0:00:00.000,0:00:06.240 0:00:06.240,0:00:08.172 We're at the Solomon[br]R. Guggenheim Museum 0:00:08.172,0:00:08.880 in New York City. 0:00:08.880,0:00:12.210 We're looking at a painting[br]by Wassily Kandinsky. 0:00:12.210,0:00:16.410 This is Improvisation[br]28 (Second Version.) 0:00:16.410,0:00:19.230 It's interesting to start off[br]by thinking about that title 0:00:19.230,0:00:21.540 because it's not the[br]title of something that's 0:00:21.540,0:00:22.830 being represented. 0:00:22.830,0:00:25.840 It's the kind of notation[br]that a composer uses. 0:00:25.840,0:00:26.340 Right. 0:00:26.340,0:00:28.830 Normally in art history[br]we have paintings 0:00:28.830,0:00:32.009 with titles of stories[br]from the Bible, 0:00:32.009,0:00:36.210 or from history, or from[br]mythology, or landscapes 0:00:36.210,0:00:37.920 that have the name of a place. 0:00:37.920,0:00:40.200 But here we have[br]improvisation which 0:00:40.200,0:00:43.330 is the name of a kind[br]of musical composition. 0:00:43.330,0:00:46.250 So the immediate question is,[br]why is Kandinsky doing that? 0:00:46.250,0:00:48.030 Well, because he's[br]composing here. 0:00:48.030,0:00:50.220 He's composing with[br]form but this is still 0:00:50.220,0:00:52.560 rooted in the[br]stories of the Bible 0:00:52.560,0:00:55.170 and of his particular[br]historical moment. 0:00:55.170,0:00:58.860 But he's clearly trying to[br]associate painting with music 0:00:58.860,0:01:04.019 to suggest that, like[br]music, painting can signify. 0:01:04.019,0:01:05.459 It can mean things. 0:01:05.459,0:01:09.840 It can take us places without[br]representing anything concrete. 0:01:09.840,0:01:11.880 Actually, he would[br]go further than that 0:01:11.880,0:01:14.430 and say that you[br]could hear color, 0:01:14.430,0:01:15.990 that you could see music. 0:01:15.990,0:01:18.336 This idea, which is[br]called synesthesia, 0:01:18.336,0:01:20.460 is something that Kandinsky[br]was very interested in. 0:01:20.460,0:01:24.190 The idea that there could be a[br]kind of crossing of the senses. 0:01:24.190,0:01:26.730 So, looking at this,[br]he may have wanted 0:01:26.730,0:01:29.100 us to actually hear something. 0:01:29.100,0:01:32.250 And, in fact, we know that[br]Kandinsky was very influenced 0:01:32.250,0:01:36.030 by Arnold Schoenberg, a[br]turn-of-the-century composer 0:01:36.030,0:01:40.950 who was jettisoning the familiar[br]Western harmonies to create 0:01:40.950,0:01:44.430 a new kind of difficult,[br]atonal music for the beginning 0:01:44.430,0:01:45.640 of the 20th century. 0:01:45.640,0:01:49.850 And I see something atonal, I[br]see something difficult here. 0:01:49.850,0:01:52.050 What would this[br]painting sound like? 0:01:52.050,0:01:54.180 For me, it would sound[br]like a cacophony. 0:01:54.180,0:01:55.780 It would sound like chaos. 0:01:55.780,0:01:59.040 It would sound like a very[br]dangerous, but also brilliant, 0:01:59.040,0:01:59.940 moment. 0:01:59.940,0:02:04.320 We have brilliant color,[br]a kind of hazy atmosphere 0:02:04.320,0:02:06.870 through which that[br]color pops, we 0:02:06.870,0:02:10.710 have these black[br]diagonal lines that 0:02:10.710,0:02:14.880 crisscross with each other that[br]almost feel like weapons moving 0:02:14.880,0:02:15.865 through space. 0:02:15.865,0:02:18.240 And it's appropriate that the[br]analogy that you're drawing 0:02:18.240,0:02:19.290 is one of war. 0:02:19.290,0:02:20.410 This is 1912. 0:02:20.410,0:02:23.480 It's just two years before[br]the First World War begins. 0:02:23.480,0:02:25.200 And early 20th-century[br]Russian history 0:02:25.200,0:02:27.260 is filled with political chaos. 0:02:27.260,0:02:30.030 We're clearly on the[br]verge of abstraction. 0:02:30.030,0:02:32.530 And, in fact, when we first[br]look at this painting, 0:02:32.530,0:02:34.350 it looks entirely abstract. 0:02:34.350,0:02:37.800 That is, we don't[br]immediately recognize 0:02:37.800,0:02:39.246 the things of the world. 0:02:39.246,0:02:40.620 But this isn't[br]what we would call 0:02:40.620,0:02:42.310 a completely abstract painting. 0:02:42.310,0:02:42.810 Right. 0:02:42.810,0:02:45.270 So one might not call this[br]painting an abstract painting 0:02:45.270,0:02:48.150 but call it an[br]abstracted painting. 0:02:48.150,0:02:49.890 So, therefore, we[br]should still be 0:02:49.890,0:02:54.110 able to recognize some[br]elements of the natural world. 0:02:54.110,0:02:57.060 Kandinsky was concerned that[br]if we could recognize things 0:02:57.060,0:03:00.330 too clearly that our conscious[br]minds would take over 0:03:00.330,0:03:04.080 the interpretation and we would[br]close off our emotional ability 0:03:04.080,0:03:06.300 to respond to the[br]pure color and form. 0:03:06.300,0:03:09.660 In the upper right, I[br]seem to see a mountain 0:03:09.660,0:03:11.010 with some buildings on it. 0:03:11.010,0:03:14.880 Maybe with chimney stacks or,[br]perhaps, a church on a hill. 0:03:14.880,0:03:17.510 An ideal city, a kind[br]of heavenly Jerusalem. 0:03:17.510,0:03:20.670 Kandinsky was deeply[br]influenced by biblical imagery. 0:03:20.670,0:03:23.640 And so, even though this is a[br]tremendously modern painting, 0:03:23.640,0:03:25.890 it is still rooted in[br]this ancient tradition 0:03:25.890,0:03:28.410 of representing[br]Christian stories. 0:03:28.410,0:03:30.690 So it makes sense that[br]we have a battle field. 0:03:30.690,0:03:31.860 Forces at war. 0:03:31.860,0:03:34.110 In fact, art historians have[br]looked at these paintings 0:03:34.110,0:03:36.660 as a kind of representation[br]of an apocalypse, 0:03:36.660,0:03:38.880 of a moment when the[br]sins of the world 0:03:38.880,0:03:40.140 are going to be washed away. 0:03:40.140,0:03:42.390 In the lower left, you[br]have a great flood, 0:03:42.390,0:03:45.270 you have a wave, this idea[br]of the way in which God 0:03:45.270,0:03:47.640 in the Old Testament had[br]wiped man from the earth, 0:03:47.640,0:03:49.470 except for Noah and his family. 0:03:49.470,0:03:52.900 Just above that wave,[br]cannon are being fired. 0:03:52.900,0:03:56.640 The atmospheric effect[br]almost reads like the smoke 0:03:56.640,0:03:57.810 on a battlefield. 0:03:57.810,0:03:59.430 Down at the bottom,[br]art historians 0:03:59.430,0:04:02.130 sometimes recognize[br]the manes and the arcs 0:04:02.130,0:04:04.020 of the necks of horses. 0:04:04.020,0:04:06.060 And we know that[br]Kandinsky was really 0:04:06.060,0:04:09.030 interested throughout his[br]career in the idea of the horse 0:04:09.030,0:04:09.542 and rider. 0:04:09.542,0:04:11.250 Symbolizing a number[br]of different things, 0:04:11.250,0:04:14.160 having overlapping[br]meanings, referencing 0:04:14.160,0:04:15.870 the four horsemen[br]of the apocalypse 0:04:15.870,0:04:17.790 but also the idea of redemption. 0:04:17.790,0:04:19.560 This was also utopian. 0:04:19.560,0:04:23.130 The idea that we could wash[br]away the old world, a world that 0:04:23.130,0:04:25.860 was about to be destroyed, not[br]only by the Russian Revolution, 0:04:25.860,0:04:27.920 but also by the First World War. 0:04:27.920,0:04:29.670 Kandinsky, at this[br]moment, was convinced 0:04:29.670,0:04:32.670 that he could help lead that,[br]at least in the visual realm. 0:04:32.670,0:04:35.940 Many artists at this time[br]in the early 20th century 0:04:35.940,0:04:39.990 had a sense that the artist[br]could play an important role 0:04:39.990,0:04:41.700 in the new civilization[br]that was going 0:04:41.700,0:04:44.144 to emerge in the 20th century. 0:04:44.144,0:04:45.810 So here we have a[br]painting that is using 0:04:45.810,0:04:47.610 color in a radically new way. 0:04:47.610,0:04:49.470 This is color for its own sake. 0:04:49.470,0:04:51.120 Not to mimic, not to describe. 0:04:51.120,0:04:53.910 We have line that is being[br]used for its own sake. 0:04:53.910,0:04:57.050 Lines that are abstractly[br]moving across the surface 0:04:57.050,0:05:00.060 to create a sense of rhythm,[br]to create a sense of staccato. 0:05:00.060,0:05:04.400 Musicality in this painting[br]it is absolutely new. 0:05:04.400,0:05:14.675