9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 It's 1878. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Sir Francis Galton[br]gives a remarkable talk. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 He's speaking to the Anthropologic[br]Instisitute of Great Britain and Ireland. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Known for his pioneering work[br]in human intelligence, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Dalton is a brilliant polymath. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 He's an explorer, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and antrhopologist, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 a sociologist, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 a psychologist, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and a statistician. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 He's also a Eugenist. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 In this talk, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 he presents a new technique 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 by which he can combine photographs[br]and produce composite portraits. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 This technique could be used[br]to characterize different types of people. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Dalton thinks that if he combines[br]photographs of violent criminals, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 he will discover the face of criminality. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 But to his surprise, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 the composite portrait that he produces 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 is beautiful. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Galton's surprising finding[br]raises deep questions. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 What is beauty? 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Why do certain configurations of line[br]and color and form excite us so? 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 For most of human hisotiry, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 these questions have been approached[br]using logic and speculation, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 but in the last few decades, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 scientists have addressed[br]the question of beauty 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 using ideas from evolutionary psychology[br]and tools of neuroscience. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 We're beginning to glimpse[br]the why and the how of beauty, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 at least in terms of what it means[br]for the human face and form. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And in the process, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 we're stumbling upon some surprises. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 When it comes to seeing[br]beauty in each other, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 while this decision is certainly[br]subjective for the individual, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 it's sculpted by factors that contribute[br]to the survival of the group. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Many experiments have shown 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that a few basic parameters contribute[br]to what makes a face attractive. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 These include averaging, symmetry[br]and the effects of hormones. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And let's take each one of these in turn. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Galton's finding 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that composite or average faces[br]are typically more attractive 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 than each individual face[br]that contributes to the average 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 has been replicated many times. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 This laboratory finding fits[br]with many people's intuitions. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Average faces represent the central[br]tendencies of a group. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 People with mixed features[br]represent different populations, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and presumably harbor[br]rare genetic diversity 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and adaptibility to the environment. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Many people find[br]mixed-race individuals attractive 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and inbred families less so. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 The second factor that contributes[br]to beauty is symmetry. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 People generally find symmetic faces[br]more attractive than asymmetic ones. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Developmental abnormalities[br]are often associated with asymmetries, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and in plants, animal and humans, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 asymmetries often arise[br]from parasitic infections. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Symmetry it turns out, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 is also an indicator of health. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 In the 1930s, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 a man named MAximallian Fector Rowis 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 recognized the importance[br]of symmetry for beauty 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 when he designed the beauty micrometer. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 With this device, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 he could measure minor, asymmetric flaws 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 which he could then make up for[br]with products he sold from his company, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 named brilliantly after himself: 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Max Factor, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 which as you know is one of the world's[br]most famous brands for makeup. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 The third factor that contributes[br]to facial attractiveness 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 is the effect of hormones. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And here, I need to apologize[br]for confining my comments 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 to heterosexual norms. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 But estrogen and testosterone[br]play important roles 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 in shaping features[br]that we find attractive. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Estrogen produces features[br]that signal fertility. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Men typically find woman attractive 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 who have elements of both[br]youth and maturity. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 A face that's too baby-like might[br]mean that the girl is not yet fertile, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 so men find women attractive 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 who have large eyes, full lips[br]and narrow chins 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 as indicators of youth, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and high cheekbones as an[br]indicator of maturity. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Now, testosterone produces features[br]that we regard as typically masculine. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 These include heavier brows, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 thinner cheeks 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and bigger, squared-off jaws. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 But here's a fascinating irony. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 In many species, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 if anything, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 testosterone suppresses the immune system. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 So the idea that testosterone-infused[br]features are a fitness indicator 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 doesn't really make a whole lot of sense. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Here, the logic is turned on its head. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Instead of a fitness indicator, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 scientists invoke a handicap principle. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 The most commonly cited[br]example of a handicap[br] 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 is a peacock's tail. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 This beautiful but cumbersome tail[br]doesn't exactly help the peacock 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 avoid predators and approach peahens. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Why should such an extravagant[br]appendage evolve? 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Even Charles Darwin, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 in an 1860 letter to Asa Gray wrote 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that the sight of the peacock's tail[br]made him physcially illl. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 He couldn't explain it with his[br]theory of natural selection, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and out of this frustration, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 he developed a theory of sexual selection. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 On this account, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 the display of the peacock's tail[br]is about sexual enticement, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and this enticement means[br]that it's more likely 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that the peacock will mate[br]and have offspring. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Now, the modern twist on this[br]display argument 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 is that the peacock is also[br]advertising its health to the peahen. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Only especially fit organisms[br]can afford to divert resources 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 to maintaining such[br]an extravagant appendage. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Only espeically fit men can afford[br]the price that testorone levies 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 on their immune system. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And by anaology, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 think of the fact that only very[br]rich men can afford 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 to pay more than $10,000 for a watch[br]as a display of their financial fitness. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Now, many people hear these kinds[br]of evoulutionary claims 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and think they mean that we somehow[br]are unconciously seeking mates 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 who are healthy, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and I htink this idea[br]is probably not right. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Teenagers and young adults are not[br]exactly known for making decisions 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that are predicated on health concerns. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 But they don't have to be, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and let me explain why. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Imaging a population in which people[br]have three different types of preferences: 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 for green, for orange and for red. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 From their point of view, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 their preferences have nothing[br]to do with health, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 they just like what they like. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 But if it were also the case 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that these preferences are associated[br]with the different likelihood 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 of producing offspring, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 let's say in a ration of three[br]to two to one, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 then in the first generation, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 there would be three greens[br]to two organges to one red, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and in each subsequent generation, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 the proportion of greens increase 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 so that intention rations 98 percent[br]of this population has a green preference. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Now, scientists coming in[br]and sampling this population 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 disover that green[br]preferences are universal, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 so the point about this little[br]abstract example 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 is that while preferences for[br]specific phsyical features 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 can be arbitrary for the individual, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 if those features are hertiable 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and they are associated[br]with a reproductive advangtage, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 over time, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 they become universal for the group. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 So what happens in the brain[br]when we see beautiful people? 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Attractive faces activate parts of our[br]visual cortex in the back of the brain. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 An area called the [fusiform gyrus][br] 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that is especially attuned[br]to processing faces, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and an adjacent area called[br]the lateral occipidal complex 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that is especially attuned[br]to processing objects. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 In addition, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 attractive faces activate parts[br]of our reward and pleasure centers 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 in the front and deep in the brain, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and these include areas that have[br]complicated names, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 like the ventral staiatum, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 the orber frontal cortex 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and the ventrimedial prefontol cortex. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Our official brain that is attuned[br]to processing faces 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 interacts with our pleasure centers 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 to underpin the experience of beauty. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Amazingly, while we all[br]engage with beauty, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 without our knowledge, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 beauty also engages us. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Our brains respond to attractive faces[br]even when we're not thinking about beauty. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 We conducted an experiement in which[br]people saw a series of faces, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and in one condition, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 they had to decide if a pair of faces[br]were the same or a different person. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Even in this condition, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 attractive faces drove neural activity[br]robustly in their visual cortex 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 despite the fact that they were thinking[br]about a person's identity 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and not their beauty. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Another group similarly found[br]automatic responses to beauty 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 within our pleasure centers. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 So taken together, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 these studies suggest that our brain[br]automatically responds to beauty 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 by linking vision and pleasure. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 These beauty detectors, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 it seems, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 ping ever time we see beauty[br]regardless of whatever else 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 we might be thinking. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 We also have a beauty is good stereotype[br]embedded in the brain. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Within the orber frontal cortex, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 there's overlapping neaural activity[br]in response to beauty and to goodness, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and this happens even when people[br]aren't expllicitly thinking 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 about beauty or goodness. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Our brains seem to reflexively[br]associate beauty and good. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And this reflexive association may be[br]the biologic trigger 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 for the many social effects of beauty. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Attractive people receive all kinds[br]of advantages in life. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 They're regarded as more intelligent, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 more trustworthy, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 they're given higher pay[br]and lesser punishments, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 even when such judgments[br]are not warranted. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 These kinds of observations reveal[br]beauty's ugly side. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 In my lab, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 we recently found that people with minor[br]facial anomalies and disfigurements 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 are regarded as less good, less kind, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 less intelligent, less competent[br]and less hardworking. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Unfortunately, we also have[br]a disfigured-is-bad stereotype. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 This stereotype is probably[br]exploited and magnified 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 by images in the popular media 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 in which facial disfigurement[br]is often used as a shorthand 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 to make someone a villianous character. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 We need to undersand[br]these kinds of implicit biases 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 if we are to overcome them, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and aim for a society in which[br]we treat people fairly, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 based on their behavior and not[br]on the happenstance of their looks. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Let me leave you with one final thought. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Beauty is a work in progress. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 The so-called universal[br]attributes of beauty 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 were selected for -- 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 during the almost two million[br]years of the [plystascne?] 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Life was nasty, brutish[br]and a very long time ago. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 The selection criteria for reproductive[br]success from that time 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 doesn't really apply today. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 For example, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 death by parasite is not one[br]of the top ways that people die, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 at least not in the[br]technologically-developed world. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 From antibiotics to surgery, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 birth control to invitrofertilization, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 the filters for reproductive[br]success are being relaxed, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and under these relaxed conditions, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 preference and trait[br]combinations are free to drift 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and become more variable. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Even as we are profoundly[br]effecting our environment, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 modern medicine and technological[br]innovation is profoundly effecting 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 the very essence of what[br]it means to look beautiful. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 The universal nature of beauty is changing 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 even as we're changing the universe. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Thank you. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 (Applause)