1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:07,760 [Intro Music] 2 00:00:07,997 --> 00:00:11,402 Hey! I'm Cam, and you are watching Reality Check. 3 00:00:11,402 --> 00:00:18,272 That's right, 64% of people can't tell the difference between PS4, XBox One, and PC. 4 00:00:18,272 --> 00:00:21,975 At least, that's according to a study done by me. 5 00:00:21,975 --> 00:00:23,770 and, uh, some of you in fact. 6 00:00:23,770 --> 00:00:28,555 Here's the skinny: Over 2,700 people took part in an online test 7 00:00:28,555 --> 00:00:32,830 which tasked participants to watch 3 different gameplay clips back-to-back, 8 00:00:32,830 --> 00:00:39,154 and then attempt to identify which was PS4, which was Xbox One, and which was PC. 9 00:00:39,154 --> 00:00:42,539 The results were then collected over the course of a few weeks. 10 00:00:42,546 --> 00:00:44,853 Okay, so a few disclaimers: 11 00:00:44,853 --> 00:00:48,995 Was the test perfect? No. Was it scientific? Kind of. 12 00:00:49,039 --> 00:00:52,022 Should it be taken as gospel? Probably not 13 00:00:52,022 --> 00:00:56,628 But does it make an interesting point about how we value graphics? Definitely. 14 00:00:56,628 --> 00:01:00,963 But, before we dive into the details of the test, reveal the correct answer, 15 00:01:00,963 --> 00:01:04,847 and talk about what went well and what I would maybe do differently next time, 16 00:01:04,847 --> 00:01:08,990 let's take a moment to recap and rewind. 17 00:01:08,990 --> 00:01:11,715 On Monday, the 16th of February, 18 00:01:11,715 --> 00:01:14,125 I ran an experiment in our GameSpot studio in London. 19 00:01:14,125 --> 00:01:18,473 I got 7 volunteers to play 3 different games on 3 identical setups. 20 00:01:18,473 --> 00:01:24,289 Their task: to tell me which they thought was PS4, PC, and Xbox One. 21 00:01:24,289 --> 00:01:27,886 All other ways of identifying each machine were controlled for. 22 00:01:27,886 --> 00:01:31,903 All they had to base their decision on was how the game looked: the graphics. 23 00:01:31,903 --> 00:01:34,830 To get the full lowdown of the test and how people got on, 24 00:01:34,830 --> 00:01:36,879 watch that episode of Reality Check. 25 00:01:36,879 --> 00:01:40,281 The problem, though, was that the test pool size of 7 people 26 00:01:40,281 --> 00:01:44,232 was WAY too small to draw any meaningful conclusions. 27 00:01:44,232 --> 00:01:49,346 So, I devised a more simple one that would allow anyone, anywhere to take part. 28 00:01:49,346 --> 00:01:54,509 So, how did I do it? Well, I added 3 video clips at the end of that previous episode, 29 00:01:54,509 --> 00:01:57,275 all consisting of Far Cry 4 gameplay. 30 00:01:57,275 --> 00:02:02,153 One clip was captured on PS4, one on Xbox One, and one on our gaming PC. 31 00:02:02,153 --> 00:02:06,205 I asked those watching to vote on which they thought was which in an online poll 32 00:02:06,205 --> 00:02:07,554 Simple stuff. 33 00:02:07,557 --> 00:02:10,260 Now obviously, web compression was always gonna be a big problem. 34 00:02:10,260 --> 00:02:14,104 As a standard for the show I uploaded the video to GameSpot and Youtube 35 00:02:14,124 --> 00:02:17,644 at 1080p resolution and 60 fps, 36 00:02:17,652 --> 00:02:20,561 and both were compressed using the H.264 codec. 37 00:02:20,566 --> 00:02:24,266 Now this is fine for general viewing, but there is always a degree of 38 00:02:24,365 --> 00:02:29,149 quality loss and artifacting, so it was far from ideal for this test. 39 00:02:29,149 --> 00:02:32,876 So, in an attempt to combat this, I also uploaded all three clips 40 00:02:32,876 --> 00:02:38,049 at 1080p-60, packaged up as one movie, uncompressed, to Google Drive, 41 00:02:38,049 --> 00:02:41,079 for anyone to download and watch for themselves. 42 00:02:42,059 --> 00:02:47,238 Okay, time to reveal the correct answer: Clip #1 was PS4. 43 00:02:47,238 --> 00:02:51,959 #2 was PC, and the final clip was XBox One 44 00:02:51,959 --> 00:02:57,298 This was the single most popular answer, with 982 votes, or 36%. 45 00:02:57,298 --> 00:03:03,115 The other 64% of voters, though, did get it wrong, either getting 1 or 0 correct. 46 00:03:03,115 --> 00:03:07,097 Interestingly though, if you shift the focus of the test to see how people 47 00:03:07,097 --> 00:03:08,611 performed at picking out the PC 48 00:03:08,611 --> 00:03:12,008 from the other 2 consoles, then the results actually get a lot better, 49 00:03:12,008 --> 00:03:16,250 with 58% of people correctly identifying the non-console. 50 00:03:16,280 --> 00:03:20,421 That was made up of the 36% who got it correct, plus 22% of people 51 00:03:20,490 --> 00:03:22,928 who just got the consoles the wrong way around. 52 00:03:22,928 --> 00:03:24,788 As for the rest of the results, here they are: 53 00:03:24,788 --> 00:03:29,456 391 people, or 14%, voted PS4/Xbox One/PC, 54 00:03:29,456 --> 00:03:33,734 311, or 11%, chose PC/Xbox One/PS4, 55 00:03:33,734 --> 00:03:39,003 291, or 11% again, thought it went Xbox One/PS4/PC 56 00:03:39,003 --> 00:03:46,033 And finally, 104, or 5% of voters, chose PC/PS4/and then another PC. 57 00:03:46,033 --> 00:03:49,410 The eagle eye amongst you will notice that that last one was wrong. 58 00:03:49,410 --> 00:03:53,905 The final option should have been Xbox One, not a second PC. 59 00:03:53,905 --> 00:03:55,967 So how did that happen? Well, 60 00:03:55,967 --> 00:03:59,624 that's what we call a derp. (Otherwise known as human error.) 61 00:03:59,624 --> 00:04:03,480 It was very late and I was very sleepy when I made that poll, simple as that. 62 00:04:03,480 --> 00:04:05,640 Whoops! But it doesn't really matter, though, 63 00:04:05,640 --> 00:04:08,753 because it was an incorrect answer either way. 64 00:04:08,753 --> 00:04:11,038 So, that was the experiment and the results, 65 00:04:11,038 --> 00:04:12,867 but like I said, it wasn't perfect. 66 00:04:12,867 --> 00:04:15,721 So it's time to look at some of the comments you guys had 67 00:04:15,721 --> 00:04:18,061 but also think about how I might do this differently 68 00:04:18,061 --> 00:04:19,771 if I was gonna do the test again. 69 00:04:19,771 --> 00:04:24,239 One big issue a lot of people commented on was my choice of clips in the experiment. 70 00:04:24,239 --> 00:04:28,803 Now I used 3 clips from the same early stage in Far Cry 4. 71 00:04:28,803 --> 00:04:33,148 The areas, though, weren't identical, but this was a deliberate choice. 72 00:04:33,148 --> 00:04:37,038 You see, I wasn't attempting to emulate the artificial setup 73 00:04:37,038 --> 00:04:38,967 of a graphics comparison, rather, 74 00:04:39,006 --> 00:04:43,295 I was trying to create real-world gaming conditions, if that makes sense. 75 00:04:43,295 --> 00:04:46,645 Sure, identical clips would have made it slightly easier, 76 00:04:46,645 --> 00:04:49,375 as you could have compared identical textures like for like. 77 00:04:49,375 --> 00:04:53,804 But the way I see it is that texture quality, dynamic lighting, and all other 78 00:04:53,804 --> 00:04:57,812 graphical settings are all consistent in a whole game area. 79 00:04:57,812 --> 00:05:01,828 And, more to the point, if graphical differences between platforms really 80 00:05:01,828 --> 00:05:05,367 weren't the fuss that a lot of people tend to make over them, 81 00:05:05,367 --> 00:05:09,128 then we should be able to tell under the conditions I set. 82 00:05:09,128 --> 00:05:12,721 That was my logic, anyway, but I'm willing to be talked around on that one 83 00:05:12,721 --> 00:05:16,030 if I were to repeat this test. So let me know what you think. 84 00:05:16,030 --> 00:05:18,377 The main issue for me, though, with these results is that 85 00:05:18,377 --> 00:05:22,967 I have no way of knowing how many of those who voted did so after watching the 86 00:05:22,967 --> 00:05:26,148 online version and how many actually downloaded the clips. 87 00:05:26,148 --> 00:05:28,623 Downloaded votes are far more powerful 88 00:05:28,623 --> 00:05:30,843 as you can eliminate all that nasty compression 89 00:05:30,843 --> 00:05:33,512 and give people a much fairer test. 90 00:05:33,512 --> 00:05:36,750 Next time I'd find a way so only after actually downloading the file 91 00:05:36,750 --> 00:05:38,291 could you cast a vote. 92 00:05:38,291 --> 00:05:40,929 Then, there's the case of the gaming PC. 93 00:05:40,929 --> 00:05:44,496 The specs of the one I used are on screen now, and I think it's fair to say that 94 00:05:44,496 --> 00:05:48,866 it makes for a reasonably powerful gaming PC, probably to the higher end of average 95 00:05:48,866 --> 00:05:51,053 that most PC gamers have. 96 00:05:51,053 --> 00:05:54,360 Plus, Far Cry 4 was running at the preset ultra settings. 97 00:05:54,360 --> 00:05:57,157 I'll admit, though, that it would've perhaps been fairer 98 00:05:57,157 --> 00:05:59,918 to have the most powerful PC I could get my hands on. 99 00:05:59,918 --> 00:06:04,254 So next time I'd jam in a Titan X in there alongside a better CPU. 100 00:06:04,254 --> 00:06:07,143 But despite these changes I would make in the glory of hindsight, 101 00:06:07,143 --> 00:06:10,362 I still think these results are really interesting. 102 00:06:10,362 --> 00:06:14,535 For me, this test simply underlines how graphics are not the most important factor 103 00:06:14,535 --> 00:06:18,164 to consider if you're trying to decide which setup is best for you. 104 00:06:18,164 --> 00:06:24,161 Ultimately, PS4, Xbox One, and a gaming PC are fairly close in visual quality. 105 00:06:24,161 --> 00:06:28,433 Sure, you can line up labeled textures and spot the highest resolution one 106 00:06:28,433 --> 00:06:29,398 in a graphics comparison, 107 00:06:29,398 --> 00:06:33,228 but when it actually comes down to sitting on your ass and having a great time gaming 108 00:06:33,228 --> 00:06:37,423 your ability to tell, and therefore the importance of those extra pixels 109 00:06:37,423 --> 00:06:39,255 or quality of lighting, or whatever— 110 00:06:39,255 --> 00:06:41,063 start to diminish. 111 00:06:41,063 --> 00:06:44,363 Other things like online services, the ability to host servers, 112 00:06:44,363 --> 00:06:48,278 digital distribution platforms, controllers, what your friends use— 113 00:06:48,278 --> 00:06:53,103 these are far more important when deciding which is best for you. 114 00:06:53,103 --> 00:06:55,991 It's all about our own individual preference. 115 00:06:55,991 --> 00:06:57,859 But that's just what I think. 116 00:06:57,859 --> 00:07:00,109 Do you guys agree or do you disagree? 117 00:07:00,109 --> 00:07:03,228 Or do you have any ideas about how I maybe could have done the test differently? 118 00:07:03,228 --> 00:07:07,002 Let me know in the comments down below or by hitting me up on Twitter @camfrazrob 119 00:07:07,002 --> 00:07:09,955 Thanks for watching. 120 00:07:09,955 --> 00:07:27,597 [Outro music] 121 00:07:28,760 --> 00:07:31,032 So, it's time to think about some of the comments you guys had, 122 00:07:31,032 --> 00:07:34,921 but also what I might do differently— that was squeaky! 123 00:07:34,921 --> 00:07:37,747 —comments you had, but also think about how I might do this differently, 124 00:07:37,747 --> 00:07:40,519 Oh there's my chair! 125 00:07:40,519 --> 00:07:43,274 but also consider what I might do differently, if I was going 126 00:07:43,274 --> 00:07:44,494 to do this test again. 127 00:07:46,850 --> 00:07:52,280 [laughs from Cam and the cameraman] How did that happen? 128 00:07:52,339 --> 00:07:56,289 If you guys agree or disagree, or if you have any other ideas about how I 129 00:07:57,507 --> 00:08:05,191 [electronic alarm sound]