to make the content and the message a bit more clear I guess. We have not used this in a performative way yet, but if we could ever find a pardon to do that I would gladly set it up on, you know I don't know, a conference you know? An airport? And just see you know if people are gonna participate. You know it's just a small moment. You can go to your own private room if you want to. By the way that's what you call uh affirmative approach, right? Versus critical... And Alanohof, the alano ranch. That's... this is this really small project we did a few years ago. It's just a regular fake site, right? And it's about this fake farm into role that produces organic meat from these hounds. It's all very well and we just produced it for this small you know cultural association, a club in Tirol. And she said can you do something that will you know give us our you know a title page on our you know tyrolean newspaper? And I mean that's, it's easy it's fun. But it's really just a fun project, right? We got into so much trouble because of this project. applause We have you know like we had five different times and you were there right we had police standing in front of our doors at home right? It's like Sunday evening, it's Sunday evening I'm by myself because my partner just went to Sofia for whatever he always does there. And you know, knock on the door and it's these two police guys they're like oh mumbles I like look at them, go like you're not here for Alano, are you? And they're like: yeah. And I'm like, what the hell? You know it's been like, four years since we did the project and they're still coming. I don't know it's because of the dogs you know don't do anything. It's not a cat, you know? We know don't... laughter and applause I don't understand that, don't say anything mean about cats on the internet, yeah. laughter We all bow our heads to the gods, right? But now basically it was also a newspaper that got behind it and there was some you know dog hating forum that totally loved the site. But I mean seriously, I mean they made police people drive to the About address we put on the on the website. And drive there and there was like this local police guy who knew up front that there was no farm there. And we read all the card papers and so on it says like oh i went there and there's no farm and no one around knows it. We had... but the thing was we had to pay money for that because there was no imprint on the website in the beginning. And this is actually you know... this was not a problem early on because basically this means I mean this is a, it's a fake site, you know? If police contact you and you're like no we're artists, this is a fake side they're like fine. And the first two police people that contacted us, they were also okay that's fine yeah. Actually it's interesting kind of a book and so on. But you know laws change over time. And now, you know they really made us put an imprint in there, otherwise you know we could have you know paid as much as 20˙000€. And they were like if you put the imprint in now, you only pay like 200. And we're like we're not paying 20˙000€ for a freaking dog, obviously not. For you know we paid more than 20˙000€ for you know doing the whole vote auction bullshit, but not for a dog, you know? So that's all you know, judicial stuff you know? See? It's a yeah "Tötung von gesunden Hunden", killing you know healthy dogs. We should have put up that we're only killing sick dogs. laughter Mea culpa, yeah. So now on to something a lot more serious. This is a project that's very close to my heart. It's called Superenhanced. And started doing this in about 2006 to 2008. And actually I want to, this is important for me for various reasons. Also because of the talk that's going on right now obviously all the time. We're all being listened to and so on and I don't understand how anyone could not have known that. I seriously don't. Because we all know that anything that's technically possible will be done. We know that from ourselves, even if it's only very often only very little because we're technical incapable, yeah? But there was something else on the agenda and that was you know the issues of enhanced interrogation, Torture Taxis, super max prisons in the states. And I personally don't really understand, I mean I do understand, but I still don't understand why there's this huge uproar now about you know the NSA bullshit, but there was never any of that big upper already really got to people being imprisoned. And this is also you know, this is where real terror laws started happening, right? And this is and, no nothing. I didn't hear anything and we did this project. And one part of the project is a this is just image material from our research. I did like half a year of research on this project. And then I programmed the Superenhanced generator together with a friend of mine. And it's basically an interrogation software. Because it's always the problem in interrogations who's to fucking blame if anything goes wrong? So we did a software, so the software is to blame, right? So you can only follow your orders, and everything it's fine. So basically it just runs you through and if you don't answer properly you get into trouble. So that's not fun, I know, I'm so sorry. We used this in a few performances, in Palestine I think. Yeah that's right we went to Israel and went to Palestine and I really gotta say the one, the performance in Israel didn't work out. Because the people we got as volunteers, they just totally fucking chickened out. I mean it was really just like you know, what do you do in the beginning? Like you throw a bit of water into people's faces or whatever? As an enhancement rate and they're just chickened out. Versus the people in Ramallah they were fine because they were all really experienced. laughter No seriously there was a hundred percent of all the people that were you know there for our talk had experience in being detained. I mean really detained, not just, you know? And about 50% had been more than once. So this is the system graph of the generator. And more images, sorry to spoil your party. And, wait... We're looking for a specific image. Oh that's, if you want to read a good book this is really close to my heart now. Read this book by Murad Kurnaz. Just read it. It might not be a nice christmas present but use it for easter time somebody got nailed on a cross there. so that's fine applause We worked together with this guy, Chris Arendt who was a guard in Guantanamo. And he lived with us for two months. You know, so we could do more research and talk and block. Get the hands-on approach, that's what we like. And he's kind of okay now. He was in a really bad state then. But I don't feel bad for him because I feel bad for the victim not for the perpetrator. I'm sorry Chris, he knows that. That's a set of photographs we did with our kids. People find it offensive. Billy always laughs about it, right? Stop laughing Billy. That's her little sister Lola. That's, we don't need that. That's a grown-up person. And that's a funny thing too. I mean, these pictures I found on the back up of my iPhone and I had never seen those pictures before. I had not, I mean I know my research, I had not seen those pictures before. And when I had to you know sift through my backup I found all these pictures of Guantanamo courtrooms. I found that really strange, but it was very you know helpful. So this is, there's more to show obviously, but there's not so much time. There's just like one thing I want to say before we kind of end this and it's: If we always talk about these issues now of privacy and so on, please bear in mind that this is a first world problem. The southern hemisphere does not suffer from you know being spied on all the time. They suffer from not getting any fucking attention. So just bear that in mind, that it's kind of a luxury problem that needs to be discussed obviously. Second forget crypto because crypto is elitist. I'm not saying don't do it at all obviously, it's something that yorman(?) has to pursue. But if you try to find a solution for the situation now it's not going to be crypto because nobody can fucking use it. inaudible interjection Okay? And then, to all these engineers of the internet, all the sysadmins with so much power and lots of, you know, intelligence very often, lots of brain, but so little education. So you know, so little amount of books have you ever read. So little knowledge and so much responsibility. Please, read a book. Read a motherfucking book. I just applause Maybe not the "Allgemeinbildung for dummies" that I just saw on the train last week, but something like that, okay? We need to close now, I mean we were running a bit late with starting it, but how much more time do we have? Yeah so um I'd rather stop now and we have time for some Q&A, what do you think about that? I'm not going to run a vote on it. Herald: Okay for any question there is... just cue on the microphones in the room. Question: Hi...? lizvlx: Hi! Q: Okay hi, you seem to like confrontation so mine is what's your point? applause lizvlx: You just asked me again, do you think that's funny? That's the same question again. There's no point in a confrontation. I'm not the confrontation the fucking terror law is the confrontation. I'm just mirroring that shit. If you got a problem with that, then you're not doing anything. And you don't need to do anything i'm not telling you what to do what, not at all you know. I'm just doing the stuff that I think makes my life more enjoyable. Herald: Number two. Q: Hi, I wasn't going to say anything but the last few words provoked me. On behalf of people that I know who don't live in the first world, surveillance is a problem. And if you think that it isn't, you're wrong. sporadic clapping lizvlx: Well I spend lots of time in Africa and Near East. Most of all in Africa. And I know surveillance is not an issue in a slum. It's just not, because nobody even knows that you're alive. So you cannot be surveilled. No, they really have issues of visibility. And I know intellectually, of course. And so on, yes I know where you're coming from. But still, I mean. I don't know how many times you're in Africa, but last time I checked, not really, no I. Q: I don't work in Africa, I work in the Americas, but um I think it's a good point for a discussion but i don't think that it's helpful to state to make a broad statement like that in this kind of environment where you have this stage. And we certainly would really like to talk to you more about that. Because it's not good to say. It's not like internet surveillance is not necessarily a problem. But surveillance is a problem. On the street, surveillance is a problem, having people outside of your house watching you 24 hours a day is a problem. lizvlx: No we don't want to, that's not what I mean, obviously. Surveillance it's not a problem it's just ugly bullshit that no one needs. It's just idiotic, you know? It just makes sense and it no obviously. But there is no street surveillance in most of Africa, you know? So it's not it's a different world there and I just want you... Q: Well not the first world is bigger than Africa as well, you said the southern hemisphere... lizvlx: Well we yeah we I get to a point, but I was making a different point. Q: Okay. Herald: Back to one. Q: Hello? You talked about uh self- censorship. lizvlx: Yeah. Q: Is there a connection to pure reflection, and... between self-censorship and reflection so what is reflection to you, and what is self-censorship? lizvlx: Well, especially when it comes to Facebook you know, right when you type in your message it already gets recorded. Even if you delete it, right? So that's right the case of you're just self- reflecting. But they get it then you self- censor yourself and then still... So it's because it gets all very fuzzy I think. And I think the fuzziness is kind of an issue right there. Because if you just censor yourself because you don't want to say that that's fine. But if you don't want to say it because of some other implications that will happen that are fucking crazy, then you have a real issue, I think. Q: Thank you. lizvlx: welcome Herald: Three now. Q: Yeah um lizvlx: hi: Q: I see art as being something on the fringe and I think that's what you're doing. But I'm interested in what you, what you think will happen when this will get internalized. I think you see my point. So you know, art is always something like exploratory, something kind of out there. And eventually it becomes mainstream. I mean it takes time, but it will become mainstream. So what do you think will happen when this becomes mainstream? lizvlx: Well I only know, I mean, I see lots of our work in the context of Viennese Actionism and you know that was in the 60s when it just smeared each other up with you know any kind of body fluids and so on. And that's still not really mainstream in a way. So I can't go back to any historical parallel really. Q: I don't think there's any historical parallel. I think this is always new. lizvlx: But I guess it just in a way it becomes more mainstream because it gets old, you know? It's like an old computer with the old website, for example. Q: So it never really gets internalized in a certain sense? lizvlx: It might not, which I really like, yeah. Q: Weird stuff, thanks. lizvlx: Yeah, you're welcome. good question! Herald: There is time for one last question, which is to the guy in the microphone one. Q: Hi I have a follow-up. lizvlx: hey Q: The first thing is concerning the surveillance in the first world. I mean if you're in Africa often too, or often. I mean how many people there have mobile phones and will have in the next years and what will they do with it. That's actually my question and i think that's why i don't think this first world third world thing i don't think that works at all. Because our aim is to make one world, and in this one world we all will have this problem. And the second question is how does like animal rights law abuse how does that somehow refer to anti-terrorist laws. lizvlx: Well okay first question. Lots of people have phones in Africa. Extremely, an enormous amount. Because they use it for payment. They don't use it for internet surfing. Because that's not possible. So it's a totally different usage. So surveillance comes in from a totally different aspect. So you can't make these people profiles out of their behavior. It's just a really different world. If you want to make it one world that's great, but it's not there yet. So it doesn't make sense I think to impose our first world scenarios onto theirs. Because it's not the situation yet, you know? But at least that's also what i get from you know talking to people from Africa. That's one thing and the second one, how does that correlate with antiterrorist? Because it doesn't matter to them any more. Because if they want to take your website offline or whatever you're doing they want to stop it, they will find some kind of aspect in any kind of law business, they'll find and then they'll get at you. And also I mean obviously when it comes to animal rights, you're quite quickly in a terrorist scheme because it's like the anti-organized crime. There was quite a bunch of activists incarcerated in Austria because of animal rights activism. So actually that's really close together. What you wouldn't think but it actually is by now. Um we have yeah if you can we have a 30 seconds question from the Signal guy up there. Signal Angel: That's fine so we had a lot of questions on IRC on why did you put your daughter on stage? laughter lizvlx: Why is my daughter on stage? Because she likes being with me. Yeah it's very easy. It's a family business situation. I asked her if she wanted to be in the audience or up on stage with me she's opted for the stage version.