WEBVTT

00:00:00.760 --> 00:00:03.816
So you probably have the sense,
as most people do,

00:00:03.840 --> 00:00:07.496
that polarization
is getting worse in our country,

00:00:07.520 --> 00:00:10.976
that the divide
between the left and the right

00:00:11.000 --> 00:00:14.536
is as bad as it's been
in really any of our lifetimes.

00:00:14.560 --> 00:00:19.840
But you might also reasonably wonder
if research backs up your intuition.

00:00:20.560 --> 00:00:25.240
And in a nutshell,
the answer is sadly yes.

00:00:26.920 --> 00:00:28.936
In study after study, we find

00:00:28.960 --> 00:00:32.640
that liberals and conservatives
have grown further apart.

00:00:33.440 --> 00:00:38.216
They increasingly wall themselves off
in these ideological silos,

00:00:38.240 --> 00:00:42.376
consuming different news,
talking only to like-minded others

00:00:42.400 --> 00:00:45.640
and more and more choosing
to live in different parts of the country.

NOTE Paragraph

00:00:46.720 --> 00:00:49.936
And I think that
most alarming of all of it

00:00:49.960 --> 00:00:53.760
is seeing this rising
animosity on both sides.

00:00:54.440 --> 00:00:56.096
Liberals and conservatives,

00:00:56.120 --> 00:00:58.016
Democrats and Republicans,

00:00:58.040 --> 00:01:01.160
more and more they just
don't like one another.

00:01:02.320 --> 00:01:04.336
You see it in many different ways.

00:01:04.360 --> 00:01:08.016
They don't want to befriend one another.
They don't want to date one another.

00:01:08.040 --> 00:01:11.336
If they do, if they find out,
they find each other less attractive,

00:01:11.360 --> 00:01:14.456
and they more and more don't want
their children to marry someone

00:01:14.480 --> 00:01:16.176
who supports the other party,

00:01:16.200 --> 00:01:17.960
a particularly shocking statistic.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:19.640 --> 00:01:22.456
You know, in my lab,
the students that I work with,

00:01:22.480 --> 00:01:25.936
we're talking about
some sort of social pattern --

00:01:25.960 --> 00:01:29.496
I'm a movie buff, and so I'm often like,

00:01:29.520 --> 00:01:32.480
what kind of movie are we in here
with this pattern?

00:01:33.080 --> 00:01:36.360
So what kind of movie are we in
with political polarization?

00:01:37.080 --> 00:01:39.800
Well, it could be a disaster movie.

00:01:40.880 --> 00:01:42.560
It certainly seems like a disaster.

00:01:42.920 --> 00:01:44.920
Could be a war movie.

00:01:45.640 --> 00:01:46.840
Also fits.

00:01:47.480 --> 00:01:51.296
But what I keep thinking is that
we're in a zombie apocalypse movie.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:51.320 --> 00:01:52.776
(Laughter)

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:52.800 --> 00:01:55.096
Right? You know the kind.

00:01:55.120 --> 00:01:57.536
There's people wandering around in packs,

00:01:57.560 --> 00:01:59.336
not thinking for themselves,

00:01:59.360 --> 00:02:00.976
seized by this mob mentality

00:02:01.000 --> 00:02:04.240
trying to spread their disease
and destroy society.

00:02:05.480 --> 00:02:07.816
And you probably think, as I do,

00:02:07.840 --> 00:02:11.296
that you're the good guy
in the zombie apocalypse movie,

00:02:11.320 --> 00:02:15.016
and all this hate and polarization,
it's being propagated by the other people,

00:02:15.040 --> 00:02:16.920
because we're Brad Pitt, right?

00:02:17.760 --> 00:02:20.656
Free-thinking, righteous,

00:02:20.680 --> 00:02:22.976
just trying to hold on
to what we hold dear,

00:02:23.000 --> 00:02:26.576
you know, not foot soldiers
in the army of the undead.

00:02:26.600 --> 00:02:28.056
Not that.

00:02:28.080 --> 00:02:29.280
Never that.

NOTE Paragraph

00:02:30.080 --> 00:02:31.576
But here's the thing:

00:02:31.600 --> 00:02:34.320
what movie do you suppose
they think they're in?

00:02:35.480 --> 00:02:36.696
Right?

00:02:36.720 --> 00:02:39.256
Well, they absolutely think
that they're the good guys

00:02:39.280 --> 00:02:41.136
in the zombie apocalypse movie. Right?

00:02:41.160 --> 00:02:44.136
And you'd better believe
that they think that they're Brad Pitt

00:02:44.160 --> 00:02:46.280
and that we, we are the zombies.

00:02:49.120 --> 00:02:51.480
And who's to say that they're wrong?

00:02:52.440 --> 00:02:55.560
I think that the truth is
that we're all a part of this.

00:02:56.240 --> 00:02:59.400
And the good side of that
is that we can be a part of the solution.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:00.280 --> 00:03:02.280
So what are we going to do?

00:03:03.320 --> 00:03:07.576
What can we do to chip away
at polarization in everyday life?

00:03:07.600 --> 00:03:11.416
What could we do to connect with
and communicate with

00:03:11.440 --> 00:03:13.160
our political counterparts?

00:03:13.720 --> 00:03:17.856
Well, these were exactly the questions
that I and my colleague, Matt Feinberg,

00:03:17.880 --> 00:03:19.738
became fascinated with a few years ago,

00:03:19.762 --> 00:03:21.962
and we started
doing research on this topic.

00:03:22.920 --> 00:03:25.896
And one of the first things
that we discovered

00:03:25.920 --> 00:03:29.376
that I think is really helpful
for understanding polarization

00:03:29.400 --> 00:03:30.616
is to understand

00:03:30.640 --> 00:03:35.056
that the political divide in our country
is undergirded by a deeper moral divide.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:35.080 --> 00:03:39.856
So one of the most robust findings
in the history of political psychology

00:03:39.880 --> 00:03:43.576
is this pattern identified
by Jon Haidt and Jesse Graham,

00:03:43.600 --> 00:03:44.816
psychologists,

00:03:44.840 --> 00:03:48.856
that liberals and conservatives
tend to endorse different values

00:03:48.880 --> 00:03:50.080
to different degrees.

00:03:50.600 --> 00:03:56.096
So for example, we find that liberals
tend to endorse values like equality

00:03:56.120 --> 00:03:59.776
and fairness and care
and protection from harm

00:03:59.800 --> 00:04:01.936
more than conservatives do.

00:04:01.960 --> 00:04:07.216
And conservatives tend to endorse
values like loyalty, patriotism,

00:04:07.240 --> 00:04:10.696
respect for authority and moral purity

00:04:10.720 --> 00:04:12.800
more than liberals do.

00:04:13.920 --> 00:04:17.976
And Matt and I were thinking
that maybe this moral divide

00:04:18.000 --> 00:04:21.096
might be helpful
for understanding how it is

00:04:21.120 --> 00:04:23.536
that liberals and conservatives
talk to one another

00:04:23.560 --> 00:04:25.976
and why they so often
seem to talk past one another

00:04:26.000 --> 00:04:27.216
when they do.

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:27.240 --> 00:04:29.216
So we conducted a study

00:04:29.240 --> 00:04:32.336
where we recruited liberals to a study

00:04:32.360 --> 00:04:34.816
where they were supposed
to write a persuasive essay

00:04:34.840 --> 00:04:39.280
that would be compelling to a conservative
in support of same-sex marriage.

00:04:39.800 --> 00:04:43.056
And what we found was that liberals
tended to make arguments

00:04:43.080 --> 00:04:47.256
in terms of the liberal moral values
of equality and fairness.

00:04:47.280 --> 00:04:49.016
So they said things like,

00:04:49.040 --> 00:04:52.416
"Everyone should have the right
to love whoever they choose,"

00:04:52.440 --> 00:04:55.016
and, "They" -- they being gay Americans --

00:04:55.040 --> 00:04:57.800
"deserve the same equal rights
as other Americans."

00:04:58.360 --> 00:05:01.576
Overall, we found
that 69 percent of liberals

00:05:01.600 --> 00:05:07.016
invoked one of the more liberal
moral values in constructing their essay,

00:05:07.040 --> 00:05:10.736
and only nine percent invoked
one of the more conservative moral values,

00:05:10.760 --> 00:05:14.176
even though they were supposed
to be trying to persuade conservatives.

00:05:14.200 --> 00:05:18.496
And when we studied conservatives
and had them make persuasive arguments

00:05:18.520 --> 00:05:21.416
in support of making English
the official language of the US,

00:05:21.440 --> 00:05:23.976
a classically conservative
political position,

00:05:24.000 --> 00:05:26.216
we found that they weren't
much better at this.

00:05:26.240 --> 00:05:27.856
59 percent of them made arguments

00:05:27.880 --> 00:05:30.576
in terms of one of the more
conservative moral values,

00:05:30.600 --> 00:05:33.096
and just eight percent
invoked a liberal moral value,

00:05:33.120 --> 00:05:36.480
even though they were supposed
to be targeting liberals for persuasion.

NOTE Paragraph

00:05:37.480 --> 00:05:41.520
Now, you can see right away
why we're in trouble here. Right?

00:05:42.280 --> 00:05:45.776
People's moral values,
they're their most deeply held beliefs.

00:05:45.800 --> 00:05:49.200
People are willing
to fight and die for their values.

00:05:49.720 --> 00:05:52.416
Why are they going to give that up
just to agree with you

00:05:52.440 --> 00:05:55.976
on something that they don't particularly
want to agree with you on anyway?

00:05:56.000 --> 00:05:59.256
If that persuasive appeal that
you're making to your Republican uncle

00:05:59.280 --> 00:06:01.696
means that he doesn't
just have to change his view,

00:06:01.720 --> 00:06:03.886
he's got to change
his underlying values, too,

00:06:03.910 --> 00:06:05.470
that's not going to go very far.

NOTE Paragraph

00:06:06.080 --> 00:06:07.400
So what would work better?

00:06:08.200 --> 00:06:12.496
Well, we believe it's a technique
that we call moral reframing,

00:06:12.520 --> 00:06:15.136
and we've studied it
in a series of experiments.

00:06:15.160 --> 00:06:16.656
In one of these experiments,

00:06:16.680 --> 00:06:19.816
we recruited liberals
and conservatives to a study

00:06:19.840 --> 00:06:22.136
where they read one of three essays

00:06:22.160 --> 00:06:25.200
before having their environmental
attitudes surveyed.

00:06:25.640 --> 00:06:27.136
And the first of these essays

00:06:27.160 --> 00:06:30.536
was a relatively conventional
pro-environmental essay

00:06:30.560 --> 00:06:34.576
that invoked the liberal values
of care and protection from harm.

00:06:34.600 --> 00:06:37.136
It said things like,
"In many important ways

00:06:37.160 --> 00:06:39.976
we are causing real harm
to the places we live in,"

00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:42.816
and, "It is essential
that we take steps now

00:06:42.840 --> 00:06:45.760
to prevent further destruction
from being done to our Earth."

00:06:47.120 --> 00:06:48.536
Another group of participants

00:06:48.560 --> 00:06:50.776
were assigned to read
a really different essay

00:06:50.800 --> 00:06:55.240
that was designed to tap into
the conservative value of moral purity.

00:06:56.190 --> 00:06:58.176
It was a pro-environmental essay as well,

00:06:58.200 --> 00:06:59.696
and it said things like,

00:06:59.720 --> 00:07:03.960
"Keeping our forests, drinking water,
and skies pure is of vital importance."

00:07:05.000 --> 00:07:06.496
"We should regard the pollution

00:07:06.520 --> 00:07:08.560
of the places we live in
to be disgusting."

00:07:09.160 --> 00:07:11.256
And, "Reducing pollution
can help us preserve

00:07:11.280 --> 00:07:14.440
what is pure and beautiful
about the places we live."

00:07:15.880 --> 00:07:17.296
And then we had a third group

00:07:17.320 --> 00:07:19.816
that were assigned
to read just a nonpolitical essay.

00:07:19.840 --> 00:07:22.576
It was just a comparison group
so we could get a baseline.

NOTE Paragraph

00:07:22.600 --> 00:07:24.553
And what we found when we surveyed people

00:07:24.577 --> 00:07:26.776
about their environmental
attitudes afterwards,

00:07:26.800 --> 00:07:29.736
we found that liberals,
it didn't matter what essay they read.

00:07:29.760 --> 00:07:32.856
They tended to have highly
pro-environmental attitudes regardless.

00:07:32.880 --> 00:07:35.296
Liberals are on board
for environmental protection.

00:07:35.320 --> 00:07:36.536
Conservatives, however,

00:07:36.560 --> 00:07:40.976
were significantly more supportive
of progressive environmental policies

00:07:41.000 --> 00:07:42.536
and environmental protection

00:07:42.560 --> 00:07:44.616
if they had read the moral purity essay

00:07:44.640 --> 00:07:47.040
than if they read
one of the other two essays.

00:07:48.160 --> 00:07:51.256
We even found that conservatives
who read the moral purity essay

00:07:51.280 --> 00:07:54.776
were significantly more likely to say
that they believed in global warming

00:07:54.800 --> 00:07:56.705
and were concerned about global warming,

00:07:56.729 --> 00:07:59.456
even though this essay
didn't even mention global warming.

00:07:59.480 --> 00:08:01.936
That's just a related environmental issue.

00:08:01.960 --> 00:08:05.040
But that's how robust
this moral reframing effect was.

NOTE Paragraph

00:08:05.960 --> 00:08:09.696
And we've studied this on a whole slew
of different political issues.

00:08:09.720 --> 00:08:13.456
So if you want to move conservatives

00:08:13.480 --> 00:08:16.576
on issues like same-sex marriage
or national health insurance,

00:08:16.600 --> 00:08:20.056
it helps to tie these liberal
political issues to conservative values

00:08:20.080 --> 00:08:22.880
like patriotism and moral purity.

00:08:23.800 --> 00:08:25.896
And we studied it the other way, too.

00:08:25.920 --> 00:08:29.736
If you want to move liberals
to the right on conservative policy issues

00:08:29.760 --> 00:08:34.376
like military spending and making English
the official language of the US,

00:08:34.400 --> 00:08:36.056
you're going to be more persuasive

00:08:36.080 --> 00:08:39.416
if you tie those conservative
policy issues to liberal moral values

00:08:39.440 --> 00:08:41.320
like equality and fairness.

NOTE Paragraph

00:08:42.640 --> 00:08:45.496
All these studies
have the same clear message:

00:08:45.520 --> 00:08:48.456
if you want to persuade
someone on some policy,

00:08:48.480 --> 00:08:52.320
it's helpful to connect that policy
to their underlying moral values.

00:08:53.520 --> 00:08:55.696
And when you say it like that

00:08:55.720 --> 00:08:57.216
it seems really obvious. Right?

00:08:57.240 --> 00:08:59.016
Like, why did we come here tonight?

00:08:59.040 --> 00:09:00.256
Why --

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:00.280 --> 00:09:01.816
(Laughter)

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:01.840 --> 00:09:03.880
It's incredibly intuitive.

00:09:05.400 --> 00:09:08.696
And even though it is,
it's something we really struggle to do.

00:09:08.720 --> 00:09:12.576
You know, it turns out that when we go
to persuade somebody on a political issue,

00:09:12.600 --> 00:09:15.336
we talk like we're speaking into a mirror.

00:09:15.360 --> 00:09:19.736
We don't persuade so much
as we rehearse our own reasons

00:09:19.760 --> 00:09:22.640
for why we believe
some sort of political position.

00:09:23.400 --> 00:09:27.816
We kept saying when we were designing
these reframed moral arguments,

00:09:27.840 --> 00:09:30.480
"Empathy and respect,
empathy and respect."

00:09:31.040 --> 00:09:32.496
If you can tap into that,

00:09:32.520 --> 00:09:34.176
you can connect

00:09:34.200 --> 00:09:37.000
and you might be able to persuade
somebody in this country.

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:37.560 --> 00:09:39.976
So thinking again

00:09:40.000 --> 00:09:42.280
about what movie we're in,

00:09:43.200 --> 00:09:44.776
maybe I got carried away before.

00:09:44.800 --> 00:09:46.760
Maybe it's not a zombie apocalypse movie.

00:09:47.520 --> 00:09:49.440
Maybe instead it's a buddy cop movie.

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:50.040 --> 00:09:52.056
(Laughter)

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:52.080 --> 00:09:54.096
Just roll with it, just go with it please.

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:54.120 --> 00:09:55.560
(Laughter)

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:56.480 --> 00:09:59.176
You know the kind:
there's a white cop and a black cop,

00:09:59.200 --> 00:10:01.336
or maybe a messy cop and an organized cop.

00:10:01.360 --> 00:10:03.416
Whatever it is, they don't get along

00:10:03.440 --> 00:10:04.726
because of this difference.

00:10:05.520 --> 00:10:08.736
But in the end, when they have
to come together and they cooperate,

00:10:08.760 --> 00:10:10.696
the solidarity that they feel,

00:10:10.720 --> 00:10:14.360
it's greater because of that gulf
that they had to cross. Right?

00:10:15.280 --> 00:10:17.256
And remember that in these movies,

00:10:17.280 --> 00:10:20.176
it's usually worst in the second act

00:10:20.200 --> 00:10:22.600
when our leads are further apart
than ever before.

00:10:23.440 --> 00:10:25.776
And so maybe that's
where we are in this country,

00:10:25.800 --> 00:10:27.976
late in the second act
of a buddy cop movie --

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:28.000 --> 00:10:30.576
(Laughter)

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:30.600 --> 00:10:33.680
torn apart but about
to come back together.

00:10:35.400 --> 00:10:37.056
It sounds good,

00:10:37.080 --> 00:10:38.936
but if we want it to happen,

00:10:38.960 --> 00:10:41.680
I think the responsibility
is going to start with us.

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:42.520 --> 00:10:44.680
So this is my call to you:

00:10:45.480 --> 00:10:47.480
let's put this country back together.

00:10:49.080 --> 00:10:52.136
Let's do it despite the politicians

00:10:52.160 --> 00:10:55.016
and the media and Facebook and Twitter

00:10:55.040 --> 00:10:56.576
and Congressional redistricting

00:10:56.600 --> 00:10:59.320
and all of it,
all the things that divide us.

00:11:00.360 --> 00:11:02.600
Let's do it because it's right.

00:11:03.920 --> 00:11:08.336
And let's do it
because this hate and contempt

00:11:08.360 --> 00:11:10.520
that flows through all of us every day

00:11:11.400 --> 00:11:14.576
makes us ugly and it corrupts us,

00:11:14.600 --> 00:11:17.920
and it threatens
the very fabric of our society.

00:11:19.960 --> 00:11:22.616
We owe it to one another and our country

00:11:22.640 --> 00:11:24.800
to reach out and try to connect.

00:11:26.000 --> 00:11:29.160
We can't afford to hate them any longer,

00:11:30.200 --> 00:11:32.400
and we can't afford
to let them hate us either.

00:11:33.880 --> 00:11:35.240
Empathy and respect.

00:11:35.880 --> 00:11:37.120
Empathy and respect.

00:11:37.920 --> 00:11:41.720
If you think about it, it's the very least
that we owe our fellow citizens.

NOTE Paragraph

00:11:42.400 --> 00:11:43.616
Thank you.

NOTE Paragraph

00:11:43.640 --> 00:11:48.325
(Applause)