0:00:01.869,0:00:03.836 It's 1878. 0:00:04.969,0:00:08.247 Sir Francis Galton[br]gives a remarkable talk. 0:00:09.318,0:00:13.456 He's speaking to the anthropologic[br]institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 0:00:14.170,0:00:18.196 Known for his pioneering work[br]in human intelligence, 0:00:18.220,0:00:20.208 Galton is a brilliant polymath. 0:00:21.716,0:00:23.270 He's an explorer, 0:00:23.294,0:00:25.047 an anthropologist, 0:00:25.071,0:00:26.601 a sociologist, 0:00:26.625,0:00:28.194 a psychologist 0:00:28.218,0:00:29.692 and a statistician. 0:00:31.387,0:00:33.669 He's also a eugenist. 0:00:34.600,0:00:35.846 In this talk, 0:00:36.807,0:00:41.560 he presents a new technique[br]by which he can combine photographs 0:00:41.584,0:00:43.843 and produce composite portraits. 0:00:44.663,0:00:49.677 This technique could be used[br]to characterize different types of people. 0:00:50.702,0:00:56.051 Galton thinks that if he combines[br]photographs of violent criminals, 0:00:56.075,0:00:59.201 he will discover the face of criminality. 0:01:00.253,0:01:02.240 But to his surprise, 0:01:02.264,0:01:05.128 the composite portrait that he produces 0:01:05.951,0:01:07.207 is beautiful. 0:01:10.026,0:01:13.054 Galton's surprising finding[br]raises deep questions: 0:01:13.515,0:01:15.100 What is beauty? 0:01:16.070,0:01:22.889 Why do certain configurations of line[br]and color and form excite us so? 0:01:24.372,0:01:25.900 For most of human history, 0:01:25.924,0:01:31.479 these questions have been approached[br]using logic and speculation. 0:01:32.115,0:01:33.632 But in the last few decades, 0:01:33.656,0:01:36.534 scientists have addressed[br]the question of beauty 0:01:36.558,0:01:41.627 using ideas from evolutionary psychology[br]and tools of neuroscience. 0:01:42.502,0:01:46.365 We're beginning to glimpse[br]the why and the how of beauty, 0:01:46.945,0:01:50.269 at least in terms of what it means[br]for the human face and form. 0:01:51.201,0:01:52.757 And in the process, 0:01:52.781,0:01:55.133 we're stumbling upon some surprises. 0:01:56.160,0:01:58.968 When it comes to seeing[br]beauty in each other, 0:01:59.749,0:02:04.104 while this decision is certainly[br]subjective for the individual, 0:02:04.128,0:02:08.311 it's sculpted by factors that contribute[br]to the survival of the group. 0:02:08.810,0:02:11.458 Many experiments have shown 0:02:11.482,0:02:15.483 that a few basic parameters contribute[br]to what makes a face attractive. 0:02:16.315,0:02:21.991 These include averaging, symmetry[br]and the effects of hormones. 0:02:22.015,0:02:24.425 Let's take each one of these in turn. 0:02:26.531,0:02:28.005 Galton's finding 0:02:28.029,0:02:33.312 that composite or average faces[br]are typically more attractive 0:02:33.336,0:02:36.893 than each individual face[br]that contributes to the average 0:02:36.917,0:02:38.846 has been replicated many times. 0:02:39.933,0:02:44.122 This laboratory finding fits[br]with many people's intuitions. 0:02:44.754,0:02:48.965 Average faces represent[br]the central tendencies of a group. 0:02:49.724,0:02:54.043 People with mixed features[br]represent different populations, 0:02:54.067,0:02:57.415 and presumably harbor[br]greater genetic diversity 0:02:57.439,0:02:59.637 and adaptability to the environment. 0:03:00.337,0:03:04.741 Many people find mixed-race[br]individuals attractive, 0:03:04.765,0:03:06.939 and inbred families less so. 0:03:08.627,0:03:12.810 The second factor that contributes[br]to beauty is symmetry. 0:03:13.474,0:03:17.800 People generally find symmetric faces[br]more attractive than asymmetric ones. 0:03:18.758,0:03:24.010 Developmental abnormalities[br]are often associated with asymmetries, 0:03:24.034,0:03:27.299 and in plants, animals and humans, 0:03:27.323,0:03:30.629 asymmetries often arise[br]from parasitic infections. 0:03:31.373,0:03:33.591 Symmetry, it turns out, 0:03:33.615,0:03:37.118 is also an indicator of health. 0:03:38.469,0:03:40.063 In the 1930s, 0:03:40.779,0:03:43.679 a man named Maksymilian Faktorowicz 0:03:43.703,0:03:46.880 recognized the importance[br]of symmetry for beauty 0:03:46.904,0:03:49.059 when he designed the beauty micrometer. 0:03:50.297,0:03:51.448 With this device, 0:03:51.472,0:03:54.527 he could measure minor asymmetric flaws 0:03:54.551,0:03:59.100 which he could then make up for[br]with products he sold from his company, 0:03:59.124,0:04:02.948 named brilliantly[br]after himself, Max Factor, 0:04:02.972,0:04:05.983 which, as you know,[br]is one of the world's most famous brands 0:04:06.007,0:04:07.175 for "make up." 0:04:08.515,0:04:12.473 The third factor that contributes[br]to facial attractiveness 0:04:12.497,0:04:14.210 is the effect of hormones. 0:04:15.533,0:04:19.587 And here, I need to apologize[br]for confining my comments 0:04:20.282,0:04:21.849 to heterosexual norms. 0:04:23.618,0:04:28.088 But estrogen and testosterone[br]play important roles 0:04:28.112,0:04:30.710 in shaping features[br]that we find attractive. 0:04:31.643,0:04:35.500 Estrogen produces features[br]that signal fertility. 0:04:36.334,0:04:39.284 Men typically find women attractive 0:04:39.308,0:04:43.609 who have elements[br]of both youth and maturity. 0:04:44.183,0:04:48.156 A face that's too baby-like might[br]mean that the girl is not yet fertile, 0:04:49.119,0:04:51.092 so men find women attractive 0:04:51.116,0:04:55.352 who have large eyes,[br]full lips and narrow chins 0:04:55.376,0:04:56.885 as indicators of youth, 0:04:57.700,0:05:01.083 and high cheekbones[br]as an indicator of maturity. 0:05:02.564,0:05:07.847 Testosterone produces features[br]that we regard as typically masculine. 0:05:08.777,0:05:10.797 These include heavier brows, 0:05:10.821,0:05:12.126 thinner cheeks 0:05:12.150,0:05:14.402 and bigger, squared-off jaws. 0:05:14.426,0:05:16.216 But here's a fascinating irony. 0:05:17.695,0:05:18.846 In many species, 0:05:18.870,0:05:20.251 if anything, 0:05:20.275,0:05:23.967 testosterone suppresses the immune system. 0:05:25.002,0:05:29.176 So the idea that testosterone-infused[br]features are a fitness indicator 0:05:29.200,0:05:31.425 doesn't really make a whole lot of sense. 0:05:32.183,0:05:34.682 Here, the logic is turned on its head. 0:05:35.658,0:05:37.807 Instead of a fitness indicator, 0:05:37.831,0:05:41.238 scientists invoke a handicap principle. 0:05:42.789,0:05:46.321 The most commonly cited[br]example of a handicap 0:05:46.345,0:05:47.836 is the peacock's tail. 0:05:48.542,0:05:52.938 This beautiful but cumbersome tail[br]doesn't exactly help the peacock 0:05:52.962,0:05:54.224 avoid predators 0:05:54.910,0:05:56.367 and approach peahens. 0:05:57.188,0:06:00.640 Why should such an extravagant[br]appendage evolve? 0:06:01.947,0:06:03.542 Even Charles Darwin, 0:06:04.408,0:06:07.807 in an 1860 letter to Asa Gray wrote 0:06:07.831,0:06:11.603 that the sight of the peacock's tail[br]made him physically ill. 0:06:12.144,0:06:15.042 He couldn't explain it[br]with his theory of natural selection, 0:06:15.066,0:06:16.965 and out of this frustration, 0:06:16.989,0:06:20.173 he developed the theory[br]of sexual selection. 0:06:21.501,0:06:22.651 On this account, 0:06:22.675,0:06:27.058 the display of the peacock's tail[br]is about sexual enticement, 0:06:27.082,0:06:33.304 and this enticement means[br]it's more likely the peacock will mate 0:06:33.328,0:06:34.662 and have offspring. 0:06:35.818,0:06:38.807 Now, the modern twist[br]on this display argument 0:06:39.472,0:06:44.442 is that the peacock is also[br]advertising its health to the peahen. 0:06:46.001,0:06:51.128 Only especially fit organisms[br]can afford to divert resources 0:06:51.152,0:06:53.850 to maintaining such[br]an extravagant appendage. 0:06:54.592,0:06:59.485 Only especially fit men can afford[br]the price that testosterone levies 0:06:59.509,0:07:00.778 on their immune system. 0:07:01.560,0:07:04.218 And by analogy, think of the fact 0:07:04.242,0:07:11.207 that only very rich men can afford[br]to pay more than $10,000 for a watch 0:07:11.231,0:07:13.481 as a display of their financial fitness. 0:07:15.113,0:07:17.915 Now, many people hear these kinds[br]of evolutionary claims 0:07:17.939,0:07:23.669 and think they mean that we somehow[br]are unconsciously seeking mates 0:07:23.693,0:07:25.608 who are healthy. 0:07:25.632,0:07:28.575 And I think this idea[br]is probably not right. 0:07:30.269,0:07:35.131 Teenagers and young adults are not exactly[br]known for making decisions 0:07:35.155,0:07:37.343 that are predicated on health concerns. 0:07:38.544,0:07:40.145 But they don't have to be, 0:07:40.169,0:07:41.652 and let me explain why. 0:07:43.151,0:07:44.502 Imagine a population 0:07:45.208,0:07:49.386 in which people have three different[br]kinds of preferences: 0:07:49.410,0:07:52.735 for green, for orange and for red. 0:07:53.922,0:07:55.113 From their point of view, 0:07:55.137,0:07:57.500 these preferences have[br]nothing to do with health; 0:07:57.524,0:07:59.016 they just like what they like. 0:08:00.128,0:08:04.169 But if it were also the case[br]that these preferences are associated 0:08:04.193,0:08:07.191 with the different likelihood[br]of producing offspring -- 0:08:07.215,0:08:10.077 let's say in a ratio of 3:2:1 -- 0:08:11.060,0:08:12.504 then in the first generation, 0:08:12.528,0:08:15.800 there would be 3 greens[br]to 2 oranges to 1 red, 0:08:15.824,0:08:18.010 and in each subsequent generation, 0:08:18.034,0:08:20.740 the proportion of greens increase, 0:08:22.067,0:08:23.778 so that in 10 generations, 0:08:23.802,0:08:27.575 98 percent of this population[br]has a green preference. 0:08:27.963,0:08:31.084 Now, a scientist coming in[br]and sampling this population 0:08:31.108,0:08:34.757 discovers that green[br]preferences are universal. 0:08:35.606,0:08:39.478 So the point about this little[br]abstract example 0:08:39.502,0:08:44.162 is that while preferences[br]for specific physical features 0:08:44.186,0:08:46.749 can be arbitrary for the individual, 0:08:48.090,0:08:49.860 if those features are heritable 0:08:53.232,0:08:57.391 and they are associated[br]with a reproductive advantage, 0:08:57.415,0:08:58.629 over time, 0:08:58.653,0:09:00.580 they become universal for the group. 0:09:03.172,0:09:08.373 So what happens in the brain[br]when we see beautiful people? 0:09:10.520,0:09:14.548 Attractive faces activate[br]parts of our visual cortex 0:09:14.572,0:09:16.517 in the back of the brain, 0:09:16.541,0:09:18.483 an area called the fusiform gyrus, 0:09:18.507,0:09:21.309 that is especially tuned[br]to processing faces, 0:09:21.333,0:09:25.347 and an adjacent area called[br]the lateral occipital complex, 0:09:25.371,0:09:28.127 that is especially attuned[br]to processing objects. 0:09:28.700,0:09:30.096 In addition, 0:09:30.120,0:09:35.198 attractive faces activate parts[br]of our reward and pleasure centers 0:09:35.222,0:09:37.487 in the front and deep in the brain, 0:09:38.179,0:09:41.303 and these include areas[br]that have complicated names, 0:09:41.327,0:09:43.191 like the ventral striatum, 0:09:43.215,0:09:45.134 the orbitofrontal cortex 0:09:45.158,0:09:47.752 and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. 0:09:48.732,0:09:52.716 Our visual brain that is tuned[br]to processing faces 0:09:52.740,0:09:55.377 interacts with our pleasure centers 0:09:55.401,0:09:57.848 to underpin the experience of beauty. 0:09:59.719,0:10:03.811 Amazingly, while we all[br]engage with beauty, 0:10:03.835,0:10:05.432 without our knowledge, 0:10:05.456,0:10:07.214 beauty also engages us. 0:10:08.478,0:10:10.977 Our brains respond to attractive faces 0:10:11.001,0:10:13.355 even when we're not thinking about beauty. 0:10:14.637,0:10:18.926 We conducted an experiment[br]in which people saw a series of faces, 0:10:18.950,0:10:20.653 and in one condition, 0:10:20.677,0:10:26.253 they had to decide if a pair of faces[br]were the same or a different person. 0:10:27.907,0:10:30.400 Even in this condition, 0:10:30.424,0:10:36.566 attractive faces drove neural activity[br]robustly in their visual cortex, 0:10:36.590,0:10:40.103 despite the fact that they were thinking[br]about a person's identity 0:10:40.127,0:10:41.428 and not their beauty. 0:10:43.127,0:10:47.438 Another group similarly found[br]automatic responses to beauty 0:10:47.462,0:10:49.625 within our pleasure centers. 0:10:50.551,0:10:53.340 Taken together, these studies suggest 0:10:54.033,0:10:58.544 that our brain automatically[br]responds to beauty 0:10:58.568,0:11:00.583 by linking vision and pleasure. 0:11:01.854,0:11:04.234 These beauty detectors, it seems, 0:11:04.258,0:11:06.096 ping every time we see beauty, 0:11:06.120,0:11:08.814 regardless of whatever else[br]we might be thinking. 0:11:11.022,0:11:16.511 We also have a "beauty is good"[br]stereotype embedded in the brain. 0:11:17.712,0:11:19.939 Within the orbitofrontal cortex, 0:11:19.963,0:11:21.738 there's overlapping neural activity 0:11:21.762,0:11:25.546 in response to beauty and to goodness, 0:11:27.185,0:11:30.707 and this happens even when people[br]aren't explicitly thinking 0:11:30.731,0:11:32.334 about beauty or goodness. 0:11:33.906,0:11:37.865 Our brains seem to reflexively[br]associate beauty and good. 0:11:38.690,0:11:42.668 And this reflexive association[br]may be the biologic trigger 0:11:42.692,0:11:45.374 for the many social effects of beauty. 0:11:46.057,0:11:50.451 Attractive people receive[br]all kinds of advantages in life. 0:11:51.556,0:11:54.310 They're regarded as more intelligent, 0:11:54.334,0:11:55.937 more trustworthy, 0:11:55.961,0:11:59.506 they're given higher pay[br]and lesser punishments, 0:11:59.530,0:12:02.252 even when such judgments[br]are not warranted. 0:12:03.572,0:12:06.912 These kinds of observations[br]reveal beauty's ugly side. 0:12:07.796,0:12:09.869 In my lab, we recently found 0:12:09.893,0:12:14.815 that people with minor facial[br]anomalies and disfigurements 0:12:14.839,0:12:18.623 are regarded as less good, less kind, 0:12:18.647,0:12:23.078 less intelligent, less competent[br]and less hardworking. 0:12:23.854,0:12:29.138 Unfortunately, we also have[br]a "disfigured is bad" stereotype. 0:12:30.398,0:12:37.056 This stereotype is probably[br]exploited and magnified 0:12:37.080,0:12:39.493 by images in popular media, 0:12:39.517,0:12:43.413 in which facial disfigurement[br]is often used as a shorthand 0:12:43.437,0:12:46.095 to depict someone of villainous character. 0:12:47.378,0:12:50.832 We need to understand[br]these kinds of implicit biases 0:12:50.856,0:12:52.593 if we are to overcome them, 0:12:52.617,0:12:56.298 and aim for a society[br]in which we treat people fairly, 0:12:56.322,0:13:00.737 based on their behavior and not[br]on the happenstance of their looks. 0:13:04.758,0:13:08.003 Let me leave you with one final thought. 0:13:09.044,0:13:11.092 Beauty is a work in progress. 0:13:12.527,0:13:15.734 The so-called universal[br]attributes of beauty 0:13:15.758,0:13:21.246 were selected for during the almost[br]two million years of the Pleistocene. 0:13:21.944,0:13:26.836 Life was nasty, brutish[br]and a very long time ago. 0:13:28.014,0:13:33.338 The selection criteria[br]for reproductive success from that time 0:13:33.362,0:13:35.227 doesn't really apply today. 0:13:35.966,0:13:37.456 For example, 0:13:37.480,0:13:41.547 death by parasite is not one[br]of the top ways that people die, 0:13:41.571,0:13:44.462 at least not in the technologically[br]developed world. 0:13:45.997,0:13:48.357 From antibiotics to surgery, 0:13:48.381,0:13:51.873 birth control to in vitro fertilization, 0:13:51.897,0:13:55.287 the filters for reproductive success[br]are being relaxed. 0:13:55.956,0:13:58.611 And under these relaxed conditions, 0:13:58.635,0:14:02.869 preference and trait combinations[br]are free to drift 0:14:02.893,0:14:04.662 and become more variable. 0:14:05.416,0:14:09.602 Even as we are profoundly[br]affecting our environment, 0:14:10.985,0:14:14.298 modern medicine[br]and technological innovation 0:14:14.322,0:14:16.075 is profoundly affecting 0:14:16.099,0:14:19.821 the very essence of what it means[br]to look beautiful. 0:14:21.197,0:14:23.747 The universal nature of beauty is changing 0:14:23.771,0:14:26.692 even as we're changing the universe. 0:14:28.863,0:14:30.048 Thank you. 0:14:30.072,0:14:33.658 (Applause)