1
00:00:11,744 --> 00:00:16,215
我喺 Twitter 嘅自我介紹係

2
00:00:16,775 --> 00:00:20,896
「我既多疑又樂觀」

3
00:00:22,359 --> 00:00:26,471
我相信科學，亦相信無限可能

4
00:00:26,601 --> 00:00:29,863
我所講嘅正係我今日會講嘅題目

5
00:00:32,135 --> 00:00:35,604
如果我哋身處一個真正公開透明嘅社會

6
00:00:35,604 --> 00:00:39,904
我哋嘅世界會點樣

7
00:00:39,904 --> 00:00:43,804
一個社會大致上清楚

8
00:00:43,804 --> 00:00:52,731
我哋每日都面對嘅方方面面
包括社會、政治、環境、經濟

9
00:00:53,391 --> 00:00:57,341
但係，新聞文化表明

10
00:00:57,341 --> 00:01:02,054
我哋可以更加知情

11
00:01:02,907 --> 00:01:05,840
嗨，我係 Coleen Christie

12
00:01:06,667 --> 00:01:10,686
我係一位新聞主播
如果你鍾意，可以叫我廣播記者

13
00:01:11,440 --> 00:01:15,562
我……我會猶疑咁講出呢個名
係因為我最近至知道

14
00:01:15,566 --> 00:01:21,373
原來新聞廣播係業員
喺最受鄙視職業排行榜上排第六

15
00:01:21,373 --> 00:01:22,868
（笑聲）
係呀

16
00:01:22,868 --> 00:01:25,939
我哋比稅務精算師高一名

17
00:01:25,939 --> 00:01:26,778
咁又係嘅

18
00:01:26,778 --> 00:01:30,565
因為大部分人都鍾意稅務精算師
多過廣播記者

19
00:01:30,565 --> 00:01:31,998
（笑聲）
真係。唔錯

20
00:01:31,998 --> 00:01:36,295
就好似當莎莉．菲爾德
發表奧斯卡獲獎致謝辭嗰陣

21
00:01:36,295 --> 00:01:38,710
佢心裏其實想講
你憎我、你恨我

22
00:01:38,710 --> 00:01:39,675
（笑聲）

23
00:01:39,675 --> 00:01:41,968
唔只係我一個人講
可以嘅話請畀我幾分鐘試試

24
00:01:41,968 --> 00:01:43,057
（笑聲）

25
00:01:43,057 --> 00:01:46,692
但我哋至少比律師做得好
佢哋排第三

26
00:01:46,692 --> 00:01:48,510
就係咁畀咗我希望

27
00:01:48,510 --> 00:01:50,206
（笑聲）

28
00:01:50,206 --> 00:01:55,942
我任職嘅溫哥華 CTV 
係加拿大最大電視台嘅附屬機構

29
00:01:55,942 --> 00:02:00,982
我嘅生涯從一個唔尋常嘅方式開始

30
00:02:00,982 --> 00:02:07,530
我一開始喺市場同推廣方面工作嘅經歷
令我對新聞有一個獨特嘅視野

31
00:02:07,530 --> 00:02:10,407
你睇，我已經明白到

32
00:02:10,407 --> 00:02:12,574
新聞係一種產品
佢需要推銷

33
00:02:13,337 --> 00:02:16,042
仲係一件好重要嘅產品

34
00:02:16,723 --> 00:02:18,541
我喺一個好注重新聞嘅家庭長大

35
00:02:18,541 --> 00:02:21,274
當我阿媽唔需要返工嗰陣

36
00:02:21,274 --> 00:02:23,599
佢就會將成份報紙刨曬

37
00:02:23,599 --> 00:02:27,673
佢知道曬裏面嘅
所有新聞、所有球員消息

38
00:02:27,777 --> 00:02:29,988
但佢嘅學歷只有八年級

39
00:02:30,853 --> 00:02:33,994
作為一家人
我哋會一齊睇晚間新聞報導

40
00:02:33,994 --> 00:02:35,508
我哋係專心咁睇

41
00:02:35,508 --> 00:02:37,955
我諗係因為我父母出身貧苦嘅緣故

42
00:02:37,955 --> 00:02:43,448
佢哋認為畀我哋了解事物
同教育我哋都係好重要

43
00:02:44,127 --> 00:02:48,826
晚飯傾計話題經常係
政治議題、時下城中熱話

44
00:02:48,826 --> 00:02:52,178
「遞鐵板汁過黎。
我唔信你係咁社會主義 !

45
00:02:52,178 --> 00:02:55,315
你要多啲薯仔嗎？」
之類嘅話題

46
00:02:55,315 --> 00:02:56,621
（笑聲）
係呀

47
00:02:57,256 --> 00:03:03,323
講番轉頭
我哋宜家嘅新聞選材比以前多

48
00:03:03,323 --> 00:03:04,089
呢個無容置疑

49
00:03:04,089 --> 00:03:05,623
以前無論我哋喺邊度搵到消息

50
00:03:05,623 --> 00:03:09,671
我哋都相信呢單消息係可信可靠嘅

51
00:03:10,384 --> 00:03:13,479
但係各位，一切都變曬，係唔係？

52
00:03:15,035 --> 00:03:19,701
喺依家嘅新聞新時代
資訊就係力量

53
00:03:19,701 --> 00:03:25,474
但我哋駕馭資訊嘅能力
面臨著前所未有嘅危機

54
00:03:25,721 --> 00:03:28,783
過去十年
我哋使用新聞嘅習慣

55
00:03:28,783 --> 00:03:32,161
有咗明顯嘅改變

56
00:03:32,345 --> 00:03:35,925
大部分原因係因為數碼媒體爆炸性增長

57
00:03:35,925 --> 00:03:39,707
爆炸性增長促使更多競爭

58
00:03:39,707 --> 00:03:44,224
衝擊我哋喺報章同電視行業嘅領導地位

59
00:03:44,224 --> 00:03:49,256
又改變我哋所謂嘅新聞價值

60
00:03:51,711 --> 00:03:53,355
最近有個調查

61
00:03:53,563 --> 00:03:55,137
你或者會覺得有趣

62
00:03:56,090 --> 00:04:01,974
就係接近九成嘅北美洲人
話佢哋好想收到每日嘅新聞

63
00:04:01,974 --> 00:04:03,206
但留意

64
00:04:05,152 --> 00:04:08,560
接近五成嘅人話佢哋唔信報導

65
00:04:10,845 --> 00:04:12,344
信唔信係一個問題

66
00:04:12,344 --> 00:04:18,025
而我認為部分原因係
因為我哋覺得新聞有偏頗

67
00:04:19,319 --> 00:04:25,743
當然，當出現極端嘅新聞機構
例如右翼嘅福斯廣播公司

68
00:04:25,743 --> 00:04:30,421
同左翼嘅微軟國家廣播公司
偏頗嘅報導就會出現

69
00:04:30,421 --> 00:04:32,804
但身為從業員

70
00:04:32,804 --> 00:04:37,491
我認為話所有傳媒都有偏頗
就將問題睇得太簡單

71
00:04:37,491 --> 00:04:42,068
事實上，我今日會話畀你聽

72
00:04:42,068 --> 00:04:46,546
問題嘅根本唔係傳媒有偏頗

73
00:04:47,421 --> 00:04:52,335
你先係今日新聞嘅問題所在

74
00:04:53,109 --> 00:04:55,913
其實我唔係問緊
你可以信邊單報導

75
00:04:55,913 --> 00:04:59,191
而係，你信唔信自己
可以明辨是非？

76
00:05:00,187 --> 00:05:03,848
新聞就係對事實嘅報導

77
00:05:03,848 --> 00:05:08,562
每日，記者透過報導發放資訊

78
00:05:08,562 --> 00:05:11,760
但係我哋嚟睇清楚

79
00:05:11,760 --> 00:05:18,223
有兩種新聞來源

80
00:05:18,223 --> 00:05:24,095
一種係主流可信嘅新聞材料
其餘嘅就係另一種

81
00:05:24,095 --> 00:05:26,284
仲有根據你對材料嘅相信程度

82
00:05:26,284 --> 00:05:30,313
嗰條分辨是否可信嘅界綫
對你嚟講似乎好模糊

83
00:05:30,313 --> 00:05:33,686
當然有例外
例外成日都出現

84
00:05:33,804 --> 00:05:36,717
可信新聞嘅最簡單定義係︰

85
00:05:36,717 --> 00:05:41,247
經過嚴格步驟
確定資料正確同平衡各方立場後

86
00:05:41,247 --> 00:05:43,401
所得出嘅資訊

87
00:05:43,553 --> 00:05:46,260
多數人每日接收新聞

88
00:05:46,260 --> 00:05:49,403
聽咗之後就忘記咗
甚至從來都冇思考過

89
00:05:49,403 --> 00:05:52,286
我認為明白呢個過程好重要

90
00:05:53,725 --> 00:06:00,857
例如，喺電視裏面
新聞資訊黎自唔同地方

91
00:06:00,857 --> 00:06:06,938
我哋項目編輯嘅職責
就係整合呢啲資訊

92
00:06:06,938 --> 00:06:10,588
列出可能會報導嘅項目

93
00:06:11,035 --> 00:06:14,386
宜家，下一步可能會令你感到驚訝

94
00:06:15,555 --> 00:06:20,500
我哋真係會辨論、討論每個新聞素材

95
00:06:21,498 --> 00:06:25,629
而我哋就係一班具備經驗同訓綀

96
00:06:25,629 --> 00:06:28,648
有知識、唔同性格嘅人

97
00:06:28,648 --> 00:06:32,139
但其實，新聞工作室裏面
想參與嘅任何人

98
00:06:32,957 --> 00:06:36,454
都可以一齊去衡量每篇新聞嘅價值

99
00:06:36,454 --> 00:06:40,518
呢啲係唔係我哋觀眾想要、想睇嘅？

100
00:06:40,876 --> 00:06:45,029
下一步，我哋分配新聞畀報導員
佢哋準備就緒

101
00:06:45,029 --> 00:06:49,068
然後外出採訪、整合資料

102
00:06:49,068 --> 00:06:51,296
寫好新聞嘅內容

103
00:06:51,296 --> 00:06:57,487
的確，有啲新聞比較複雜
但一般黎講

104
00:06:57,487 --> 00:06:59,261
如果到最後

105
00:07:00,356 --> 00:07:04,202
一篇新聞冇足夠新聞價值

106
00:07:05,566 --> 00:07:09,622
或者未通過評估
佢就唔能夠出街

107
00:07:09,630 --> 00:07:13,141
呢個就係全世界新聞工作室嘅運作

108
00:07:13,141 --> 00:07:16,594
呢個程序好多時都有效

109
00:07:17,197 --> 00:07:19,710
但你知道
唯一我哋未能避開嘅

110
00:07:20,492 --> 00:07:23,451
就係偏頗睇法

111
00:07:23,847 --> 00:07:25,735
我哋極力避免呢樣嘢

112
00:07:25,735 --> 00:07:30,864
但畢竟我哋唔能夠喺我哋嘅報導裏邊
避免偏頗嘅睇法

113
00:07:30,864 --> 00:07:32,188
舉個例子

114
00:07:33,673 --> 00:07:38,141
當我哋報導一個競選計劃嘅時候
我哋因為某啲原因而受到指責

115
00:07:38,166 --> 00:07:39,420
因為同時支持現任
同支持挑戰現任者嘅人

116
00:07:39,420 --> 00:07:44,460
我哋俾人話

117
00:07:44,460 --> 00:07:47,289
（笑聲）
每次都係，每次都係咁

118
00:07:47,289 --> 00:07:50,056
當然，我哋唔會偏幫任何一方

119
00:07:50,235 --> 00:07:54,616
你睇，主流媒體冇政治取態

120
00:07:55,441 --> 00:07:57,695
你可能會話「吓？」

121
00:07:58,065 --> 00:07:59,285
但的確係千真萬確

122
00:07:59,285 --> 00:08:02,922
主流媒體冇政治取態

123
00:08:02,922 --> 00:08:05,200
雖然我哋有右翼保守媒體

124
00:08:05,200 --> 00:08:08,316
但係同時，有左翼媒體平衡返

125
00:08:08,316 --> 00:08:10,750
但我講嘅係主流傳媒

126
00:08:10,750 --> 00:08:15,147
對於我哋嗰啲行中間路線嘅人嚟講

127
00:08:15,147 --> 00:08:19,264
政黨陰謀論

128
00:08:19,264 --> 00:08:22,635
絕對係無稽之談

129
00:08:23,473 --> 00:08:27,051
除咗嗰次月球登陸
嗰個係大話，從來都冇發生過

130
00:08:27,051 --> 00:08:28,573
（笑聲）
從來都冇發生

131
00:08:28,573 --> 00:08:30,319
當然，利用敘述式新聞

132
00:08:30,319 --> 00:08:33,349
去推廣某種思識形態、政治立場嘅機構

133
00:08:33,349 --> 00:08:38,612
情況當然唔同

134
00:08:38,612 --> 00:08:40,969
甚至宜家呢啲組織更難被察覺

135
00:08:40,969 --> 00:08:45,059
尤其當網絡上嘅新聞資訊愈嚟愈多

136
00:08:45,059 --> 00:08:47,802
呢啲冇經過記者檢查同平衡嘅資訊

137
00:08:47,802 --> 00:08:51,575
會誤導人錯信

138
00:08:53,039 --> 00:08:59,514
被認為係偏見嘅錯誤係有可能出現嘅

139
00:09:00,035 --> 00:09:04,033
但我認為呢啲機構唔係
你想像中咁別有用心

140
00:09:04,033 --> 00:09:06,049
當呢種錯出現嗰陣

141
00:09:06,049 --> 00:09:10,602
多數可靠嘅傳媒都會
恪守佢哋自己嘅原則

142
00:09:11,242 --> 00:09:15,255
喺超過一百年嘅歷史當中
新聞媒體一直都喺度改正錯誤

143
00:09:15,255 --> 00:09:17,399
無論我哋滿唔滿意

144
00:09:17,399 --> 00:09:20,582
呢種改正工作的確係存在嘅

145
00:09:21,064 --> 00:09:24,800
所以操守係職業嘅一大部分

146
00:09:25,901 --> 00:09:30,133
但對嚟講，呢個唔係工作最難嘅地方

147
00:09:31,486 --> 00:09:36,294
宜家，你可能唔知道
當我喺早上返工

148
00:09:36,294 --> 00:09:40,877
我唔需要擔心感染傳染病

149
00:09:40,877 --> 00:09:46,213
俾人開槍射、綁架、虐待
強暴、處決

150
00:09:46,213 --> 00:09:48,760
好似我一啲同事一樣

151
00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:53,266
我只需要同身處現場嘅佢哋通話就可以
而佢哋就要冒險

152
00:09:53,266 --> 00:10:00,544
（掌聲）

153
00:10:00,544 --> 00:10:02,670
係嘅，係通話，係通話

154
00:10:02,969 --> 00:10:04,365
唔，我呢份工作實在好好

155
00:10:04,365 --> 00:10:06,474
雖然辦公室嘅一日辛勞會令我頭髮變差

156
00:10:06,474 --> 00:10:08,600
（笑聲）

157
00:10:08,600 --> 00:10:11,393
咁對我嚟講并唔艱難
但對你哋就係，因為你要睇新聞

158
00:10:11,393 --> 00:10:13,149
見到嗎？

159
00:10:13,584 --> 00:10:18,550
宜家，我工作最難嘅地方就係收聲

160
00:10:21,258 --> 00:10:23,392
我唔係講緊晏晝嘅會議

161
00:10:23,392 --> 00:10:25,833
當然喺會議度同事都想我收聲

162
00:10:25,833 --> 00:10:30,013
我喺講喺我報導新聞嗰時

163
00:10:30,013 --> 00:10:36,249
我唔可以對充滿分歧嘅事
加入個人意見

164
00:10:36,658 --> 00:10:39,650
我只係唔可以做

165
00:10:40,810 --> 00:10:42,701
我唔會冒險去做

166
00:10:42,790 --> 00:10:47,716
身為傳訊者
我嘅職責係令你明白報導內容

167
00:10:47,872 --> 00:10:50,647
但我冇責任去話你知點樣思考

168
00:10:50,647 --> 00:10:54,166
我唔可以去冒險
我哋都唔可以冒險

169
00:10:54,222 --> 00:10:56,236
你所睇到嘅真相係

170
00:10:56,952 --> 00:11:01,856
主流傳媒唔能夠承受採取立場嘅後果

171
00:11:02,305 --> 00:11:05,504
我會用「承受」呢個詞語

172
00:11:06,871 --> 00:11:09,780
偏頗對於商業經營嚟講係壞嘅

173
00:11:10,727 --> 00:11:13,173
等我話你聽現金喺呢度嘅作用

174
00:11:13,173 --> 00:11:14,855
我依家只會講現金

175
00:11:14,855 --> 00:11:18,606
我哋民主社會需要獨立嘅新聞

176
00:11:18,606 --> 00:11:20,468
令我哋可以一直知情同自在

177
00:11:20,468 --> 00:11:27,219
而新聞同新聞行業需要客戶去維持經營

178
00:11:27,699 --> 00:11:32,633
對於電視行業，觀眾就係顧客

179
00:11:33,093 --> 00:11:35,250
觀眾愈多，收視愈高

180
00:11:35,250 --> 00:11:37,966
收視愈高，廣告收益愈高

181
00:11:37,966 --> 00:11:41,039
廣告收益令開支預算可以維持落去

182
00:11:41,039 --> 00:11:47,902
開支預算則支付記者嘅薪酬
令佢哋收集令我哋自在嘅新聞

183
00:11:47,902 --> 00:11:49,806
呢個就係成個運作機制

184
00:11:50,204 --> 00:11:53,930
如果我哋有意偏頗嘅話

185
00:11:54,625 --> 00:11:58,470
好可能會引起廣大觀眾嘅對抗

186
00:12:00,087 --> 00:12:01,690
咁就唔好嘞

187
00:12:01,715 --> 00:12:06,352
偏頗喺新聞界唔係好嘢

188
00:12:07,957 --> 00:12:11,068
最近一啲調查發現

189
00:12:11,068 --> 00:12:13,727
我哋一啲消費習慣嘅有趣數據

190
00:12:14,786 --> 00:12:20,352
我必須強調我哋大部分人
仍然由電視獲取新聞

191
00:12:21,439 --> 00:12:23,791
但我哋接收新聞嘅形式愈黎愈多樣化

192
00:12:23,791 --> 00:12:30,837
大部分北美洲人宜家
喺多個平台獲取新聞

193
00:12:31,454 --> 00:12:35,495
仍然，我哋接近九成仍然

194
00:12:35,495 --> 00:12:38,812
由單一新聞機構接收新聞

195
00:12:39,242 --> 00:12:42,050
所以等我話你知成件事係點樣

196
00:12:42,521 --> 00:12:46,300
你喺屋企度
電視播住 CNN 頻道

197
00:12:47,434 --> 00:12:51,102
你用平板電腦上 CNN 網站

198
00:12:51,206 --> 00:12:55,440
又用手機喺 Twitter 
跟進 CNN 嘅突發新聞

199
00:12:55,675 --> 00:12:57,383
你冇社交生活

200
00:12:57,653 --> 00:12:59,743
（笑聲）

201
00:12:59,743 --> 00:13:01,302
近視？

202
00:13:02,152 --> 00:13:03,083
係嘅，有可能

203
00:13:03,083 --> 00:13:05,577
除非你有樣嘢畀 Wolf Blitzer
嗱，唔好講咩呀

204
00:13:05,948 --> 00:13:07,427
（笑聲）

205
00:13:07,559 --> 00:13:09,505
諷刺嘅係

206
00:13:10,006 --> 00:13:11,824
今年一個調查顯示

207
00:13:12,497 --> 00:13:18,110
北美洲人話佢哋感覺比以前更加知情

208
00:13:19,038 --> 00:13:24,149
當我哋感到更多知情嘅時候
我哋好像係接收更加多嘅新聞

209
00:13:24,149 --> 00:13:26,447
但我哋往往獲得嘅都只係同一單新聞

210
00:13:26,447 --> 00:13:28,723
新聞資訊以愈嚟愈快嘅速度
嚟到我哋面前

211
00:13:28,723 --> 00:13:30,337
我哋喺統計上知道

212
00:13:30,337 --> 00:13:33,926
我哋專注時間正變得愈黎愈短

213
00:13:33,926 --> 00:13:38,844
呢個正改變我哋對新聞類型嘅口味

214
00:13:39,986 --> 00:13:43,965
集中專注力係前所未有嘅難

215
00:13:43,965 --> 00:13:48,802
電視上每則新聞嘅平均長度
少於兩分鐘

216
00:13:48,802 --> 00:13:52,995
有時短到 20 秒

217
00:13:53,302 --> 00:13:54,628
大家可以諗下

218
00:13:56,101 --> 00:13:56,815
嘩

219
00:13:58,168 --> 00:14:01,031
沉悶令你嘅睇法傾側

220
00:14:01,520 --> 00:14:05,968
如果我哋唔能令你參與其中
你就會離開

221
00:14:06,649 --> 00:14:08,283
我哋並唔想你離開

222
00:14:08,770 --> 00:14:13,570
喺電視上，我哋洗成日搜集
你可以信賴、有質量嘅資訊

223
00:14:13,570 --> 00:14:15,901
雖然你哋之中有五成唔相信

224
00:14:15,901 --> 00:14:16,878
（笑聲）

225
00:14:16,878 --> 00:14:22,233
你嘅「資訊晚餐」上枱喇
我哋仲同你加咗「甜品」

226
00:14:22,233 --> 00:14:24,686
真嘅，真嘅。至於流行影片

227
00:14:24,686 --> 00:14:26,963
你知道，只要係古怪嘅
逗笑嘅、有趣嘅影片

228
00:14:26,963 --> 00:14:29,195
都會喺大部分嘅新聞報導裏面播

229
00:14:29,195 --> 00:14:33,774
仲要喺收視率最高時段播出

230
00:14:34,494 --> 00:14:38,247
真嘅，真嘅，係呀

231
00:14:39,307 --> 00:14:44,362
小心，我哋知道
要令新聞睇起黎唔重要

232
00:14:44,362 --> 00:14:47,226
我哋好小心唔去咁做

233
00:14:47,226 --> 00:14:51,181
但我哋同喬恩 ‧ 史都華競爭緊

234
00:14:51,181 --> 00:14:52,004
（笑聲）

235
00:14:52,004 --> 00:14:57,161
我哋開足馬力工作
令你哋可以一直享受娛樂同收到資訊

236
00:14:57,161 --> 00:14:59,548
於是你會依住部電視

237
00:15:00,198 --> 00:15:03,561
但你可能問︰「喂，電子新聞
喺我需要嗰陣畀到我想要嘅嘢」

238
00:15:03,561 --> 00:15:06,408
呢個絕對正確，但同樣恐怖

239
00:15:06,408 --> 00:15:10,597
你上網嘅習慣會被翻睇、跟進、塑造

240
00:15:10,597 --> 00:15:11,941
你嘅每次點擊

241
00:15:11,941 --> 00:15:17,838
都會留低紀錄
於是你就俾人推介更多相關嘅新聞

242
00:15:18,858 --> 00:15:24,627
所以社交媒體就造成咗你嘅偏見

243
00:15:24,627 --> 00:15:26,878
自從 2009 年

244
00:15:26,878 --> 00:15:32,629
社交媒體新聞頁面嘅瀏覽量
上升咗 60%

245
00:15:33,260 --> 00:15:37,396
最近北美洲有七成受訪者

246
00:15:37,396 --> 00:15:41,782
話佢哋將社交媒體當成一種新聞來源

247
00:15:41,928 --> 00:15:46,891
我唔係要講社交媒體嘅壞話
我都好鍾意佢嘅

248
00:15:47,227 --> 00:15:51,148
Twitter 對於交流、發佈突發新聞黎講

249
00:15:51,148 --> 00:15:53,534
係好好嘅工具

250
00:15:53,534 --> 00:15:57,097
但如果你用社交媒體
作為你基本嘅新聞來源

251
00:15:57,857 --> 00:16:00,292
咁你就要小心喇
因為試諗下

252
00:16:00,292 --> 00:16:04,533
你嘅鄰居或者同事

253
00:16:04,533 --> 00:16:07,652
佢鍾意貓嘅影片
又係你嘅新聞統籌主任

254
00:16:07,652 --> 00:16:08,749
（笑聲）

255
00:16:08,749 --> 00:16:09,786
你知嗎？

256
00:16:09,786 --> 00:16:11,836
你 Facebook 上面嘅編輯團隊

257
00:16:11,836 --> 00:16:15,071
水平同你 Facebook 嘅朋友一樣

258
00:16:16,020 --> 00:16:17,143
真嘅

259
00:16:17,380 --> 00:16:23,299
仲有 Twitter
係冇新聞統籌主任，真係冇

260
00:16:23,489 --> 00:16:28,096
# 競爭 # 情感
# 金．卡達夏

261
00:16:28,096 --> 00:16:29,229
（笑聲）

262
00:16:29,229 --> 00:16:30,917
我剩係講 Kim Kardashian

263
00:16:30,917 --> 00:16:33,370
因為我希望當某個人
喺網上搜索佢嘅名字時

264
00:16:33,370 --> 00:16:34,964
呢場演講會顯示出嚟

265
00:16:34,964 --> 00:16:36,148
（笑聲 )

266
00:16:36,148 --> 00:16:37,818
# 唔知醜

267
00:16:37,908 --> 00:16:41,485
你係你自己世界裏面嘅新聞裁縫師

268
00:16:41,485 --> 00:16:47,665
我哋喺統計上知道你鍾意
喺同你諗法差唔多嘅人嗰度獲取新聞

269
00:16:47,689 --> 00:16:48,980
呢個係事實

270
00:16:49,288 --> 00:16:53,963
除此之外，想喺網絡上面非常知情嘅話

271
00:16:53,963 --> 00:17:00,430
你就要畀啲功夫

272
00:17:00,770 --> 00:17:04,695
你只會㩒吸引你嘅嘢，係嗎？

273
00:17:05,501 --> 00:17:08,363
諗一諗，情況就好像去食自助餐

274
00:17:08,865 --> 00:17:11,318
你唔會獲分兩份沙律一樣

275
00:17:11,318 --> 00:17:13,152
( 笑聲）

276
00:17:13,152 --> 00:17:17,240
但你知，你睇到啲甜品喺嗰度
佢哋睇起身好好食

277
00:17:17,297 --> 00:17:18,663
冇人睇住

278
00:17:18,851 --> 00:17:20,738
攞兩份。咩呀？

279
00:17:20,760 --> 00:17:22,482
我哋都係人

280
00:17:22,839 --> 00:17:25,303
我哋都鍾意薄批

281
00:17:25,355 --> 00:17:30,070
我哋嘅個人喜好滿足我哋嘅偏向

282
00:17:30,095 --> 00:17:34,521
我哋對新聞內容嘅選擇
足以證明呢個道理

283
00:17:35,454 --> 00:17:40,528
通過定義同設計，數碼媒體
提供咗我哋喜好之外更多嘅嘢

284
00:17:40,528 --> 00:17:45,564
你想要嘅話
就可以建立一個自己嘅資訊播放列表

285
00:17:46,511 --> 00:17:51,102
佢就好似——我唔知係唔係
新聞裏邊嘅音樂串流程式

286
00:17:51,639 --> 00:17:55,273
呢個系統畀到你需求以外更多嘅嘢

287
00:17:55,273 --> 00:18:00,304
佢係唔錯，但你係點樣接觸到新事物？

288
00:18:00,529 --> 00:18:03,939
你係點用另一個角度睇嘢嘅？

289
00:18:04,214 --> 00:18:05,990
如果你仍然收聽 80 年代嘅頻道 8

290
00:18:05,990 --> 00:18:08,288
你又點會聽到新音樂？

291
00:18:08,288 --> 00:18:09,684
係嗎（笑聲）

292
00:18:09,684 --> 00:18:12,695
唔理我哋有冇認清

293
00:18:12,696 --> 00:18:18,606
我哋潛意識嘅傾向
都喺度控制我哋使用新聞嘅習慣

294
00:18:18,779 --> 00:18:22,586
咁令我哋比以前知情得更少

295
00:18:23,999 --> 00:18:27,836
你知嗎？我哋知道有咩發生咗

296
00:18:28,789 --> 00:18:32,628
當我哋對傳媒嘅信任跌至新低

297
00:18:33,036 --> 00:18:34,493
就代表咗我哋

298
00:18:34,493 --> 00:18:40,897
尋找新同更廣新聞來源嘅意欲消失咗

299
00:18:41,348 --> 00:18:43,883
同時我哋嘅偏見變得更為嚴重

300
00:18:44,925 --> 00:18:46,288
我哋每日都睇到咁樣嘅嘢︰

301
00:18:46,288 --> 00:18:50,710
當一方嘅陣營喺一邊
另一方陣營喺另一邊嘅時候

302
00:18:51,221 --> 00:18:53,261
兩派人都唔聽對方講嘢

303
00:18:53,261 --> 00:18:56,515
佢哋唔想聽，因為缺乏信任

304
00:18:56,515 --> 00:19:00,048
一切都緣於自我、害怕

305
00:19:00,048 --> 00:19:04,338
拒絕對方，最後冇進展

306
00:19:05,468 --> 00:19:09,747
我哋表現得好似細路咁
如果係嘅話，我哋就會受罰

307
00:19:09,747 --> 00:19:13,940
但係，喺呢件事上
採取呢種態度嘅人

308
00:19:13,940 --> 00:19:15,979
會收睇佢哋自己嘅電視節目

309
00:19:15,979 --> 00:19:19,102
又或者，佢哋收集嘅節目

310
00:19:21,090 --> 00:19:25,389
畫家同社會分子魯本 ‧ 布雷德斯
寫過一句好有說服力嘅話︰

311
00:19:25,389 --> 00:19:28,665
「我哋怕睇到社會最知情嘅狀態


312
00:19:28,665 --> 00:19:31,808
墮落到人人漠唔關心嘅地步」

313
00:19:31,808 --> 00:19:33,799
（掌聲）

314
00:19:33,799 --> 00:19:38,289
所以當我哋個人傾向
令我哋困喺一個惡性循環裏邊

315
00:19:38,289 --> 00:19:41,618
不斷畀我哋同類資訊嘅時候

316
00:19:41,618 --> 00:19:46,053
我哋點可以實現一個真正知情嘅社會？

317
00:19:47,001 --> 00:19:51,416
例如，當我哋喺平常習慣以外

318
00:19:51,416 --> 00:19:56,764
揀第二或第三個新聞來源嘅時候

319
00:19:56,764 --> 00:20:00,884
有咩會發生？

320
00:20:02,575 --> 00:20:06,558
新聞更多元化可以令我哋知情更多

321
00:20:06,558 --> 00:20:08,897
肯定令我哋喺婚禮、Mitzvahs 酒吧

322
00:20:08,897 --> 00:20:12,435
同 TED 會議上表現更聰明

323
00:20:12,435 --> 00:20:14,223
（笑聲）

324
00:20:14,393 --> 00:20:17,321
但表現聰明唔係目標

325
00:20:17,843 --> 00:20:20,084
同我哋所講嘅無關

326
00:20:21,561 --> 00:20:23,273
我哋係講緊自由

327
00:20:24,903 --> 00:20:29,623
新聞傳媒係我哋自由嘅守衛

328
00:20:30,649 --> 00:20:34,559
政府向我哋問責
我哋就向你問責

329
00:20:36,086 --> 00:20:38,411
你可以自由選擇任何你鍾意嘅新聞來源

330
00:20:38,411 --> 00:20:41,595
但如果你都選擇類似嘅，仲係自由咩？

331
00:20:41,595 --> 00:20:47,021
選擇嗰啲可以加強你諗法嘅新聞
會令你感覺良好

332
00:20:47,433 --> 00:20:49,695
但呢個其實係一種安全感嘅錯覺

333
00:20:49,695 --> 00:20:53,882
仲唔會令你更深入認識事物

334
00:20:54,990 --> 00:20:57,951
呢種安全感肯定唔會挑戰我哋
去挑戰我哋自己嘅觀念

335
00:20:57,951 --> 00:21:01,043
所以我哋點先知道
我哋所睇嘅新聞足夠多元化？

336
00:21:01,045 --> 00:21:05,359
如果你對所睇嘅一切感到滿意

337
00:21:05,359 --> 00:21:07,524
你可能要加入一啲唔同嘅新聞來源

338
00:21:07,524 --> 00:21:11,199
你知嗎？
新聞傳媒亦需要咁樣做

339
00:21:11,199 --> 00:21:15,485
我哋需要令新聞睇起嚟更切合個人
尤其是我負責嘅嗰個新聞組別

340
00:21:16,926 --> 00:21:18,674
我哋需要令人明白

341
00:21:18,674 --> 00:21:21,626
點解一個新聞故事係重要嘅
一單新聞點影響到佢哋

342
00:21:21,893 --> 00:21:24,657
任何人都可以獲得真相

343
00:21:25,084 --> 00:21:27,597
而我哋就需要提供內容

344
00:21:27,767 --> 00:21:32,571
當一個人點擊更加誘人嘅內容時

345
00:21:32,571 --> 00:21:37,423
西方古語「吃佢吧，佢對你有益」
就唔啱用喇

346
00:21:37,782 --> 00:21:42,303
如果冇咗你啲，我哋就輸咗喇

347
00:21:42,303 --> 00:21:45,935
結果係大家一齊輸

348
00:21:49,593 --> 00:21:55,391
著名廣播記者 Charlie Rose 講得好：

349
00:21:56,322 --> 00:22:00,933
「就算我哋唔同意其他人，
我哋亦會向佢哋學習，

350
00:22:00,933 --> 00:22:04,240
尤其是當我哋意見唔同嗰時」

351
00:22:05,208 --> 00:22:07,574
我哋愈係講求

352
00:22:07,574 --> 00:22:10,952
忍耐、多元、理解嘅真諦

353
00:22:10,952 --> 00:22:14,594
我哋愈係能夠放低嗰啲

354
00:22:14,594 --> 00:22:18,465
令到世界紛亂嘅仇恨同極端

355
00:22:18,659 --> 00:22:22,939
所以我懇請你啲放低成見

356
00:22:22,939 --> 00:22:27,385
畀你自己可以接收更廣泛嘅新聞

357
00:22:27,385 --> 00:22:33,547
或者可能，只係可能
我哋可以締造一個知情嘅社會

358
00:22:33,547 --> 00:22:40,079
一個真正知情嘅社會
然後邁進一個快樂嘅新時代

359
00:22:40,370 --> 00:22:41,387
多謝

360
00:22:41,649 --> 00:22:44,568
（掌聲）