Over the next hour and a half according to Can you hear me? Does it sound good to me? Yes, ok Good morning everyone, it is a pleasure to be here and see the seating full of young promises. Do not? Which is what you sure are all you Into the AENOR i am not response of TIC the response of the TIC are several people, I currently market intellectual property of the rules that we will now see that they are I’ve been in AENOR for 16 years, the first 10 year dedicated to in international normalization traveling all the weeks to Brussels, to Geneva and rest of the world, 5 years ago as i told you to try that companies and universities like in which we today understand what the importance of standards is and in my case and in the case of Alicia Guerrero that accompanies me therefore that you buy them said clearly Alicia Guerrero that I have not presented is the equivalent of an account manager of certain clients including this university. Telling experts say that the presentations should begin with an index but of course an index of AENOR would What are the rules?, Where are they made? What this AENOR? etc, etc Really horrible even myself and I say it myself would be bored to start with an index So I'm going to change it and I'm going to start with what I think it should be that is what the objectives are Today's Goals, i will give many laps, I will tell examples we will all talk, Is that from here you come out knowing that it is a rule where it is done, what it serves, what apply etc etc. what is that? This gentleman has rules even in the ears I have never normalized For there will be precious metal standards specifying the composition the characteristics that jewelry should have the headlights of motorcycles well here look where they even look at the chairs in which they are sitting are standardized are special chairs of educational centers, specifically one of the types is for universities the helmets, we begin to see a concept the rules are not laws norms do not sanction, help they say the characteristics that must have the helmet this gentleman does not wear it on his head he carries it on the wrong arm, but the rule does not say "Wear the helmet on your head" the technical rule says that it has to be composed that resistance has to endure before a possible impact what tests you have to do in the laboratory and how long you must endure so that it does not break but does not say that you have to carry it in the head for that is the law, the same goes with the gas emissions the rules say how they are measured but not what values have to have that is the law the same noise that particular norm that you see here the 74516 is the norm of the noise meters and says how they should be and that they have to measure but they do not say how many db of maximum or as maximum can emit a motorcycle and so on, imagine the tires that did not exist the measurements of the tires I can make a great car, come to the conclusion that the wheels want a tire of 18.5 p, you'll see that it does not exist or it's 18p or 19p because you studied there 18.5p is the best Then rules are everywhere we have put here a simple drawing there are rules even trout, there is a fish market and there are rules of trout there are obviously rules of cement on the composition of cement how much chemical composition must have senior residences how to manage facilities, playgrounds toys safety standards can not be sold any toy has to meet certain safety standards sewers I mean we are not going to roll because we look where we look at the lights from up here everything has regulations And now I ask, not to mention I only have those who dare with what we have already seen What do you think might be the most relevant rule in the world? If no I point out eh, You look at any one, i will not give 20 euros to anyone who guesses I don't know air quality Air quality for example if it is a standard that exists for example in hospitals is very important "How to make rules" how to make rules are guidelines guides yes sir there are even some specials for how to make rules for SMEs given that you know that SMEs can not usually participate in the development of standards they have to be taken into account eh sorry there are education standards i'm asking for the most important I'm not saying that these are not more it's very easy, what standard to say what product to apply to everything really that is one of the reasons why we do standards is actually to make everything equal that is to say that I can buy in China and serve me I buy a computer in China and of course if in China they have invented some connectors because I bring it to Spain and is that here we do not have it I can not connect my computer to the screen because it is a connector that have invented the Chinese not true use the same connector either the usb now 3.1 or the corresponding or the hdmi because it is normalized and I am giving them the clue, is not so difficult Does anyone dare? Which is the most important norm I have invented it It's not that it's the most important How does that computer come from China here? Comes flying Come on have the clue is not so difficult this is the most important norm you imagine the number of containers that circulate would say daily the second for this world, absolutely everything travels in those containers and these containers are standardized with an ISO standard good are several and there are not a single type of containers obviously there are 20 feet of 40 feet that equals 6 m 12 m agree or I have invented it note the importance of the rules if the container was not standardized we could not put it in boats that you know have standard measures are all next to each other then when I release it to the train wagon and if I put it in a truck is a truck also standardized that is a norm that specifies the dimensions of these containers you say that they are informatics that has this to do with me more examples who have not heard of the din A4 sure that they still hear about it or not well, the din A4 that famous is an UNE-EN ISO norm that happens that originally comes from Germany, Bin proposed it to ISO, made the norm in 2002 and good all formats not only the A4 that we would do if we did not have an A4 because we could not design printers or portfolios nor absolutely nothing that has to do with a standard paper, at Better to me I like the folio but of course if the folders or the printers are designed for a standardized paper of a specific measures because I that folio as I do not use it to paint monkeys I do not know what I will do more modern the cards who does not use the cards either to withdraw money in the bank the carnet of identity etc etc but we have normalized the external contacts we can not use any of the interfaces or devices readers of all this type of cards these are standards concretely this i give you clues more or less know what a standard is not law are characteristics of operation etc Sometimes it costs a lot to normalize who does not remember the mobile phone charger had 500 I spent not so many and finally got normalized I take your time what happens that now life especially in software is very fast in 2011 we Gets an internationally recognized standard that is the connector that you all know are standardized and I dare say that thanks to that standard To which gathered a lot of companies in a committee and they agreed we can now use a connector for all mobile tablets etc i have put a data that the sale of chargers already equals the sale of the mobiles more questions: everything everything can be normalized? My answer is no but what you just said About the chargers for example Apple has a different charger Or for example Oneplus Is not normalized, there are still things that are not normalized I ask, wouldn't it be better if they were? I do not know when I was younger of the age of you I think that more or less then we had the videos of magnetic tape and there were three systems I'm telling you stories I already look like the grandfather “Cebolleta” telling the stories not so long ago and came out to watch video movies at home rent a few magnetic tapes that had 3 systems vhs the beta and 2000 vhs was the first of worse quality than the beta that was the smallest and best tape Quality and then was the 2000 that was bigger of better quality and over was reversible they did not agree there was no way to normalize as happens as your partner has just said, in the end who won the market curiously the market chose the most bad the vhs what happens that the digital era came in which you are Wrapped and all that seems like it was a long time ago but it was actually before yesterday what happens is that this goes very fast Is what I wanted to say is not always achieved normalize this is the great example of what is not standardized when we travel we have to carry the plug adapter to call it somehow because in every country in the world the pin is different the base that is as it is called the normative the rules unites this is called base and this pin I call it plug because I am think a person quite normal In Spain we have that UNE that specifies the dimensions that has the pin of ours that is the safest since we are here in Spain I do propaganda and promotion of our system that is the best you could not say you can not give Cramp said in the rough which in the US if you look if I have the finger in the middle can be stuck it is also true that the tension there is 125 and here is a little higher 230 then this is not normalized and we go there because not It normalizes It is usually easy to normalize what moves that is, traditionally normalizes products that are marketed and moved said to be understood, I manufacture in China and I bring it to Spain but of course a fixed installation as a dwelling or telecommunications as they are theirs because they are say that they do not travel the houses do not go on the boats say I open the slash in The house now not because now there is pladur I open the slash I put the cable I lay the bases and it is already those things that are called fixed installations are not standardized internationally but what I can buy in one place and sell in another if except an exception well then to summarize, that is a norm? We already have a technical specification that is voluntary care standards are not mandatory other things is that a legislation and that I was also interested to highlight it as the electrical regulation of low voltage refer to a standard UNE the standard for if it is voluntary no one obliges to apply it what happens is that the legislation may say this is mandatory imagine I'm going to invent a case that is not real that says is mandatory to wear the helmet and the helmet must meet certain standards the rule is voluntary but somehow the legislation is saying to me hears but that helmet can not be any one has to be the one that complies with the norm of AENOR and thus with many things of the 31500 norms that we have almost 5000 rules a little more are related to legislation but they are not legislation It costs a lot to make them all agree, but I'm interested in a technology and I'm interested in another the mobile chargers that your partner pointed out because Apple does not agree with the use of another connector if one day he gets to be because he is interested commercially there will be a single connector really and there has to be a single recognized body as is the case of AENOR to monitor in some way that is not making a standard that already exists that is not making a rule in Spain contradictory to another European or international and through which you can go to Geneva or Brussels for example to defend its technology, because in fact the most important of the regulations is what we call technology transfer as long as you can include in the standards ISO the technology of your companies before To expand internationally in that right now are experts Koreans and Chinese a few years ago Americans and Germans but the world has changed now those who are very active are the ones I have told you We could as I say an easy world without rules without regulation would not need to educate and will come opportunity is a little exaggerated this presentation and if the equipment is broken and I buy another, not the equipment must be manufactured according to a standard so that they do not break Must have a few operating characteristics and of course safety and this from here is what I have said would be lost if there was no standard just to apply directly you have a lot of textbooks that the professor who has written or the teacher or the expert if or if it used rules and most of the tables you find in textbooks are copies of rules those parameters, these values are all removed from the rules what I have to do I find out to tell you that it has copyright and that it can not be copied so I agree that I say it here because it is true the rules have the right From copyright for everything I have told you that it costs a lot of money to do them and you when you participate that some already do it know what it costs to do them Then here you are given some data because the rules favor the security that are related to your work I do not believe this very well this source MCafee through Tecnalia says that 1 out of every 5 employees of a company uses or lets their family use the internet with company computers 1 in 5 or know if they are more one Of every 10 confesses to have seen some content during the working hours of course 1 in 10 confesses to know how many there will actually be two thirds say they have very limited knowledge on security two thirds practically 3 thirds except you who are experts the others do not know anything I have put these examples precisely because of this because they are more related to their work and 5% say that they can see things that should not be within the company that they say no It is maybe 1% in your case maybe 100% because they know a lot the natural evolution of normalization and then we enter into the matter of what affects you directly what was said at the beginning were the products were normalized all this begins and the reality is so in wars whether we like it or not we must normalize the cannons and bullets because if I have a front to 5000 km of the factory has to get said in some way the ammunition that enters the canyon then that same is used for the circulation of goods and services I start to normalize services we have in AENOR the standard of discos because if you read the rule of discotecas you imagine what it says but there must be as many bottles of rum prepared the limited capacity of this form, a series of posters etc etc This is a voluntary norm but if that gives some recommendations of how should a functional disco then we are already in the operability and convergence of the TIC already begins to normalize the TIC and this is theirs and now curiously we are already in a phase in which we start to make standards of what people demand protection of the environment accessibility for all, not only the sidewalks are accessible so that the wheelchair does not have that technical barrier also the web pages are accessible you know, safety regulations citizen protection are also being done somehow they are becoming normative not of the product but normative of the sustainability of the economy and here I tell you already so that they are not anecdotally the reality is that we already have anti-bribery rules that is to say we have to live the times we live and you see the news and social networks like me and at the end ISO Because what he has done is because I'm talking about the world not only of Spain In the end, iso has made a rule that allows companies to establish procedures, to somehow prevent bribery that their employees do not accept bribes or said otherwise if they come to accept the responsible is not the owner or owner of the company or the board of directors because there are some established procedures that the guilty in some way you can prove that it is not my Company if not that man if you can skip all those protocols This drawing that we like all, the homo as they call it? The homo informaticus that we are all is the evolution of the human being and the standard already accompanies what is technological and economic development making product standards we have reached standards of sustainability good I do not understand very well but it is so the norm evolves with the same let's be human Before going to the rules that affect them the most I want them to see everything we have we have management system standards raw materials vocabularies, they all have vocabulary consumer products transport i+d+i that Spain is the leader AENOR is the one that has made curiously the standards of i+d+i that everyone is asking us seems to lie does not seem like good this because it has not done as well to said you before Korea or Japan or China no no not the rules that are the PUNE 166000 1 2 3 4 and 5 are from AENOR and have copied in Europe and are copying in ISOand we have asked the Chinese to copy and so many because they are rules of management that indicate or specify the procedures that a company must fulfill in order to be able to demonstrate that it has implemented an innovation system Information technology logistic tourism, tourism obviously that is easy right? That we are leaders if we are leaders in norms of tourism evidently we all want to leave Cancún and sites of these but of truth that like Spain there are none, You like who likes the best hotels the best beaches in the world are here it says someone who has traveled a lot I have been to many places and to me what I like most is Spain and not because it is Spanish is what I have seen good that normalizes in its scope that all this sounds to them, because this is normalizing and as we are not there we will normalize others such as the big data like cloud computing, the internet at thing cyber security, smart cities and for example we have highlighted the very important rules all health informatics technology we all get older and in the end or we can have diseases we want this to work smart cities e are also going to boast a bit in Spain is also leader the standards of smart cities that we have in AENOR that are about 20 we have asked the ITU the international union of information technology and we are reference in the world in standards of Smart cities interestingly smart cities is all right? Now we talk about everything is smart less the car that is an electric vehicle, because there is the smart the internet of thing I return to the same is everything the truth is that talk to you about this gives hurry because they know infinitely more than I and let's see some examples of what is being done now Note where all this is, this if you are very interested all this we have seen in the previous transparency is and normalized in the committee JTC1 of the ISO and this if it is important to point it because there are now all projects that are developing for example design and development of it systems and tools I have put here an example: Functionalities product quality, information system security, application accounting vocabulary there must always be harmonized vocabulary if we do not understand each other etc etc etc Is normalizing, note that there are now around 2500 standards and are involved several thousand experts They are very quiet they do not have any questions do you think they are interesting or not? At least they are watching I do not see many who are still sleeping specifically within the JTC1 if they want we could give it a bit of dynamism if I entered into any of these truths if I clicked and it worked Internet that should very well, for you to see this if it is live and live you can see inside the ISO the rules that are doing right now and I put it because I am not an expert but you yes and the rules that are currently developing are these Information technologies, security techniques, I do not know that entity ... the authentication of the entity used mechanisms in I do not know what it puts here, algorithms etc algorithms encyclopedias or something like that I am not expert in these subjects but you yes that they are and see what is now being done that has to coincide with what you are studying I invite you to investigate these projects also have click here published rules this is what is being done now and this is what you are going to to work Because they already work in companies How many of you are working already? Raise your hand good are not many or are very embarrassing and How are you happy?? Yes In what company? who else? From there no one, what company? Aban group happy? good Sincere person you also of course well they are very young still envy more rules and we are done because I am more interested in the questions These are the standards that are international standards for us from AENOR of course we are not experts in software or information technologies but if we are experts in business management and these two are fundamental for the management of a company the security of the information to implant in a company systems of management so that the information this certain that I am going to tell to them right now is fundamental and it is a subject of present and of future what is not is of past AENOR what we do is certify that companies have implemented this system and business continuity before natural disasters or simply an event that could lose data I would have implemented a management system that allows us to know how to react to events of this type is essential for a company these two standards apart from all the others of the thousands that are for us are the keys you say not for me they are not Not in the end we all work in our company or in someone's company and what we have to get is I spend a money and I have to get more and I can not allow the business to break for something that I did not plan and much less that I steal the data and that will agree with me that it is fundamental this has to be understood very well and we there that we directly help the companies through our auditors auditing that they have effectively implemented a management system or this o the two That we do at European level that more curious thing we do also in norm not only they are norm of product as previously now also has developed a norm that identifies all the profiles of you i do not do more than call you all possible profiles of information comunication professionals and information and are in some way to call them so crossed with the skills they must have ie a computer designer does not have to have the same skills Information technology that a business manager related to information technologies nor the one that carries the support have been identified around 40 competencies that must have distributed depending on the professional profile that occupies the person in the company this has obviously been done with participation not only with experts in computer science and software but also with experts in human resources and this has already been done and is being made a norm to complete the family that is part 3 this serious application part And part 1 would be the rule itself and to finish some olle say but not only exists AENOR ISO and EC there are actually many consortiums that make standards and now the strategy we have implemented is although before we had a pyramid and we believed the kings speaking clear we thought that good there are Sectoral rules of companies specifically then are the national standards then the Americans the French the English the Spanish then regional level would be the European standards that would be as encompassing all of Europe and then the international ones that are recognized around the world and we had made this pyramid as saying the only international standards are ISO and EC this is recognized by the world trade organization in DTT and well it is so and not because here are some consorcios as you see the accessible web pages IEEE of the engineers OASIS ECMA that also make rules that happens that are bad? not what happens is that other procedures are also important that they know it while we have to invite the public administration users to consumers to universities that phenomenal that we have to invite them all be told they do not make the rules With the experts who really know that in some cases like these of leading technology from my point of view and deny having said it less badly that they are not recording it is better because if I am going to make a norm of washing machines I say the truth there is a 60 335 part 2 that specifies the safety requirements of the Washing machine man as it would not be more than the users of the washing machines came that the test laboratories come so we do not say dumb then come here I'm going to stick a little with ... then come the environment that is very well but of course the environment says that the washing machine can not spend water and can not spend detergent then says manufacturer And how do you want me to wash this is real is real I've lived it we reached a consensus I'm going to spend a little water I'm going to spend a little bit of detergent and I'm going to do the standard washing machine this is real I'm not inventing it, well here is not here is not the user of the computer here is the technician who knows and are fighting between technicians, here a good example is the standard 39500 xml finally got that you know that the ECMA376 was opened through Numbers or meetings as it becomes an IEC standard the same as OASIS the open document ends up being an IEC standard Because to them also you are interested that are down here sector that arrives up here and everyone knows at the end what is its IEEE technology that is an American organization as they know internationally everything is said although this down here could be up here Because also it is achieved that software engineering that its norm ends up being an international standard will sound strange but this is very important it is very important that to date ISO EC y AENOR let's say the acquaintances are negotiating contracts with all of them so that all their rules as far as possible reach and spread internationally and are recognized Then in summary this would be the part of the talk because I am more interested in the questions I want you to know that the rules are not nonsense those who are involved in normalization do not do it for the sake of art they do to introduce their technology Aenor for example does a very important work for the Spanish and European industry facilitating regulation UNE the Latin American countries very much despite I look at the camera because I sell them but I have to understand, it is more important for you than the technology of the norms UNE that for that you have fought in Geneva in Brussels in Japan and in 20000 places of the world that technology that are in the standards unites that are European standards And that they are ISO and EC standards we will give it somehow to the countries that we can in this case thanks to the Latin American language so that when you want to sell there it is that they have adopted the AENOR standard because well this rule is now the norm Colombian or I make it Ecuadorian standard or even make it Brazilian standard that the language is not exactly the same that is fundamental for that reason the norms are transfer of technology the one that writes the norm has capacity to transfer to the whole world and to sell in the whole world that they know that it is the most important of the norms they are not nonsense Then if you have innovative technology try as soon as possible to introduce a rule and get sold around the world and now I guess someone will ask me the patent question but I have it prepared Have we met goals? Who sees that he has not fulfilled that I raise my hand I am not going to do anything and all are experts in rules I do not believe it and I took 15 years to find out Yes, sure? You are a shy little eh as this was all good there is much more but I want you to ask me or if it is not typical the teacher is the one who asks the first question Subtitled by Alfredo Hernandez