WEBVTT
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.668
This is a—to me—pretty big deal.
00:00:03.668 --> 00:00:06.788
I've never seen this around
any court I've ever been…
00:00:06.788 --> 00:00:10.036
involved with, where there's
this much dark money
00:00:10.036 --> 00:00:13.538
and this much influence being used.
00:00:13.538 --> 00:00:15.988
Here's how Washington Post
summed it up.
00:00:15.988 --> 00:00:18.955
“This is a conservative activist's
behind-the-scenes campaign
00:00:18.955 --> 00:00:20.729
to remake the nation's courts”
00:00:20.729 --> 00:00:26.000
and it's a $250 million
dark money operation.
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:30.573
$250 million is a lot of money to
spend if you're not getting anything for it.
00:00:30.573 --> 00:00:32.775
So that raises the question,
00:00:32.775 --> 00:00:34.302
what are they getting for it?
00:00:34.302 --> 00:00:37.340
Well… I showed this slide earlier
00:00:37.340 --> 00:00:45.011
on the Affordable Care Act. And
on Obergefell, and on Roe vs. Wade.
00:00:45.011 --> 00:00:47.366
That's where they lost.
00:00:47.366 --> 00:00:50.550
But with another judge, that could change.
00:00:50.550 --> 00:00:52.392
That's where the contest is.
00:00:52.392 --> 00:00:55.864
That's where the Republican party
platform tells us to look
00:00:55.864 --> 00:00:59.060
at how they want judges to rule,
00:00:59.060 --> 00:01:02.095
to reverse Roe, to reverse
the Obamacare cases,
00:01:02.095 --> 00:01:04.861
and to reverse Obergefell
and take away gay marriage.
00:01:04.861 --> 00:01:08.782
That is their stated objective and plan…
00:01:08.782 --> 00:01:11.435
why not take them at their word?
00:01:11.435 --> 00:01:15.249
But there's another
piece of it. And that is…
00:01:15.249 --> 00:01:18.584
not what's ahead of us,
but what's behind us.
00:01:18.584 --> 00:01:26.084
And what's behind us is now 80 cases,
Mr Chairman, 80… cases.
00:01:26.084 --> 00:01:27.983
Under Chief Justice Roberts
00:01:27.983 --> 00:01:29.654
that have these characteristics:
00:01:29.654 --> 00:01:34.840
One, they were decided
5 to 4, by a bare majority.
00:01:34.840 --> 00:01:40.533
Two, the 5 to 4 majority was… partisan…
00:01:40.533 --> 00:01:44.808
in the sense that not one Democrat—
Democratic appointee joined the 5.
00:01:44.808 --> 00:01:46.961
I refer to that group
as the “Roberts Five”.
00:01:46.961 --> 00:01:51.119
It changes a little bit, as… with
Justice Scalia's death, for instance.
00:01:51.119 --> 00:01:53.656
But there's been a steady Roberts Five
00:01:53.656 --> 00:01:58.172
that has delivered now
80 of these decisions…
00:01:58.172 --> 00:02:00.099
And the last characteristic
of them is that
00:02:00.099 --> 00:02:04.938
there is an identifiable Republican
donor interest in those cases
00:02:04.938 --> 00:02:08.894
and in every single case,
that donor interest won.
00:02:08.894 --> 00:02:14.837
it was an 80 to 0, 5 to 4 partisan… rout.
00:02:14.837 --> 00:02:17.709
Ransacking.
00:02:17.709 --> 00:02:20.850
And it's important to look at
where those cases went
00:02:20.850 --> 00:02:24.298
because they're not
about big, public issues
00:02:24.298 --> 00:02:26.477
like getting rid of
the Affordable Care Act,
00:02:26.477 --> 00:02:32.481
undoing Roe vs. Wade, and
undoing… same-sex marriage.
00:02:32.481 --> 00:02:34.161
They're about power.
00:02:34.161 --> 00:02:38.981
And if you look at those 80
decisions, they fall into 4 categories…
00:02:38.981 --> 00:02:41.159
over and over and over again.
00:02:41.159 --> 00:02:48.048
One… unlimited and dark money in politics.
00:02:48.048 --> 00:02:51.996
Citizens United is the famous one,
but it's continued since with McCutchen
00:02:51.996 --> 00:02:54.140
and we've got one coming up now.
00:02:54.140 --> 00:02:58.290
Always the 5 for unlimited
money in politics,
00:02:58.290 --> 00:03:01.020
never protecting against
dark money in politics
00:03:01.020 --> 00:03:04.584
despite the fact that they said
it was gonna be transparent.
00:03:04.584 --> 00:03:06.070
And who wins?
00:03:06.070 --> 00:03:08.404
When you allow unlimited
dark money in politics?
00:03:08.404 --> 00:03:10.256
A very small group.
00:03:10.256 --> 00:03:12.460
The ones who have unlimited money to spend
00:03:12.460 --> 00:03:14.475
and a motive to spend it in politics.
00:03:14.475 --> 00:03:16.420
They win, everybody else loses.
00:03:16.420 --> 00:03:19.578
And if you were looking… at
who might be behind this,
00:03:19.578 --> 00:03:20.378
[points at card loudly]
00:03:20.378 --> 00:03:25.643
let's talk about the people with unlimited
money to spend and a motive to do it.
00:03:25.643 --> 00:03:28.200
We'll see how that goes.
00:03:28.200 --> 00:03:32.086
Next, knock the civil jury down.
00:03:32.086 --> 00:03:33.633
Whittle it down to a nub.
00:03:33.633 --> 00:03:37.295
The civil jury was in the
Constitution, in the Bill of Rights,
00:03:37.295 --> 00:03:40.744
in our darn Declaration of Independence.
00:03:40.744 --> 00:03:44.079
But it's annoying to big corporate powers.
00:03:44.079 --> 00:03:48.035
Because you can swagger your way
as a big corporate power through Congress.
00:03:48.035 --> 00:03:51.739
You can go and tell the President
you put money into to elect what to do.
00:03:51.739 --> 00:03:53.932
He'll put your stooges at the EPA.
00:03:53.932 --> 00:03:56.187
It's aaaaaall great.
00:03:56.187 --> 00:03:59.450
Until you get to the civil jury.
00:03:59.450 --> 00:04:02.995
Because they have an obligation,
as you know, Judge Barrett,
00:04:02.995 --> 00:04:04.588
they have an obligation under the law
00:04:04.588 --> 00:04:07.442
to be fair to both parties
irrespective of their size.
00:04:07.442 --> 00:04:09.489
You can't bribe them—
you're not allowed to.
00:04:09.489 --> 00:04:12.645
It's a crime to tamper with the jury.
00:04:12.645 --> 00:04:15.309
It's standard practice to
tamper with Congress.
00:04:18.697 --> 00:04:21.571
And they make decisions based on the law.
00:04:21.571 --> 00:04:23.798
If you're used to being the boss,
00:04:23.798 --> 00:04:26.248
and swaggering your way
around the political side
00:04:26.248 --> 00:04:28.393
you don't wanna be
answerable before a jury.
00:04:28.393 --> 00:04:33.428
And so one after another, these 80
5 to 4 decisions have knocked down,
00:04:33.428 --> 00:04:35.417
whittled away, at the civil jury,
00:04:35.417 --> 00:04:37.415
a great American institution.
00:04:38.322 --> 00:04:39.530
Third.
00:04:39.530 --> 00:04:41.797
First was unlimited dark money.
00:04:41.797 --> 00:04:45.347
Second was, demean
and diminish the civil jury.
00:04:45.347 --> 00:04:50.058
Third is, weaken regulatory agencies.
00:04:50.297 --> 00:04:53.229
A lot of this money, I'm
convinced, is polluter money.
00:04:55.149 --> 00:04:57.414
The coke industries is a polluter.
00:04:57.893 --> 00:05:00.328
The fossil fuels industry is a polluter.
00:05:00.644 --> 00:05:03.478
Who else would be putting
buckets of money into this
00:05:03.478 --> 00:05:05.804
and wanting to hide who
they are behind Donors Trust
00:05:05.804 --> 00:05:08.541
or other… schemes.
00:05:10.691 --> 00:05:12.189
And what if— If you're a big polluter
00:05:12.189 --> 00:05:13.328
what do you want?
00:05:13.328 --> 00:05:15.439
You want weak regulatory agencies.
00:05:15.439 --> 00:05:18.880
You want ones that you can
box up and run over to Congress.
00:05:18.891 --> 00:05:21.994
and get your friends to fix things for you in Congress.
00:05:21.994 --> 00:05:24.938
Over and over and over again,
00:05:24.938 --> 00:05:27.911
these decisions are
targeted at regulatory agencies
00:05:27.911 --> 00:05:31.881
to weaken their independence
and weaken their strength.
00:05:31.881 --> 00:05:32.915
And if you're a big polluter
00:05:32.915 --> 00:05:37.288
then weak regulatory agencies
is your idea of a good day.
00:05:37.736 --> 00:05:40.027
And the last thing is in politics.
00:05:40.607 --> 00:05:41.509
In voting.
00:05:42.447 --> 00:05:46.068
Why on earth… the Court made the decision
00:05:46.068 --> 00:05:48.295
—a factual decision.
00:05:48.295 --> 00:05:50.922
Not something appellate courts
ordinarily are supposed to make,
00:05:50.922 --> 00:05:53.946
as I understand it, Judge Barrett—
00:05:53.946 --> 00:05:57.862
the factual decision that
nobody needed to worry about
00:05:57.862 --> 00:05:59.954
minority voters in preclearance states
00:05:59.954 --> 00:06:01.350
being discriminated against
00:06:01.350 --> 00:06:04.482
or that legislators would try
to knock back their ability to vote.
00:06:05.262 --> 00:06:08.794
These five… made that
finding in Shelby County
00:06:09.204 --> 00:06:13.543
Against bipartisan legislation
from both houses of Congress
00:06:13.543 --> 00:06:16.993
hugely past, on no factual record.
00:06:16.993 --> 00:06:20.925
They just decided that that
was a problem that was over.
00:06:21.575 --> 00:06:24.153
On no record, with no basis,
00:06:24.153 --> 00:06:29.996
Because it got them to
the result… that we then saw.
00:06:29.996 --> 00:06:32.780
What followed. State
after state after state
00:06:32.780 --> 00:06:35.120
passed voter suppression laws.
00:06:35.120 --> 00:06:37.735
One, so badly targeting African-Americans
00:06:37.735 --> 00:06:41.386
that 2 courts that it was surgically…
00:06:41.386 --> 00:06:45.429
surgically tailored to get
after minority voters.
00:06:45.849 --> 00:06:46.978
And gerrymandering.
00:06:46.978 --> 00:06:49.165
The other great… control.
00:06:49.165 --> 00:06:51.937
Bulk gerrymandering,
when you go into a state,
00:06:51.937 --> 00:06:56.072
like the REDMAP project
in Ohio and Pennsylvania
00:06:56.072 --> 00:07:00.364
and you pack Democrats
so tightly into a few districts
00:07:00.364 --> 00:07:03.361
that all the others become
Republican majority districts.
00:07:03.361 --> 00:07:04.271
And in those states,
00:07:04.271 --> 00:07:07.054
you send a delegation to Congress
00:07:07.054 --> 00:07:10.350
that has a huge majority
of Republican members
00:07:10.350 --> 00:07:13.533
like 13 to 5, as I recall
00:07:13.533 --> 00:07:19.448
in a state where the 5, the party of the 5
actually won the popular vote.
00:07:21.704 --> 00:07:23.773
You’ve sent a delegation to Congress
00:07:23.773 --> 00:07:29.111
that is out of step with the
popular vote of that state, and…
00:07:29.111 --> 00:07:31.544
court after court figured
out how to solve that
00:07:31.544 --> 00:07:33.165
and the Supreme Court said, “Nope.”
00:07:33.165 --> 00:07:36.913
5 to 4 again. “Nope. We’re not going
to take an interest in that question.”
00:07:37.497 --> 00:07:42.208
In all these areas where it’s about
political power for big special interests,
00:07:42.208 --> 00:07:44.222
and people want to fund campaigns,
00:07:44.222 --> 00:07:46.089
and people want to get
their way through politics
00:07:46.089 --> 00:07:47.713
without actually showing up
00:07:47.713 --> 00:07:50.184
doing it behind Donors
Trust and other groups,
00:07:50.184 --> 00:07:52.151
doing it through these schemes …
00:07:53.501 --> 00:07:56.669
over and over and over again…
00:07:56.669 --> 00:07:58.062
you see the same thing.
00:07:58.062 --> 00:08:00.354
80 decisions, Judge Barrett.
00:08:00.735 --> 00:08:01.811
80 decisions.
00:08:01.811 --> 00:08:03.563
An 80 to 0 sweep.
00:08:03.563 --> 00:08:05.750
I don’t— I don’t think you’ve tried cases
00:08:05.750 --> 00:08:07.428
but some cases…
00:08:08.968 --> 00:08:11.202
the issue is bias and discrimination.
00:08:11.202 --> 00:08:14.601
And if you’re making a
bias case, as a trial lawyer
00:08:14.601 --> 00:08:16.660
—Lindsey Graham is a
hell of a good trial lawyer—
00:08:16.660 --> 00:08:19.077
if he wanted to make a biased case
00:08:19.077 --> 00:08:21.848
—Dick Durbin’s a hell
of a good trial lawyer—
00:08:21.848 --> 00:08:23.469
if they wanted to make a bias case,
00:08:23.469 --> 00:08:26.212
and they could show and 80 to 0 pattern…
00:08:27.903 --> 00:08:29.198
A, that’s admissible,
00:08:29.198 --> 00:08:32.556
and B, I’d love to make
that argument to the jury.
00:08:32.556 --> 00:08:34.508
I’d be really hard-pressed
to be the lawyer saying
00:08:34.508 --> 00:08:36.937
“No. 80 to 0’s just a bunch of flukes.”
00:08:37.469 --> 00:08:40.614
All 5–4, all partisan, all this way.
00:08:42.373 --> 00:08:46.091
So… something is not right
00:08:46.091 --> 00:08:47.592
around the court.
00:08:48.772 --> 00:08:51.564
And dark money has a lot to do with it.
00:08:51.564 --> 00:08:54.516
Special interests
have a lot to do with it.
00:08:54.516 --> 00:08:57.640
Donors Trust and whoever’s
hiding behind Donors Trust
00:08:57.640 --> 00:08:59.550
has a lot to do with it.
00:08:59.550 --> 00:09:01.177
And the Bradley Foundation
00:09:01.177 --> 00:09:05.493
orchestrating it’s amici over at the court
00:09:05.493 --> 00:09:08.328
has a lot to do with it.