WEBVTT 00:00:00.256 --> 00:00:03.652 - [Voiceover] The figure above shows the graph of f prime, 00:00:03.652 --> 00:00:06.612 the derivative of a twice-differentiable function f, 00:00:06.612 --> 00:00:08.047 on the interval, that's a closed interval, 00:00:08.047 --> 00:00:09.580 from negative three to four. 00:00:09.580 --> 00:00:12.262 The graph of f prime has horizontal tangents 00:00:12.262 --> 00:00:14.526 at x equals negative one, x equals one, 00:00:14.526 --> 00:00:15.860 and x equals three. 00:00:15.860 --> 00:00:19.192 So you have a horizontal tangent right over, 00:00:19.192 --> 00:00:21.921 a horizontal tangent right over there. 00:00:23.041 --> 00:00:24.524 And let me draw that a little bit neater, 00:00:24.524 --> 00:00:25.458 right over there, 00:00:25.458 --> 00:00:27.320 a horizontal tangent right over there, 00:00:27.320 --> 00:00:29.362 and a horizontal tangent right over there. 00:00:30.976 --> 00:00:31.557 Alright. 00:00:31.557 --> 00:00:33.345 The areas of the regions bounded 00:00:33.345 --> 00:00:36.475 by the x-axis and the graph of f prime 00:00:36.475 --> 00:00:38.731 on the intervals negative two to one, 00:00:38.731 --> 00:00:40.346 closed intervals from negative two to one, 00:00:40.346 --> 00:00:42.694 so this region right over here, 00:00:42.694 --> 00:00:45.142 and the region from one to four, 00:00:45.142 --> 00:00:46.591 so this region right over there, 00:00:46.591 --> 00:00:48.494 they tell us have, 00:00:48.494 --> 00:00:50.911 have the areas are 9 and 12, respectively. 00:00:50.911 --> 00:00:54.203 So that area's 9 and that area is 12. 00:00:54.203 --> 00:00:55.729 So Part A, 00:00:55.729 --> 00:00:59.955 Find all x coordinates at which f has a relative maximum. 00:00:59.955 --> 00:01:03.473 Give a reason for your answer. 00:01:03.473 --> 00:01:05.527 All x-coordinates at which f 00:01:05.527 --> 00:01:06.955 has a relative maximum. 00:01:06.955 --> 00:01:07.629 So you might say, 00:01:07.629 --> 00:01:09.196 "Oh wait, wait this looks like a relative maximum 00:01:09.196 --> 00:01:10.509 over here, but this isn't f. 00:01:10.509 --> 00:01:12.413 This is the graph of f prime." 00:01:12.413 --> 00:01:13.793 So let's think about when we used to 00:01:13.793 --> 00:01:15.490 we don't have a graph of f in front of us. 00:01:15.490 --> 00:01:17.427 So let's think about what it needs to be true 00:01:17.427 --> 00:01:20.943 for f to have a relative maximum at a point. 00:01:20.943 --> 00:01:23.210 We are probably familiar with 00:01:23.210 --> 00:01:25.415 what relative maximum will look like. 00:01:25.415 --> 00:01:28.214 It'd look like a little lump, like that. 00:01:28.214 --> 00:01:30.072 It could also actually look like that 00:01:30.072 --> 00:01:32.173 but since this is differentiable function 00:01:32.173 --> 00:01:33.671 over the interval, we're probably not dealing 00:01:33.671 --> 00:01:36.213 with a relative maximum that looks like that. 00:01:37.571 --> 00:01:41.803 And so what do we know about a relative maximum point? 00:01:41.803 --> 00:01:44.754 So let's say that's our relative maximum. 00:01:44.754 --> 00:01:46.883 As we approach our relative maximum 00:01:46.883 --> 00:01:50.202 from values, as we have x values that are approaching 00:01:50.202 --> 00:01:54.043 the x value of our relative maximum point, 00:01:54.043 --> 00:01:56.659 as we approach it from values below that x value, 00:01:56.659 --> 00:01:59.699 we see that we have a positive slope. 00:01:59.699 --> 00:02:02.839 Our function needs to be increasing. 00:02:02.839 --> 00:02:04.751 So over here. 00:02:05.784 --> 00:02:08.686 Over here we see f is increasing, 00:02:08.686 --> 00:02:11.827 going into the relative maximum point, 00:02:11.827 --> 00:02:12.726 f is increasing, 00:02:12.726 --> 00:02:15.227 which means that the derivative of f 00:02:15.227 --> 00:02:17.312 the derivative of f must be greater than zero. 00:02:18.342 --> 00:02:20.874 And then after we past that maximum point, 00:02:20.874 --> 00:02:22.491 after we past that maximum point, 00:02:22.491 --> 00:02:26.247 we see that our function needs to be decreasing. 00:02:26.247 --> 00:02:27.569 Do this in another color. 00:02:27.569 --> 00:02:29.711 We see that our funciton is decreasing 00:02:29.711 --> 00:02:33.090 right over here, so f decreasing, 00:02:34.100 --> 00:02:36.764 decreasing, which means 00:02:36.764 --> 00:02:39.684 that f prime of x needs to be less than zero. 00:02:40.524 --> 00:02:43.745 So our relative maximum point 00:02:43.745 --> 00:02:46.247 should happen at an x value. 00:02:46.247 --> 00:02:47.312 It should happen at an x value 00:02:47.312 --> 00:02:50.284 where our first derivative transitions 00:02:50.284 --> 00:02:52.478 from being greater than zero 00:02:52.478 --> 00:02:55.244 to being less than zero. 00:02:55.244 --> 00:02:56.437 So what x value, 00:02:56.437 --> 00:02:57.262 so let me say this, 00:02:57.262 --> 00:03:00.737 so we have 00:03:00.737 --> 00:03:05.407 f has relative, let me just write it shorthand, 00:03:05.407 --> 00:03:10.351 relative maximum at x values 00:03:11.505 --> 00:03:13.526 where 00:03:13.526 --> 00:03:16.561 f prime transitions, 00:03:16.561 --> 00:03:17.631 transitions, 00:03:19.022 --> 00:03:21.703 transitions from 00:03:21.703 --> 00:03:26.272 from positive, positive, 00:03:27.871 --> 00:03:32.713 to negative, to, let me write this a little bit neater, 00:03:32.713 --> 00:03:34.493 to negative. 00:03:35.653 --> 00:03:37.713 to negative. 00:03:37.713 --> 00:03:39.923 And where do we see f prime transitioning 00:03:39.923 --> 00:03:41.902 from positive to negative? 00:03:41.902 --> 00:03:43.933 Well over here we only see that happening once. 00:03:43.933 --> 00:03:47.138 We see right here f prime is positive, positive, positive, 00:03:47.138 --> 00:03:49.077 and then it goes negative, negative, negative. 00:03:49.077 --> 00:03:50.797 So we see, 00:03:50.797 --> 00:03:54.143 we see f prime is positive over here, 00:03:55.273 --> 00:03:58.020 And then, right when we hit x equals negative two, 00:03:58.020 --> 00:04:00.702 f prime becomes negative. 00:04:00.702 --> 00:04:03.849 F prime becomes negative. 00:04:03.849 --> 00:04:05.706 So we know that the function itself, 00:04:05.706 --> 00:04:06.426 not f prime, 00:04:06.426 --> 00:04:07.877 f must be increasing here 00:04:07.877 --> 00:04:10.768 because f prime is positive, 00:04:10.768 --> 00:04:13.369 and then our function at f 00:04:13.369 --> 00:04:14.518 is decreasing here 00:04:14.518 --> 00:04:17.084 because f prime is negative. 00:04:18.054 --> 00:04:20.969 And so this happens at x equals two. 00:04:20.969 --> 00:04:22.773 So let me write that down. 00:04:22.773 --> 00:04:24.870 This happens at x equals two. 00:04:24.870 --> 00:04:27.550 This happens, 00:04:27.550 --> 00:04:31.969 happens at x equals two. 00:04:31.969 --> 00:04:33.301 And we're done.