0:00:00.197,0:00:02.177
- [Voiceover] All right, Part D.

0:00:02.177,0:00:04.837
To investigate the claim[br]that exposure to light

0:00:04.837,0:00:08.581
overrides the genetically-controlled[br]circadian rhythm,

0:00:08.581,0:00:10.873
the researchers plan to[br]repeat the experiment

0:00:10.873,0:00:12.972
with mutant mice lacking a gene

0:00:12.972,0:00:15.525
that controls the circadian rhythm.

0:00:15.525,0:00:17.903
Predict the observed activity pattern

0:00:17.903,0:00:21.374
of the mutant mice[br]under L12:D12 conditions

0:00:21.374,0:00:24.607
and under DD, continuous[br]darkness conditions,

0:00:24.607,0:00:27.494
that would support the[br]claim that light overrides

0:00:27.494,0:00:30.596
the genetically-controlled[br]circadian rhythm.

0:00:30.596,0:00:34.134
All right, so let me write[br]this down. So, Part D.

0:00:34.134,0:00:37.222
So under some mutant mice,

0:00:37.222,0:00:41.152
mutant mice,

0:00:41.152,0:00:43.587
under, so let me make two columns,

0:00:43.587,0:00:46.872
mutant mice under L12,

0:00:46.872,0:00:50.152
L12:D12, and then

0:00:50.152,0:00:55.054
under continuous, continuous[br]darkness, what would I expect?

0:00:55.054,0:00:56.870
What would I expect?

0:00:56.870,0:00:59.155
So they predict the[br]observed activity pattern.

0:00:59.155,0:01:01.183
So the mutant mice, they don't have,

0:01:01.183,0:01:04.087
they have some, they're lacking genes

0:01:04.087,0:01:07.286
that control circadian[br]rhythm, but under L12:D12,

0:01:07.286,0:01:10.496
they don't need the[br]genetic circadian patterns,

0:01:10.496,0:01:13.119
the genetically-influenced[br]ones, because they get the ones

0:01:13.119,0:01:15.663
from their environment,[br]the light and the darkness.

0:01:15.663,0:01:17.518
They didn't get, this isn't a gene

0:01:17.518,0:01:20.157
that somehow makes them[br]not sensitive to light.

0:01:20.157,0:01:23.510
So I would assume under the L12:D12,

0:01:23.510,0:01:26.364
they would behave, they[br]would have activity pattern

0:01:26.364,0:01:30.982
similar to non-mutant mice, activity

0:01:32.082,0:01:36.100
same as non-mutant,

0:01:36.100,0:01:41.020
as non-mutant,

0:01:41.020,0:01:44.927
mutant mice,

0:01:44.927,0:01:49.890
non, or inactivity, inactivity

0:01:49.890,0:01:54.468
during L12,

0:01:54.468,0:01:59.442
activity, activity

0:02:00.612,0:02:04.591
during D12.

0:02:04.591,0:02:05.707
That's what I would expect.

0:02:05.707,0:02:07.356
They still could react to the light

0:02:07.356,0:02:08.394
and the darkness the same way

0:02:08.394,0:02:10.119
that a non-mutant mice would.

0:02:10.119,0:02:12.084
Now, what about continuous darkness?

0:02:12.084,0:02:14.215
The non-mutant mice, we said that they,

0:02:14.215,0:02:16.533
they went off of a 24-hour cycle,

0:02:16.533,0:02:18.994
but they still had a cycle[br]where they were inactive,

0:02:18.994,0:02:23.350
active, inactive, active,[br]and it was less than 12 hours

0:02:23.350,0:02:25.367
for each cycle, but it was close to it.

0:02:25.367,0:02:28.149
It was maybe 9, 10, or[br]11 hours of activity,

0:02:28.149,0:02:31.354
followed by 9, 10, or[br]11 hours of inactivity.

0:02:31.354,0:02:33.135
I would guess that a mutant mouse

0:02:33.135,0:02:35.466
that has no, that doesn't have some

0:02:35.466,0:02:37.841
of these genes for circadian rhythm,

0:02:37.841,0:02:39.409
well, for them, it's just gonna be,

0:02:39.409,0:02:40.486
it's just gonna be random,

0:02:40.486,0:02:43.090
it's just gonna be much more sporadic.

0:02:43.090,0:02:47.353
So, much, much

0:02:47.353,0:02:51.491
more sporadic,

0:02:51.491,0:02:54.779
sporadic activity,

0:02:54.779,0:02:59.779
activity, fewer,

0:02:59.836,0:03:03.370
fewer continuous,

0:03:03.370,0:03:05.610
continuous,

0:03:05.610,0:03:08.925
or I would say, maybe,[br]less continuous periods,

0:03:08.925,0:03:12.036
or shorter continuous periods,

0:03:12.036,0:03:16.289
shorter continuous

0:03:16.289,0:03:20.912
periods of activity

0:03:20.912,0:03:22.896
and inactivity,

0:03:22.896,0:03:25.165
activity slash

0:03:25.165,0:03:29.016
inactivity.

0:03:29.016,0:03:32.798
All right, now let's look at Part E now.

0:03:32.798,0:03:35.652
So that was my predictions[br]that I would see

0:03:35.652,0:03:37.316
for mutant mice in either of these.

0:03:37.316,0:03:39.664
So now let's go to Part E.

0:03:39.664,0:03:42.172
In nature, mice are potential prey

0:03:42.172,0:03:46.109
for some predatory birds[br]that hunt during the day.

0:03:46.109,0:03:49.667
Describe two features of[br]a model that represents

0:03:49.667,0:03:51.748
how the predator-prey relationship

0:03:51.748,0:03:55.202
between the birds and the[br]mice may have resulted

0:03:55.202,0:03:56.705
in the evolution

0:03:56.705,0:04:01.304
of the observed activity pattern of mice.

0:04:01.304,0:04:06.304
Well, if the birds hunt during the day,

0:04:06.433,0:04:11.174
if birds hunt

0:04:11.174,0:04:15.617
during day

0:04:15.617,0:04:16.697
a mouse is more likely

0:04:16.697,0:04:21.275
to be eaten by a bird if[br]it's active during the day.

0:04:21.275,0:04:25.052
Mouse, then,

0:04:25.052,0:04:29.337
then the mouse

0:04:29.337,0:04:34.277
is more likely

0:04:34.277,0:04:38.536
to be eaten,

0:04:38.536,0:04:42.510
eaten if it is

0:04:42.510,0:04:44.398
active during the day,

0:04:44.398,0:04:47.036
if it is active

0:04:47.036,0:04:51.987
during the day.

0:04:53.548,0:04:54.721
And if it is, I guess you could say

0:04:54.721,0:04:57.440
that's one, that's one[br]feature of our model,

0:04:57.440,0:04:59.761
that you're just more likely to be eaten

0:04:59.761,0:05:02.009
if you're active when[br]the birds are hunting.

0:05:02.009,0:05:03.969
And then the second one[br]is, if you're more likely

0:05:03.969,0:05:08.268
to be eaten, then you're[br]less likely to reproduce.

0:05:08.268,0:05:11.350
If, actually that should be capital I,

0:05:11.350,0:05:15.480
if, if the mouse

0:05:17.260,0:05:22.172
is more likely

0:05:22.172,0:05:25.422
to be eaten

0:05:25.422,0:05:29.189
by being

0:05:29.189,0:05:31.540
active

0:05:31.540,0:05:35.755
during the day,

0:05:37.765,0:05:40.727
then it is less likely to reproduce,

0:05:40.727,0:05:44.628
then it is less

0:05:44.628,0:05:46.728
likely

0:05:46.728,0:05:49.393
to reproduce.

0:05:49.393,0:05:53.091
And if I were, if I were[br]taking the AP test here,

0:05:53.091,0:05:55.220
I would try to put as[br]much context as possible,

0:05:55.220,0:05:56.435
because you're not exactly sure

0:05:56.435,0:05:58.920
how they're, they're[br]going to mark this thing,

0:05:58.920,0:06:01.544
to grade this thing, so[br]you could give more context

0:06:01.544,0:06:04.646
that therefore, the mice

0:06:04.646,0:06:06.852
that are active during,

0:06:06.852,0:06:11.659
therefore, therefore,

0:06:11.659,0:06:16.110
mice that are

0:06:16.110,0:06:18.708
active

0:06:18.708,0:06:21.348
during night,

0:06:21.348,0:06:22.954
they have to be active sometime,

0:06:22.954,0:06:27.075
active during night and inactive

0:06:28.185,0:06:31.972
during day

0:06:31.972,0:06:36.214
will be selected for, will

0:06:36.214,0:06:40.520
be selected for,

0:06:41.370,0:06:45.558
less likely to be eaten, less likely

0:06:45.558,0:06:48.714
to be hunted,

0:06:48.714,0:06:53.438
I guess you could say, and[br]more likely to reproduce,

0:06:53.438,0:06:58.403
more likely to reproduce,

0:06:58.403,0:07:02.535
reproduce, and we are done.