0:00:00.017,0:00:04.006
So you're cruising around the Internet and[br]you see a link to an article from some trusted

0:00:04.006,0:00:08.061
news source and it's got a really intriguing[br]title, so you read it. And later you find

0:00:08.061,0:00:14.053
out that that whole article was mostly false.[br]What you thought was news was really just

0:00:14.053,0:00:21.013
gossip or conjecture. So we've got Ryan Holiday[br]here. He's a media manipulator and he explains

0:00:21.013,0:00:21.089
how this happens.

0:00:21.089,0:00:26.449
So, so what I quickly discovered was that[br]the media was this sort of hierarchy or chain.

0:00:26.449,0:00:32.003
At the bottom you have small blogs who have[br]small readerships but correspondingly low

0:00:32.003,0:00:37.609
threshold for what they will and will not[br]publish. Say this blog publishes a rumor then

0:00:37.609,0:00:42.035
Business Insider or The Huffington Post or[br]Perez Hilton writes about. And now, because

0:00:42.035,0:00:46.003
of the stature of those sites, it becomes[br]something that people are talking about on

0:00:46.003,0:00:49.719
Twitter, on Facebook, on email, they're chattering[br]about it.

0:00:49.719,0:00:55.053
And what happens is producers for CNN, producers[br]for a right wing talk radio, journalists for

0:00:55.053,0:00:59.209
The New York Times -- where do they find out[br]the news? They're not out pounding the pavement

0:00:59.209,0:01:04.019
like it's 100 years ago. No, they're reading[br]what people are chattering about online.

0:01:04.019,0:01:09.064
And that cycle is hijacked by people like[br]me who say, "Okay, if this blog here has the

0:01:09.064,0:01:15.045
power to accidently start a media firestorm[br]by what it publishes, I'm going to get them

0:01:15.045,0:01:17.579
to publish something that benefits me."

0:01:17.579,0:01:23.035
I, I've sent them fake anonymous emails and[br]watched as that turned into front page stories.

0:01:23.035,0:01:27.899
The public isn't aware that this is how their[br]news is being made, but on both sides of the

0:01:27.899,0:01:34.021
divide -- on the marketing side and on the[br]news side -- neither is particularly concerned

0:01:34.021,0:01:39.159
with quality. They're concerned with what[br]will get attention.

0:01:39.159,0:01:43.081
And that's because of how blog sites and news[br]sites make money. First, they get a lot of

0:01:43.081,0:01:48.439
viewers to their pages. And then they sell[br]that view count to advertisers. So to get

0:01:48.439,0:01:50.035
more views you do stuff like...

0:01:50.035,0:01:55.979
Asking rhetorical untrue questions in a headline;[br]doing your fact checking after you've published

0:01:55.979,0:02:00.074
an article; gossiping; speculating; making[br]up a story from whole cloth.

0:02:00.074,0:02:06.034
But what if I want good, accurate news. I[br]mean, shouldn't news sites want to give that

0:02:06.034,0:02:06.084
to me?

0:02:06.084,0:02:11.073
Yeah, look, uh, I think the rule of thumb[br]is if you're not paying for it they don't

0:02:11.073,0:02:14.053
give a shit about you. They're loyal to their[br]advertisers.

0:02:14.053,9:59:59.000
If you aren't paying for it you aren't the[br]customer, you are really the product.