1
00:00:00,903 --> 00:00:02,384
Twenty years ago,

2
00:00:02,384 --> 00:00:05,188
when I was a barrister
and human rights lawyer

3
00:00:05,188 --> 00:00:08,410
in full-time legal practice in London,

4
00:00:08,410 --> 00:00:10,472
and the highest court in the land

5
00:00:10,472 --> 00:00:15,109
still convened, some would say
by an accident of history,

6
00:00:15,109 --> 00:00:17,033
in this building here,

7
00:00:17,033 --> 00:00:20,249
I met a young man who had
just quit his job

8
00:00:20,249 --> 00:00:22,187
in the British Foreign Office.

9
00:00:22,187 --> 00:00:24,868
When I asked him why did you leave,

10
00:00:24,868 --> 00:00:26,751
he told me this story.

11
00:00:26,751 --> 00:00:29,490
He had gone to his boss
one morning and said,

12
00:00:29,490 --> 00:00:34,526
"Let's do something about
human rights abuses in China."

13
00:00:34,526 --> 00:00:36,494
And his boss had replied,

14
00:00:36,494 --> 00:00:39,204
"We can't do anything about
human rights abuses in China

15
00:00:39,204 --> 00:00:42,971
because we have
trade relations with China."

16
00:00:42,971 --> 00:00:45,553
So my friend went away
with his tail between his legs,

17
00:00:45,553 --> 00:00:47,017
and six months later,

18
00:00:47,017 --> 00:00:49,432
he returned again to his boss,

19
00:00:49,432 --> 00:00:51,277
and he said this time,

20
00:00:51,277 --> 00:00:54,876
"Let's do something about
human rights in Burma,"

21
00:00:54,876 --> 00:00:56,751
as it was then called.

22
00:00:56,751 --> 00:00:59,284
His boss once again paused

23
00:00:59,284 --> 00:01:02,986
and said, "Oh, but we can't do
anything about human rights in Burma

24
00:01:02,986 --> 00:01:08,049
because we don't have any
trade relations with Burma."

25
00:01:08,049 --> 00:01:10,432
This was the moment he knew
he had to leave.

26
00:01:10,432 --> 00:01:12,880
It wasn't just the hypocrisy
that got to him.

27
00:01:12,880 --> 00:01:17,442
It was the unwillingness

28
00:01:17,442 --> 00:01:19,279
of his government to engage
in conflict with other governments,

29
00:01:19,279 --> 00:01:21,161
intense discussions.

30
00:01:21,161 --> 00:01:25,800
All the while, innocent people
were being harmed.

31
00:01:25,800 --> 00:01:28,375
We are constantly told

32
00:01:28,375 --> 00:01:30,641
that conflict is bad,

33
00:01:30,641 --> 00:01:33,912
that compromise is good,

34
00:01:33,912 --> 00:01:35,663
that conflict is bad

35
00:01:35,663 --> 00:01:38,348
but consensus is good,

36
00:01:38,348 --> 00:01:39,749
that conflict is bad

37
00:01:39,749 --> 00:01:44,130
and collaboration is good.

38
00:01:44,130 --> 00:01:45,930
But in my view,

39
00:01:45,930 --> 00:01:48,198
that's far too simple
a vision of the world.

40
00:01:48,198 --> 00:01:52,023
We cannot know

41
00:01:52,023 --> 00:01:52,695
whether conflict is bad

42
00:01:52,695 --> 00:01:54,892
unless we know who is fighting,

43
00:01:54,892 --> 00:01:56,773
why they are fighting,

44
00:01:56,773 --> 00:01:58,998
and how they are fighting,

45
00:01:58,998 --> 00:02:02,467
and compromises can be thoroughly rotten

46
00:02:02,467 --> 00:02:05,867
if they harm people who
are not at the table,

47
00:02:05,867 --> 00:02:08,344
people who are vulnerable, disempowered,

48
00:02:08,344 --> 00:02:12,686
people whom we have
an obligation to protect.

49
00:02:12,686 --> 00:02:16,498
Now you might be somewhat
skeptical of a lawyer

50
00:02:16,498 --> 00:02:19,013
arguing about the benefits of conflict

51
00:02:19,013 --> 00:02:21,535
and creating problems for compromise,

52
00:02:21,535 --> 00:02:24,813
but I did also qualify as a mediator,
and these days, I spend my time

53
00:02:24,813 --> 00:02:27,389
giving talks about ethics for free.

54
00:02:27,389 --> 00:02:30,987
So as my bank manager likes to remind me,
I'm downwardly mobile.

55
00:02:30,987 --> 00:02:35,687
But if you accept my argument,

56
00:02:35,687 --> 00:02:38,782
it should change not just the way
we lead our personal lives,

57
00:02:38,782 --> 00:02:41,834
which I wish to put
to one side for the moment,

58
00:02:41,834 --> 00:02:45,668
but it will change the way we think
about major problems

59
00:02:45,668 --> 00:02:49,731
of public health and the environment.

60
00:02:49,731 --> 00:02:52,603
Let me explain.

61
00:02:52,603 --> 00:02:55,071
Every middle schooler
in the United States,

62
00:02:55,071 --> 00:02:57,720
my 12-year old daughter included,

63
00:02:57,720 --> 00:03:01,596
learns that there are three
branches of government,

64
00:03:01,596 --> 00:03:05,860
the legislative, the executive,
and the judicial branch.

65
00:03:05,860 --> 00:03:10,177
James Madison wrote, "If there is any
principle more sacred

66
00:03:10,177 --> 00:03:12,101
in our Constitution,

67
00:03:12,101 --> 00:03:15,338
and indeed in any free constitution
than any other,

68
00:03:15,338 --> 00:03:18,809
it is that which separates

69
00:03:18,809 --> 00:03:24,521
the legislative, the executive,
and the judicial powers."

70
00:03:24,521 --> 00:03:27,445
Now the framers were not just concerned

71
00:03:27,445 --> 00:03:31,594
about the concentration
and exercise of power.

72
00:03:31,594 --> 00:03:36,680
They also understood
the perils of influence.

73
00:03:36,680 --> 00:03:41,470
Judges cannot determine
the constitutionality of laws

74
00:03:41,470 --> 00:03:45,521
if they participate in making those laws,

75
00:03:45,521 --> 00:03:49,472
nor can they hold the other branches
of government accountable

76
00:03:49,472 --> 00:03:51,567
if they collaborate with them

77
00:03:51,567 --> 00:03:55,789
or enter into close
relationships with them.

78
00:03:55,789 --> 00:03:59,613
The Constitution is,
as one famous scholar put it,

79
00:03:59,613 --> 00:04:02,260
"an invitation to struggle."

80
00:04:02,260 --> 00:04:05,306
And we the people are served

81
00:04:05,306 --> 00:04:11,556
when those branches do, indeed,
struggle with each other.

82
00:04:11,556 --> 00:04:16,609
Now, we recognize the importance
of struggle not just

83
00:04:16,609 --> 00:04:18,208
in the public sector

84
00:04:18,208 --> 00:04:20,504
between our branches of government.

85
00:04:20,504 --> 00:04:23,936
We also know it too in the private sector,

86
00:04:23,936 --> 00:04:27,599
in relationships among corporations.

87
00:04:27,599 --> 00:04:29,953
Let's imagine that two American airlines

88
00:04:29,953 --> 00:04:32,607
get together and agree

89
00:04:32,607 --> 00:04:35,751
that they will not drop the price

90
00:04:35,751 --> 00:04:39,924
of their economy class airfares
below 250 dollars a ticket.

91
00:04:39,924 --> 00:04:43,843
That is collaboration,
some would say collusion,

92
00:04:43,843 --> 00:04:45,191
not competition,

93
00:04:45,191 --> 00:04:48,008
and we the people are harmed

94
00:04:48,008 --> 00:04:51,219
because we pay more for our tickets.

95
00:04:51,219 --> 00:04:53,962
Imagine similarly two airlines
were to say, "Look,

96
00:04:53,962 --> 00:04:58,333
Airline A, we'll take the route
from LA to Chicago,"

97
00:04:58,333 --> 00:05:02,514
and Airline B says, "We'll take
the route from Chicago to DC,

98
00:05:02,514 --> 00:05:03,278
and we won't compete."

99
00:05:03,278 --> 00:05:07,644
Once again, that's collaboration
or collusion instead of competition,

100
00:05:07,644 --> 00:05:12,188
and we the people are harmed.

101
00:05:12,188 --> 00:05:15,616
So we understand the importance

102
00:05:15,616 --> 00:05:19,493
of struggle when it comes to relationships

103
00:05:19,493 --> 00:05:23,410
between branches of government,

104
00:05:23,410 --> 00:05:25,096
the public sector.

105
00:05:25,096 --> 00:05:29,464
We also understand the importance
of conflict when it comes

106
00:05:29,464 --> 00:05:33,004
to relationships among corporations,

107
00:05:33,004 --> 00:05:34,543
the private sector.

108
00:05:34,543 --> 00:05:37,248
But where we have forgotten it

109
00:05:37,248 --> 00:05:41,553
is in the relationships
between the public and the private,

110
00:05:41,553 --> 00:05:45,528
and governments all over the world
are collaborating with industry

111
00:05:45,528 --> 00:05:49,080
to solve problems of public health
and the environment,

112
00:05:49,080 --> 00:05:53,427
often collaborating with the very
corporations that are creating

113
00:05:53,427 --> 00:05:57,319
or exacerbating the problems
they are trying to solve.

114
00:05:57,319 --> 00:05:59,460
We are told that these relationships

115
00:05:59,460 --> 00:06:05,650
are a win-win.

116
00:06:05,650 --> 00:06:10,282
But what if someone is losing out?

117
00:06:10,282 --> 00:06:14,058
Let me give you some examples.

118
00:06:14,058 --> 00:06:18,116
A United Nations agency decided
to address a serious problem,

119
00:06:18,116 --> 00:06:19,915
poor sanitation in schools

120
00:06:19,915 --> 00:06:22,483
in rural India.

121
00:06:22,483 --> 00:06:26,438
They did so not just in collaboration
with national and local governments

122
00:06:26,438 --> 00:06:29,137
but also with a television company

123
00:06:29,137 --> 00:06:33,973
and with a major multinational
soda company.

124
00:06:33,973 --> 00:06:36,930
In exchange for less
than one million dollars,

125
00:06:36,930 --> 00:06:41,529
that corporation received the benefits
of a months-long promotional campaign

126
00:06:41,529 --> 00:06:43,913
including a 12-hour telethon

127
00:06:43,913 --> 00:06:48,344
all using the company's logo
and color scheme.

128
00:06:48,344 --> 00:06:51,360
This was an arrangement

129
00:06:51,360 --> 00:06:53,410
which was totally understandable

130
00:06:53,410 --> 00:06:55,458
from the corporation's point of view.

131
00:06:55,458 --> 00:06:57,776
It enhances the reputation of the company,

132
00:06:57,776 --> 00:07:01,417
and it creates brand loyalty
for its products.

133
00:07:01,417 --> 00:07:03,198
But in my view,

134
00:07:03,198 --> 00:07:05,406
this is profoundly problematic
for the intergovernmental agency,

135
00:07:05,406 --> 00:07:12,281
an agency that has a mission
to promote sustainable living.

136
00:07:12,281 --> 00:07:15,288
By increasing consumption
of sugar-sweetened beverages

137
00:07:15,288 --> 00:07:19,450
made from scarce local water supplies
and drunk out of plastic bottles

138
00:07:19,450 --> 00:07:22,623
in a country that is already
grappling with obesity,

139
00:07:22,623 --> 00:07:26,137
this is neither sustainable
from a public health

140
00:07:26,137 --> 00:07:29,117
nor an environmental point of view,

141
00:07:29,117 --> 00:07:32,346
and in order to solve one
public health problem,

142
00:07:32,346 --> 00:07:34,688
the agency is sowing the seeds

143
00:07:34,688 --> 00:07:37,699
of another.

144
00:07:37,699 --> 00:07:41,350
This is just one example
of dozens I discovered

145
00:07:41,350 --> 00:07:47,279
in researching a book on the relationships
between government and industry.

146
00:07:47,279 --> 00:07:51,808
I could also have told you about
the initiatives in parks in London

147
00:07:51,808 --> 00:07:54,192
and throughout Britain
involving the same company

148
00:07:54,192 --> 00:07:55,763
promoting exercise,

149
00:07:55,763 --> 00:08:00,802
or indeed of the British Government
creating voluntary pledges

150
00:08:00,802 --> 00:08:02,987
in partnership with industry

151
00:08:02,987 --> 00:08:05,912
instead of regulating industry.

152
00:08:05,912 --> 00:08:09,294
These collaborations or partnerships

153
00:08:09,294 --> 00:08:11,447
have become the paradigm in public health,

154
00:08:11,447 --> 00:08:15,467
and once again, they make sense
from the point of view of industry.

155
00:08:15,467 --> 00:08:19,116
It allows them to frame
public health problems and their solutions

156
00:08:19,116 --> 00:08:22,918
in ways that are least threatening to,
most consonant with,

157
00:08:22,918 --> 00:08:24,381
their commercial interests.

158
00:08:24,381 --> 00:08:30,954
So obesity becomes a problem
of individual decision-making,

159
00:08:30,954 --> 00:08:33,045
of personal behavior,

160
00:08:33,045 --> 00:08:36,147
personal responsibility
and lack of physical activity.

161
00:08:36,147 --> 00:08:39,718
It is not a problem

162
00:08:39,718 --> 00:08:40,288
when framed this way

163
00:08:40,288 --> 00:08:43,503
of a multinational food system
involving major corporations.

164
00:08:43,503 --> 00:08:45,968
And again, I don't blame industry.

165
00:08:45,968 --> 00:08:48,562
Industry naturally engages
in strategies of influence

166
00:08:48,562 --> 00:08:51,820
to promote its commercial interests.

167
00:08:51,820 --> 00:08:54,981
But governments have a responsibility

168
00:08:54,981 --> 00:08:57,062
to develop counterstrategies

169
00:08:57,062 --> 00:08:59,017
to protect us and the common good.

170
00:08:59,017 --> 00:09:06,064
The mistake that governments are making

171
00:09:06,064 --> 00:09:09,109
when they collaborate in this way

172
00:09:09,109 --> 00:09:10,435
with industry

173
00:09:10,435 --> 00:09:13,155
is that they conflate

174
00:09:13,155 --> 00:09:17,348
the common good with common ground.

175
00:09:17,348 --> 00:09:20,167
When you collaborate with industry,

176
00:09:20,167 --> 00:09:23,015
you necessarily put off the table

177
00:09:23,015 --> 00:09:26,395
things that might promote the common good
to which industry will not agree.

178
00:09:26,395 --> 00:09:29,231
Industry will not agree
to increase regulation

179
00:09:29,231 --> 00:09:33,845
unless it believes this will stave off
even more regulation

180
00:09:33,845 --> 00:09:38,213
or perhaps knock some competitors
out of the market.

181
00:09:38,213 --> 00:09:40,628
Nor can companies agree
to do certain things,

182
00:09:40,628 --> 00:09:43,606
for example raise the prices
of their unhealthy products,

183
00:09:43,606 --> 00:09:45,746
because that would violate
competition law,

184
00:09:45,746 --> 00:09:48,590
as we've established.

185
00:09:48,590 --> 00:09:52,106
So our governments should not confound

186
00:09:52,106 --> 00:09:54,501
the common good and common ground,

187
00:09:54,501 --> 00:09:57,002
especially when common ground

188
00:09:57,002 --> 00:09:59,423
means reaching agreement with industry.

189
00:09:59,423 --> 00:10:02,764
I want to give you another example,

190
00:10:02,764 --> 00:10:04,895
moving from high-profile collaboration

191
00:10:04,895 --> 00:10:06,905
to something that is below ground

192
00:10:06,905 --> 00:10:10,587
both literally and figuratively:

193
00:10:10,587 --> 00:10:13,538
the hydraulic fracturing of natural gas.

194
00:10:13,538 --> 00:10:17,495
Imagine that you purchase a plot of land

195
00:10:17,495 --> 00:10:19,680
not knowing the mineral rights
have been sold.

196
00:10:19,680 --> 00:10:21,983
This is before the fracking boom.

197
00:10:21,983 --> 00:10:25,382
You build your dream home on that plot,

198
00:10:25,382 --> 00:10:29,070
and shortly afterwards,

199
00:10:29,070 --> 00:10:33,382
you discover that a gas company
is building a well pad on your land.

200
00:10:33,382 --> 00:10:37,499
That was the plight
of the Hallowich family.

201
00:10:37,499 --> 00:10:40,329
Within a very short period of time,

202
00:10:40,329 --> 00:10:43,148
they began to complain of headaches,

203
00:10:43,148 --> 00:10:46,611
of sore throats, of itchy eyes,

204
00:10:46,611 --> 00:10:49,995
in addition to the interference
of the noise, vibration,

205
00:10:49,995 --> 00:10:52,803
and the bright lights from the flaring
of natural gas.

206
00:10:52,803 --> 00:10:56,153
They were very vocal in their criticisms,

207
00:10:56,153 --> 00:10:58,631
and then they fell silent,

208
00:10:58,631 --> 00:11:01,610
and thanks to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette,
where this image appeared,

209
00:11:01,610 --> 00:11:04,405
and one other newspaper, we discovered
why they fell silent.

210
00:11:04,405 --> 00:11:08,137
The newspapers went to the court and said,
what happened to the Hallowiches?

211
00:11:08,137 --> 00:11:11,982
And it turned out the Hallowiches
had made a secret settlement

212
00:11:11,982 --> 00:11:14,285
with the gas operators,

213
00:11:14,285 --> 00:11:16,207
and it was a take-it-or-leave-it
settlement.

214
00:11:16,207 --> 00:11:17,908
The gas company said,

215
00:11:17,908 --> 00:11:21,439
you can have a six figure sum
to move elsewhere

216
00:11:21,439 --> 00:11:22,890
and start your lives again, but in return

217
00:11:22,890 --> 00:11:26,396
you must promise not to speak
of your experience with our company,

218
00:11:26,396 --> 00:11:29,331
not to speak of your
experience with fracking,

219
00:11:29,331 --> 00:11:33,570
not to speak about the health consequences

220
00:11:33,570 --> 00:11:38,004
that might have been revealed
by a medical examination.

221
00:11:38,004 --> 00:11:40,873
Now, I do not blame
the Hallowiches for accepting

222
00:11:40,873 --> 00:11:43,710
a take-it-or-leave-it settlement

223
00:11:43,710 --> 00:11:45,746
and starting their lives elsewhere.

224
00:11:45,746 --> 00:11:49,083
And one can understand why the company
would wish to silence

225
00:11:49,083 --> 00:11:50,174
a squeaky wheel.

226
00:11:50,174 --> 00:11:53,899
What I want to point the finger at
is the legal and regulatory system,

227
00:11:53,899 --> 00:11:56,545
a system in which there are
networks of agreements

228
00:11:56,545 --> 00:11:58,313
just like this one

229
00:11:58,313 --> 00:12:00,711
which serve to silence people

230
00:12:00,711 --> 00:12:02,551
and seal off data points

231
00:12:02,551 --> 00:12:04,881
from public health experts
and epidemiologists,

232
00:12:04,881 --> 00:12:08,618
a system in which regulators
will even refrain from issuing

233
00:12:08,618 --> 00:12:10,613
a violation notice

234
00:12:10,613 --> 00:12:12,116
in the event of pollution

235
00:12:12,116 --> 00:12:14,063
if the landowner and the gas company

236
00:12:14,063 --> 00:12:15,446
agree to settle.

237
00:12:15,446 --> 00:12:19,352
This is a system which isn't just
bad from a public health point of view.

238
00:12:19,352 --> 00:12:22,843
It exposes hazards to local families

239
00:12:22,843 --> 00:12:26,436
who remain in the dark.

240
00:12:26,436 --> 00:12:31,781
Now I have given you two examples
not because they are isolated examples.

241
00:12:31,781 --> 00:12:34,446
They are examples of a systemic problem.

242
00:12:34,446 --> 00:12:37,331
I could share some counterexamples,

243
00:12:37,331 --> 00:12:39,378
the case for example
of the public official

244
00:12:39,378 --> 00:12:43,073
who sues the pharmaceutical company

245
00:12:43,073 --> 00:12:46,414
for concealing the fact
that its antidepressant

246
00:12:46,414 --> 00:12:49,787
increases suicidal
thoughts in adolescents.

247
00:12:49,787 --> 00:12:51,471
I can tell you about the regulator

248
00:12:51,471 --> 00:12:55,003
who went after the food company

249
00:12:55,003 --> 00:12:59,043
for exaggerating the purported
health benefits of its yogurt.

250
00:12:59,043 --> 00:13:04,572
And I can tell you about the legislator
who despite heavy lobbying

251
00:13:04,572 --> 00:13:06,806
directed at both sides of the aisle

252
00:13:06,806 --> 00:13:11,070
pushes for environmental protections.

253
00:13:11,070 --> 00:13:13,079
These are isolated examples,

254
00:13:13,079 --> 00:13:17,141
but they are beacons of light
in the darkness

255
00:13:17,141 --> 00:13:22,310
and they can show us the way.

256
00:13:22,310 --> 00:13:27,488
I began by suggesting that sometimes
we need to engage in conflict.

257
00:13:27,488 --> 00:13:31,292
Governments should tussle with,

258
00:13:31,292 --> 00:13:38,207
struggle with, at times engage in
direct conflict with corporations.

259
00:13:38,207 --> 00:13:42,579
This is not because governments
are inherently good

260
00:13:42,579 --> 00:13:44,872
and corporations are inherently evil.

261
00:13:44,872 --> 00:13:49,703
Each is capable of good or ill.

262
00:13:49,703 --> 00:13:52,551
But corporations understandably act
to promote their commercial interests

263
00:13:52,551 --> 00:14:01,494
and they do so either sometimes
undermining or promoting the common good.

264
00:14:01,494 --> 00:14:05,126
But it is the responsibility
of governments

265
00:14:05,126 --> 00:14:08,646
to protect and promote the common good,

266
00:14:08,646 --> 00:14:11,065
and we should insist

267
00:14:11,065 --> 00:14:14,647
that they fight to do so.

268
00:14:14,647 --> 00:14:17,556
This is because governments

269
00:14:17,556 --> 00:14:19,606
are the guardians of public health,

270
00:14:19,606 --> 00:14:25,441
governments are the guardians

271
00:14:25,441 --> 00:14:26,896
of the environment,

272
00:14:26,896 --> 00:14:28,669
and it is governments

273
00:14:28,669 --> 00:14:35,069
that are guardians of these
essential parts of our common good.

274
00:14:35,933 --> 00:14:37,571
Thank you.

275
00:14:37,571 --> 00:14:43,140
(Applause)