1 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 It's 1878. 2 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Sir Francis Galton gives a remarkable talk. 3 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 He's speaking to the Anthropologic Instisitute of Great Britain and Ireland. 4 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Known for his pioneering work in human intelligence, 5 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Dalton is a brilliant polymath. 6 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 He's an explorer, 7 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and antrhopologist, 8 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 a sociologist, 9 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 a psychologist, 10 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and a statistician. 11 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 He's also a Eugenist. 12 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 In this talk, 13 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 he presents a new technique 14 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 by which he can combine photographs and produce composite portraits. 15 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 This technique could be used to characterize different types of people. 16 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Dalton thinks that if he combines photographs of violent criminals, 17 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 he will discover the face of criminality. 18 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 But to his surprise, 19 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 the composite portrait that he produces 20 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 is beautiful. 21 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Galton's surprising finding raises deep questions. 22 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 What is beauty? 23 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Why do certain configurations of line and color and form excite us so? 24 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 For most of human hisotiry, 25 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 these questions have been approached using logic and speculation, 26 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 but in the last few decades, 27 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 scientists have addressed the question of beauty 28 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 using ideas from evolutionary psychology and tools of neuroscience. 29 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 We're beginning to glimpse the why and the how of beauty, 30 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 at least in terms of what it means for the human face and form. 31 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 And in the process, 32 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 we're stumbling upon some surprises. 33 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 When it comes to seeing beauty in each other, 34 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 while this decision is certainly subjective for the individual, 35 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 it's sculpted by factors that contribute to the survival of the group. 36 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Many experiments have shown 37 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 that a few basic parameters contribute to what makes a face attractive. 38 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 These include averaging, symmetry and the effects of hormones. 39 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 And let's take each one of these in turn. 40 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Galton's finding 41 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 that composite or average faces are typically more attractive 42 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 than each individual face that contributes to the average 43 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 has been replicated many times. 44 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 This laboratory finding fits with many people's intuitions. 45 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Average faces represent the central tendencies of a group. 46 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 People with mixed features represent different populations, 47 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and presumably harbor rare genetic diversity 48 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and adaptibility to the environment. 49 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Many people find mixed-race individuals attractive 50 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and inbred families less so. 51 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The second factor that contributes to beauty is symmetry. 52 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 People generally find symmetic faces more attractive than asymmetic ones. 53 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Developmental abnormalities are often associated with asymmetries, 54 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and in plants, animal and humans, 55 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 asymmetries often arise from parasitic infections. 56 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Symmetry it turns out, 57 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 is also an indicator of health. 58 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 In the 1930s, 59 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 a man named MAximallian Fector Rowis 60 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 recognized the importance of symmetry for beauty 61 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 when he designed the beauty micrometer. 62 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 With this device, 63 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 he could measure minor, asymmetric flaws 64 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 which he could then make up for with products he sold from his company, 65 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 named brilliantly after himself: 66 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Max Factor, 67 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 which as you know is one of the world's most famous brands for makeup. 68 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The third factor that contributes to facial attractiveness 69 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 is the effect of hormones. 70 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 And here, I need to apologize for confining my comments 71 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 to heterosexual norms. 72 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 But estrogen and testosterone play important roles 73 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 in shaping features that we find attractive. 74 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Estrogen produces features that signal fertility. 75 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Men typically find woman attractive 76 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 who have elements of both youth and maturity. 77 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 A face that's too baby-like might mean that the girl is not yet fertile, 78 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 so men find women attractive 79 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 who have large eyes, full lips and narrow chins 80 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 as indicators of youth, 81 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and high cheekbones as an indicator of maturity. 82 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Now, testosterone produces features that we regard as typically masculine. 83 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 These include heavier brows, 84 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 thinner cheeks 85 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and bigger, squared-off jaws. 86 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 But here's a fascinating irony. 87 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 In many species, 88 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 if anything, 89 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 testosterone suppresses the immune system. 90 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 So the idea that testosterone-infused features are a fitness indicator 91 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 doesn't really make a whole lot of sense. 92 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Here, the logic is turned on its head. 93 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Instead of a fitness indicator, 94 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 scientists invoke a handicap principle. 95 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The most commonly cited example of a handicap 96 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 is a peacock's tail. 97 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 This beautiful but cumbersome tail doesn't exactly help the peacock 98 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 avoid predators and approach peahens. 99 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Why should such an extravagant appendage evolve? 100 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Even Charles Darwin, 101 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 in an 1860 letter to Asa Gray wrote 102 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 that the sight of the peacock's tail made him physcially illl. 103 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 He couldn't explain it with his theory of natural selection, 104 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and out of this frustration, 105 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 he developed a theory of sexual selection. 106 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 On this account, 107 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 the display of the peacock's tail is about sexual enticement, 108 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and this enticement means that it's more likely 109 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 that the peacock will mate and have offspring. 110 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Now, the modern twist on this display argument 111 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 is that the peacock is also advertising its health to the peahen. 112 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Only especially fit organisms can afford to divert resources 113 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 to maintaining such an extravagant appendage. 114 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Only espeically fit men can afford the price that testorone levies 115 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 on their immune system. 116 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 And by anaology, 117 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 think of the fact that only very rich men can afford 118 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 to pay more than $10,000 for a watch as a display of their financial fitness. 119 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Now, many people hear these kinds of evoulutionary claims 120 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and think they mean that we somehow are unconciously seeking mates 121 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 who are healthy, 122 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and I htink this idea is probably not right. 123 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Teenagers and young adults are not exactly known for making decisions 124 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 that are predicated on health concerns. 125 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 But they don't have to be, 126 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and let me explain why. 127 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Imaging a population in which people have three different types of preferences: 128 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 for green, for orange and for red. 129 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 From their point of view, 130 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 their preferences have nothing to do with health, 131 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 they just like what they like. 132 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 But if it were also the case 133 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 that these preferences are associated with the different likelihood 134 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 of producing offspring, 135 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 let's say in a ration of three to two to one, 136 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 then in the first generation, 137 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 there would be three greens to two organges to one red, 138 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and in each subsequent generation, 139 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 the proportion of greens increase 140 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 so that intention rations 98 percent of this population has a green preference. 141 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Now, scientists coming in and sampling this population 142 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 disovers that green preferences are universal