WEBVTT

00:00:02.133 --> 00:00:04.256
♪ [music] ♪

00:00:14.090 --> 00:00:17.820
- This is a pretty tragic topic and in
some ways it's tough to talk about, but

00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:21.540
let's give it a try. Let's keep in mind
that in the modern world there still

00:00:21.720 --> 00:00:26.930
really is a lot of slavery and many people
are rightfully outraged by this. But the

00:00:27.110 --> 00:00:32.409
question is what to do about it? So in the
1990's, there were humanitarian reformers

00:00:32.590 --> 00:00:38.340
and they went to Sudan and their plan was
to buy slaves and set them free. Now that

00:00:38.520 --> 00:00:42.710
sounds great, what could be better than
setting free slaves? That sounds pretty

00:00:42.890 --> 00:00:47.760
noble, but did it actually stamp out
slavery or did paying slaveholders to

00:00:47.940 --> 00:00:54.270
release these slaves lead to more people
captured? Let's use the economic concept

00:00:54.450 --> 00:00:58.960
of the elasticity of supply to help
understand this better. The problem is

00:00:59.140 --> 00:01:02.840
this, the people trying to free the
slaves, we'll call them the slave

00:01:03.020 --> 00:01:07.480
redeemers, they're also creating
additional demand for slaves. After all,

00:01:07.660 --> 00:01:12.590
they're buying slaves in the market. That
additional demand shifts out the demand

00:01:12.770 --> 00:01:18.380
curve for slaves and that leads to a new
and higher market price. That higher price

00:01:18.560 --> 00:01:22.570
will bring forth additional supply. So
what are the people who round up and

00:01:22.750 --> 00:01:26.350
kidnap the slaves, what are they going to
do? Well, they're going to increase their

00:01:26.530 --> 00:01:30.310
operations. They're going to have more
raids and they're going to take more

00:01:30.490 --> 00:01:36.340
people into slavery. We can already see
there's at least a possibility that buying

00:01:36.520 --> 00:01:39.950
the slaves and setting them free will be
counterproductive because we haven't

00:01:40.130 --> 00:01:44.850
managed to stamp out all of slavery, what
we've done is set some people free but

00:01:45.030 --> 00:01:48.530
actually give those kidnappers, those
people in the middle, we've increased

00:01:48.710 --> 00:01:53.640
their incentives to bring more people into
slavery. And therein lies the potential

00:01:53.820 --> 00:01:58.890
for an even greater tragedy. The concept
of elasticity in economic terms that

00:01:59.070 --> 00:02:04.070
refers to how responsive is quantity
supplied when market price changes.

00:02:04.250 --> 00:02:08.690
It's going to help us understand how much
a slave redemption program will increase

00:02:08.870 --> 00:02:13.670
the number of people who end up captured
by slave raiders. Inelastic supply means

00:02:13.850 --> 00:02:19.230
that even a much higher price doesn't
result in a much larger quantity supplied.

00:02:19.410 --> 00:02:23.550
In that case, even if the price of slaves
went up by a lot, not that many additional

00:02:23.730 --> 00:02:28.250
people would be captured. That's the
better case scenario. It also means the

00:02:28.430 --> 00:02:32.890
price of slaves will go up and stay high
because the off setting supply response is

00:02:33.070 --> 00:02:37.370
weak and it's not pushing that market
price back down again. Again that's the

00:02:37.550 --> 00:02:41.880
better case scenario. It means that in the
long run the redeemers are doing more to

00:02:42.060 --> 00:02:47.060
limit slavery than to encourage it. But,
however, let's say the supply curve is

00:02:47.240 --> 00:02:51.810
more elastic, that means a flatter curve
and it means the quantity supplied to the

00:02:51.990 --> 00:02:57.610
market will increase a lot with the higher
price. In that case, it's easier to find

00:02:57.790 --> 00:03:02.110
more people to enslave. Then as a result
of the boost in demand from the

00:03:02.290 --> 00:03:08.400
humanitarian redeemers, a lot more people
will end up captured and enslaved and then

00:03:08.580 --> 00:03:12.790
the total number of people captured as
slaves is going up quite a bit. And you

00:03:12.970 --> 00:03:17.190
have to wonder in that case are these
slave redemption programs really a good

00:03:17.370 --> 00:03:24.910
idea? So what's the answer? It's genuinely
hard to say whether the supply of slaves

00:03:25.090 --> 00:03:30.860
is elastic or inelastic, but we can look
at price as a possible indicator of which

00:03:31.040 --> 00:03:35.010
scenario is more likely to hold. We know
that in the early years of slave

00:03:35.190 --> 00:03:39.650
redemption there was a noticeable increase
in the price of slaves and that could be

00:03:39.830 --> 00:03:45.410
evidenced of a fairly inelastic supply
curve. However, over time the price of

00:03:45.590 --> 00:03:50.950
slaves has fallen and that could indicate
greater elasticity of supply in the longer

00:03:51.130 --> 00:03:56.140
run. That makes sense but the suppliers
are usually more responsive to an increase

00:03:56.320 --> 00:04:01.000
in price as they have more time to adjust.
For instance, they can hire more people

00:04:01.180 --> 00:04:06.030
and expand their operations.
So this evidence overall suggests that

00:04:06.210 --> 00:04:10.840
perhaps the program has become less
effective over time and perhaps today it

00:04:11.020 --> 00:04:15.840
may actually be counterproductive and be
increasing the burden of slavery. In other

00:04:16.019 --> 00:04:21.320
words, good intentions aren't always
enough. If someone comes along and puts an

00:04:21.500 --> 00:04:25.550
apparently good idea on the table, we
still need to think through it's

00:04:25.730 --> 00:04:27.670
unintended consequences.

00:04:27.850 --> 00:04:33.470
- [male] If you want to test yourself,
click Practice questions. Or if you're

00:04:33.650 --> 00:04:36.550
ready to move on, just click Next Video.

00:04:36.550 --> 00:04:38.550
♪ [music] ♪