1
00:00:01,948 --> 00:00:03,915
It's 1878.

2
00:00:05,057 --> 00:00:08,631
Sir Francis Galton
gives a remarkable talk.

3
00:00:09,422 --> 00:00:13,560
He's speaking to the anthropologic
institute of Great Britain and Ireland.

4
00:00:14,170 --> 00:00:18,220
Known for his pioneering work
in human intelligence,

5
00:00:18,220 --> 00:00:21,112
Galton is a brilliant polymath.

6
00:00:21,716 --> 00:00:23,518
He's an explorer,

7
00:00:23,518 --> 00:00:25,294
an anthropologist,

8
00:00:25,294 --> 00:00:26,847
a sociologist,

9
00:00:26,847 --> 00:00:28,385
a psychologist,

10
00:00:28,385 --> 00:00:30,481
and a statistician.

11
00:00:31,491 --> 00:00:34,166
He's also a eugenist.

12
00:00:34,807 --> 00:00:36,871
In this talk,

13
00:00:36,871 --> 00:00:38,353
he presents a new technique

14
00:00:38,353 --> 00:00:43,749
by which he can combine photographs
and produce composite portraits.

15
00:00:44,663 --> 00:00:49,677
This technique could be used
to characterize different types of people.

16
00:00:50,814 --> 00:00:56,186
Galton thinks that if he combines
photographs of violent criminals,

17
00:00:56,186 --> 00:00:59,845
he will discover the face of criminality.

18
00:01:00,420 --> 00:01:02,430
But to his surprise,

19
00:01:02,430 --> 00:01:06,116
the composite portrait that he produces

20
00:01:06,116 --> 00:01:07,597
is beautiful.

21
00:01:10,154 --> 00:01:13,066
Galton's surprising finding
raises deep questions.

22
00:01:13,666 --> 00:01:15,490
What is beauty?

23
00:01:16,254 --> 00:01:22,852
Why do certain configurations of line
and color and form excite us so?

24
00:01:24,555 --> 00:01:26,106
For most of human history,

25
00:01:26,106 --> 00:01:32,219
these questions have been approached
using logic and speculation,

26
00:01:32,219 --> 00:01:33,974
but in the last few decades,

27
00:01:33,974 --> 00:01:36,784
scientists have addressed
the question of beauty

28
00:01:36,784 --> 00:01:41,807
using ideas from evolutionary psychology
and tools of neuroscience.

29
00:01:42,708 --> 00:01:47,146
We're beginning to glimpse
the why and the how of beauty,

30
00:01:47,146 --> 00:01:50,474
at least in terms of what it means
for the human face and form.

31
00:01:51,376 --> 00:01:52,955
And in the process,

32
00:01:52,955 --> 00:01:55,307
we're stumbling upon some surprises.

33
00:01:56,327 --> 00:01:59,915
When it comes to seeing
beauty in each other,

34
00:01:59,915 --> 00:02:04,293
while this decision is certainly
subjective for the individual,

35
00:02:04,293 --> 00:02:08,239
it's sculpted by factors that contribute
to the survival of the group.

36
00:02:09,009 --> 00:02:11,680
Many experiments have shown

37
00:02:11,680 --> 00:02:15,681
that a few basic parameters contribute
to what makes a face attractive.

38
00:02:16,490 --> 00:02:22,189
These include averaging, symmetry
and the effects of hormones.

39
00:02:22,189 --> 00:02:25,014
And let's take each one of these in turn.

40
00:02:26,658 --> 00:02:28,292
Galton's finding

41
00:02:28,292 --> 00:02:33,432
that composite or average faces
are typically more attractive

42
00:02:33,432 --> 00:02:37,012
than each individual face
that contributes to the average

43
00:02:37,012 --> 00:02:39,287
has been replicated many times.

44
00:02:40,140 --> 00:02:44,329
This laboratory finding fits
with many people's intuitions.

45
00:02:44,945 --> 00:02:49,392
Average faces represent the central
tendencies of a group.

46
00:02:49,852 --> 00:02:54,299
People with mixed features
represent different populations,

47
00:02:54,299 --> 00:02:57,670
and presumably harbor
greater genetic diversity

48
00:02:57,670 --> 00:03:00,141
and adaptability to the environment.

49
00:03:00,567 --> 00:03:04,948
Many people find mixed-race
individuals attractive,

50
00:03:04,948 --> 00:03:07,775
and inbred families less so.

51
00:03:08,834 --> 00:03:13,017
The second factor that contributes
to beauty is symmetry.

52
00:03:13,602 --> 00:03:18,263
People generally find symmetric faces
more attractive than asymmetric ones.

53
00:03:18,957 --> 00:03:24,232
Developmental abnormalities
are often associated with asymmetries,

54
00:03:24,232 --> 00:03:27,520
and in plants, animals and humans,

55
00:03:27,520 --> 00:03:30,687
asymmetries often arise
from parasitic infections.

56
00:03:31,492 --> 00:03:33,888
Symmetry, it turns out,

57
00:03:33,888 --> 00:03:37,304
is also an indicator of health.

58
00:03:38,621 --> 00:03:40,987
In the 1930s,

59
00:03:40,987 --> 00:03:43,901
a man named Maksymilian Faktorowicz


60
00:03:43,901 --> 00:03:47,101
recognized the importance
of symmetry for beauty

61
00:03:47,101 --> 00:03:49,911
when he designed the beauty micrometer.

62
00:03:50,455 --> 00:03:51,622
With this device,

63
00:03:51,622 --> 00:03:54,700
he could measure minor asymmetric flaws

64
00:03:54,700 --> 00:03:59,272
which he could then make up for
with products he sold from his company,

65
00:03:59,272 --> 00:04:01,505
named brilliantly after himself:

66
00:04:01,505 --> 00:04:03,207
Max Factor,

67
00:04:03,207 --> 00:04:08,107
which as you know is one of the world's
most famous brands for makeup.

68
00:04:08,746 --> 00:04:12,615
The third factor that contributes
to facial attractiveness

69
00:04:12,615 --> 00:04:14,867
is the effect of hormones.

70
00:04:15,787 --> 00:04:20,441
And here, I need to apologize
for confining my comments

71
00:04:20,441 --> 00:04:22,577
to heterosexual norms.

72
00:04:23,785 --> 00:04:28,278
But estrogen and testosterone
play important roles

73
00:04:28,278 --> 00:04:31,280
in shaping features
that we find attractive.

74
00:04:31,810 --> 00:04:36,002
Estrogen produces features
that signal fertility.

75
00:04:36,485 --> 00:04:39,458
Men typically find women attractive

76
00:04:39,458 --> 00:04:43,734
who have elements of both
youth and maturity.

77
00:04:44,350 --> 00:04:49,119
A face that's too baby-like might
mean that the girl is not yet fertile,

78
00:04:49,119 --> 00:04:51,116
so men find women attractive

79
00:04:51,116 --> 00:04:55,376
who have large eyes,
full lips and narrow chins

80
00:04:55,376 --> 00:04:57,914
as indicators of youth,

81
00:04:57,914 --> 00:05:01,553
and high cheekbones as an
indicator of maturity.

82
00:05:02,708 --> 00:05:07,738
Testosterone produces features
that we regard as typically masculine.

83
00:05:08,896 --> 00:05:10,939
These include heavier brows,

84
00:05:10,939 --> 00:05:12,267
thinner cheeks

85
00:05:12,267 --> 00:05:14,660
and bigger, squared-off jaws.

86
00:05:14,660 --> 00:05:16,771
But here's a fascinating irony.

87
00:05:17,875 --> 00:05:19,028
In many species,

88
00:05:19,028 --> 00:05:20,348
if anything,

89
00:05:20,348 --> 00:05:24,224
testosterone suppresses the immune system.

90
00:05:25,161 --> 00:05:29,295
So the idea that testosterone-infused
features are a fitness indicator

91
00:05:29,295 --> 00:05:31,520
doesn't really make a whole lot of sense.

92
00:05:32,334 --> 00:05:35,107
Here, the logic is turned on its head.

93
00:05:35,775 --> 00:05:37,831
Instead of a fitness indicator,

94
00:05:37,831 --> 00:05:41,587
scientists invoke a handicap principle.

95
00:05:42,925 --> 00:05:46,480
The most commonly cited
example of a handicap


96
00:05:46,480 --> 00:05:48,305
is the peacock's tail.

97
00:05:48,773 --> 00:05:53,121
This beautiful but cumbersome tail
doesn't exactly help the peacock

98
00:05:53,121 --> 00:05:56,848
avoid predators and approach peahens.

99
00:05:57,348 --> 00:06:00,937
Why should such an extravagant
appendage evolve?

100
00:06:02,082 --> 00:06:04,552
Even Charles Darwin,

101
00:06:04,552 --> 00:06:07,974
in an 1860 letter to Asa Gray wrote

102
00:06:07,974 --> 00:06:12,044
that the sight of the peacock's tail
made him physcially illl.

103
00:06:12,304 --> 00:06:15,125
He couldn't explain it with his
theory of natural selection,

104
00:06:15,125 --> 00:06:17,185
and out of this frustration,

105
00:06:17,185 --> 00:06:20,618
he developed the theory
of sexual selection.

106
00:06:21,596 --> 00:06:22,675
On this account,

107
00:06:22,675 --> 00:06:27,233
the display of the peacock's tail
is about sexual enticement,

108
00:06:27,233 --> 00:06:31,266
and this enticement means
that it's more likely

109
00:06:31,266 --> 00:06:35,258
that the peacock will mate
and have offspring.

110
00:06:36,001 --> 00:06:39,654
Now, the modern twist
on this display argument

111
00:06:39,654 --> 00:06:44,924
is that the peacock is also
advertising its health to the peahen.

112
00:06:46,001 --> 00:06:51,263
Only especially fit organisms
can afford to divert resources

113
00:06:51,263 --> 00:06:54,735
to maintaining such
an extravagant appendage.

114
00:06:54,735 --> 00:06:59,601
Only especially fit men can afford
the price that testosterone levies

115
00:06:59,601 --> 00:07:01,299
on their immune system.

116
00:07:01,561 --> 00:07:02,875
And by anaology,

117
00:07:02,875 --> 00:07:07,883
think of the fact that only very
rich men can afford

118
00:07:07,883 --> 00:07:13,804
to pay more than $10,000 for a watch
as a display of their financial fitness.

119
00:07:15,304 --> 00:07:18,129
Now, many people hear these kinds
of evoulutionary claims

120
00:07:18,129 --> 00:07:23,882
and think they mean that we somehow
are unconciously seeking mates

121
00:07:23,882 --> 00:07:25,820
who are healthy,

122
00:07:25,820 --> 00:07:28,892
and I think this idea
is probably not right.

123
00:07:30,365 --> 00:07:35,348
Teenagers and young adults are not
exactly known for making decisions

124
00:07:35,348 --> 00:07:37,844
that are predicated on health concerns.

125
00:07:38,592 --> 00:07:40,354
But they don't have to be,

126
00:07:40,354 --> 00:07:42,255
and let me explain why.

127
00:07:43,382 --> 00:07:49,540
Imagine a population in which people
have three different types of preferences:

128
00:07:49,540 --> 00:07:53,368
for green, for orange, and for red.

129
00:07:53,935 --> 00:07:55,137
From their point of view,

130
00:07:55,137 --> 00:07:57,524
these preferences have
nothing to do with health,

131
00:07:57,524 --> 00:07:59,823
they just like what they like.

132
00:08:00,207 --> 00:08:01,603
But if it were also the case

133
00:08:01,603 --> 00:08:05,609
that these preferences are associated
with the different likelihood

134
00:08:05,609 --> 00:08:07,352
of producing offspring,

135
00:08:07,352 --> 00:08:11,164
let's say in a ratio of [3:2:1]

136
00:08:11,164 --> 00:08:12,595
then in the first generation,

137
00:08:12,595 --> 00:08:16,104
there would be
[3 greens: 2 oranges: 1 red,]

138
00:08:16,104 --> 00:08:18,169
and in each subsequent generation,

139
00:08:18,169 --> 00:08:22,211
the proportion of greens increase

140
00:08:22,211 --> 00:08:27,796
so that [intention rations] 98 percent
of this population has a green preference.

141
00:08:28,210 --> 00:08:31,265
Now, scientists coming in
and sampling this population

142
00:08:31,265 --> 00:08:35,606
disover that green
preferences are universal,

143
00:08:35,606 --> 00:08:39,780
so the point about this
little abstract example

144
00:08:39,780 --> 00:08:44,514
is that while preferences
for specific physical features

145
00:08:44,514 --> 00:08:48,162
can be arbitrary for the individual,

146
00:08:48,162 --> 00:08:51,579
if those features are hertiable

147
00:08:51,579 --> 00:08:57,545
and they are associated
with a reproductive advangtage,

148
00:08:57,545 --> 00:08:58,566
over time,

149
00:08:58,566 --> 00:09:01,350
they become universal for the group.

150
00:09:03,236 --> 00:09:08,600
So what happens in the brain
when we see beautiful people?

151
00:09:10,719 --> 00:09:16,653
Attractive faces activate parts of our
visual cortex in the back of the brain;

152
00:09:16,653 --> 00:09:18,618
an area called the fusiform gyrus


153
00:09:18,618 --> 00:09:21,646
that is especially attuned
to processing faces,

154
00:09:21,646 --> 00:09:25,451
and an adjacent area called
the lateral occipital complex

155
00:09:25,451 --> 00:09:28,207
that is especially attuned
to processing objects.

156
00:09:28,915 --> 00:09:30,334
In addition,

157
00:09:30,334 --> 00:09:35,402
attractive faces activate parts
of our reward and pleasure centers

158
00:09:35,402 --> 00:09:38,386
in the front and deep in the brain,

159
00:09:38,386 --> 00:09:41,533
and these include areas that have
complicated names,

160
00:09:41,533 --> 00:09:43,420
like the ventral striatum,

161
00:09:43,420 --> 00:09:45,362
the [orbitofrontal] cortex

162
00:09:45,362 --> 00:09:47,956
and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

163
00:09:49,153 --> 00:09:52,931
Our official brain that is attuned
to processing faces

164
00:09:52,931 --> 00:09:55,591
interacts with our pleasure centers

165
00:09:55,591 --> 00:09:58,038
to underpin the experience of beauty.

166
00:10:00,259 --> 00:10:04,034
Amazingly, while we all
engage with beauty,

167
00:10:04,034 --> 00:10:05,654
without our knowledge,

168
00:10:05,654 --> 00:10:07,829
beauty also engages us.

169
00:10:08,629 --> 00:10:13,251
Our brains respond to attractive faces
even when we're not thinking about beauty.

170
00:10:14,827 --> 00:10:19,139
We conducted an experiement in which
people saw a series of faces,

171
00:10:19,139 --> 00:10:20,865
and in one condition,

172
00:10:20,865 --> 00:10:26,441
they had to decide if a pair of faces
were the same or a different person.

173
00:10:27,907 --> 00:10:30,423
Even in this condition,

174
00:10:30,423 --> 00:10:36,776
attractive faces drove neural activity
robustly in their visual cortex

175
00:10:36,776 --> 00:10:40,242
despite the fact that they were thinking
about a person's identity

176
00:10:40,242 --> 00:10:42,060
and not their beauty.

177
00:10:43,294 --> 00:10:47,568
Another group similarly found
automatic responses to beauty

178
00:10:47,568 --> 00:10:49,731
within our pleasure centers.

179
00:10:50,699 --> 00:10:51,869
So taken together,

180
00:10:51,869 --> 00:10:54,288
these studies suggest

181
00:10:54,288 --> 00:10:58,728
that our brain automatically
responds to beauty

182
00:10:58,728 --> 00:11:01,210
by linking vision and pleasure.

183
00:11:02,005 --> 00:11:03,468
These beauty detectors,

184
00:11:03,468 --> 00:11:04,407
it seems,

185
00:11:04,407 --> 00:11:07,736
ping ever time we see beauty
regardless of whatever else

186
00:11:07,736 --> 00:11:09,662
we might be thinking.

187
00:11:11,181 --> 00:11:16,572
We also have a "beauty is good"
stereotype embedded in the brain.

188
00:11:17,888 --> 00:11:20,138
Within the [orbitofrontal] cortex,

189
00:11:20,138 --> 00:11:21,936
there's overlapping neural activity


190
00:11:21,936 --> 00:11:27,336
in response to beauty and to goodness,

191
00:11:27,336 --> 00:11:30,881
and this happens even when people
aren't expllicitly thinking

192
00:11:30,881 --> 00:11:33,184
about beauty or goodness.

193
00:11:34,129 --> 00:11:38,928
Our brains seem to reflexively
associate beauty and good.

194
00:11:38,928 --> 00:11:42,929
And this reflexive association
may be the biologic trigger

195
00:11:42,929 --> 00:11:45,893
for the many social effects of beauty.

196
00:11:46,217 --> 00:11:50,611
Attractive people receive
all kinds of advantages in life.

197
00:11:51,683 --> 00:11:54,547
They're regarded as more intelligent,

198
00:11:54,547 --> 00:11:56,083
more trustworthy,

199
00:11:56,083 --> 00:11:59,681
they're given higher pay
and lesser punishments,

200
00:11:59,681 --> 00:12:02,619
even when such judgments
are not warranted.

201
00:12:03,620 --> 00:12:07,269
These kinds of observations
reveal beauty's ugly side.

202
00:12:07,953 --> 00:12:08,970
In my lab,

203
00:12:08,970 --> 00:12:14,974
we recently found that people with minor
facial anomalies and disfigurements

204
00:12:14,974 --> 00:12:18,781
are regarded as less good, less kind,

205
00:12:18,781 --> 00:12:23,407
less intelligent, less competent
and less hardworking.

206
00:12:23,982 --> 00:12:29,266
Unfortunately, we also have
a "disfigured is bad" stereotype.

207
00:12:30,518 --> 00:12:36,965
This stereotype is probably
exploited and magnified

208
00:12:36,965 --> 00:12:39,816
by images in popular media

209
00:12:39,816 --> 00:12:43,612
in which facial disfigurement
is often used as a shorthand

210
00:12:43,612 --> 00:12:47,191
to depict someone of villainous character.

211
00:12:47,600 --> 00:12:51,007
We need to understand
these kinds of implicit biases

212
00:12:51,007 --> 00:12:52,767
if we are to overcome them,

213
00:12:52,767 --> 00:12:56,471
and aim for a society in which
we treat people fairly,

214
00:12:56,471 --> 00:13:01,251
based on their behavior and not
on the happenstance of their looks.

215
00:13:04,925 --> 00:13:08,170
Let me leave you with one final thought.

216
00:13:09,203 --> 00:13:11,251
Beauty is a work in progress.

217
00:13:12,766 --> 00:13:15,878
The so-called universal
attributes of beauty

218
00:13:15,878 --> 00:13:17,822
were selected for --

219
00:13:17,822 --> 00:13:21,454
during the almost two million
years of the Pleistocene.

220
00:13:22,183 --> 00:13:27,006
Life was nasty, brutish
and a very long time ago.

221
00:13:28,197 --> 00:13:33,544
The selection criteria for reproductive
success from that time

222
00:13:33,544 --> 00:13:36,084
doesn't really apply today.

223
00:13:36,084 --> 00:13:37,831
For example,

224
00:13:37,831 --> 00:13:41,682
death by parasite is not one
of the top ways that people die,

225
00:13:41,682 --> 00:13:44,865
at least not in the
technologically-developed world.

226
00:13:46,172 --> 00:13:48,555
From antibiotics to surgery,

227
00:13:48,555 --> 00:13:52,070
birth control to in vitro fertilization,

228
00:13:52,070 --> 00:13:56,195
the filters for reproductive
success are being relaxed,

229
00:13:56,195 --> 00:13:58,740
and under these relaxed conditions,

230
00:13:58,740 --> 00:14:03,126
preference and trait
combinations are free to drift

231
00:14:03,126 --> 00:14:04,895
and become more variable.

232
00:14:05,615 --> 00:14:11,025
Even as we are profoundly
effecting our environment,

233
00:14:11,025 --> 00:14:16,256
modern medicine and technological
innovation is profoundly effecting

234
00:14:16,256 --> 00:14:19,978
the very essence of what
it means to look beautiful.

235
00:14:21,348 --> 00:14:23,921
The universal nature of beauty is changing

236
00:14:23,921 --> 00:14:26,842
even as we're changing the universe.

237
00:14:28,896 --> 00:14:30,442
Thank you.

238
00:14:30,442 --> 00:14:32,122
(Applause)