WEBVTT

00:00:01.948 --> 00:00:03.915
It's 1878.

00:00:05.057 --> 00:00:08.631
Sir Francis Galton
gives a remarkable talk.

00:00:09.422 --> 00:00:13.560
He's speaking to the anthropologic
institute of Great Britain and Ireland.

00:00:14.170 --> 00:00:18.220
Known for his pioneering work
in human intelligence,

00:00:18.220 --> 00:00:21.112
Galton is a brilliant polymath.

00:00:21.716 --> 00:00:23.518
He's an explorer,

00:00:23.518 --> 00:00:25.294
an anthropologist,

00:00:25.294 --> 00:00:26.847
a sociologist,

00:00:26.847 --> 00:00:28.385
a psychologist,

00:00:28.385 --> 00:00:30.481
and a statistician.

00:00:31.491 --> 00:00:34.166
He's also a eugenist.

00:00:34.807 --> 00:00:36.871
In this talk,

00:00:36.871 --> 00:00:38.353
he presents a new technique

00:00:38.353 --> 00:00:43.749
by which he can combine photographs
and produce composite portraits.

00:00:44.663 --> 00:00:49.677
This technique could be used
to characterize different types of people.

00:00:50.814 --> 00:00:56.186
Galton thinks that if he combines
photographs of violent criminals,

00:00:56.186 --> 00:00:59.845
he will discover the face of criminality.

00:01:00.420 --> 00:01:02.430
But to his surprise,

00:01:02.430 --> 00:01:06.116
the composite portrait that he produces

00:01:06.116 --> 00:01:07.597
is beautiful.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:10.154 --> 00:01:13.066
Galton's surprising finding
raises deep questions.

00:01:13.666 --> 00:01:15.490
What is beauty?

00:01:16.254 --> 00:01:22.852
Why do certain configurations of line
and color and form excite us so?

00:01:24.555 --> 00:01:26.106
For most of human history,

00:01:26.106 --> 00:01:32.219
these questions have been approached
using logic and speculation,

00:01:32.219 --> 00:01:33.974
but in the last few decades,

00:01:33.974 --> 00:01:36.784
scientists have addressed
the question of beauty

00:01:36.784 --> 00:01:41.807
using ideas from evolutionary psychology
and tools of neuroscience.

00:01:42.708 --> 00:01:47.146
We're beginning to glimpse
the why and the how of beauty,

00:01:47.146 --> 00:01:50.474
at least in terms of what it means
for the human face and form.

00:01:51.376 --> 00:01:52.955
And in the process,

00:01:52.955 --> 00:01:55.307
we're stumbling upon some surprises.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:56.327 --> 00:01:59.915
When it comes to seeing
beauty in each other,

00:01:59.915 --> 00:02:04.293
while this decision is certainly
subjective for the individual,

00:02:04.293 --> 00:02:08.239
it's sculpted by factors that contribute
to the survival of the group.

00:02:09.009 --> 00:02:11.680
Many experiments have shown

00:02:11.680 --> 00:02:15.681
that a few basic parameters contribute
to what makes a face attractive.

00:02:16.490 --> 00:02:22.189
These include averaging, symmetry
and the effects of hormones.

00:02:22.189 --> 00:02:25.014
And let's take each one of these in turn.

NOTE Paragraph

00:02:26.658 --> 00:02:28.292
Galton's finding

00:02:28.292 --> 00:02:33.432
that composite or average faces
are typically more attractive

00:02:33.432 --> 00:02:37.012
than each individual face
that contributes to the average

00:02:37.012 --> 00:02:39.287
has been replicated many times.

00:02:40.140 --> 00:02:44.329
This laboratory finding fits
with many people's intuitions.

00:02:44.945 --> 00:02:49.392
Average faces represent the central
tendencies of a group.

00:02:49.852 --> 00:02:54.299
People with mixed features
represent different populations,

00:02:54.299 --> 00:02:57.670
and presumably harbor
greater genetic diversity

00:02:57.670 --> 00:03:00.141
and adaptability to the environment.

00:03:00.567 --> 00:03:04.948
Many people find mixed-race
individuals attractive,

00:03:04.948 --> 00:03:07.775
and inbred families less so.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:08.834 --> 00:03:13.017
The second factor that contributes
to beauty is symmetry.

00:03:13.602 --> 00:03:18.263
People generally find symmetric faces
more attractive than asymmetric ones.

00:03:18.957 --> 00:03:24.232
Developmental abnormalities
are often associated with asymmetries,

00:03:24.232 --> 00:03:27.520
and in plants, animals and humans,

00:03:27.520 --> 00:03:30.687
asymmetries often arise
from parasitic infections.

00:03:31.492 --> 00:03:33.888
Symmetry, it turns out,

00:03:33.888 --> 00:03:37.304
is also an indicator of health.

00:03:38.621 --> 00:03:40.987
In the 1930s,

00:03:40.987 --> 00:03:43.901
a man named Maksymilian Faktorowicz


00:03:43.901 --> 00:03:47.101
recognized the importance
of symmetry for beauty

00:03:47.101 --> 00:03:49.911
when he designed the beauty micrometer.

00:03:50.455 --> 00:03:51.622
With this device,

00:03:51.622 --> 00:03:54.700
he could measure minor asymmetric flaws

00:03:54.700 --> 00:03:59.272
which he could then make up for
with products he sold from his company,

00:03:59.272 --> 00:04:01.505
named brilliantly after himself:

00:04:01.505 --> 00:04:03.207
Max Factor,

00:04:03.207 --> 00:04:08.107
which as you know is one of the world's
most famous brands for makeup.

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:08.746 --> 00:04:12.615
The third factor that contributes
to facial attractiveness

00:04:12.615 --> 00:04:14.867
is the effect of hormones.

00:04:15.787 --> 00:04:20.441
And here, I need to apologize
for confining my comments

00:04:20.441 --> 00:04:22.577
to heterosexual norms.

00:04:23.785 --> 00:04:28.278
But estrogen and testosterone
play important roles

00:04:28.278 --> 00:04:31.280
in shaping features
that we find attractive.

00:04:31.810 --> 00:04:36.002
Estrogen produces features
that signal fertility.

00:04:36.485 --> 00:04:39.458
Men typically find women attractive

00:04:39.458 --> 00:04:43.734
who have elements of both
youth and maturity.

00:04:44.350 --> 00:04:49.119
A face that's too baby-like might
mean that the girl is not yet fertile,

00:04:49.119 --> 00:04:51.116
so men find women attractive

00:04:51.116 --> 00:04:55.376
who have large eyes,
full lips and narrow chins

00:04:55.376 --> 00:04:57.914
as indicators of youth,

00:04:57.914 --> 00:05:01.553
and high cheekbones as an
indicator of maturity.

00:05:02.708 --> 00:05:07.738
Testosterone produces features
that we regard as typically masculine.

00:05:08.896 --> 00:05:10.939
These include heavier brows,

00:05:10.939 --> 00:05:12.267
thinner cheeks

00:05:12.267 --> 00:05:14.660
and bigger, squared-off jaws.

00:05:14.660 --> 00:05:16.771
But here's a fascinating irony.

00:05:17.875 --> 00:05:19.028
In many species,

00:05:19.028 --> 00:05:20.348
if anything,

00:05:20.348 --> 00:05:24.224
testosterone suppresses the immune system.

00:05:25.161 --> 00:05:29.295
So the idea that testosterone-infused
features are a fitness indicator

00:05:29.295 --> 00:05:31.520
doesn't really make a whole lot of sense.

00:05:32.334 --> 00:05:35.107
Here, the logic is turned on its head.

00:05:35.775 --> 00:05:37.831
Instead of a fitness indicator,

00:05:37.831 --> 00:05:41.587
scientists invoke a handicap principle.

00:05:42.925 --> 00:05:46.480
The most commonly cited
example of a handicap


00:05:46.480 --> 00:05:48.305
is the peacock's tail.

00:05:48.773 --> 00:05:53.121
This beautiful but cumbersome tail
doesn't exactly help the peacock

00:05:53.121 --> 00:05:56.848
avoid predators and approach peahens.

00:05:57.348 --> 00:06:00.937
Why should such an extravagant
appendage evolve?

00:06:02.082 --> 00:06:04.552
Even Charles Darwin,

00:06:04.552 --> 00:06:07.974
in an 1860 letter to Asa Gray wrote

00:06:07.974 --> 00:06:12.044
that the sight of the peacock's tail
made him physcially illl.

00:06:12.304 --> 00:06:15.125
He couldn't explain it with his
theory of natural selection,

00:06:15.125 --> 00:06:17.185
and out of this frustration,

00:06:17.185 --> 00:06:20.618
he developed the theory
of sexual selection.

NOTE Paragraph

00:06:21.596 --> 00:06:22.675
On this account,

00:06:22.675 --> 00:06:27.233
the display of the peacock's tail
is about sexual enticement,

00:06:27.233 --> 00:06:31.266
and this enticement means
that it's more likely

00:06:31.266 --> 00:06:35.258
that the peacock will mate
and have offspring.

00:06:36.001 --> 00:06:39.654
Now, the modern twist
on this display argument

00:06:39.654 --> 00:06:44.924
is that the peacock is also
advertising its health to the peahen.

00:06:46.001 --> 00:06:51.263
Only especially fit organisms
can afford to divert resources

00:06:51.263 --> 00:06:54.735
to maintaining such
an extravagant appendage.

00:06:54.735 --> 00:06:59.601
Only especially fit men can afford
the price that testosterone levies

00:06:59.601 --> 00:07:01.299
on their immune system.

00:07:01.561 --> 00:07:02.875
And by anaology,

00:07:02.875 --> 00:07:07.883
think of the fact that only very
rich men can afford

00:07:07.883 --> 00:07:13.804
to pay more than $10,000 for a watch
as a display of their financial fitness.

NOTE Paragraph

00:07:15.304 --> 00:07:18.129
Now, many people hear these kinds
of evoulutionary claims

00:07:18.129 --> 00:07:23.882
and think they mean that we somehow
are unconciously seeking mates

00:07:23.882 --> 00:07:25.820
who are healthy,

00:07:25.820 --> 00:07:28.892
and I think this idea
is probably not right.

00:07:30.365 --> 00:07:35.348
Teenagers and young adults are not
exactly known for making decisions

00:07:35.348 --> 00:07:37.844
that are predicated on health concerns.

00:07:38.592 --> 00:07:40.354
But they don't have to be,

00:07:40.354 --> 00:07:42.255
and let me explain why.

00:07:43.382 --> 00:07:49.540
Imagine a population in which people
have three different types of preferences:

00:07:49.540 --> 00:07:53.368
for green, for orange, and for red.

00:07:53.935 --> 00:07:55.137
From their point of view,

00:07:55.137 --> 00:07:57.524
these preferences have
nothing to do with health,

00:07:57.524 --> 00:07:59.823
they just like what they like.

00:08:00.207 --> 00:08:01.603
But if it were also the case

00:08:01.603 --> 00:08:05.609
that these preferences are associated
with the different likelihood

00:08:05.609 --> 00:08:07.352
of producing offspring,

00:08:07.352 --> 00:08:11.164
let's say in a ratio of [3:2:1]

00:08:11.164 --> 00:08:12.595
then in the first generation,

00:08:12.595 --> 00:08:16.104
there would be
[3 greens: 2 oranges: 1 red,]

00:08:16.104 --> 00:08:18.169
and in each subsequent generation,

00:08:18.169 --> 00:08:22.211
the proportion of greens increase

00:08:22.211 --> 00:08:27.796
so that [intention rations] 98 percent
of this population has a green preference.

00:08:28.210 --> 00:08:31.265
Now, scientists coming in
and sampling this population

00:08:31.265 --> 00:08:35.606
disover that green
preferences are universal,

00:08:35.606 --> 00:08:39.780
so the point about this
little abstract example

00:08:39.780 --> 00:08:44.514
is that while preferences
for specific physical features

00:08:44.514 --> 00:08:48.162
can be arbitrary for the individual,

00:08:48.162 --> 00:08:51.579
if those features are hertiable

00:08:51.579 --> 00:08:57.545
and they are associated
with a reproductive advangtage,

00:08:57.545 --> 00:08:58.566
over time,

00:08:58.566 --> 00:09:01.350
they become universal for the group.

00:09:03.236 --> 00:09:08.600
So what happens in the brain
when we see beautiful people?

00:09:10.719 --> 00:09:16.653
Attractive faces activate parts of our
visual cortex in the back of the brain;

00:09:16.653 --> 00:09:18.618
an area called the fusiform gyrus


00:09:18.618 --> 00:09:21.646
that is especially attuned
to processing faces,

00:09:21.646 --> 00:09:25.451
and an adjacent area called
the lateral occipital complex

00:09:25.451 --> 00:09:28.207
that is especially attuned
to processing objects.

00:09:28.915 --> 00:09:30.334
In addition,

00:09:30.334 --> 00:09:35.402
attractive faces activate parts
of our reward and pleasure centers

00:09:35.402 --> 00:09:38.386
in the front and deep in the brain,

00:09:38.386 --> 00:09:41.533
and these include areas that have
complicated names,

00:09:41.533 --> 00:09:43.420
like the ventral striatum,

00:09:43.420 --> 00:09:45.362
the [orbitofrontal] cortex

00:09:45.362 --> 00:09:47.956
and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

00:09:49.153 --> 00:09:52.931
Our official brain that is attuned
to processing faces

00:09:52.931 --> 00:09:55.591
interacts with our pleasure centers

00:09:55.591 --> 00:09:58.038
to underpin the experience of beauty.

00:10:00.259 --> 00:10:04.034
Amazingly, while we all
engage with beauty,

00:10:04.034 --> 00:10:05.654
without our knowledge,

00:10:05.654 --> 00:10:07.829
beauty also engages us.

00:10:08.629 --> 00:10:13.251
Our brains respond to attractive faces
even when we're not thinking about beauty.

00:10:14.827 --> 00:10:19.139
We conducted an experiement in which
people saw a series of faces,

00:10:19.139 --> 00:10:20.865
and in one condition,

00:10:20.865 --> 00:10:26.441
they had to decide if a pair of faces
were the same or a different person.

00:10:27.907 --> 00:10:30.423
Even in this condition,

00:10:30.423 --> 00:10:36.776
attractive faces drove neural activity
robustly in their visual cortex

00:10:36.776 --> 00:10:40.242
despite the fact that they were thinking
about a person's identity

00:10:40.242 --> 00:10:42.060
and not their beauty.

00:10:43.294 --> 00:10:47.568
Another group similarly found
automatic responses to beauty

00:10:47.568 --> 00:10:49.731
within our pleasure centers.

00:10:50.699 --> 00:10:51.869
So taken together,

00:10:51.869 --> 00:10:54.288
these studies suggest

00:10:54.288 --> 00:10:58.728
that our brain automatically
responds to beauty

00:10:58.728 --> 00:11:01.210
by linking vision and pleasure.

00:11:02.005 --> 00:11:03.468
These beauty detectors,

00:11:03.468 --> 00:11:04.407
it seems,

00:11:04.407 --> 00:11:07.736
ping ever time we see beauty
regardless of whatever else

00:11:07.736 --> 00:11:09.662
we might be thinking.

00:11:11.181 --> 00:11:16.572
We also have a "beauty is good"
stereotype embedded in the brain.

00:11:17.888 --> 00:11:20.138
Within the [orbitofrontal] cortex,

00:11:20.138 --> 00:11:21.936
there's overlapping neural activity


00:11:21.936 --> 00:11:27.336
in response to beauty and to goodness,

00:11:27.336 --> 00:11:30.881
and this happens even when people
aren't expllicitly thinking

00:11:30.881 --> 00:11:33.184
about beauty or goodness.

00:11:34.129 --> 00:11:38.928
Our brains seem to reflexively
associate beauty and good.

00:11:38.928 --> 00:11:42.929
And this reflexive association
may be the biologic trigger

00:11:42.929 --> 00:11:45.893
for the many social effects of beauty.

00:11:46.217 --> 00:11:50.611
Attractive people receive
all kinds of advantages in life.

00:11:51.683 --> 00:11:54.547
They're regarded as more intelligent,

00:11:54.547 --> 00:11:56.083
more trustworthy,

00:11:56.083 --> 00:11:59.681
they're given higher pay
and lesser punishments,

00:11:59.681 --> 00:12:02.619
even when such judgments
are not warranted.

00:12:03.620 --> 00:12:07.269
These kinds of observations
reveal beauty's ugly side.

00:12:07.953 --> 00:12:08.970
In my lab,

00:12:08.970 --> 00:12:14.974
we recently found that people with minor
facial anomalies and disfigurements

00:12:14.974 --> 00:12:18.781
are regarded as less good, less kind,

00:12:18.781 --> 00:12:23.407
less intelligent, less competent
and less hardworking.

00:12:23.982 --> 00:12:29.266
Unfortunately, we also have
a "disfigured is bad" stereotype.

00:12:30.518 --> 00:12:36.965
This stereotype is probably
exploited and magnified

00:12:36.965 --> 00:12:39.816
by images in popular media

00:12:39.816 --> 00:12:43.612
in which facial disfigurement
is often used as a shorthand

00:12:43.612 --> 00:12:47.191
to depict someone of villainous character.

00:12:47.600 --> 00:12:51.007
We need to understand
these kinds of implicit biases

00:12:51.007 --> 00:12:52.767
if we are to overcome them,

00:12:52.767 --> 00:12:56.471
and aim for a society in which
we treat people fairly,

00:12:56.471 --> 00:13:01.251
based on their behavior and not
on the happenstance of their looks.

00:13:04.925 --> 00:13:08.170
Let me leave you with one final thought.

00:13:09.203 --> 00:13:11.251
Beauty is a work in progress.

00:13:12.766 --> 00:13:15.878
The so-called universal
attributes of beauty

00:13:15.878 --> 00:13:17.822
were selected for --

00:13:17.822 --> 00:13:21.454
during the almost two million
years of the Pleistocene.

00:13:22.183 --> 00:13:27.006
Life was nasty, brutish
and a very long time ago.

00:13:28.197 --> 00:13:33.544
The selection criteria for reproductive
success from that time

00:13:33.544 --> 00:13:36.084
doesn't really apply today.

00:13:36.084 --> 00:13:37.831
For example,

00:13:37.831 --> 00:13:41.682
death by parasite is not one
of the top ways that people die,

00:13:41.682 --> 00:13:44.865
at least not in the
technologically-developed world.

00:13:46.172 --> 00:13:48.555
From antibiotics to surgery,

00:13:48.555 --> 00:13:52.070
birth control to in vitro fertilization,

00:13:52.070 --> 00:13:56.195
the filters for reproductive
success are being relaxed,

00:13:56.195 --> 00:13:58.740
and under these relaxed conditions,

00:13:58.740 --> 00:14:03.126
preference and trait
combinations are free to drift

00:14:03.126 --> 00:14:04.895
and become more variable.

00:14:05.615 --> 00:14:11.025
Even as we are profoundly
effecting our environment,

00:14:11.025 --> 00:14:16.256
modern medicine and technological
innovation is profoundly effecting

00:14:16.256 --> 00:14:19.978
the very essence of what
it means to look beautiful.

00:14:21.348 --> 00:14:23.921
The universal nature of beauty is changing

00:14:23.921 --> 00:14:26.842
even as we're changing the universe.

00:14:28.896 --> 00:14:30.442
Thank you.

00:14:30.442 --> 00:14:32.122
(Applause)