1
00:00:01,424 --> 00:00:04,582
It was an afternoon in the fall of 2005.

2
00:00:05,325 --> 00:00:08,924
I was working at the ACLU
as the organization's science advisor.

3
00:00:09,388 --> 00:00:11,995
I really, really loved my job,

4
00:00:12,019 --> 00:00:13,655
but I was having one of those days

5
00:00:13,679 --> 00:00:16,248
where I was feeling
just a little bit discouraged.

6
00:00:17,265 --> 00:00:21,369
So I wandered down the hallway
to my colleague Chris Hansen's office.

7
00:00:22,367 --> 00:00:26,021
Chris had been at the ACLU
for more than 30 years,

8
00:00:26,045 --> 00:00:29,120
so he had deep institutional
knowledge and insights.

9
00:00:29,640 --> 00:00:32,613
I explained to Chris
that I was feeling a little bit stuck.

10
00:00:33,512 --> 00:00:35,694
I had been investigating
a number of issues

11
00:00:35,718 --> 00:00:41,019
at the intersection of science
and civil liberties -- super interesting.

12
00:00:41,043 --> 00:00:44,953
But I wanted the ACLU to engage
these issues in a much bigger way,

13
00:00:44,977 --> 00:00:47,222
in a way that could really
make a difference.

14
00:00:49,603 --> 00:00:51,703
So Chris cut right
to the chase, and he says,

15
00:00:51,727 --> 00:00:55,187
"Well, of all the issues you've been
looking at, what are the top five?"

16
00:00:55,524 --> 00:00:58,180
"Well, there's genetic discrimination,

17
00:00:58,204 --> 00:01:00,629
and reproductive technologies,

18
00:01:00,653 --> 00:01:02,794
and biobanking, and ...

19
00:01:02,818 --> 00:01:04,660
oh, there's this really cool issue,

20
00:01:04,684 --> 00:01:07,333
functional MRI and using it
for lie detection, and ...

21
00:01:07,357 --> 00:01:09,478
oh, and of course, there's gene patents."

22
00:01:09,502 --> 00:01:11,131
"Gene patents?"

23
00:01:11,967 --> 00:01:14,049
"Yes, you know, patents on human genes."

24
00:01:14,073 --> 00:01:15,579
"No!

25
00:01:15,603 --> 00:01:18,064
You're telling me that the US government

26
00:01:18,088 --> 00:01:21,012
has been issuing patents
on part of the human body?

27
00:01:21,543 --> 00:01:23,226
That can't be right."

28
00:01:23,861 --> 00:01:27,320
I went back to my office
and sent Chris three articles.

29
00:01:27,954 --> 00:01:31,281
And 20 minutes later,
he came bursting in my office.

30
00:01:31,305 --> 00:01:34,921
"Oh my god! You're right! Who can we sue?"

31
00:01:35,330 --> 00:01:36,839
(Laughter)

32
00:01:37,713 --> 00:01:40,087
Now Chris is a really brilliant lawyer,

33
00:01:40,111 --> 00:01:43,020
but he knew almost nothing
about patent law

34
00:01:43,044 --> 00:01:45,480
and certainly nothing about genetics.

35
00:01:45,504 --> 00:01:48,382
I knew something about genetics,
but I wasn't even a lawyer,

36
00:01:48,406 --> 00:01:50,067
let alone a patent lawyer.

37
00:01:50,091 --> 00:01:53,557
So clearly we had a lot to learn
before we could file a lawsuit.

38
00:01:54,036 --> 00:01:56,894
First, we needed to understand
exactly what was patented

39
00:01:56,918 --> 00:01:58,599
when someone patented a gene.

40
00:01:59,679 --> 00:02:03,501
Gene patents typically contain
dozens of claims,

41
00:02:03,525 --> 00:02:08,302
but the most controversial of these
are to so-called "isolated DNA" --

42
00:02:08,699 --> 00:02:13,140
namely, a piece of DNA
that has been removed from a cell.

43
00:02:14,073 --> 00:02:15,372
Gene patent proponents say,

44
00:02:15,396 --> 00:02:18,570
"See? We didn't patent
the gene in your body,

45
00:02:18,594 --> 00:02:20,529
we patented an isolated gene."

46
00:02:21,148 --> 00:02:22,349
And that's true,

47
00:02:22,373 --> 00:02:29,106
but the problem is that any use
of the gene requires that it be isolated.

48
00:02:30,510 --> 00:02:34,915
And the patents weren't just
to a particular gene that they isolated,

49
00:02:34,939 --> 00:02:37,826
but on every possible
version of that gene.

50
00:02:38,183 --> 00:02:39,520
So what does that mean?

51
00:02:39,981 --> 00:02:43,043
That means that you can't give
your gene to your doctor

52
00:02:43,067 --> 00:02:45,363
and ask him or her to look at it,

53
00:02:45,387 --> 00:02:47,487
say, to see if it has any mutations,

54
00:02:47,511 --> 00:02:49,587
without permission of the patent holder.

55
00:02:50,363 --> 00:02:54,556
It also means that the patent holder
has the right to stop anyone

56
00:02:54,580 --> 00:02:58,062
from using that gene
in research or clinical testing.

57
00:02:58,871 --> 00:03:00,569
Allowing patent holders,

58
00:03:00,593 --> 00:03:01,877
often private companies,

59
00:03:01,901 --> 00:03:06,387
to lock up stretches of the human genome
was harming patients.

60
00:03:06,958 --> 00:03:08,110
Consider Abigail,

61
00:03:08,134 --> 00:03:10,527
a 10-year-old with long QT syndrome,

62
00:03:10,551 --> 00:03:13,975
a serious heart condition that,
if left untreated,

63
00:03:13,999 --> 00:03:15,777
can result in sudden death.

64
00:03:16,911 --> 00:03:20,833
The company that obtained a patent on two
genes associated with this condition

65
00:03:20,857 --> 00:03:23,339
developed a test to diagnose the syndrome.

66
00:03:23,363 --> 00:03:26,187
But then they went bankrupt
and they never offered it.

67
00:03:27,060 --> 00:03:28,988
So another lab tried to offer the test,

68
00:03:29,012 --> 00:03:32,000
but the company that held the patents
threatened to sue the lab

69
00:03:32,024 --> 00:03:33,206
for patent infringement.

70
00:03:33,230 --> 00:03:34,389
So as a result,

71
00:03:34,413 --> 00:03:37,275
for 2 years, no test was available.

72
00:03:38,291 --> 00:03:39,441
During that time,

73
00:03:39,465 --> 00:03:42,715
Abigail died of undiagnosed long QT.

74
00:03:43,776 --> 00:03:47,013
Gene patents clearly were a problem
and were harming patients.

75
00:03:47,467 --> 00:03:49,873
But was there a way
we could challenge them?

76
00:03:50,266 --> 00:03:51,998
Turns out that the Supreme Court

77
00:03:52,022 --> 00:03:55,136
has made clear
through a long line of cases,

78
00:03:55,160 --> 00:03:57,946
that certain things
are not patent eligible.

79
00:03:58,925 --> 00:04:01,299
You can't patent products of nature --

80
00:04:02,148 --> 00:04:06,357
the air, the water, minerals,
elements of the periodic table.

81
00:04:07,170 --> 00:04:09,282
And you can't patent laws of nature --

82
00:04:10,193 --> 00:04:12,472
the law of gravity, E = mc2.

83
00:04:12,909 --> 00:04:17,715
These things are just too fundamental
and must remain free to all

84
00:04:17,739 --> 00:04:19,562
and reserved exclusively to none.

85
00:04:20,348 --> 00:04:22,495
It seemed to us that DNA,

86
00:04:22,519 --> 00:04:25,035
the most fundamental structure of life,

87
00:04:25,059 --> 00:04:27,715
that codes for the production
of all of our proteins,

88
00:04:27,739 --> 00:04:30,965
is both a product of nature
and a law of nature,

89
00:04:30,989 --> 00:04:33,691
regardless of whether it's in our bodies

90
00:04:33,715 --> 00:04:35,753
or sitting in the bottom of a test tube.

91
00:04:36,523 --> 00:04:37,978
As we delved into this issue,

92
00:04:38,002 --> 00:04:41,910
we traveled all over the country
to speak with many different experts --

93
00:04:42,588 --> 00:04:46,301
scientists, medical professionals,
lawyers, patent lawyers.

94
00:04:46,753 --> 00:04:50,663
Most of them agreed that we were right
as a matter of policy,

95
00:04:50,687 --> 00:04:53,472
and, at least in theory,
as a matter of law.

96
00:04:54,313 --> 00:04:55,468
All of them thought

97
00:04:55,492 --> 00:04:58,062
our chances of winning
a gene-patent challenge

98
00:04:58,086 --> 00:04:59,953
were about zero.

99
00:05:01,628 --> 00:05:02,991
Why is that?

100
00:05:03,015 --> 00:05:06,102
Well, the patent office
had been issuing these patents

101
00:05:06,126 --> 00:05:07,827
for more than 20 years.

102
00:05:08,686 --> 00:05:11,566
There were literally thousands
of patents on human genes.

103
00:05:12,843 --> 00:05:15,784
The patent bar was deeply
entrenched in the status quo,

104
00:05:16,581 --> 00:05:20,204
the biotech industry had grown up
around this practice,

105
00:05:20,228 --> 00:05:23,347
and legislation to ban gene patents
had been introduced

106
00:05:23,371 --> 00:05:24,769
year after year in Congress,

107
00:05:24,793 --> 00:05:26,584
and had gone absolutely nowhere.

108
00:05:27,401 --> 00:05:28,615
So the bottom line:

109
00:05:29,027 --> 00:05:32,202
courts just weren't going to be willing
to overturn these patents.

110
00:05:32,916 --> 00:05:37,511
Now, neither Chris nor I were the type
to shy away from a challenge,

111
00:05:37,535 --> 00:05:40,679
and hearing, "Being right
just isn't enough,"

112
00:05:40,703 --> 00:05:43,233
seemed all the more reason
to take on this fight.

113
00:05:44,311 --> 00:05:46,246
So we set out to build our case.

114
00:05:47,494 --> 00:05:50,984
Now, patent cases tend to be:
Company A sues Company B

115
00:05:51,008 --> 00:05:54,191
over some really narrow,
obscure technical issue.

116
00:05:54,822 --> 00:05:57,187
We weren't really interested
in that kind of case,

117
00:05:57,211 --> 00:05:59,600
and we thought this case
was much bigger than that.

118
00:05:59,624 --> 00:06:02,112
This was about scientific freedom,
medical progress,

119
00:06:02,136 --> 00:06:03,595
the rights of patients.

120
00:06:03,619 --> 00:06:06,722
So we decided we were going
to develop a case

121
00:06:06,746 --> 00:06:09,264
that was not like
your typical patent case --

122
00:06:09,645 --> 00:06:11,527
more like a civil rights case.

123
00:06:12,756 --> 00:06:15,598
We set out to identify
a gene-patent holder

124
00:06:15,622 --> 00:06:18,407
that was vigorously enforcing its patents

125
00:06:18,431 --> 00:06:21,725
and then to organize a broad coalition
of plaintiffs and experts

126
00:06:21,749 --> 00:06:23,639
that could tell the court

127
00:06:23,663 --> 00:06:28,052
about all the ways that these patents
were harming patients and innovation.

128
00:06:29,404 --> 00:06:32,526
We found the prime candidate
to sue in Myriad Genetics,

129
00:06:32,550 --> 00:06:35,405
a company that's based
in Salt Lake City, Utah.

130
00:06:36,718 --> 00:06:38,968
Myriad held patents on two genes,

131
00:06:38,992 --> 00:06:42,313
the BRCA1 and the BRCA2 genes.

132
00:06:43,150 --> 00:06:45,884
Women with certain mutations
along these genes

133
00:06:45,908 --> 00:06:48,534
are considered to be
at a significantly increased risk

134
00:06:48,558 --> 00:06:50,503
of developing breast and ovarian cancer.

135
00:06:51,834 --> 00:06:53,714
Myriad had used its patents to maintain

136
00:06:53,738 --> 00:06:57,947
a complete monopoly on BRCA testing
in the United States.

137
00:06:58,544 --> 00:07:02,732
It had forced multiple labs
that were offering BRCA testing to stop.

138
00:07:02,756 --> 00:07:04,915
It charged a lot of money for its test --

139
00:07:04,939 --> 00:07:06,622
over 3,000 dollars.

140
00:07:07,089 --> 00:07:09,424
It had stopped sharing its clinical data

141
00:07:09,448 --> 00:07:11,735
with the international
scientific community.

142
00:07:12,522 --> 00:07:14,425
And perhaps worst of all,

143
00:07:14,449 --> 00:07:16,885
for a period of several years,

144
00:07:16,909 --> 00:07:20,622
Myriad refused to update its test
to include additional mutations

145
00:07:20,646 --> 00:07:24,267
that had been identified
by a team of researchers in France.

146
00:07:24,974 --> 00:07:27,482
It has been estimated
that during that period,

147
00:07:27,506 --> 00:07:28,879
for several years,

148
00:07:28,903 --> 00:07:32,655
as many as 12 percent of women
undergoing testing

149
00:07:32,679 --> 00:07:35,081
received the wrong answer --

150
00:07:36,377 --> 00:07:40,146
a negative test result
that should have been positive.

151
00:07:41,485 --> 00:07:43,226
This is Kathleen Maxian.

152
00:07:44,172 --> 00:07:47,429
Kathleen's sister Eileen
developed breast cancer at age 40

153
00:07:47,453 --> 00:07:49,293
and she was tested by Myriad.

154
00:07:50,032 --> 00:07:51,758
The test was negative.

155
00:07:51,782 --> 00:07:53,308
The family was relieved.

156
00:07:53,332 --> 00:07:57,120
That meant that Eileen's cancer
most likely didn't run in the family,

157
00:07:57,144 --> 00:08:00,159
and that other members of her family
didn't need to be tested.

158
00:08:00,843 --> 00:08:02,073
But two years later,

159
00:08:02,097 --> 00:08:06,157
Kathleen was diagnosed
with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

160
00:08:06,927 --> 00:08:10,799
It turned out that Kathleen's sister
was among the 12 percent

161
00:08:10,823 --> 00:08:13,692
who received a false-negative test result.

162
00:08:14,347 --> 00:08:17,436
Had Eileen received the proper result,

163
00:08:17,460 --> 00:08:19,833
Kathleen would have then been tested,

164
00:08:19,857 --> 00:08:22,770
and her ovarian cancer
could have been prevented.

165
00:08:24,818 --> 00:08:26,082
Once we settled on Myriad,

166
00:08:26,106 --> 00:08:29,991
we then had to form a coalition
of plaintiffs and experts

167
00:08:30,015 --> 00:08:32,103
that could illuminate these problems.

168
00:08:32,127 --> 00:08:34,699
We ended up with 20
highly committed plaintiffs:

169
00:08:35,325 --> 00:08:36,863
genetic counselors,

170
00:08:36,887 --> 00:08:40,246
geneticists who had received
cease and desist letters,

171
00:08:40,905 --> 00:08:42,754
advocacy organizations,

172
00:08:43,532 --> 00:08:46,597
four major scientific organizations
that collectively represented

173
00:08:46,621 --> 00:08:50,151
more than 150,000 scientists
and medical professionals,

174
00:08:50,755 --> 00:08:54,052
and individual women who either
couldn't afford Myriad's test,

175
00:08:54,076 --> 00:08:57,080
or who wanted to obtain
a second opinion but could not,

176
00:08:57,104 --> 00:08:58,848
as a result of the patents.

177
00:09:00,315 --> 00:09:03,755
One of the major challenges
we had in preparing the case

178
00:09:03,779 --> 00:09:06,645
was figuring out how best
to communicate the science.

179
00:09:07,079 --> 00:09:10,910
So in order to argue that what Myriad did
was not an invention,

180
00:09:10,934 --> 00:09:14,211
and that isolated BRCA genes
were products of nature,

181
00:09:15,124 --> 00:09:17,837
we had to explain a couple
of basic concepts, like:

182
00:09:17,861 --> 00:09:20,005
What's a gene? What's DNA?

183
00:09:20,029 --> 00:09:23,745
How is DNA isolated,
and why isn't that an invention?

184
00:09:25,168 --> 00:09:29,030
We spent hours and hours
with our plaintiffs and experts,

185
00:09:29,054 --> 00:09:31,990
trying to come up with ways
of explaining these concepts

186
00:09:32,014 --> 00:09:33,557
simply yet accurately.

187
00:09:34,306 --> 00:09:37,638
And we ended up relying heavily
on the use of metaphors,

188
00:09:37,662 --> 00:09:38,818
like gold.

189
00:09:39,789 --> 00:09:42,073
So isolating DNA --

190
00:09:42,097 --> 00:09:44,597
it's like extracting gold from a mountain

191
00:09:45,105 --> 00:09:47,121
or taking it out of a stream bed.

192
00:09:47,145 --> 00:09:50,819
You might be able to patent
the process for mining the gold,

193
00:09:50,843 --> 00:09:52,924
but you can't patent the gold itself.

194
00:09:53,929 --> 00:09:56,672
It might've taken a lot
of hard work and effort

195
00:09:56,696 --> 00:09:58,556
to dig the gold out of the mountain;

196
00:09:59,127 --> 00:10:01,408
you still can't patent it,
it's still gold.

197
00:10:01,432 --> 00:10:03,188
And the gold, once it's extracted,

198
00:10:03,212 --> 00:10:05,300
can clearly be used
for all sorts of things

199
00:10:05,324 --> 00:10:08,060
that it couldn't be used
for when it was in the mountain;

200
00:10:08,084 --> 00:10:10,266
you can make jewelry
out of it for example --

201
00:10:10,290 --> 00:10:12,455
still can't patent the gold,
it's still gold.

202
00:10:13,364 --> 00:10:17,218
So now it's 2009,
and we're ready to file our case.

203
00:10:18,286 --> 00:10:21,781
We filed in federal court
in the Southern District of New York,

204
00:10:22,355 --> 00:10:25,721
and the case was randomly assigned
to Judge Robert Sweet.

205
00:10:26,599 --> 00:10:29,799
In March 2010, Judge Sweet
issued his opinion --

206
00:10:30,569 --> 00:10:32,427
152 pages --

207
00:10:32,834 --> 00:10:35,086
and a complete victory for our side.

208
00:10:35,964 --> 00:10:37,395
In reading the opinion,

209
00:10:37,419 --> 00:10:42,134
we could not get over how eloquently
he described the science in the case.

210
00:10:42,504 --> 00:10:45,275
I mean, our brief --
it was pretty good,

211
00:10:45,299 --> 00:10:46,866
but not this good.

212
00:10:47,778 --> 00:10:51,155
How did he develop such a deep
understanding of this issue

213
00:10:51,179 --> 00:10:52,339
in such a short time?

214
00:10:52,363 --> 00:10:55,971
We just could not comprehend
how this had happened.

215
00:10:55,995 --> 00:10:57,259
So it turned out,

216
00:10:57,283 --> 00:11:00,593
Judge Sweet's clerk
working for him at the time,

217
00:11:00,617 --> 00:11:02,097
was not just a lawyer --

218
00:11:02,121 --> 00:11:03,835
he was a scientist.

219
00:11:03,859 --> 00:11:05,457
He was not just a scientist --

220
00:11:05,481 --> 00:11:08,627
he had a PhD in molecular biology.

221
00:11:08,651 --> 00:11:10,402
(Laughter)

222
00:11:10,426 --> 00:11:13,001
What an incredible stroke of luck!

223
00:11:14,058 --> 00:11:15,358
Myriad then appealed

224
00:11:15,382 --> 00:11:17,877
to the US Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit.

225
00:11:18,496 --> 00:11:20,512
And here things got really interesting.

226
00:11:21,465 --> 00:11:24,525
First, in a pivotal moment of this case,

227
00:11:25,187 --> 00:11:27,818
the US government switched sides.

228
00:11:28,739 --> 00:11:32,488
So in the district court the government
submitted a brief on Myriad's side.

229
00:11:32,512 --> 00:11:37,640
But now in direct opposition
to its own patent office,

230
00:11:37,664 --> 00:11:40,372
the US government files a brief
that states that is has

231
00:11:40,396 --> 00:11:44,084
reconsidered this issue
in light of the district court's opinion,

232
00:11:44,108 --> 00:11:47,294
and has concluded that isolated DNA
is not patent eligible.

233
00:11:47,818 --> 00:11:49,629
This was a really big deal,

234
00:11:49,653 --> 00:11:51,215
totally unexpected.

235
00:11:52,773 --> 00:11:54,853
The Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit

236
00:11:54,877 --> 00:11:56,560
hears all patent cases,

237
00:11:56,584 --> 00:11:59,742
and it has a reputation for being
very, very pro-patent.

238
00:12:00,305 --> 00:12:02,731
So even with this remarkable development,

239
00:12:02,755 --> 00:12:04,434
we expected to lose.

240
00:12:04,458 --> 00:12:05,805
And we did.

241
00:12:06,389 --> 00:12:07,541
Sort of.

242
00:12:08,357 --> 00:12:10,944
Ends up split decision, 2 to 1.

243
00:12:11,743 --> 00:12:14,239
But the two judges who ruled against us,

244
00:12:14,263 --> 00:12:16,504
did so for completely different reasons.

245
00:12:17,275 --> 00:12:19,101
The first one, Judge Lourie,

246
00:12:19,125 --> 00:12:22,140
made up his own novel,
biological theory --

247
00:12:22,164 --> 00:12:23,332
totally wrong.

248
00:12:23,356 --> 00:12:24,367
(Laughter)

249
00:12:24,391 --> 00:12:26,609
He decided Myriad had created
a new chemical --

250
00:12:26,633 --> 00:12:28,498
made absolutely no sense.

251
00:12:28,522 --> 00:12:31,308
Myriad didn't even argue this,
so it came out of the blue.

252
00:12:31,632 --> 00:12:33,609
The other, Judge Moore,

253
00:12:33,633 --> 00:12:37,511
said she basically agreed with us
that isolated DNA is a product of nature.

254
00:12:37,987 --> 00:12:41,320
But she's like, "I don't want
to shake up the biotech industry."

255
00:12:42,248 --> 00:12:44,820
The third, Judge Bryson,

256
00:12:45,233 --> 00:12:46,449
agreed with us.

257
00:12:47,750 --> 00:12:50,281
So now we sought review
by the Supreme Court.

258
00:12:50,305 --> 00:12:53,008
And when you petition the Supreme Court,

259
00:12:53,032 --> 00:12:56,154
you have to present a question
that you want the Court to answer.

260
00:12:56,534 --> 00:13:00,261
Usually these questions take the form
of a super-long paragraph,

261
00:13:00,285 --> 00:13:03,308
like a whole page long
with lots and lots of clauses,

262
00:13:03,332 --> 00:13:05,789
"wherein this" and "therefore that."

263
00:13:06,294 --> 00:13:10,201
We submitted perhaps
the shortest question presented ever.

264
00:13:11,312 --> 00:13:12,525
Four words:

265
00:13:14,220 --> 00:13:16,271
Are human genes patentable?

266
00:13:16,922 --> 00:13:19,746
Now when Chris first asked me
what I thought of these words,

267
00:13:19,770 --> 00:13:21,144
I said, "Well, I don't know.

268
00:13:21,168 --> 00:13:24,335
I think you have to say,
'Is isolated DNA patentable?'"

269
00:13:24,968 --> 00:13:26,137
"Nope.

270
00:13:26,487 --> 00:13:31,108
I want the justices to have
the very same reaction that I had

271
00:13:31,132 --> 00:13:34,219
when you brought this issue
to me seven years ago."

272
00:13:34,896 --> 00:13:37,053
Well, I certainly couldn't
argue with that.

273
00:13:37,981 --> 00:13:40,864
The Supreme Court only hears
about one percent

274
00:13:40,888 --> 00:13:42,554
of the cases that it receives,

275
00:13:42,578 --> 00:13:44,169
and it agreed to hear ours.

276
00:13:45,772 --> 00:13:49,899
The day of the oral argument arrives,
and it was really, really exciting --

277
00:13:49,923 --> 00:13:51,358
long line of people outside,

278
00:13:51,382 --> 00:13:54,146
people had been standing in line
since 2:30 in the morning

279
00:13:54,170 --> 00:13:55,904
to try to get into the courthouse.

280
00:13:55,928 --> 00:13:57,899
Two breast cancer organizations,

281
00:13:57,923 --> 00:13:59,591
Breast Cancer Action and FORCE,

282
00:13:59,615 --> 00:14:02,316
had organized a demonstration
on the courthouse steps.

283
00:14:03,232 --> 00:14:06,102
Chris and I sat quietly in the hallway,

284
00:14:06,776 --> 00:14:09,790
moments before he was to walk in and argue

285
00:14:09,814 --> 00:14:12,130
the most important case of his career.

286
00:14:12,765 --> 00:14:15,144
I was clearly more nervous than he was.

287
00:14:16,096 --> 00:14:20,856
But any remaining panic subsided
as I walked into the courtroom

288
00:14:20,880 --> 00:14:23,693
and looked around
at a sea of friendly faces:

289
00:14:24,059 --> 00:14:25,824
our individual women clients

290
00:14:25,848 --> 00:14:28,289
who had shared their
deeply personal stories,

291
00:14:29,210 --> 00:14:32,836
the geneticists who had taken huge chunks
of time out of their busy careers

292
00:14:32,860 --> 00:14:34,685
to dedicate themselves to this fight

293
00:14:35,122 --> 00:14:37,701
and representatives from a diverse array

294
00:14:37,725 --> 00:14:39,612
of medical, patient advocacy,

295
00:14:39,636 --> 00:14:41,712
environmental and religious organizations,

296
00:14:41,736 --> 00:14:45,268
who had submitted friend of the court
briefs in the case.

297
00:14:46,609 --> 00:14:49,634
Also in the room were three leaders
of the Human Genome Project,

298
00:14:49,658 --> 00:14:52,330
including the co-discoverer
of DNA himself,

299
00:14:52,354 --> 00:14:53,644
James Watson,

300
00:14:53,668 --> 00:14:55,814
who had submitted a brief to the court,

301
00:14:55,838 --> 00:14:59,349
where he referred
to gene patenting as "lunacy."

302
00:14:59,373 --> 00:15:01,221
(Laughter)

303
00:15:01,245 --> 00:15:04,882
The diversity of the communities
represented in this room

304
00:15:04,906 --> 00:15:08,347
and the contributions each had made
to make this day a reality

305
00:15:08,371 --> 00:15:10,668
spoke volumes to what was at stake.

306
00:15:11,386 --> 00:15:13,599
The argument itself was riveting.

307
00:15:14,205 --> 00:15:15,868
Chris argued brilliantly.

308
00:15:15,892 --> 00:15:17,137
But for me,

309
00:15:17,161 --> 00:15:20,925
the most thrilling aspect was watching
the Supreme Court justices grapple

310
00:15:20,949 --> 00:15:22,518
with isolated DNA,

311
00:15:22,542 --> 00:15:25,768
through a series of colorful analogies
and feisty exchanges,

312
00:15:25,792 --> 00:15:29,132
very much the same way
as our legal team had done

313
00:15:29,156 --> 00:15:30,846
for the past seven years.

314
00:15:31,666 --> 00:15:34,322
Justice Kagan likened isolating DNA

315
00:15:34,346 --> 00:15:37,122
to extracting a medicinal plant
from the Amazon.

316
00:15:38,516 --> 00:15:42,526
Justice Roberts distinguished it
from carving a baseball bat from a tree.

317
00:15:43,995 --> 00:15:46,477
And in one of my absolutely
favorite moments,

318
00:15:46,501 --> 00:15:51,770
Justice Sotomayor proclaimed isolated DNA
to be "just nature sitting there."

319
00:15:51,794 --> 00:15:52,894
(Laughter)

320
00:15:53,318 --> 00:15:56,193
We felt pretty confident
leaving the courtroom that day,

321
00:15:56,217 --> 00:15:59,223
but I could never have
anticipated the outcome:

322
00:16:00,574 --> 00:16:02,081
nine to zero.

323
00:16:03,025 --> 00:16:06,747
"A naturally occurring DNA segment
is a product of nature,

324
00:16:06,771 --> 00:16:09,818
and not patent-eligible merely because
it has been isolated.

325
00:16:10,394 --> 00:16:11,741
And furthermore,

326
00:16:11,765 --> 00:16:14,310
Myriad did not create anything."

327
00:16:16,160 --> 00:16:18,156
Within 24 hours of the decision,

328
00:16:18,180 --> 00:16:19,572
five labs had announced

329
00:16:19,596 --> 00:16:22,610
that they would begin to offer testing
for the BRCA genes.

330
00:16:23,149 --> 00:16:26,632
Some of them promised to offer the tests
at a lower price than Myriad's.

331
00:16:27,142 --> 00:16:30,062
Some promised to provide
a more comprehensive test

332
00:16:30,086 --> 00:16:31,769
than the one Myriad was offering.

333
00:16:32,490 --> 00:16:35,328
But of course the decision
goes far beyond Myriad.

334
00:16:35,352 --> 00:16:39,748
It ends a 25-year practice
of allowing patents on human genes

335
00:16:39,772 --> 00:16:40,979
in the United States.

336
00:16:41,383 --> 00:16:46,076
It clears a significant barrier
to biomedical discovery and innovation.

337
00:16:46,484 --> 00:16:51,385
And it helps to ensure that patients
like Abigail, Kathleen and Eileen

338
00:16:51,409 --> 00:16:53,565
have access to the tests that they need.

339
00:16:54,991 --> 00:16:58,206
A few weeks after the court
issued its decision,

340
00:16:58,230 --> 00:17:00,490
I received a small package in the mail.

341
00:17:01,246 --> 00:17:02,853
It was from Bob Cook-Deegan,

342
00:17:02,877 --> 00:17:05,146
a professor at Duke University

343
00:17:05,170 --> 00:17:08,394
and one the very first people
Chris and I went to visit

344
00:17:08,418 --> 00:17:11,117
when we started to consider
whether to bring this case.

345
00:17:12,033 --> 00:17:14,842
I opened it up to find
a small stuffed animal.

346
00:17:16,344 --> 00:17:19,303
(Laughter)

347
00:17:21,568 --> 00:17:23,896
We took a big risk in taking this case.

348
00:17:24,722 --> 00:17:27,232
Part of what gave us the courage
to take that risk

349
00:17:27,256 --> 00:17:29,694
was knowing that we were doing
the right thing.

350
00:17:30,079 --> 00:17:33,809
The process took nearly eight years
from the start to finish,

351
00:17:33,833 --> 00:17:36,054
with many twists and turns along the way.

352
00:17:36,578 --> 00:17:38,269
A little luck certainly helped,

353
00:17:38,888 --> 00:17:41,700
but it was the communities
that we bridged,

354
00:17:41,724 --> 00:17:43,815
the alliances that we created,

355
00:17:43,839 --> 00:17:45,259
that made pigs fly.

356
00:17:45,802 --> 00:17:46,958
Thank you.

357
00:17:46,982 --> 00:17:52,496
(Applause)